

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Two coalitions of groups--some overlapping--sent letters to Congress and President Joe Biden on Wednesday demanding an end to forever wars. (Photo: Program Executive Office Soldier/Flickr/cc)
Thanks to a pair of letters on Wednesday, Congress and President Joe Biden faced fresh pressure to end "forever wars" abroad and pursue a U.S. foreign policy that is "consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Regardless of your political persuasion, it should be clear that the United States should not be able to wage endless war around the globe, largely hidden from the public eye, without democratic debate," said Win Without War advocacy director Erica Fein. "The U.S. public has long agreed that it is time to end our endless wars. With a new Congress and administration, we finally have the chance to do so."
Win Without War and a dozen other organizations--Bridges Faith Initiative, Concerned Veterans for America, Defense Priorities Initiative, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), Human Rights First, National Religious Campaign Against Torture, Peace Action, Project On Government Oversight, Protect Democracy, Secure Families Initiative, September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, and Women's Action for New Directions--backed both letters.
"The war-based approach to counterterrorism of the last two decades has cost $6.4 trillion, resulted in the deaths of over 335,000 civilians, and displaced a further 37 million," noted Heather Brandon-Smith, FCNL's legislative director for militarism and human rights. She expressed hope that Biden will work with Congress to scrap the laws authorizing military force, shift U.S. policy "away from expanding global militarism, and invest in robust, effective non-military tools to properly address threats to U.S. security at home and abroad."
The letter (pdf) to lawmakers was signed by an ideologically diverse coalition of 25 groups who want Congress to "reorient U.S. foreign policy away from the unaccountable, interventionist approach we've seen for nearly two decades" by sunsetting the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) and repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF.
Enacted in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, "the 2001 AUMF has served as a blank check for endless, global war under multiple presidents," the letter notes, pointing out that "three successive presidents have used the law to unilaterally expand the nation's use of military force."
The 2002 Iraq AUMF, the letter further notes, "is not required for any ongoing military activities, as the executive branch relies on an overly broad interpretation of the 2001 AUMF for operations against ISIS, al Qaeda, and other groups."
"However, both the Obama and Trump administrations expanded their interpretation of the scope of the 2002 Iraq AUMF beyond congressional intent," the coalition adds. "Most recently, the Trump administration cited it as a legal basis for the targeted killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, an action clearly unrelated to the original scope of the authorization. Retaining this law renders it susceptible to further abuse."
Emphasizing that Biden "has stated a desire to end the forever wars," the groups urge Congress not only to ditch both of those AUMFs but also to avoid expediting a new one--demanding public debate about "whether military force is both necessary and appropriate for addressing current security challenges and what, if any, new legal authority may be necessary."
The letter specifically urges lawmakers to support legislation from Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) to sunset the 2001 AUMF and repeal the 2002 Iraq AUMF. Lee--the only member of Congress to vote against the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, which led to the longest-ever U.S. war--reiterated her commitment to those goals on Twitter:
The letter (pdf) to Biden, signed by 23 groups, praises him for "wisely" committing to ending "endless wars" as a candidate and calls on him to deliver on that promise.
"Now, as president, you have the authority, and responsibility, to rethink and reshape the United States' approach to national and human security based on a realistic assessment of challenges, threats, and priorities; sound strategy; and clear objectives," the letter says. "And you have an obligation to ensure that U.S. policy and practice are consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Continuing down the path of endless war is not only unpopular and harmful, it is also unwise and unnecessary," the letter continues. "The United States has a robust array of diplomatic, law enforcement, peacebuilding, development, and other resources to mitigate actual security concerns abroad and at home. The United States need not, therefore, remain in this harmful, counterproductive, and costly state."
The groups lay out specific steps that Biden can take to "end the cycle of endless war of the last two decades":
"One of the primary reasons we find ourselves in 'forever wars' is because Congress has abdicated its responsibility in matters of war and peace," said Nate Anderson, executive director for Concerned Veterans for America. "If President Biden is serious about his commitment to ending our forever wars, his administration should wholeheartedly support this bipartisan effort to repeal the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Thanks to a pair of letters on Wednesday, Congress and President Joe Biden faced fresh pressure to end "forever wars" abroad and pursue a U.S. foreign policy that is "consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Regardless of your political persuasion, it should be clear that the United States should not be able to wage endless war around the globe, largely hidden from the public eye, without democratic debate," said Win Without War advocacy director Erica Fein. "The U.S. public has long agreed that it is time to end our endless wars. With a new Congress and administration, we finally have the chance to do so."
Win Without War and a dozen other organizations--Bridges Faith Initiative, Concerned Veterans for America, Defense Priorities Initiative, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), Human Rights First, National Religious Campaign Against Torture, Peace Action, Project On Government Oversight, Protect Democracy, Secure Families Initiative, September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, and Women's Action for New Directions--backed both letters.
"The war-based approach to counterterrorism of the last two decades has cost $6.4 trillion, resulted in the deaths of over 335,000 civilians, and displaced a further 37 million," noted Heather Brandon-Smith, FCNL's legislative director for militarism and human rights. She expressed hope that Biden will work with Congress to scrap the laws authorizing military force, shift U.S. policy "away from expanding global militarism, and invest in robust, effective non-military tools to properly address threats to U.S. security at home and abroad."
The letter (pdf) to lawmakers was signed by an ideologically diverse coalition of 25 groups who want Congress to "reorient U.S. foreign policy away from the unaccountable, interventionist approach we've seen for nearly two decades" by sunsetting the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) and repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF.
Enacted in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, "the 2001 AUMF has served as a blank check for endless, global war under multiple presidents," the letter notes, pointing out that "three successive presidents have used the law to unilaterally expand the nation's use of military force."
The 2002 Iraq AUMF, the letter further notes, "is not required for any ongoing military activities, as the executive branch relies on an overly broad interpretation of the 2001 AUMF for operations against ISIS, al Qaeda, and other groups."
"However, both the Obama and Trump administrations expanded their interpretation of the scope of the 2002 Iraq AUMF beyond congressional intent," the coalition adds. "Most recently, the Trump administration cited it as a legal basis for the targeted killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, an action clearly unrelated to the original scope of the authorization. Retaining this law renders it susceptible to further abuse."
Emphasizing that Biden "has stated a desire to end the forever wars," the groups urge Congress not only to ditch both of those AUMFs but also to avoid expediting a new one--demanding public debate about "whether military force is both necessary and appropriate for addressing current security challenges and what, if any, new legal authority may be necessary."
The letter specifically urges lawmakers to support legislation from Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) to sunset the 2001 AUMF and repeal the 2002 Iraq AUMF. Lee--the only member of Congress to vote against the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, which led to the longest-ever U.S. war--reiterated her commitment to those goals on Twitter:
The letter (pdf) to Biden, signed by 23 groups, praises him for "wisely" committing to ending "endless wars" as a candidate and calls on him to deliver on that promise.
"Now, as president, you have the authority, and responsibility, to rethink and reshape the United States' approach to national and human security based on a realistic assessment of challenges, threats, and priorities; sound strategy; and clear objectives," the letter says. "And you have an obligation to ensure that U.S. policy and practice are consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Continuing down the path of endless war is not only unpopular and harmful, it is also unwise and unnecessary," the letter continues. "The United States has a robust array of diplomatic, law enforcement, peacebuilding, development, and other resources to mitigate actual security concerns abroad and at home. The United States need not, therefore, remain in this harmful, counterproductive, and costly state."
The groups lay out specific steps that Biden can take to "end the cycle of endless war of the last two decades":
"One of the primary reasons we find ourselves in 'forever wars' is because Congress has abdicated its responsibility in matters of war and peace," said Nate Anderson, executive director for Concerned Veterans for America. "If President Biden is serious about his commitment to ending our forever wars, his administration should wholeheartedly support this bipartisan effort to repeal the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs."
Thanks to a pair of letters on Wednesday, Congress and President Joe Biden faced fresh pressure to end "forever wars" abroad and pursue a U.S. foreign policy that is "consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Regardless of your political persuasion, it should be clear that the United States should not be able to wage endless war around the globe, largely hidden from the public eye, without democratic debate," said Win Without War advocacy director Erica Fein. "The U.S. public has long agreed that it is time to end our endless wars. With a new Congress and administration, we finally have the chance to do so."
Win Without War and a dozen other organizations--Bridges Faith Initiative, Concerned Veterans for America, Defense Priorities Initiative, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), Human Rights First, National Religious Campaign Against Torture, Peace Action, Project On Government Oversight, Protect Democracy, Secure Families Initiative, September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, and Women's Action for New Directions--backed both letters.
"The war-based approach to counterterrorism of the last two decades has cost $6.4 trillion, resulted in the deaths of over 335,000 civilians, and displaced a further 37 million," noted Heather Brandon-Smith, FCNL's legislative director for militarism and human rights. She expressed hope that Biden will work with Congress to scrap the laws authorizing military force, shift U.S. policy "away from expanding global militarism, and invest in robust, effective non-military tools to properly address threats to U.S. security at home and abroad."
The letter (pdf) to lawmakers was signed by an ideologically diverse coalition of 25 groups who want Congress to "reorient U.S. foreign policy away from the unaccountable, interventionist approach we've seen for nearly two decades" by sunsetting the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) and repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF.
Enacted in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, "the 2001 AUMF has served as a blank check for endless, global war under multiple presidents," the letter notes, pointing out that "three successive presidents have used the law to unilaterally expand the nation's use of military force."
The 2002 Iraq AUMF, the letter further notes, "is not required for any ongoing military activities, as the executive branch relies on an overly broad interpretation of the 2001 AUMF for operations against ISIS, al Qaeda, and other groups."
"However, both the Obama and Trump administrations expanded their interpretation of the scope of the 2002 Iraq AUMF beyond congressional intent," the coalition adds. "Most recently, the Trump administration cited it as a legal basis for the targeted killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, an action clearly unrelated to the original scope of the authorization. Retaining this law renders it susceptible to further abuse."
Emphasizing that Biden "has stated a desire to end the forever wars," the groups urge Congress not only to ditch both of those AUMFs but also to avoid expediting a new one--demanding public debate about "whether military force is both necessary and appropriate for addressing current security challenges and what, if any, new legal authority may be necessary."
The letter specifically urges lawmakers to support legislation from Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) to sunset the 2001 AUMF and repeal the 2002 Iraq AUMF. Lee--the only member of Congress to vote against the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, which led to the longest-ever U.S. war--reiterated her commitment to those goals on Twitter:
The letter (pdf) to Biden, signed by 23 groups, praises him for "wisely" committing to ending "endless wars" as a candidate and calls on him to deliver on that promise.
"Now, as president, you have the authority, and responsibility, to rethink and reshape the United States' approach to national and human security based on a realistic assessment of challenges, threats, and priorities; sound strategy; and clear objectives," the letter says. "And you have an obligation to ensure that U.S. policy and practice are consistent with the nation's legal, human, and civil rights obligations, and the moral authority that the United States has long claimed on these issues."
"Continuing down the path of endless war is not only unpopular and harmful, it is also unwise and unnecessary," the letter continues. "The United States has a robust array of diplomatic, law enforcement, peacebuilding, development, and other resources to mitigate actual security concerns abroad and at home. The United States need not, therefore, remain in this harmful, counterproductive, and costly state."
The groups lay out specific steps that Biden can take to "end the cycle of endless war of the last two decades":
"One of the primary reasons we find ourselves in 'forever wars' is because Congress has abdicated its responsibility in matters of war and peace," said Nate Anderson, executive director for Concerned Veterans for America. "If President Biden is serious about his commitment to ending our forever wars, his administration should wholeheartedly support this bipartisan effort to repeal the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs."