

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Keala Uchôa: keala@amazonwatch.org, 1-510-827-1269
Landmark ruling calls for concrete measures to guarantee their survival
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) released a judgment declaring Ecuador’s international responsibility for violating the rights of the Tagaeri and Taromenane Indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation.
The Court determined that the Ecuadorian government failed in its duty to guarantee the principle of no contact of these peoples, allowing illegal incursions into their territory by third parties. Likewise, the creation of the Tagaeri Taromenane Intangible Zone (ZITT) was implemented without due diligence, facilitating extractive activities in the Yasuní National Park without applying the precautionary principle. In addition, the government failed to adopt adequate measures to protect the Tagaeri and Taromenane Indigenous peoples from violence by external actors.
The ruling establishes that Ecuador violated, among others, the rights to life, personal integrity, and collective property of the Indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation by failing to prevent the episodes of violence that occurred in 2003, 2006, and 2013, in which members of the Tagaeri and Taromenane were killed. The government is also responsible for the forced separation of two Indigenous girls after the 2013 massacre, which affected their cultural identity and fundamental rights.
The court decision comes after voters in a 2023 national referendum opted to keep the 846 million barrels of crude permanently in the ground underneath part of Yasuní National Park. The country’s Constitutional Court gave President Daniel Noboa’s administration one year to decommission drilling – closing 247 wells, dismantling infrastructure, and remediating and restoring the region. But to date, only four wells have been closed, exacerbating the existential threat to the Tagaeri-Taromenane.
The IACHR gave Ecuador one year to implement its binding decision, which will have a major impact on the next president and future of oil extraction in the country. The ruling also opens the door to further restrictions on drilling in other areas inside Yasuní, or future oil concessions if the ZITT is expanded. Ecuador will hold run-off elections on April 13, 2025 between incumbent right-wing president Noboa and Luisa González, the hand-picked candidate of former leftist president Rafael Correa. Both administrations seek to expand oil activities in the country’s Amazon region, despite opposition from local Indigenous peoples.
Concerning the popular referendum, the court ordered the Ecuadorian government to adopt “legislative, administrative and any other measures to effectively implement the decision taken in the popular consultation of August 20, 2023 to keep the crude of Block 43 indefinitely under the subsoil.” It also ordered the government to guarantee the application of the precautionary principle in any extractive activity in the region.
The Court also ordered 20 measures of reparations, restitution, and guarantees of non-repetition, including the obligation to investigate the massacres of 2003 and 2006, determine government responsibilities for the violation of the rights of the girls contacted and forcibly separated, train its officials in the rights of peoples living in voluntary isolation, establish effective judicial mechanisms for the protection of their territories, the obligation of the government to present a report on the improvement of the current monitoring measures of the ZITT, the creation of a technical commission for the evaluation of the ZITT to guarantee the protection of the peoples living in voluntary isolation, and that a public act of recognition of responsibility be carried out. This commission should include the participation of independent experts, representatives of Indigenous organizations, and civil society, as well as guaranteeing government funding for its adequate functioning.
The ruling marks a milestone in the defense of peoples living in voluntary isolation throughout the region and demands that Ecuador move from abandonment to immediate action for their effective protection. There are no more excuses: the government must guarantee their right to exist, free from violence and exploitation.
“This judgment of the Inter-American Court is the result of many years of struggle and is a guarantee of the rights to territory for peoples in isolation, so that they can live without the threat of oil, mining, and other threats. This is a milestone for all Indigenous peoples living in isolation in the region and throughout the world. It is a precedent of the struggle of years and the Waorani are united. We are celebrating this victory and condemning the government for violating the rights of the people,” Juan Bay, President of the Waorani Nationality of Ecuador (NAWE), underscored.
“This judgment is historic in several ways. It is the first time that the IACHR Court has issued a ruling regarding peoples living in voluntary isolation and ratifies the standards of protection and respect for the principle of no contact, precaution, and intangibility of their territories located in the Ecuadorian Amazon. On the other hand, it creates a historical precedent on the need to cease oil exploitation to protect the PIAV, since the court orders compliance with the popular consultation of Yasuní that has been pending since August 2023. This is an emblematic example of climate and social justice for the world,” emphasized Nathaly Yépez Pulles, Ecuador Legal Advisor at Amazon Watch.
Kevin Koenig, Climate, Energy, and Extractive Industry Director at Amazon Watch, explains that this ruling has implications for the United States as well: “This decision makes it crystal clear: anyone consuming and or importing crude from Ecuador is complicit in the violation of the rights of isolated Indigenous peoples and undermining the will of Ecuadorian voters, the country’s Constitutional Court, and now the Inter-American Court on Human Rights. California is addicted to Amazon crude, and the first step is admitting it has a problem.”
Amazon Watch is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 to protect the rainforest and advance the rights of indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with indigenous and environmental organizations in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability and the preservation of the Amazon's ecological systems.
"The enemy does not want us to succeed or have development and progress, but all our universities are united now by these attacks," said the president of Tehran's prestigious Sharif University of Technology.
At least 60 students and 10 professors have been killed in US-Israeli attacks on universities, according to an Iranian government official, while other university officials report even higher death tolls.
Standing outside the bombed-out ruins of Iran's Aerospace Research Institute, which was targeted twice earlier this month, Minister of Science, Research, and Technology, Hossein Simaei, said on Wednesday that attacks on the facility and other universities were “scientific crimes."
“This was a center where researchers worked on civilian sectors, including biology, agriculture, and surveying,” Simaei said. “Unfortunately, it has fallen victim to the enemy’s brutal attacks.”
The institute was one of at least 32 universities and 857 schools that have been attacked by US and Israeli forces since the US and Israel launched the war at the end of February, according to a report by the Iranian Red Crescent on April 10.
Bijan Ranjbar, the president of the Islamic Azad University system—one of the largest in the world—has confirmed that at least 110 students at his institution have been killed and 21 university branches have been damaged.
On April 6, the Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, which has been described as the "MIT of Iran," was also bombed, severely damaging its High-Performance Computing Center, which serves more than 3,000 artificial intelligence and computer science researchers.
The Pasteur Institute, one of the oldest research and health institutes in Iran, was also hit earlier this month, rendering it "unable to continue delivering health services," according to the World Health Organization.
"The enemy does not want us to succeed or have development and progress, but all our universities are united now by these attacks," said Sharif University president Masoud Tajrishi.
Israel has justified attacking these institutions on the grounds that they are closely linked to the Iranian military, similar to its claim that universities in Gaza are used by Hamas.
But following promises by US President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to bomb Iran "back to the Stone Ages," attacks on civilian infrastructure have gone far beyond those with any discernible military purpose.
The WHO reported on April 8 that since the beginning of the war, at least 23 healthcare institutions were attacked by US and Israeli forces. Attacks have also been reported on several oil and energy facilities.
Though the US and Israel often frame these attacks as inseparable from their objective of weakening Iran militarily, Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, an assistant professor of the international relations of the Middle East at the University of St. Andrews, argues that they function as attacks on the whole of Iranian society.
"Whatever role the state played in constructing refineries, pharmaceutical plants, and research institutions, it is Iranian workers, engineers, scientists, and patients who depend on them, who built their careers inside them, and who will suffer most from their destruction," he wrote in Jacobin earlier this week. "Bombing a country’s industrial and scientific base is an act of violence against its people, regardless of what one thinks of its government."
He said: “The systematic killing of scientists and engineers, the destruction of centrifuges and computer networks, the bombing of research universities and pharmaceutical facilities: All of it reflects a coherent strategic objective, which is to erase the embodied knowledge, the accumulated expertise, and the institutional memory that make Iranian technological development possible.”
“Moments of global crisis continue to translate into bumper profits for oil majors while ordinary people pay the price."
US President Donald Trump's unprovoked war of choice in Iran has been a goldmine for the fossil fuels industry, which is earning massive windfall profits thanks to the rise in the price of petroleum.
An analysis published by The Guardian on Wednesday estimated that the 100 biggest oil and gas companies have collectively raked in an extra $30 million per hour since Trump launched his war with Iran without any congressional authorization in late February.
In just the first month of the conflict, The Guardian reported, Big Oil made $23 billion in windfall profits, and the industry is projected to haul in an additional $234 billion in windfall profits by the end of the year if the price of oil stays in the $100 range.
The top beneficiaries of the Iran conflict are Saudi Aramco, which is projected to earn $25.5 billion in windfall profits by the end of the year; Kuwait Petroleum Corp., which is projected to earn $12.1 billion; and ExxonMobil, which is projected to earn $11 billion.
"The excess profits come from the pockets of ordinary people as they pay high prices to fill up their vehicles and power their homes, as well as from businesses incurring higher energy bills," The Guardian noted. "Dozens of countries have cut fuel taxes to help struggling consumers, meaning those nations, including Australia, South Africa, Italy, Brazil and Zambia, are raising less money for public services."
The Guardian's analysis was conducted by climate watchdog Global Witness, using data from intelligence provider Rystad Energy.
Patrick Galey, head of news investigations at Global Witness, told The Guardian that Big Oil's windfall profits should be a wakeup call to the world about the dangers of relying on fossil fuels.
"Moments of global crisis continue to translate into bumper profits for oil majors while ordinary people pay the price," Galey said. "Until governments kick their fossil fuel addiction, all of our spending power will be held hostage to the whims of strongmen."
Climate advocates have for months been calling for a windfall profits tax on Big Oil during the Iran War as a way to retrieve some of the money consumers have lost during the conflict.
Earlier this month, the climate advocacy organization 350.org renewed its previous call to slap fossil fuel companies with a windfall profits tax, and then invest the revenue into renewable energy sources to provide real long-term relief to global consumers.
Beth Walker, an energy policy expert at climate change think tank E3G, also recommended a windfall profits tax with the aim of ending reliance on dirty energy sources.
"Governments should use taxes on windfall profits to accelerate the transition to green energy," said Walker, "rather than deepen dependence on fossil fuels.”
The new articles of impeachment unveiled by House Democrats accuse the Pentagon chief of directing an illegal war and backing deadly attacks on civilians.
House Democrats officially unveiled five articles of impeachment against Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday as the US military announced a deployment of thousands of additional troops to the Middle East, even as President Donald Trump claims his war of choice in Iran is "very close to over."
The seven-page impeachment resolution, led by Iranian American Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), accuses Hegseth of directing and participating in an assault on Iran "in direct contravention of Article I of the Constitution," which gives Congress the sole authority to declare war; authorizing or failing to prevent the use of deadly military force against civilians, specifically in the horrific attack on the girls' school in southern Iran; potentially violating the Geneva Conventions by declaring that "no quarter" would be given to "our enemies"; and more.
"I am introducing articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth for repeatedly violating his oath of office and his duty to the Constitution," Ansari said in a statement last week announcing the impeachment push. "Only Congress has the power to declare war, not a rogue president or his lackeys. Hegseth’s reckless endangerment of US servicemembers and repeated war crimes, including bombing a girls’ school in Minab, Iran and willfully targeting civilian infrastructure, are grounds for impeachment and removal from office."
Axios reported Wednesday that Ansari introduced the impeachment articles with eight original cosponsors, all Democrats: Reps. Steve Cohen of Tennessee, Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Nikema Williams of Georgia, Dina Titus of Nevada, David Min of California, Shri Thanedar of Michigan, Brittany Pettersen of Colorado, and Sarah McBride of Delaware.
The Democratic effort to impeach Hegseth is "also supported by several progressive and anti-war groups, including MoveOn, Indivisible, and the Center for International Policy," Axios noted.
The impeachment articles landed in the House as the Pentagon deployed roughly 6,000 additional troops to the Middle East amid a highly tenuous ceasefire in Iran. The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration is "considering the possibility of additional strikes or ground operations" in Iran if the two-week ceasefire deal collapses.
According to the Post, the American forces now heading to the Middle East "include about 6,000 troops aboard the aircraft carrier USS George HW Bush and several warships escorting it."
"About 4,200 others with the Boxer Amphibious Ready Group and its embarked Marine Corps task force, the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, are expected to arrive near the end of the month," the Post added.
The forces will join the estimated 55,000 US troops currently stationed in the region for a conflict that Trump has repeatedly claimed is all but over and won.
“We’ve beaten them militarily, totally,” Trump, who is also facing an impeachment push and growing calls for his removal via the 25th Amendment, told Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo in an interview that aired Wednesday. “I think it’s close to over, I view it as very close to over."
"If I pulled up stakes right now it would take them 20 years to rebuild that country," Trump added, "and we’re not finished."
Trump also repeated his threat to commit grave war crimes in Iran, declaring that the US military could "take out every one of their bridges in one hour."
"We could take out every one of their power plants, electric power plants, in one hour," the president added.