

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A solid majority of Americans favor Starbucks and other retail
establishments establishing strict "no guns" policies for their retail
premises. The numbers are dramatically more pronounced among women who
say the current policy allowing guns makes them fear for their safety.
This data comes from a new poll conducted for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
A solid majority of Americans favor Starbucks and other retail
establishments establishing strict "no guns" policies for their retail
premises. The numbers are dramatically more pronounced among women who
say the current policy allowing guns makes them fear for their safety.
This data comes from a new poll conducted for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Details of the Starbucks related polling were released today in Seattle in partnership with Washington Ceasefire.
"Retailers - especially Starbucks - who allow guns in stores risk losing business," said Celinda Lake, President of Lake Research Partners, which conducted the national poll of 600 registered voters April 26-28.
Fifty-six
percent of those polled want Starbucks to adopt a "no guns" policy on
their premises while only 31 percent opposed such a policy. Of those
who support a "no guns" policy, 42 percent were strongly in favor.
Among
women, the results of the poll should be viewed as alarming for
Starbucks. Sixty-three percent of women favor Starbucks adopting a "no
guns" policy for their premises, including 69 percent of Democratic
women and 60 percent of rural women.
A full 47 percent of
women - and 57 percent of women who identify themselves as Democrats,
54 percent of older women and 52 percent of women of color - said they
were less likely to go to Starbucks because of the policy. About a
third of women (32 percent) said they were "much less likely" to go to
Starbucks because of the policy.
Among those polled, 37
percent are less likely to go to a Starbucks because of the chain's
current policy allowing the open carry of firearms, with only 15
percent more likely to go to Starbucks. Forty-six percent of
respondents said it would make no difference - but this includes people
who don't go to Starbucks, or don't even drink coffee.
"When
it comes to guns in its stores, Starbucks needs to wake up and smell
the coffee," said Dennis Henigan, Vice President for Law and Policy at
the Brady Center. "The public does not support the company's policy of
allowing guns in its stores and the feeling is especially strong among
women. When a third of women say that its gun-friendly policy makes
them 'much less likely' to visit Starbucks, the company is risking the
loss of a huge part of its market."
"These numbers validate
our original thinking that Starbucks' failure to stand up to the gun
groups is bad for business," said Ralph Fascitelli, President of the
Board of Washington Ceasefire. "Their timid response on this issue has
been disappointing to say the least."
Even gun owners support
a "no guns" policy for Starbucks. Forty-eight percent of gun owners
want Starbucks to prohibit guns, while 37 percent oppose such a
policy. Urban respondents favor a no guns policy by 27 points,
suburban respondents by 30 points, and even rural residents prefer it
by 18 points.
The poll carries a margin of error of plus or minus four percent. Among the findings:
*
Republicans favor Starbucks barring guns 50-37; political independents
want a "no guns" policy at Starbucks 55-30; men favor a "no guns"
policy 48-34; rural residents favor "no guns" 52-33 and non-college
graduates favor a "no guns" policy at Starbucks 56-30.
* Fully
49 percent of non-gun owners and 47 percent of older Americans say they
are less likely to go to Starbucks because of the policy allowing guns.
And 65 percent of people who don't own a gun want Starbucks to change
its policy.
Yesterday, the Brady Center released additional information from the poll,
showing that more Americans feel unsafe knowing people can carry guns
openly in public than feel safer - and a third feel much less safe with
that knowledge. Half of those polled said that the open carrying of
guns in public make them feel less safe, with 31 percent saying they
feel much less safe. And 63 percent of women say open carry make them
feel less safe.
Paul Helmke, the Brady President, is
scheduled to speak to news media in Charlotte, North Carolina tomorrow
(Friday, May 14), the site of the National Rifle Association annual
meeting featuring speakers including Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.
The time and location of that press briefing will be announced
separately.
A broader set of the polling data is available at www.BradyCenter.org, and more will be added to the website Friday after the Charlotte, N.C. press briefing.
The
controversy about the open carrying of firearms began early this year
when groups of gun activists began gathering at coffee houses and
restaurants - primarily in California, and including Starbucks
locations - with openly visible guns strapped to their hips. While
some retail chains, including California Pizza Kitchen and Peet's
Coffee and Tea, responded by announcing firm "no guns" policies,
Starbucks officials said they would allow guns in the company's stores.
The Brady Campaign launched a petition online in February, in partnership with CREDO Action,
asking Americans to urge Starbucks to bar guns from its stores. So far
nearly 36,000 have signed. The Brady Campaign has also posted videos
related to the Starbucks issue on its YouTube page. View them at www.youtube.com/bradycampaign#p/a/u/0/aStG6cWyF2Y.
More information about "open carry," including which states allow it, is at www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/gunlobbybacked/opencarryguns.
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
The vice president attended the opening ceremony in Milan, where people also protested the presence of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Winter Olympics.
US Vice President JD Vance was booed at the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games in Italy on Friday, but at least one widely shared video of it was swiftly scrubbed from X, the social media platform controlled by former Trump administration adviser Elon Musk.
Acyn Torabi, or @Acyn, "is an industrialized viral-video machine," the Washington Post explained last year, "grabbing the most eye-catching moments from press conferences and TV news panels, packaging them within seconds into quick highlights, and pushing them to his million followers across X and Bluesky dozens of times a day."
In this case, Torabi, who's now senior digital editor at MeidasTouch, reshared a video of the vice president and his wife, Usha Vance, being booed that was initially posted by filmmaker Mick Gzowski.
However, the video was shortly taken down and replaced with the text, "This media has been disabled in response to a report by the copyright owner."
Noting the development, Torabi, said: "No one should have a copyright on Vance being booed. It belongs to the world."
As of press time, the footage is still circulating online thanks to other X accounts and across other platforms—including a video shared on Bluesky by MeidasTouch editor in chief Ron Filipkowski.
JD Vance loudly booed at the Winter Olympics today.
[image or embed]
— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) February 6, 2026 at 4:25 PM
The Vances' unfriendly welcome came after a Friday protest in the streets of Milan over the presence of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Winter Olympics, with some participants waving "FCK ICE" signs.
The Trump administration has said the ICE agents—whose agency is under fire for its treatment of people across the United States as part of the president's mass deportation agenda—are helping to provide security for the vice president and other US delegation members, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
"It’s hard to see how Making America Healthy Again was anything but another broken campaign promise," said one critic.
The US Environmental Protection Agency on Friday announced its anticipated reapproval of dicamba for two key crops, a move which, given the pesticide's proven health risks, places the EPA at apparent odds with President Donald Trump's vow to "Make America Healthy Again."
“The industry cronies at the EPA just approved a pesticide that drifts away from application sites for miles and poisons everything it touches,” Nathan Donley, environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in response to Friday's announcement.
“With the EPA taking aggressive pro-pesticide industry actions like this, it’s hard to see how Making America Healthy Again was anything but another broken campaign promise," Donley added. "When push comes to shove, this administration is willing to bend over backward to appease the pesticide industry, regardless of the consequences to public health or the environment.”
The EPA said in a statement that the agency "established the strongest protections in agency history for over-the-top (OTT) dicamba application on dicamba-tolerant cotton and soybean crops," and that "this decision responds directly to the strong advocacy of America's cotton and soybean farmers."
While scientific studies have linked exposure to high levels of dicamba to increased risk of cancer and hypothyroidism and the European Union has classified dicamba as a category II suspected endocrine disruptor, the EPA said Friday that "when applied according to the new label instructions," it "found no unreasonable risk to human health and the environment from OTT dicamba use."
This is the third time the EPA has approved dicamba for OTT use. On both prior occasions, federal courts blocked the approvals, citing underestimation of the risk of chemical drift that could harm neighboring farms.
The agency highlighted new restrictions on dicamba use it said will reduce risk of drift.
"EPA recognizes that previous drift issues created legitimate concerns, and designed these new label restrictions to directly address them, including cutting the amount of dicamba that can be used annually in half, doubling required safety agents, requiring conservation practices to protect endangered species, and restricting applications during high temperatures when exposure and volatility risks increase," it said.
Critics noted that the EPA during the Biden administration published a report revealing that during Trump’s first term, senior administration officials intentionally excluded scientific evidence of dicamba-related hazards, including the risk of widespread drift damage, prior to a previous reapproval.
Others pointed to the recent appointment of former American Soybean Associate lobbyist and dicamba advocate Kyle Kunkler as the EPA's pesticides chief.
"Kunkler works under two former lobbyists for the American Chemistry Council, Nancy Beck and Lynn Dekleva, who are now overseen by a fourth industry lobbyist, Doug Troutman, who was recently confirmed to lead the chemicals office following endorsement by the chemical council," the Center for Food Safety (CFS) noted Friday.
The Trump EPA has also come under fire for promoting the alleged safety of atrazine, a herbicide that the World Health Organization says probably causes cancer, and for pushing the US Supreme Court to shield Bayer, which makes the likely carcinogenic weedkiller Roundup, from thousands of lawsuits.
CFS science director Bill Freese said that “the Trump administration’s hostility to farmers and rural America knows no bounds."
“Dicamba drift damage threatens farmers’ livelihoods and tears apart rural communities," Freese added. "And these are farmers and communities already reeling from Trump’s [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raids on farmworkers, the trade war shutdown of soybean exports to China, and Trump’s bailout of Argentina, whose farmers are selling soybeans to the Chinese—soybeans China used to buy from American growers.”
"This is not a decent man. This is not an honest man. He openly takes bribes. He's pathetic as a president."
As polling shows Americans are increasingly unhappy with President Donald Trump's authoritarianism, economy, and overall performance during his first year back in power, some of his voters are speaking out about feeling "swindled" and having buyer's remorse, including one who called into C-SPAN on Friday.
A man identified only as "John in New Mexico, Republican," called in to "Washington Journal" after President Donald Trump posted a video on his Truth Social account with the heads of former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama edited onto the bodies of apes—which was widely condemned, including by some congressional Republicans, before it was taken down.
"I voted for the president—supported him—but I really want to apologize," the caller told anchor Greta Brawner. "I mean, I'm looking at this awful picture of the Obamas. What an embarrassment to our country. All this man does is tell lies. He is not worthy of the presidency."
During Trump's first term, the Washington Post tallied at least 30,573 "false or misleading claims." The trend has continued since his 2020 loss—about which he's often lied—and into his second term. Last year, Glenn Kessler, who was editor and chief writer of the Post's "Fact Checker," found inaccuracies in 32 claims Trump made in just one interview marking 100 days back in office.
The C-SPAN caller on Friday also ripped Trump's relationships with corporate leaders and deadly immigration operations, saying: "He takes bribes, blatantly, and now he's being a racist, blatantly. They were supposed to deport the dangerous criminals. They were not supposed to go after small children, storm schools, bring terror upon the little kids and the women and children. Not just the immigrants in the school, all the children are scared."
"This is not a decent man. This is not an honest man. He openly takes bribes. He's pathetic as a president. And I just want to apologize to everybody in the country for supporting this rotten, rotten man," the caller said, confirming that he voted for Trump in all three of the most recent presidential elections. He also discussed the difficulty of finding jobs and primary care physicians in New Mexico.
Common Dreams has not independently verified the caller's personal details. C-SPAN's call-in feature dates back to 1980, and "Washington Journal" has been the network's flagship program for such calls since 1995. This particular call quickly caught the attention of political observers, as Trump and others in his administration contend with growing outrage over US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions and mounting allegations of corruption and conflicts of interest.
"Wow, it's finally happening!" wrote political commentator Ed Krassenstein on X. "Republicans are waking up to the con that Donald Trump is. Listen to this Trump voter who called into C-SPAN to apologize to the American people for voting for Trump. He tears Trump apart for his racist meme about the Obamas, as well as his inhumane ICE raids and his corruption."
The post about the Obamas was later removed. As Reuters reported:
"A White House staffer erroneously made the post," a White House official said. "It has been taken down."
A Trump adviser said the president had not seen the video before it was posted late on Thursday and ordered it taken down once he had.
Both officials declined to be named. The White House did not respond to a question about the staffer's identity. Only a few senior aides have direct access to Trump's social media account, according to the Trump adviser.
MS NOW anchor Katy Tur played a recording of the C-SPAN caller on her network Friday and noted that "this man isn't the only one who appears to be over it. That frustration is being borne out in poll after poll after poll. The numbers all say the same thing. There are no outliers here."
"The president is too focused on foreign policy, too focused on his 2020 conspiracy theory that he won the election when he did not. Too cruel to migrants and children. Too focused on enriching himself. Not focused enough, by the way, on the economy. Not successful in his big promise of lowering prices. Unethical," she summarized.
Tur also pointed to the recent upset in a special election for a deep-red Texas Senate district—Democrat Taylor Rehmet defeated Trump-endorsed Leigh Wambsganss—and new Axios reporting that Republicans are worried about losing both chambers of Congress, which they currently control by narro in the midterm elections this November.
In the face of such fears, Trump has bullied some Republican-controlled states to gerrymander their political maps and declared Monday that the Republican Party should "nationalize the voting" in the United States, in defiance of the Constitution. The US Department of Justice is also fighting to acquire voter data from states, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation is summoning state election officials for a February 25 conference to discuss "preparations" for the midterms.