May, 13 2010, 11:10am EDT
Starbucks, Note: Most in Poll, Particularly Women, Don't Want Guns in Stores
A solid majority of Americans favor Starbucks and other retail
establishments establishing strict "no guns" policies for their retail
premises. The numbers are dramatically more pronounced among women who
say the current policy allowing guns makes them fear for their safety.
This data comes from a new poll conducted for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
WASHINGTON
A solid majority of Americans favor Starbucks and other retail
establishments establishing strict "no guns" policies for their retail
premises. The numbers are dramatically more pronounced among women who
say the current policy allowing guns makes them fear for their safety.
This data comes from a new poll conducted for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Details of the Starbucks related polling were released today in Seattle in partnership with Washington Ceasefire.
"Retailers - especially Starbucks - who allow guns in stores risk losing business," said Celinda Lake, President of Lake Research Partners, which conducted the national poll of 600 registered voters April 26-28.
Fifty-six
percent of those polled want Starbucks to adopt a "no guns" policy on
their premises while only 31 percent opposed such a policy. Of those
who support a "no guns" policy, 42 percent were strongly in favor.
Among
women, the results of the poll should be viewed as alarming for
Starbucks. Sixty-three percent of women favor Starbucks adopting a "no
guns" policy for their premises, including 69 percent of Democratic
women and 60 percent of rural women.
A full 47 percent of
women - and 57 percent of women who identify themselves as Democrats,
54 percent of older women and 52 percent of women of color - said they
were less likely to go to Starbucks because of the policy. About a
third of women (32 percent) said they were "much less likely" to go to
Starbucks because of the policy.
Among those polled, 37
percent are less likely to go to a Starbucks because of the chain's
current policy allowing the open carry of firearms, with only 15
percent more likely to go to Starbucks. Forty-six percent of
respondents said it would make no difference - but this includes people
who don't go to Starbucks, or don't even drink coffee.
"When
it comes to guns in its stores, Starbucks needs to wake up and smell
the coffee," said Dennis Henigan, Vice President for Law and Policy at
the Brady Center. "The public does not support the company's policy of
allowing guns in its stores and the feeling is especially strong among
women. When a third of women say that its gun-friendly policy makes
them 'much less likely' to visit Starbucks, the company is risking the
loss of a huge part of its market."
"These numbers validate
our original thinking that Starbucks' failure to stand up to the gun
groups is bad for business," said Ralph Fascitelli, President of the
Board of Washington Ceasefire. "Their timid response on this issue has
been disappointing to say the least."
Even gun owners support
a "no guns" policy for Starbucks. Forty-eight percent of gun owners
want Starbucks to prohibit guns, while 37 percent oppose such a
policy. Urban respondents favor a no guns policy by 27 points,
suburban respondents by 30 points, and even rural residents prefer it
by 18 points.
The poll carries a margin of error of plus or minus four percent. Among the findings:
*
Republicans favor Starbucks barring guns 50-37; political independents
want a "no guns" policy at Starbucks 55-30; men favor a "no guns"
policy 48-34; rural residents favor "no guns" 52-33 and non-college
graduates favor a "no guns" policy at Starbucks 56-30.
* Fully
49 percent of non-gun owners and 47 percent of older Americans say they
are less likely to go to Starbucks because of the policy allowing guns.
And 65 percent of people who don't own a gun want Starbucks to change
its policy.
Yesterday, the Brady Center released additional information from the poll,
showing that more Americans feel unsafe knowing people can carry guns
openly in public than feel safer - and a third feel much less safe with
that knowledge. Half of those polled said that the open carrying of
guns in public make them feel less safe, with 31 percent saying they
feel much less safe. And 63 percent of women say open carry make them
feel less safe.
Paul Helmke, the Brady President, is
scheduled to speak to news media in Charlotte, North Carolina tomorrow
(Friday, May 14), the site of the National Rifle Association annual
meeting featuring speakers including Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.
The time and location of that press briefing will be announced
separately.
A broader set of the polling data is available at www.BradyCenter.org, and more will be added to the website Friday after the Charlotte, N.C. press briefing.
The
controversy about the open carrying of firearms began early this year
when groups of gun activists began gathering at coffee houses and
restaurants - primarily in California, and including Starbucks
locations - with openly visible guns strapped to their hips. While
some retail chains, including California Pizza Kitchen and Peet's
Coffee and Tea, responded by announcing firm "no guns" policies,
Starbucks officials said they would allow guns in the company's stores.
The Brady Campaign launched a petition online in February, in partnership with CREDO Action,
asking Americans to urge Starbucks to bar guns from its stores. So far
nearly 36,000 have signed. The Brady Campaign has also posted videos
related to the Starbucks issue on its YouTube page. View them at www.youtube.com/bradycampaign#p/a/u/0/aStG6cWyF2Y.
More information about "open carry," including which states allow it, is at www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/gunlobbybacked/opencarryguns.
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular