July, 24 2012, 04:28pm EDT
Interior Unveils First-ever National Solar Energy Plan for Public Lands
The Departments of the Interior and Energy released a final plan for solar energy development on public lands in the West, marking a historic milestone in our nation's effort to accelerate environmentally responsible renewable energy generation that will create jobs, reduce greenhouse gases, and contribute to national energy security.
WASHINGTON
The Departments of the Interior and Energy released a final plan for solar energy development on public lands in the West, marking a historic milestone in our nation's effort to accelerate environmentally responsible renewable energy generation that will create jobs, reduce greenhouse gases, and contribute to national energy security.
The plan known as the Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement is the first-ever roadmap for large-scale solar energy development on lands managed by the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.
Over the past two years, a diverse coalition of stakeholders - including solar energy companies, clean energy advocates, conservation groups and electric utilities, working together in an unprecedented fashion - provided joint comments and actively engaged in finding solutions that work for solar energy as well as for wildlife and wildlands. These groups advocated for balanced, guided development that avoids, minimizes, and effectively mitigates impacts on wildlife and sensitive lands and reduces the uncertainty and time for permitting of solar power projects and associated transmission - a process advocates call "smart from the start."
This diverse group of companies and organizations is unanimous in thanking Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, his staff and the Bureau of Land Management, as well as Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and his staff, for their collaborative efforts to provide a robust solar program and for presiding over an open and transparent process. We applaud both Departments' intentions to further the nation's clean energy goals in a balanced, environmentally-sensitive way that minimizes the controversies that can attend large new energy developments on public lands.
There are still important efforts remaining both at the programmatic and project levels to flesh out the central tenets laid out in the solar plan. Over the next several days, the groups will review the SPEIS in closer detail, and we look forward to continuing to work collaboratively to implement an environmentally responsible solar energy program.
This statement is jointly released by the following groups and individuals: Audubon, Brightsource Energy Inc., Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, Center for New Energy Economy, Cleanline Partners, DBL Ventures, Defenders of Wildlife, enXco, First Solar, Inc., Greater Phoenix Economic Council, Large-scale Solar Association, Kris Mayes, former Arizona Corporation Commissioner, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Nature Conservancy, NRG Energy, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Sierra Club, Solar Energy Industries Association, Southern California Edison, Vote Solar, The Wilderness Society.
Following are statements of support:
"Interior's final solar program culminates two years of a lot of hard work and commitment by many diverse groups," said Helen O'Shea, director of NRDC's Western Renewable Energy Project. "I'm hopeful that the plan will establish a roadmap that provides a balanced approach to addressing the climate change challenge and protecting wildlife and critical lands while moving our nation closer to meeting our clean energy goals."
"The BLM Solar plan demonstrates that we as Americans don't have to choose between clean alternative energy and a healthy environment," said Mike Daulton, vice president for public affairs at Audubon. "We can have the future we want - one where we enjoy a healthy climate, and where birds and other wildlife thrive."
"Renewable energy development on federal lands is essential to reaching our national clean energy goals," said Arthur L. Haubenstock, vice president of regulatory affairs at Brightsource Energy Inc. "We appreciate the extensive efforts of Secretaries Chu and Salazar and the Departments of Energy and Interior on the Solar PEIS and we look forward to developing our next generation of utility-scale concentrating solar power projects to provide utilities with clean, sustainable and reliable solar energy."
"Renewable energy is vital to our economy and our planet's survival. We are pleased that Secretary Salazar has produced a roadmap for how to get to a renewable and environmentally sustainable future," said V. John White, executive director of the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies.
"Colorado's clean energy economy is one of the greatest success stories to date. Smart planning that identifies the best places for large solar projects will help provide the tools we need to keep building renewables here and across the west - putting Americans to work and protecting conservation values," said Bill Ritter, director of the Center for the New Energy Economy at Colorado State University and former Governor of Colorado.
"Clean Line Energy is pleased to see the Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement moving forward," said Jimmy Glotfelty, executive vice president of Clean Line Energy. "We believe that this collaboration is a step in the right direction that will lead to building solar energy transparently and responsibly in the West, ultimately resulting in a cleaner energy economy."
"The need for significant quantities of renewable energy has never been greater," said Nancy Pfund, founder and managing partner at DBL Investors. "The Solar Program that will be established through the Solar PEIS issued today holds the promise of using appropriate federal lands to serve the public good, by providing clean energy at scale to power our economy. The Solar PEIS represents the hard work and dedication of the BLM, the Departments of Energy and Interior, and many environmental and renewable energy stakeholders, all of whom recognize the great importance of renewable energy to our future and who promote the use of our federal lands for this great purpose. I applaud their efforts, and look forward to the realization of the promise of this new solar program for federal lands."
"It's smart business to guide energy development to places where conflicts with nature can be avoided or minimized. Being smart from the start will allow more projects to move ahead, providing good paying jobs while reducing the risk to wildlife and other natural resources," said Jim Lyons, senior director of renewable energy at Defenders of Wildlife. "Balancing our nation's energy production by increasing solar, wind and geothermal sources will strengthen our economy, improve energy security and reduce greenhouse gases. This solar energy plan is an important step in that direction."
"This is great news for business across Arizona, particularly here in Greater Phoenix where we host many leading solar companies and research institutions," said Barry Broome, president and CEO of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council. "Large-scale solar energy development on public lands is key to Arizona making the most of its natural assets - our abundant land and sunshine - and to getting our state economy on a growing, sustainable track."
"The Department of the Interior has taken an enormous step forward in establishing a plan for rapid, utility-scale development of Arizona's solar resources on American lands. Arizona's first solar energy zones are a terrific start - directing development and driving investment in transmission so that planners and developers can work together to build this industry. It is my hope that the success of this program will build upon itself, and that these zones are the first of many low conflict sites we can work together to identify for renewable energy development," said Kris Mayes, former Arizona Corporation Commissioner and professor of law at Arizona State University.
"The release of the final Solar PEIS marks the beginning of a new era for how energy can be developed on our public lands for both people and nature," said Michael Powelson, director of Energy Programs at The Nature Conservancy. "The Bureau of Land Management should be applauded for taking a giant step forward on developing the structure and substance of a mitigation program, which avoids high priority conservation areas and ensures all impacts are addressed."
"Pacific Gas and Electric Company delivers some of the nation's cleanest electric power. More than half of the electricity we deliver to our customers comes from sources that are clean and/or emit no greenhouse gases. This includes a growing portfolio of solar energy, which we project will contribute about forty percent of our total Renewables Portfolio Standard-eligible power deliveries in 2020," said Fong Wan, senior vice president, Energy Procurement for Pacific Gas & Electric. "We commend the Department of the Interior for its thoughtful and collaborative approach to developing the nation's first solar energy plan that aims to increase the certainty around solar project development, while protecting sensitive habitat and wildlife - two goals which PG&E strongly supports. We look forward to reviewing the final full report."
"This Administration's design for solar development on public lands is based on sound principles, particularly by focusing projects in locations with the lowest impacts on wildlife habitat, lands and water," said Barbara Boyle, senior campaign representative at the Sierra Club. "Limiting projects to low impact zones will also reduce the financial and natural resource costs of electrical transmission. We look forward to reviewing this plan and providing input to the Department of Interior so it will be implemented on our public lands with the strongest possible stewardship principles."
"California's renewable energy goals are among the most ambitious in the nation. In support of these goals, Southern California Edison procures more energy from renewable resources than any other utility in the U.S." said Nino Mascolo, manager of government lands and forestry for Southern California Edison Company. "However, we continue to experience challenges related to the permitting and siting of transmission infrastructure interconnecting with renewable energy projects. The Solar PEIS seeks to address these issues. SCE looks forward to reviewing the final solar energy development PEIS, which we understand is intended to streamline the approval of solar energy projects and the necessary transmission system infrastructure to support such generation."
"The release of the Solar PEIS represents a significant step for renewable energy development on public lands, helping in the fight against climate change while building a stronger clean energy economy," said Jim Baak, director of policy for utility scale solar at Vote Solar. "Though work remains to refine the plan, we look forward to continued collaboration with DOI, DOE, conservation partners and private industry to chart the best path forward for harnessing homegrown clean energy on federally managed lands in an environmentally responsible way."
"As America moves towards a clean energy future it is paramount that we balance energy development with the dire need to protect our last remaining wildlands," said Chase Huntley, clean energy policy director at The Wilderness Society. "The Interior Department's strong leadership puts smart planning at the forefront. This is the quickest route to meeting the renewables targets set by Congress consistent with protecting our dwindling undeveloped wildlands."
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular