For Immediate Release
Stop-and-Frisk Attorneys Comment on Monitor’s First Report
NEW YORK - Today, the court-appointed monitor overseeing reforms to the New York City Police Department’s unconstitutional stop-and-frisk practices filed his first interim report on the steps taken to date to implement the court’s orders in the Center for Constitutional Rights’ case, Floyd v. City of New York. The Center issued the following statement:
The monitor’s report reflects some initial, important steps the parties have taken in the long process of ensuring constitutional policing in compliance with the court’s 2013 permanent injunction in our Floyd case. The report identifies changes in policies relating to the constitutionality of stop and frisk, the promulgation of a new racial profiling policy, important changes to the documentation and supervisory review of stop and frisks, and substantially revised training processes for new recruits, which will be expanded and improved in future months. Still, this is no “Mission Accomplished” moment. There is a great deal of work to be done given the broad range of reforms identified by the court as necessary to rectify years of unconstitutional and discriminatory policing and ensure police accountability to the communities they serve. It has been nearly a year since Eric Garner was killed by the NYPD. As we approach that grim anniversary, we also look forward to beginning the work of the Joint Remedial Process to bring forward the concerns of affected communities who have been organizing across the city to press for transformative change in policing. We hope it will allow stakeholders the substantive role in identifying needed reforms and seeing them put into practice that which was ordered by the court.
In August 2013, the Center for Constitutional Rights and co-counsel won a landmark ruling that found the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk practices to be racially discriminatory and unconstitutional under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The court appointed a monitor to oversee reforms, including a joint remedial process that is intended to solicit substantive input from directly-affected communities as well as other stakeholders.
Read more about Floyd here.
Demos, Covington & Burling LLP, and Bedlock Levine and Hoffman LLP are co-counsel in the case.
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.