

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Foreign Office is hosting a high-level trade event for Ethiopia's Foreign Minister tomorrow (21st), despite the ongoing detention of a British man kidnapped by the Ethiopian authorities 16 months ago.
The Foreign Office is hosting a high-level trade event for Ethiopia's Foreign Minister tomorrow (21st), despite the ongoing detention of a British man kidnapped by the Ethiopian authorities 16 months ago.
Foreign minister Grant Shapps will share a stage tomorrow with Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adanhom at the UK Ethiopia Trade Investment Forum, which is hosted and supported by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and the Foreign Office (FCO). The event's website says it is "the country's highest profile investment outreach on the international stage, to date", and that it is is "a unique opportunity" for potential investors to "engage directly with the government and senior decision-makers of one of the most topical investment destinations in the world."
The event is going ahead amid criticism of the UK government for failing to request that Ethiopia release Andargachew 'Andy' Tsege, a British father of three who was kidnapped by Ethiopian forces in June 2014 and forcibly taken to the country. Mr Tsege is an outspoken critic of the Ethiopian government, and was sentenced to death there in absentia in 2009. He has been held largely incommunicado since his disappearance, and has been refused regular British consular visits, as well as contact with a lawyer and his family in London. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has demanded the "immediate release of Mr Tsege" from Ethiopia, but the UK government has so far limited itself to calling for consular access and 'due process' in his case.
Human rights organization Reprieve, which is assisting Andy's family, has asked Mr Shapps to use tomorrow's Ethiopian visit to ask for Andy to be released. In a recent letter to Reprieve, Mr Shapps claimed the government "take[s] every opportunity" to raise his case with the Ethiopian authorities.Tomorrow's visit comes as the UK government faces controversy over trade deals with countries accused of human rights abuses. Today it emerged that the Business Secretary, Sajjid Javid, had invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter in a letter to Reprieve justifying the promotion of British security exports to countries including Saudi Arabia.
Commenting, Maya Foa, head of Reprieve's death penalty team, said: "The government has already admitted that human rights are 'no longer a priority' - for ministers to now take the stage with the Ethiopian Foreign Minister in the name of boosting trade sends a further worrying signal. This is a man responsible for the kidnapping and ongoing detention of a British father of three, Andy Tsege, who awaits the carrying out of an in absentia death sentence. Promoting trade with our allies is one thing, but the UK must also use its ties with countries like Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia to help victims of abuses - including British citizens. The Foreign Office must use its visit from Tedros this week to demand Andy's urgent release."
Reprieve is a UK-based human rights organization that uses the law to enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantanamo Bay.
"He’s pretending he was always good with this vote—as he and his lackeys keep scheming to prevent it from going any further," said a former Republican congressman.
President Donald Trump has spent months doing everything in his power to downplay and dismiss calls to release the government’s files about his former friend, the powerful sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. But as he faces a mutiny within his own party and a steady drip of new scandalous details about his relationship with the disgraced financier, Trump abruptly changed course on Sunday, calling for House Republicans to hold a vote on releasing the files.
" House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files because we have nothing to hide," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "And it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party."
Trump claimed that his Department of Justice "has already turned over tens of thousands of pages to the Public on 'Epstein.'" But while the DOJ has released small tranches of heavily redacted files, most of the nearly 60,000 pages of emails and documents released to the public have come through the House Oversight Committee, which has subpoenaed DOJ files and records from Epstein’s estate.
Last week, a new batch of documents shed new light on Trump's relationship with Epstein. In one 2019 email to author Michael Wolff, Epstein said Trump "knew about the girls" he'd trafficked. In earlier emails to his co-conspirator Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein described Trump as a "dog that hasn’t barked” and said that one of his victims had "spent hours at my house" with Trump.
And far from his claims of transparency, Trump aggressively tried last week to pressure GOP Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Nancy Mace (SC) to abandon their support for a bipartisan petition to force a House vote on the release of the files, which reportedly included pulling Boebert into the Situation Room.
In one “last-ditch” effort to defuse the full release of the files, Trump also called on Attorney General Pam Bondi, to open an investigation specifically into Epstein’s ties to prominent Democrats. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the co-sponsors of the House resolution, described the investigations as a "smokescreen" because "if they have ongoing investigations in certain areas, those documents can’t be released."
None of Trump's obstruction efforts appear to have worked. With the resolution almost sure to pass, perhaps as soon as Tuesday, dozens more Republicans have hopped on the bandwagon and appear poised to vote for it. Faced with losing more trust within his party and among his voters—who have been largely dissatisfied with his handling of the Epstein firestorm—Trump's comments on Truth Social suggested he had recognized the need for a strategic retreat.
In a post that dripped with sarcasm, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), the resolution's co-sponsor, said he was "glad to see Donald Trump's complete and total endorsement of my bill."
But while Trump appeared to hope his gesture would help to quell suspicions that he’s covering up the files, Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), a member of the Oversight Committee, pointed out that it was hardly a demonstration of his transparency.
"Trump is dodging again," she wrote on social media. "There’s already a congressional subpoena for the full Epstein Files. If Trump means this, then he should release them himself right now."
The president has struggled to formulate an answer when asked why he won't simply release the files. On Friday, aboard Air Force One, a reporter asked him: "If there is nothing incriminating in the files, why not—"
Trump cut her off, shouting: "Quiet! Quiet!"
Aaron Fritschner, the deputy chief of staff for Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), pointed out that while Trump has now endorsed passing the bill to release the files, "the only reason this bill is under discussion to begin with is that the Trump administration blocked the release. They’re still blocking it!"
A resolution to release all the files would still need to be passed through the Senate, which is controlled by a 53-47 Republican majority. It would also need to be signed by Trump himself.
Justin Amash, a former Republican member of Congress, said the president's retreat was being done "in classic Trump fashion."
"He’s pretending he was always good with this vote—as he and his lackeys keep scheming to prevent it from going any further," Amash said.
Others have warned that even if the DOJ is compelled to release all its files on Epstein, there is no guarantee their integrity will be preserved.
Journalist Zaid Jilani asked, "What assurance do we have that the Trump administration isn’t selectively destroying Epstein files in anticipation of being forced to release them?"
This week's House vote comes after several survivors of Epstein's abuse published a video over the weekend calling for the full release of the files.
"Five administrations and we're still in the dark," the video says. "Call your Congress member and demand they release ALL of the Epstein files."
In a statement sent to Common Dreams following Trump's pivot, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said: "Donald Trump is leading a White House cover-up and has tried everything to kill our Jeffrey Epstein investigation. He’s failed. And now he’s panicking and has realized he is about to lose this Epstein vote to force the Department of Justice to release the files."
"Let’s be crystal clear: Trump has the power to release all the files today. And he is under subpoena to do so," Garcia continued. "But instead, he wants to continue this cover-up and launch bogus new investigations to deflect and slow down our investigation. It won’t work. We will get justice for the survivors."
"I wouldn’t even call it the Justice Department anymore. It’s become Trump’s personal law firm."
Dozens of former US Department of Justice attorneys have now gone on record to describe the unprecedented corruption of federal law enforcement taking place during President Donald Trump's second term.
In a lengthy story published on Sunday by the New York Times, the former DOJ attorneys described rampant politicization of prosecutions, directives to dig up evidence on Trump's political foes, and orders to drop investigations into potential terrorist plots and white-collar crimes.
Several attorneys told the paper that the corruption of the DOJ began on Trump's very first day in office when he issued a blanket pardon to everyone who had been convicted of rioting at the US Capitol building on his behalf on January 6, 2021, in a last-ditch effort to prevent the certification of former President Joe Biden's electoral victory.
Gregory Rosen, who oversaw the unit at the DOJ that prosecuted January 6 rioters, told the Times that he felt "numb" seeing the pardons of the rioters, but he nonetheless facilitated the pardons because he understood they were within the president's constitutional powers.
Mike Romano, a prosecutor who worked on January 6 cases, said that he had to resign as soon as he saw the broad scope of the pardons, which included rioters who were guilty of assaulting police officers.
"It’s incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie—I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice," he said. "We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted."
The mass pardon of the Capitol rioters was only the beginning, as prosecutors said that this politicization soon swept over the entire department.
In early March, for instance, Trump signed an executive order targeting law firms that had in the past represented prominent Democrats. Among other things, the order demanded federal agencies cancel government contracts with the firms and strip the firms' employees of their security clearances.
The orders also accused some of the firms in engaging in supposed racial discrimination for maintaining policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
Dena Robinson, a former attorney at the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, told the Times that the DEI investigation into law firm Perkins Coie was a particularly extreme example of the department's politicization under Trump.
"The idea of the investigation was that Perkins Coie supposedly engaged in illegal discrimination against white men," she explained. "But Perkins Coie is an extremely white firm—only 3% of the partners are Black. When my colleague pointed that out, the leadership didn’t care. They’d already reached their conclusion."
Robinson said that this attitude was emblematic of how Trump appointees conducted investigations: They begin with desired conclusions and systematically ignore evidence that undermines them.
"I wouldn’t even call it the Justice Department anymore," she said. "It’s become Trump’s personal law firm. I think Americans should be enraged."
Another aspect of the DOJ under Trump that has drawn scrutiny has been his use of pardons for political allies, including his decision last month to pardon Changpeng Zhao, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, who pleaded guilty to money-laundering charges in 2023, and who had helped boost the value of the Trump family's own cryptocurrency venture.
A new investigation from ProPublica found that Trump's use of the pardon hasn't just been relegated to prosecutions that took place during Democratic administrations.
The ProPublica report found Trump had wiped out convictions in "at least a dozen criminal cases that originated during his first term," many of which involved politicians convicted of taking bribes or engaging in kickback schemes.
Frank O. Bowman III, a professor emeritus of law at the University of Missouri, told Pro Publica that the Trump pardons taken together are part of what he described as "the systematic destruction of the Justice Department as an objective agency that seeks to uphold the law and fight crime."
In addition to this, Joseph Tirrell, former director of the Departmental Ethics Office, told the Times that the Trump DOJ has been hacking away at rules that bar law-enforcement officials from accepting gifts.
In one instance, Tirrell said he tried to intervene to stop DOJ employees from accepting cigars given by mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor and a soccer ball from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA).
"I felt like I really had to go to the mattress to convince the AG’s office: You can pay for the item or you can return the item or you can throw the item away," he said. "There’s no other way to do this."
Shortly after this, Tirrell said he got a call from the FBI general counsel inquiring "about changing exceptions to the gift rules because his boss, [FBI Director] Kash Patel, felt like he should be able to accept more expensive gifts."
Tirrell said that he then reminded the counsel that "his client was not Mr. Patel, but the United States."
Patel in recent weeks has come under scrutiny for some of the perks he's taken during his time as FBI director, including using the FBI's private jet to fly to a wrestling event where his girlfriend, country music singer Alexis Wilkins, was performing the national anthem.
MS NOW reported on Monday that Patel has also given Wilkins "a security detail made up of elite FBI agents usually assigned to a SWAT team in the FBI field office in Nashville," an unprecedented arrangement for the girlfriend of the FBI director.
Christopher O’Leary, a former senior FBI agent and MS NOW law enforcement contributor, said that there is "no legitimate justification" for granting Wilkins this level of security.
"This is a clear abuse of position and misuse of government resources," he said. "She is not his spouse, does not live in the same house or even the same city."
"The law is clear," said one advocacy group, "what's been missing is the political will to use it."
The US Department of Justice shuttered an antitrust probe into the heavily consolidated meatpacking industry shortly before President Donald Trump announced that he had asked the department to investigate whether companies are unlawfully colluding to push up beef prices.
Bloomberg reported late last week that Trump administration officials "formally notified companies recently that they were closing a probe into sharp price increases" during the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. The probe began during Trump's first term and continued through the Biden administration, which used executive action to target price gouging in the meatpacking industry.
The Trump Justice Department's decision to close the antitrust investigation came weeks before Trump, in a post on his social media platform, said earlier this month that he had instructed the DOJ to "immediately begin an investigation" into meatpacking companies. Just four corporations—Tyson, Cargill, JBS, and National Beef—control roughly 80% of the beef market in the United States.
Critics viewed the president's announcement as a performative move intended to deflect criticism of his failure to take substantive action to bring down beef prices. Trump has falsely claimed that the prices of all grocery products are down except for beef.
The advocacy group Food & Water Watch noted that Trump's call for a price-fixing probe came just three months after the Republican president "rescinded a Biden administration executive order meant to tackle these exact meatpacker abuses."
"Farmers and consumers need real action to bring down prices and protect producers—not performative announcements," said Tarah Heinzen. "If Trump is serious about investigating beef packers, his [US Department of Agriculture] must also vigorously defend the prior administration’s Packers and Stockyards Act rules."
Farm Action, a watchdog that fights corporate abuses in the agriculture sector, said that DOJ probes of the kind ordered by Trump often "end quietly" without any meaningful action.
"For this one to matter, it must end with enforcement," the group said last week. "If investigators uncover anticompetitive behavior, the DOJ has powerful tools to act. Under the Sherman Antitrust Act, it can take the packers to court, break them up, prosecute executives, force changes that protect farmers, and prevent further consolidation."
"The law is clear," Farm Action added, "what's been missing is the political will to use it."