To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks before signing H.R. 5305, the Extending Government Funding and Delivering Emergency Assistance Act, after the House passed the legislation September 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. Congress avoided a governmental shutdown with the passage of the legislation, funding the government through early December. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Political observers predicted three options late Thursday as it remained unclear whether Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi would still hold a vote on the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework, or BIF, which has stirred a Capitol Hill fight between a small band of corporate Democrats in Congress and the rest of the party anchored by the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
As of this writing, there was no final word other than promises earlier in the day by Pelosi that a vote would come--even though fresh public comments from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) made it clear that a chasm remains between his opposition and that of Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and House Democrats on the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better Act that must ultimately be passed via the bicameral reconciliation process.
According to Politico, a vote is possible, but it remains unclear where the votes would come from to see it pass. Citing sources, the outlet reported:
During a private leadership meeting Thursday morning, several members of Pelosi's team expressed reservations about bringing the bill to the floor given the lack of support within the caucus. But later, during a private meeting with moderate Democrats, Pelosi reiterated her intention to hold the vote later in the day, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.
How it could work: Multiple Democrats said one way it could work would be to hold the vote open until Pelosi can corral enough members for passage, whether that be from the progressive wing of the caucus or from Republicans who support the infrastructure bill. One member described it as a "staredown" strategy. Bring in the troops: Pelosi has also called in reinforcements from labor groups, who are sending letters to members of Congress urging them to support the bill.
The three most likely outcomes for a Thursday night vote include: 1) Pelosi pulls the scheduled vote from the floor because she knows she doesn't have the votes; 2) the vote is held and members of the CPC and other Democrats vote it down as they have promised to do; or 3) a vote is held and enough renegade Republicans join with some number of Democrats to sabotage the progressive efforts to block the bill before an agreement on reconciliation is reached.
Those likely scenarios were laid out, among others, by Ezra Levin, co-founder of the progressive advocacy group Indivisible, during an appearance on MSNBC's "The Beat" just after 6:00 pm ET where he told host Ari Melber that CPC members were right to be holding the line against Manchin and Sinema, increasingly referred to as "Manchema" by detractors in recent days. As he tweeted just ahead of his appearance:
\u201cIf we pass BIF before reconciliation, we're forfeiting our leverage and allowing Sinema/Manchin to write the reconciliation bill (or veto it entirely).\u201d— Ezra Levin (@Ezra Levin) 1633026013
In a political memo on Thursday, the advocacy group Accountable.US issued a warning--with a finger pointed directly at Manchin, Sinema, and a small group of Wall Street-back Democrats in the House--that big money was again sabotaging the democratic process in Washington, D.C. and at the worst possible moment. According to the memo:
It's not often stars align in favor of everyday working families, and it may not happen again for years. It makes no sense to squander this opportunity to level the playing field for everyday Americans after years of Washington keeping their thumb on the scale for millionaires and billion dollar corporations -- especially wasteful tax breaks for the rich that never manage to trickle-down to anyone else.
And yet, there are some Democrats that are choosing to adopt the 'concerns' of the corporate special interests that have managed to do well even during a pandemic and effectively want to keep the system rigged in their favor. It's a red flag that money from greedy industries have corrupted the reconciliation process.
According to the analysis based on campaign finance data, "in August 2021 alone--in the heat of Congressional negotiations on the Build Back Better agenda--the moderate Democrats holding up the reconciliation process, including Sens. Sinema, Manchin, and U.S. Reps. Cuellar, Gonzalez, Gottheimer, Schrader, and Murphy, banked over $150,000 in campaign donations from corporate interests--including those that are helping lead business groups opposing the bill."
Appearing on MSNBC's "The ReidOut" just after 7:00 pm, CPC chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reiterated the position that there will be no support for the BIF from progressives without the reconciliation package coming first. "This isn't some crazy idea," said Jayapal, "this is the president's agenda."
\u201cThe Build Back Better Act isn\u2019t some fringe wish list \u2014 it\u2019s the Democratic Party\u2019s agenda.\n\nFrom child care and paid leave to Medicare expansion and climate action, we can't have an equitable recovery without it.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1633031281
Other members of the CPC, such as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), spent the day also vowing to stand their ground and explaining why:
\u201cWe remain fully committed to passing President Biden\u2019s entire Build Back Better agenda and delivering transformative change. \n\nIt is what we promised voters when they delivered us the House, Senate, and White House \u2014 one supported by 96 percent of the Democratic Caucus.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1633010464
And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y) lashed out at the hypocrisy and irrational arguments of Manchin who has tried to claim that sweeping investments in pre-K education, healthcare for seniors, community college, and tackling the climate crisis are unaffordable.
\u201cEver notice how \u201cdeficit hawks\u201d vote for record-high defense spending, yet claim bills that help people & challenge lobbyists are \u201ctoo much?\u201d\n\n\u201822 Defense Bill = $768 billion/yr\nBuild Back Better = $350B/yr\n\nGuess which got rubber stamped & which gets deemed a \u201cspending problem\u201d\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1633042781
"We won't let massive corporations, billionaires, and a few conservative Democrats stand in the way of delivering transformational progress for millions of working people," Japayal tweeted Thursday evening. "Stick to the plan. Pass both bills, together."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Political observers predicted three options late Thursday as it remained unclear whether Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi would still hold a vote on the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework, or BIF, which has stirred a Capitol Hill fight between a small band of corporate Democrats in Congress and the rest of the party anchored by the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
As of this writing, there was no final word other than promises earlier in the day by Pelosi that a vote would come--even though fresh public comments from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) made it clear that a chasm remains between his opposition and that of Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and House Democrats on the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better Act that must ultimately be passed via the bicameral reconciliation process.
According to Politico, a vote is possible, but it remains unclear where the votes would come from to see it pass. Citing sources, the outlet reported:
During a private leadership meeting Thursday morning, several members of Pelosi's team expressed reservations about bringing the bill to the floor given the lack of support within the caucus. But later, during a private meeting with moderate Democrats, Pelosi reiterated her intention to hold the vote later in the day, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.
How it could work: Multiple Democrats said one way it could work would be to hold the vote open until Pelosi can corral enough members for passage, whether that be from the progressive wing of the caucus or from Republicans who support the infrastructure bill. One member described it as a "staredown" strategy. Bring in the troops: Pelosi has also called in reinforcements from labor groups, who are sending letters to members of Congress urging them to support the bill.
The three most likely outcomes for a Thursday night vote include: 1) Pelosi pulls the scheduled vote from the floor because she knows she doesn't have the votes; 2) the vote is held and members of the CPC and other Democrats vote it down as they have promised to do; or 3) a vote is held and enough renegade Republicans join with some number of Democrats to sabotage the progressive efforts to block the bill before an agreement on reconciliation is reached.
Those likely scenarios were laid out, among others, by Ezra Levin, co-founder of the progressive advocacy group Indivisible, during an appearance on MSNBC's "The Beat" just after 6:00 pm ET where he told host Ari Melber that CPC members were right to be holding the line against Manchin and Sinema, increasingly referred to as "Manchema" by detractors in recent days. As he tweeted just ahead of his appearance:
\u201cIf we pass BIF before reconciliation, we're forfeiting our leverage and allowing Sinema/Manchin to write the reconciliation bill (or veto it entirely).\u201d— Ezra Levin (@Ezra Levin) 1633026013
In a political memo on Thursday, the advocacy group Accountable.US issued a warning--with a finger pointed directly at Manchin, Sinema, and a small group of Wall Street-back Democrats in the House--that big money was again sabotaging the democratic process in Washington, D.C. and at the worst possible moment. According to the memo:
It's not often stars align in favor of everyday working families, and it may not happen again for years. It makes no sense to squander this opportunity to level the playing field for everyday Americans after years of Washington keeping their thumb on the scale for millionaires and billion dollar corporations -- especially wasteful tax breaks for the rich that never manage to trickle-down to anyone else.
And yet, there are some Democrats that are choosing to adopt the 'concerns' of the corporate special interests that have managed to do well even during a pandemic and effectively want to keep the system rigged in their favor. It's a red flag that money from greedy industries have corrupted the reconciliation process.
According to the analysis based on campaign finance data, "in August 2021 alone--in the heat of Congressional negotiations on the Build Back Better agenda--the moderate Democrats holding up the reconciliation process, including Sens. Sinema, Manchin, and U.S. Reps. Cuellar, Gonzalez, Gottheimer, Schrader, and Murphy, banked over $150,000 in campaign donations from corporate interests--including those that are helping lead business groups opposing the bill."
Appearing on MSNBC's "The ReidOut" just after 7:00 pm, CPC chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reiterated the position that there will be no support for the BIF from progressives without the reconciliation package coming first. "This isn't some crazy idea," said Jayapal, "this is the president's agenda."
\u201cThe Build Back Better Act isn\u2019t some fringe wish list \u2014 it\u2019s the Democratic Party\u2019s agenda.\n\nFrom child care and paid leave to Medicare expansion and climate action, we can't have an equitable recovery without it.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1633031281
Other members of the CPC, such as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), spent the day also vowing to stand their ground and explaining why:
\u201cWe remain fully committed to passing President Biden\u2019s entire Build Back Better agenda and delivering transformative change. \n\nIt is what we promised voters when they delivered us the House, Senate, and White House \u2014 one supported by 96 percent of the Democratic Caucus.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1633010464
And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y) lashed out at the hypocrisy and irrational arguments of Manchin who has tried to claim that sweeping investments in pre-K education, healthcare for seniors, community college, and tackling the climate crisis are unaffordable.
\u201cEver notice how \u201cdeficit hawks\u201d vote for record-high defense spending, yet claim bills that help people & challenge lobbyists are \u201ctoo much?\u201d\n\n\u201822 Defense Bill = $768 billion/yr\nBuild Back Better = $350B/yr\n\nGuess which got rubber stamped & which gets deemed a \u201cspending problem\u201d\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1633042781
"We won't let massive corporations, billionaires, and a few conservative Democrats stand in the way of delivering transformational progress for millions of working people," Japayal tweeted Thursday evening. "Stick to the plan. Pass both bills, together."
Political observers predicted three options late Thursday as it remained unclear whether Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi would still hold a vote on the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework, or BIF, which has stirred a Capitol Hill fight between a small band of corporate Democrats in Congress and the rest of the party anchored by the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
As of this writing, there was no final word other than promises earlier in the day by Pelosi that a vote would come--even though fresh public comments from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) made it clear that a chasm remains between his opposition and that of Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and House Democrats on the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better Act that must ultimately be passed via the bicameral reconciliation process.
According to Politico, a vote is possible, but it remains unclear where the votes would come from to see it pass. Citing sources, the outlet reported:
During a private leadership meeting Thursday morning, several members of Pelosi's team expressed reservations about bringing the bill to the floor given the lack of support within the caucus. But later, during a private meeting with moderate Democrats, Pelosi reiterated her intention to hold the vote later in the day, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.
How it could work: Multiple Democrats said one way it could work would be to hold the vote open until Pelosi can corral enough members for passage, whether that be from the progressive wing of the caucus or from Republicans who support the infrastructure bill. One member described it as a "staredown" strategy. Bring in the troops: Pelosi has also called in reinforcements from labor groups, who are sending letters to members of Congress urging them to support the bill.
The three most likely outcomes for a Thursday night vote include: 1) Pelosi pulls the scheduled vote from the floor because she knows she doesn't have the votes; 2) the vote is held and members of the CPC and other Democrats vote it down as they have promised to do; or 3) a vote is held and enough renegade Republicans join with some number of Democrats to sabotage the progressive efforts to block the bill before an agreement on reconciliation is reached.
Those likely scenarios were laid out, among others, by Ezra Levin, co-founder of the progressive advocacy group Indivisible, during an appearance on MSNBC's "The Beat" just after 6:00 pm ET where he told host Ari Melber that CPC members were right to be holding the line against Manchin and Sinema, increasingly referred to as "Manchema" by detractors in recent days. As he tweeted just ahead of his appearance:
\u201cIf we pass BIF before reconciliation, we're forfeiting our leverage and allowing Sinema/Manchin to write the reconciliation bill (or veto it entirely).\u201d— Ezra Levin (@Ezra Levin) 1633026013
In a political memo on Thursday, the advocacy group Accountable.US issued a warning--with a finger pointed directly at Manchin, Sinema, and a small group of Wall Street-back Democrats in the House--that big money was again sabotaging the democratic process in Washington, D.C. and at the worst possible moment. According to the memo:
It's not often stars align in favor of everyday working families, and it may not happen again for years. It makes no sense to squander this opportunity to level the playing field for everyday Americans after years of Washington keeping their thumb on the scale for millionaires and billion dollar corporations -- especially wasteful tax breaks for the rich that never manage to trickle-down to anyone else.
And yet, there are some Democrats that are choosing to adopt the 'concerns' of the corporate special interests that have managed to do well even during a pandemic and effectively want to keep the system rigged in their favor. It's a red flag that money from greedy industries have corrupted the reconciliation process.
According to the analysis based on campaign finance data, "in August 2021 alone--in the heat of Congressional negotiations on the Build Back Better agenda--the moderate Democrats holding up the reconciliation process, including Sens. Sinema, Manchin, and U.S. Reps. Cuellar, Gonzalez, Gottheimer, Schrader, and Murphy, banked over $150,000 in campaign donations from corporate interests--including those that are helping lead business groups opposing the bill."
Appearing on MSNBC's "The ReidOut" just after 7:00 pm, CPC chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reiterated the position that there will be no support for the BIF from progressives without the reconciliation package coming first. "This isn't some crazy idea," said Jayapal, "this is the president's agenda."
\u201cThe Build Back Better Act isn\u2019t some fringe wish list \u2014 it\u2019s the Democratic Party\u2019s agenda.\n\nFrom child care and paid leave to Medicare expansion and climate action, we can't have an equitable recovery without it.\u201d— Pramila Jayapal (@Pramila Jayapal) 1633031281
Other members of the CPC, such as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), spent the day also vowing to stand their ground and explaining why:
\u201cWe remain fully committed to passing President Biden\u2019s entire Build Back Better agenda and delivering transformative change. \n\nIt is what we promised voters when they delivered us the House, Senate, and White House \u2014 one supported by 96 percent of the Democratic Caucus.\u201d— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Rep. Ilhan Omar) 1633010464
And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y) lashed out at the hypocrisy and irrational arguments of Manchin who has tried to claim that sweeping investments in pre-K education, healthcare for seniors, community college, and tackling the climate crisis are unaffordable.
\u201cEver notice how \u201cdeficit hawks\u201d vote for record-high defense spending, yet claim bills that help people & challenge lobbyists are \u201ctoo much?\u201d\n\n\u201822 Defense Bill = $768 billion/yr\nBuild Back Better = $350B/yr\n\nGuess which got rubber stamped & which gets deemed a \u201cspending problem\u201d\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1633042781
"We won't let massive corporations, billionaires, and a few conservative Democrats stand in the way of delivering transformational progress for millions of working people," Japayal tweeted Thursday evening. "Stick to the plan. Pass both bills, together."
