Abortion rights supporters protest against the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to end federal abortion rights protections outside the First Street U.S. Courthouse on June 27, 2022 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Jul 02, 2022
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
--Gloria Steinem, The Verbal Karate of Florynce R. Kennedy, Esq.
In light of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, a number of readers have written asking whether I thought the Missouri state legislature and other similar state legislatures will consider enacting legislation that would ban sexual intercourse in their states. The question is not as frivolous as it would at first appear and in light of the steps the Missouri legislature took during the 2021 session, it is a sensible question. It would instantly put to rest further discussion about abortions in those states. Pregnancy would become a thing of the past.
"During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the 'morning after pill' and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy."
In 2021 the Republican-led Missouri Senate launched an effort to limit the ability of those who depend on assistance from Medicaid to obtain devices that would prevent women who had engaged in sexual intercourse or planned to do so, from becoming pregnant. During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the "morning after pill" and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy. In the discussion of that legislation, some Republican lawmakers said that using IUDs or the "morning after pill" was like getting an abortion.
In assuming their position with respect to Medicaid, the Missouri legislators were following the lead of Texas Republican Senator, Ted Cruz, who has repeatedly referred to birth control pills as being abortion-inducing drugs, ignoring the fact that in fact they prevent pregnancy rather than terminate it. By the end of the 2021 legislative session that language had been abandoned by the Missouri legislators who had proposed it, but with the demise of Roe, it may well be resurrected.
The foregoing is merely one example of the kind of legislation Republican-inspired legislators may introduce in order to further their purported goals of preserving all human life, even before it occurs. The failure of the Missouri legislators to attain their goal in their 2021 session should not lead to an assumption they never will. As House Minority Leader, Kevin McCarthy (R.Ca.) said following the issuance of the Dobbs ruling and the possibility that following the November election Republicans would once again control the House of Representatives, the GOP's anti-abortion work "is far from done." He went on to say: "The right to life has been vindicated. The voiceless will finally have a voice. This great nation can now live up to its core principle, that all are created equal, not born equal, created equal." Kevin is presumably referring to what happens when sexual intercourse takes place. Rep. McCarthy's hope for the future of the unborn is shown by a bill whimsically proposed to be introduced next year by Mickey Dollens, (D-Oklahoma).
In an interview following the passage of a 2022 bill in the Oklahoma Legislature that greatly limits the ability of a woman to get an abortion, Mr. Dollens suggested that next year he would introduce a bill in the Oklahoma legislature that would provide that all boys should receive a mandatory reversible vasectomy to prevent unwanted pregnancies. As he explained in his interview, "If you really want to end abortion, if that's your objective, then I would invite you to coauthor a bill that I am considering next year that would mandate each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that is only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability. If you think that's crazy, maybe you understand how fifty percent of Oklahomans feel about the passage of the anti-abortion bills that were enacted during the recent legislative session." Considering possible future legislation, Rep. Dollens said: "If there is one thing I have learned from my six years in the Legislature, it is if one Republican-controlled state does something, Oklahoma will follow suit." His concern about what other states might do is warranted.
Following the release of the Dobbs opinion one Missouri legislator who had been involved in the 2021 fight to limit the kinds of birth control that would be provided for Medicaid recipients, addressed what future attempts to control the reproductive rights of women he would support. In addressing the question he said: "There are some that I think are okay and some that I don't believe in, especially the morning after pill and things that come after conception. So I think anything's on the table."
There is almost certainly one thing that is not on the table. My proposal. If states that are so focused on the evils of abortion simply banned sexual intercourse, women would no longer have to worry about becoming pregnant and the need for abortions would vanish. Unlike all the other methods being discussed by men in state legislatures, it would have exactly the same effect on men that it has on women. That, all male legislators would unanimously agree, would be a bummer and for that, and perhaps other reasons, it will never happen.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Christopher Brauchli
Christopher Brauchli is a Common Dreams columnist and lawyer known nationally for his work. He is a graduate of Harvard University and the University of Colorado School of Law where he served on the Board of Editors of the Rocky Mountain Law Review. For political commentary see his web page at humanraceandothersports.com.
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
--Gloria Steinem, The Verbal Karate of Florynce R. Kennedy, Esq.
In light of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, a number of readers have written asking whether I thought the Missouri state legislature and other similar state legislatures will consider enacting legislation that would ban sexual intercourse in their states. The question is not as frivolous as it would at first appear and in light of the steps the Missouri legislature took during the 2021 session, it is a sensible question. It would instantly put to rest further discussion about abortions in those states. Pregnancy would become a thing of the past.
"During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the 'morning after pill' and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy."
In 2021 the Republican-led Missouri Senate launched an effort to limit the ability of those who depend on assistance from Medicaid to obtain devices that would prevent women who had engaged in sexual intercourse or planned to do so, from becoming pregnant. During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the "morning after pill" and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy. In the discussion of that legislation, some Republican lawmakers said that using IUDs or the "morning after pill" was like getting an abortion.
In assuming their position with respect to Medicaid, the Missouri legislators were following the lead of Texas Republican Senator, Ted Cruz, who has repeatedly referred to birth control pills as being abortion-inducing drugs, ignoring the fact that in fact they prevent pregnancy rather than terminate it. By the end of the 2021 legislative session that language had been abandoned by the Missouri legislators who had proposed it, but with the demise of Roe, it may well be resurrected.
The foregoing is merely one example of the kind of legislation Republican-inspired legislators may introduce in order to further their purported goals of preserving all human life, even before it occurs. The failure of the Missouri legislators to attain their goal in their 2021 session should not lead to an assumption they never will. As House Minority Leader, Kevin McCarthy (R.Ca.) said following the issuance of the Dobbs ruling and the possibility that following the November election Republicans would once again control the House of Representatives, the GOP's anti-abortion work "is far from done." He went on to say: "The right to life has been vindicated. The voiceless will finally have a voice. This great nation can now live up to its core principle, that all are created equal, not born equal, created equal." Kevin is presumably referring to what happens when sexual intercourse takes place. Rep. McCarthy's hope for the future of the unborn is shown by a bill whimsically proposed to be introduced next year by Mickey Dollens, (D-Oklahoma).
In an interview following the passage of a 2022 bill in the Oklahoma Legislature that greatly limits the ability of a woman to get an abortion, Mr. Dollens suggested that next year he would introduce a bill in the Oklahoma legislature that would provide that all boys should receive a mandatory reversible vasectomy to prevent unwanted pregnancies. As he explained in his interview, "If you really want to end abortion, if that's your objective, then I would invite you to coauthor a bill that I am considering next year that would mandate each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that is only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability. If you think that's crazy, maybe you understand how fifty percent of Oklahomans feel about the passage of the anti-abortion bills that were enacted during the recent legislative session." Considering possible future legislation, Rep. Dollens said: "If there is one thing I have learned from my six years in the Legislature, it is if one Republican-controlled state does something, Oklahoma will follow suit." His concern about what other states might do is warranted.
Following the release of the Dobbs opinion one Missouri legislator who had been involved in the 2021 fight to limit the kinds of birth control that would be provided for Medicaid recipients, addressed what future attempts to control the reproductive rights of women he would support. In addressing the question he said: "There are some that I think are okay and some that I don't believe in, especially the morning after pill and things that come after conception. So I think anything's on the table."
There is almost certainly one thing that is not on the table. My proposal. If states that are so focused on the evils of abortion simply banned sexual intercourse, women would no longer have to worry about becoming pregnant and the need for abortions would vanish. Unlike all the other methods being discussed by men in state legislatures, it would have exactly the same effect on men that it has on women. That, all male legislators would unanimously agree, would be a bummer and for that, and perhaps other reasons, it will never happen.
Christopher Brauchli
Christopher Brauchli is a Common Dreams columnist and lawyer known nationally for his work. He is a graduate of Harvard University and the University of Colorado School of Law where he served on the Board of Editors of the Rocky Mountain Law Review. For political commentary see his web page at humanraceandothersports.com.
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
--Gloria Steinem, The Verbal Karate of Florynce R. Kennedy, Esq.
In light of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, a number of readers have written asking whether I thought the Missouri state legislature and other similar state legislatures will consider enacting legislation that would ban sexual intercourse in their states. The question is not as frivolous as it would at first appear and in light of the steps the Missouri legislature took during the 2021 session, it is a sensible question. It would instantly put to rest further discussion about abortions in those states. Pregnancy would become a thing of the past.
"During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the 'morning after pill' and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy."
In 2021 the Republican-led Missouri Senate launched an effort to limit the ability of those who depend on assistance from Medicaid to obtain devices that would prevent women who had engaged in sexual intercourse or planned to do so, from becoming pregnant. During its 2021 session, the Missouri Senate voted to prevent Missouri state's Medicaid program from paying for the "morning after pill" and intrauterine devices (IUDs) used by women to prevent pregnancy. In the discussion of that legislation, some Republican lawmakers said that using IUDs or the "morning after pill" was like getting an abortion.
In assuming their position with respect to Medicaid, the Missouri legislators were following the lead of Texas Republican Senator, Ted Cruz, who has repeatedly referred to birth control pills as being abortion-inducing drugs, ignoring the fact that in fact they prevent pregnancy rather than terminate it. By the end of the 2021 legislative session that language had been abandoned by the Missouri legislators who had proposed it, but with the demise of Roe, it may well be resurrected.
The foregoing is merely one example of the kind of legislation Republican-inspired legislators may introduce in order to further their purported goals of preserving all human life, even before it occurs. The failure of the Missouri legislators to attain their goal in their 2021 session should not lead to an assumption they never will. As House Minority Leader, Kevin McCarthy (R.Ca.) said following the issuance of the Dobbs ruling and the possibility that following the November election Republicans would once again control the House of Representatives, the GOP's anti-abortion work "is far from done." He went on to say: "The right to life has been vindicated. The voiceless will finally have a voice. This great nation can now live up to its core principle, that all are created equal, not born equal, created equal." Kevin is presumably referring to what happens when sexual intercourse takes place. Rep. McCarthy's hope for the future of the unborn is shown by a bill whimsically proposed to be introduced next year by Mickey Dollens, (D-Oklahoma).
In an interview following the passage of a 2022 bill in the Oklahoma Legislature that greatly limits the ability of a woman to get an abortion, Mr. Dollens suggested that next year he would introduce a bill in the Oklahoma legislature that would provide that all boys should receive a mandatory reversible vasectomy to prevent unwanted pregnancies. As he explained in his interview, "If you really want to end abortion, if that's your objective, then I would invite you to coauthor a bill that I am considering next year that would mandate each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that is only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability. If you think that's crazy, maybe you understand how fifty percent of Oklahomans feel about the passage of the anti-abortion bills that were enacted during the recent legislative session." Considering possible future legislation, Rep. Dollens said: "If there is one thing I have learned from my six years in the Legislature, it is if one Republican-controlled state does something, Oklahoma will follow suit." His concern about what other states might do is warranted.
Following the release of the Dobbs opinion one Missouri legislator who had been involved in the 2021 fight to limit the kinds of birth control that would be provided for Medicaid recipients, addressed what future attempts to control the reproductive rights of women he would support. In addressing the question he said: "There are some that I think are okay and some that I don't believe in, especially the morning after pill and things that come after conception. So I think anything's on the table."
There is almost certainly one thing that is not on the table. My proposal. If states that are so focused on the evils of abortion simply banned sexual intercourse, women would no longer have to worry about becoming pregnant and the need for abortions would vanish. Unlike all the other methods being discussed by men in state legislatures, it would have exactly the same effect on men that it has on women. That, all male legislators would unanimously agree, would be a bummer and for that, and perhaps other reasons, it will never happen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.