SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Even under the best circumstances the U.S. will feel the results of the Trump administration's disregard and misuse of science for years to come. (Photo: Getty Images)
We Should Listen to Scientists Sounding the Alarm on Trump
Voting President Donald Trump out of office is only the first step.
Oct 13, 2020
Never before have we seen so many scientific organizations sound the alarm on a presidential administration, something which should frighten us all.
The New England Journal of Medicine has never weighed in on a political candidate in their 208-year history, until last week when they published an editorial signed by all of the editors condemning the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic. Last month Scientific American endorsed Joe Biden, a first in their 175 year history. A bipartisan group of four former CDC directors published an op-ed decrying the historic and dangerous politicization of science and public health under the Trump administration. Nine drug companies released a joint statement promising to "stand with science" and only seek approval for their vaccine once it had passed rigorous safety trials in an attempt to bolster public confidence that they wouldn't be used as pawns in Trump's reelection bid.
It is a myth that science is apolitical. What science gets funded and who is funded to do that science is inherently political, and the reason diseases that affect predominantly white populations, like Cystic Fibrosis, receive far more research dollars per patient than diseases that predominantly affect Black populations, like Sickle Cell Anemia. More egregiously, cherry-picked and poorly interpreted studies have been used to support eugenics and genocide. However, rightly or wrongly, scientific organizations generally steer clear of direct endorsements or pronouncements that could undermine their claims of non-partisan objectivity. The fact that so many are speaking out now is a testament to the damage that the Trump administration has done to our country and scientific institutions.
Voting President Donald Trump out of office is only the first step. A Biden administration will face the difficult task of controlling a pandemic that is still killing an average of 1,000 Americans per day. No other high income country has refused to widely implement evidence-based infectious disease control measures like widespread and rapid testing, universal masking, social distancing and contact tracing. Mixed and often inaccurate messaging from Trump has decreased the public buy-in necessary to implement these measures and a new administration will have to work hard to reverse the damage. There is also widespread public distrust of the coronavirus vaccine development process. If an effective candidate is found, the public will have to be convinced that it is safe in order for it to be taken in high enough numbers to produce herd immunity and hasten the end of the pandemic.
If there is a new administration, it will also have to embark on a long term rebuilding of the nation's scientific infrastructure. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long been the world's preeminent public health agency and helped lead the global response to AIDS, Ebola and Zika. Now the CDC has been tainted by frequent accusations of suppression or misrepresentation of scientific evidence, most recently when their recommendation to require masks on public and commercial transit was blocked by the White House. The Trump administration has politicized science in agencies like the CDC, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and diminished the role of scientific evidence in policy making to a startling degree. Career scientists have been silenced or forced to stop work on topics that are at odds with the administration's goals, especially climate change and regulating industry. These institutions should be rebuilt in a way that reduces the potential for partisan meddling and will need to work to win back both public and international trust.
Even under the best circumstances the U.S. will feel the results of the Trump administration's disregard and misuse of science for years to come. We should heed the unprecedented warnings coming from the nation's top scientific organizations and scientists that the U.S. cannot survive another four years of the Trump administration.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Hill
Katherine Wilkinson
Katherine Wilkinson is an associate professor of Biological Sciences at San Jose State University and a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.
Never before have we seen so many scientific organizations sound the alarm on a presidential administration, something which should frighten us all.
The New England Journal of Medicine has never weighed in on a political candidate in their 208-year history, until last week when they published an editorial signed by all of the editors condemning the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic. Last month Scientific American endorsed Joe Biden, a first in their 175 year history. A bipartisan group of four former CDC directors published an op-ed decrying the historic and dangerous politicization of science and public health under the Trump administration. Nine drug companies released a joint statement promising to "stand with science" and only seek approval for their vaccine once it had passed rigorous safety trials in an attempt to bolster public confidence that they wouldn't be used as pawns in Trump's reelection bid.
It is a myth that science is apolitical. What science gets funded and who is funded to do that science is inherently political, and the reason diseases that affect predominantly white populations, like Cystic Fibrosis, receive far more research dollars per patient than diseases that predominantly affect Black populations, like Sickle Cell Anemia. More egregiously, cherry-picked and poorly interpreted studies have been used to support eugenics and genocide. However, rightly or wrongly, scientific organizations generally steer clear of direct endorsements or pronouncements that could undermine their claims of non-partisan objectivity. The fact that so many are speaking out now is a testament to the damage that the Trump administration has done to our country and scientific institutions.
Voting President Donald Trump out of office is only the first step. A Biden administration will face the difficult task of controlling a pandemic that is still killing an average of 1,000 Americans per day. No other high income country has refused to widely implement evidence-based infectious disease control measures like widespread and rapid testing, universal masking, social distancing and contact tracing. Mixed and often inaccurate messaging from Trump has decreased the public buy-in necessary to implement these measures and a new administration will have to work hard to reverse the damage. There is also widespread public distrust of the coronavirus vaccine development process. If an effective candidate is found, the public will have to be convinced that it is safe in order for it to be taken in high enough numbers to produce herd immunity and hasten the end of the pandemic.
If there is a new administration, it will also have to embark on a long term rebuilding of the nation's scientific infrastructure. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long been the world's preeminent public health agency and helped lead the global response to AIDS, Ebola and Zika. Now the CDC has been tainted by frequent accusations of suppression or misrepresentation of scientific evidence, most recently when their recommendation to require masks on public and commercial transit was blocked by the White House. The Trump administration has politicized science in agencies like the CDC, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and diminished the role of scientific evidence in policy making to a startling degree. Career scientists have been silenced or forced to stop work on topics that are at odds with the administration's goals, especially climate change and regulating industry. These institutions should be rebuilt in a way that reduces the potential for partisan meddling and will need to work to win back both public and international trust.
Even under the best circumstances the U.S. will feel the results of the Trump administration's disregard and misuse of science for years to come. We should heed the unprecedented warnings coming from the nation's top scientific organizations and scientists that the U.S. cannot survive another four years of the Trump administration.
Katherine Wilkinson
Katherine Wilkinson is an associate professor of Biological Sciences at San Jose State University and a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.
Never before have we seen so many scientific organizations sound the alarm on a presidential administration, something which should frighten us all.
The New England Journal of Medicine has never weighed in on a political candidate in their 208-year history, until last week when they published an editorial signed by all of the editors condemning the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic. Last month Scientific American endorsed Joe Biden, a first in their 175 year history. A bipartisan group of four former CDC directors published an op-ed decrying the historic and dangerous politicization of science and public health under the Trump administration. Nine drug companies released a joint statement promising to "stand with science" and only seek approval for their vaccine once it had passed rigorous safety trials in an attempt to bolster public confidence that they wouldn't be used as pawns in Trump's reelection bid.
It is a myth that science is apolitical. What science gets funded and who is funded to do that science is inherently political, and the reason diseases that affect predominantly white populations, like Cystic Fibrosis, receive far more research dollars per patient than diseases that predominantly affect Black populations, like Sickle Cell Anemia. More egregiously, cherry-picked and poorly interpreted studies have been used to support eugenics and genocide. However, rightly or wrongly, scientific organizations generally steer clear of direct endorsements or pronouncements that could undermine their claims of non-partisan objectivity. The fact that so many are speaking out now is a testament to the damage that the Trump administration has done to our country and scientific institutions.
Voting President Donald Trump out of office is only the first step. A Biden administration will face the difficult task of controlling a pandemic that is still killing an average of 1,000 Americans per day. No other high income country has refused to widely implement evidence-based infectious disease control measures like widespread and rapid testing, universal masking, social distancing and contact tracing. Mixed and often inaccurate messaging from Trump has decreased the public buy-in necessary to implement these measures and a new administration will have to work hard to reverse the damage. There is also widespread public distrust of the coronavirus vaccine development process. If an effective candidate is found, the public will have to be convinced that it is safe in order for it to be taken in high enough numbers to produce herd immunity and hasten the end of the pandemic.
If there is a new administration, it will also have to embark on a long term rebuilding of the nation's scientific infrastructure. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long been the world's preeminent public health agency and helped lead the global response to AIDS, Ebola and Zika. Now the CDC has been tainted by frequent accusations of suppression or misrepresentation of scientific evidence, most recently when their recommendation to require masks on public and commercial transit was blocked by the White House. The Trump administration has politicized science in agencies like the CDC, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and diminished the role of scientific evidence in policy making to a startling degree. Career scientists have been silenced or forced to stop work on topics that are at odds with the administration's goals, especially climate change and regulating industry. These institutions should be rebuilt in a way that reduces the potential for partisan meddling and will need to work to win back both public and international trust.
Even under the best circumstances the U.S. will feel the results of the Trump administration's disregard and misuse of science for years to come. We should heed the unprecedented warnings coming from the nation's top scientific organizations and scientists that the U.S. cannot survive another four years of the Trump administration.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.