Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
The wife and child of Qassem Elawawde mourn his murder in an Israeli strike last week.
Further

Soul Of My Soul: How Many Dead Palestinians Are Enough

Harrowing headlines still spew from Gaza: They have run out of body bags, 96% of children feel their death is imminent, it is the worst slaughter of civilians in history, everyone is starving. Last week, an "icon of Gazan suffering" was killed, like his toddler grandchildren before him, by "the most evil army on earth.” And a year after the murder of poet and teacher Refaat Alareer,his posthumous writings were released. Its searing, plaintive thesis: "If I must die/Let it bring hope."

Still, hope is scant. The death toll has passed 45,000, two thirds of whom are women and children, many (unfathomably, still) shot in the head and chest by Israeli snipers. Also killed are at least 1,000 health workers, 200 journalists, many hundreds of teachers and writers, a people's torchbearers. Health care and homes are decimated, Israel's brutal blockade has left most Gazans without power or water and starving or at least hungry, nearly 107,000 have been wounded or maimed, untold thousands of dead remain rotting under rubble. Almost a year after international jurists declared Israel is committing genocide - ungodly news an indifferent world met with thunderous silence - Amnesty Internationalhas just released a meticulously detailed, 300-page report confirming that yes, it is. They added, "Month after month, Israel has treated Palestinians in Gaza as a subhuman group unworthy of human rights and dignity."

Despite their ongoing, perversely preposterous claims of trying really hard not to kill civilians, from Oct. 8, 2023 onward Israel's war against a trapped, traumatized population has been "by all measures and standards a 'war' against civilians, a war of depopulation, with no precedents in this century," according to U.K-based watchdog Airwars, which tracks civilian harm from aerial bombardment. During its first month, an Airwars report found harm to civilians "incomparable with any 21st century air campaign," with the rate of killings of thousands of civilians, children and entire families at home three to seven times higher than any earlier documented war. Amidst the vast carnage, 96% of children reportedly feel "their death is imminent" in "one of the most horrifying places in the world to be a child." And from ravaged northern Gaza, Palestinian journalist Hossam Sabath imparted the sickening news, "We have run out of body bags to bury the dead."

In the face of Israel's "voluminous crimes against humanity," the Biden administration isobscenely still sending money and weapons to Israel - to date, a record $17.9 billion, with another $20 billion in killing machines approved in August - despite widespread outrage. More shame: Despite the international Doctors Without Borders regularly mourning and celebrating its lost colleagues - with the dark reminder that, "Nowhere in Gaza is safe" - and a handful of U.S. doctors volunteering in and speaking up for Gaza, America's medical establishment has remained largely, willfully silent about the bloodshed. The prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, having finally apologized for its longstanding silence about the Nazi holocaust in a new “Recognizing Historical Injustices in Medicine series, has not published a single article about the devastation in Gaza; nor has it mentioned the words genocide, blockade or Occupation.

With pro-Zionist repression sweeping even the art world - funding lost, exhibitions cancelled, "sensitivity reviews" of Muslim artists - a group of Palestinians in Palestine and the U.S. have filed the first lawsuit against Biden's State Department for breaking domestic human rights law. The suit accuses State of circumventing the decades-old Leahy Law, which bars U.S. military aid to forces "credibly implicated" in war crimes, to continue funding Israel's genocide despite its "overwhelming record of gross violations of human rights." Arguing the agency has adopted "arbitrary and capricious" standards - "The rules were different for Israel" - the suit charges State with embracing a "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" approach that ignores Israel's countless crimes in defiance of the Leahy Law." For final proof, the suit, backed by multiple former State Department officials, notes that no Israeli unit has ever been deemed ineligible for aid.

America's complicity, it turns out, doesn't stop there. Writing for Drop Site News, two journalists uncovered both a "Ghost Unit" of snipers inside Gaza that's allegedly killed over 100 people - and boasted they set a long-distance record by "neutralizing" a "terrorist" from 1.26 kilometers away - but a U.S, tax-exempt Friends of Paratrooper Sniper Unit 202 that has raised over $300,000 to buy vests, silencers, stands etc "for the overall welfare of soldiers," part of broader Israeli fundraising that includes the $100-million-a-year Friends of the IDF. "Your support allowed us to get my son and his elite sniper unit the most advanced scopes (to) have an advantage over Hamas," wrote the mother of a unit member from Illinois, helping them "to go into battle (and) come home safely." The unit posted her thanks, also three grainy videos of civilian executions with, “When they meet the 202nd battalion, they are going to regret being born.”

Righteous Khaled Nabhan, who last year movingly mourned his granddaughter Reem, 3, as "soul of my soul\u201d; also killed was her brother  Tarek, 5.  On Monday,  Nabhan was also killed. Righteous Khaled Nabhan, who last year movingly mourned his granddaughter Reem, 3, as "soul of my soul,” when she was killed by an Israeli strike that also killed her brother Tarek, 5. On Monday, Nabhan was killed in another strike. Photos from family

Many Gazans, of course, already do. Hossam Shabat, a rare surviving journalist in northern Gaza, documents in grim detail a recent, hours-long "death march," a mass expulsion from Beit Lahia under heavy artillery shelling and gunfire. Shabat, displaced over 20 times while seeing countless colleagues killed before him, describes dust-covered, tear-streaked children running panicked as warplanes roar overhead. When some pleaded for water, the Israeli soldiers corralling them laughed, instead tauntingly pouring water on the ground. When soldiers detained the fathers in the crowd, their kids screamed in terror, clinging to Israeli tanks that could take them away. A 16-year-old girl and her sister, sole survivors of an earlier airstrike that killed 70, walked until the sister was hit and fell, blood pouring from her. When no help came, the girl left her there: "I was screaming, but no one heard me."

Aid workers also chronicle the anguish - many thousands of small orphans left to fend for themselves, children wracked by nightmares reflecting "a mental health catastrophe (of) multigenerational trauma that will endure for decades," weary, gaunt ghosts of adults numbly "waiting for what comes next." "People are waiting, full of agony, holding on to some small hope," says one. "We are dying slowly." Even amidst so much grief and horror, some losses strike especially deep. On Monday, an Israeli airstrike on Nuseirat refugee camp killed Khaled Nabhan, a "righteous" 54-year-old grandfather murdered 14 months after he became "an icon of Gaza's suffering" when he was filmed tearfully kissing goodbye his bloodied, beloved granddaughter Reem, three, calling her "soul of my soul." Reem died in another strike at Nuseirat that also killed her brother Tarek, five; all three were killed by what Omar Suleiman called "the most evil army on earth."

After his grandchildren died, Nabhan, known as "Abu Diaa," became "a one-man relief agency." Despite his pain, he spent the year "spreading hope" to others hungry, hurting, traumatized. He collected tents, toys, food, clothing; he helped rescuers and medics care for injured Gazans, particularly children; he fed stray cats, played with his surviving grandkids, took care of his elderly mother, and worked as a laborer when he could. His son Diaa: "He starved himself to make sure we had enough food.” His daughter Maysa, mother of Reem and Tarek, said it was her father who daily comforted her after their deaths: "He was everything to us. He held this family together...Even when the bombs were falling, he made us feel safe." Seeking solace, many of those bitterly grieving Nabhan's loss prayed that he and Reem would now be reunited "in the realm of souls where the wickedness of this so-called humanity will no longer reach them."

Last week, the anniversary of another painful death was marked with the posthumous release of “If I Must Die,” a collection of poetry and prose by esteemed teacher, writer and mentor Refaat Alareer, killed last Dec. 6 at 46 in a "surgical" airstrike that hit only his sister's apartment where he sheltered with family; the blast also killed his brother, his brother’s son, his sister and her three children. Proceeds from the book of reportage, essays, poems and interviews during the last decade of Alareer's life will go to his surviving family. Published by OR Books, it's "an oral history that reads like an epic poem," a "poetry of witness" serving as "evidence of what occurred," a grim chronicle of Occupation in "granular, human terms" told by "a man of his people" in "writing born of fire" - often in English, to reach a wider audience. It was compiled by student and colleague Yousef Aljamal, who calls Alareer "the giant of the Palestinian narrative."

Born in Shuja’iyya, a neighborhood with a history of fierce resistance to the occupation, Alareer grew up amidst its violence and his grandmother's stories of the Nakba. As a first-grader, he was struck in the head by a stone thrown by an Israeli soldier "smiling ear to ear"; four years later, he was shot by a rubber bullet for throwing stones; over time, he saw relatives killed or maimed. Educated at home and abroad, he taught literature at Gaza's Islamic University, often mentoring young writers; after Israel's brutal response to the peaceful Great March of Return, he became a sort of "peoples historian," editing and contributing to the anthologies Gaza Writes Back and Gaza Unsilenced. He also helped start We Are Not Numbers to chronicle Gazans' collective struggles against dispossession. Always, he believed in the power of storytelling: "As a Palestinian, I have been brought up on stories. It's both selfish and treacherous to keep a story to yourself."

He taught his students Edward Said, Virginia Woolf, The Merchant of Venice; revisiting Robinson Crusoe, he was struck by the likeness of Friday's story to that of Palestinians, told by "a self-appointed, colonial (master) assuming ownership of a land that was not his," and he fought for his people's right to narrate their own experiences and history. Daring to imagine a free Palestine but "chillingly prescient," he saw genocide unfold, his kids go hungry, Gaza become "an "extermination camp." His lastpoemIf I Must Die, to his daughter Shymaa - “If I die/ you must live/ to tell my story...Let it bring hope/ Let it be a tale" - went around the world, especially after Shymaa was killed along with her husband and baby. As "a small measure of justice," Drop Site has been working to publicize Refaat’s book, to "let it fly (like) a kite (and) keep alive hope for a better world." "When will this pass?" Alareer asked as he watched Gaza destroyed. "How many dead Palestinians are enough?" Still, he wrote, "We have no choice but to fight back and tell her stories. For Palestine."

A Gazan man kisses his son, killed in an Israeli assault, good-bye.A Gazan man kisses his son, killed in an Israeli assault, good-bye.SOPA via Getty Images

SEE ALL
The remnants of buildings in Chimney Rock, North Carolina
News

Congressional Report Warns of Climate Threat to US Insurance, Housing Markets

After at least two dozen U.S. disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion during a year that is on track to be the hottest on record, a congressional committee on Monday released a report detailing how the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency poses a "significant threat" to the country's housing and insurance markets.

"Climate-exacerbated disasters, such as wildfires, hurricanes, floods, drought, and excessive heat, are increasing risk and causing damage to homes across the country," states the report from Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee (JEC). "Last year, roughly 70% of Americans reported that their community experienced an extreme weather event."

"In the 1980s, the United States experienced an average of one billion-dollar disaster (adjusted for inflation) every four months; now, these significant disasters occur approximately every three weeks," the document continues. "2023 was the worst year for home insurers since 2000, with losses reaching $15.2 billion—more than twice the losses reported in 2022."

"Rising premiums and this issue of uninsurability could seriously disrupt the housing market and stress state-operated insurance programs, public services, and disaster relief."

The insurance industry is already responding to that stress. The publication highlights that "insurers are pulling out of some states with substantial wildfire or hurricane risk—like California, Arizona, Florida, and North Carolina—leaving some areas 'uninsurable,'" and "in many regions, even if the homeowner can get insurance, the policy covers less than the actual physical climate risks (for example, rising sea levels or more intense wildfires) that their home faces, leaving them 'underinsured.'"

JEC Democratic staff found that last year, "the average U.S. homeowners' insurance rate rose over 11%," and from 2011-21, it soared 44%. Researchers also documented state-by-state jumps for 2020-23. For increases, Florida was the highest ($1,272), followed by Louisiana ($986), the District of Columbia ($971), Colorado ($892), Massachusetts ($855), and Nebraska ($849).

The highest premiums for 2023 were in Florida ($3,547), Nebraska ($3,055), Oklahoma ($2,990), Massachusetts ($2,980), Colorado ($2,972), Hawaii ($2,958), D.C. ($2,867), Louisana ($2,793), Rhode Island ($2,792), and Mississippi ($2,787).

The report ties the rising premiums to "surging" prices for repairs, reinsurers also hiking rates, insurance litigation issues, and rate caps in some states pushing higher costs off to states that regulate the industry less. While JEC Democrats focused on the United States, as Common Dreamsreported last week, the climate threat to the insurance industry is a global problem.

"Rising premiums and this issue of uninsurability could seriously disrupt the housing market and stress state-operated insurance programs, public services, and disaster relief," the new report warns. "Given this rising threat, innovations in climate mitigation and adaptation, insurance options, and disaster relief are essential for protecting Americans and their finances."

The publication points out that "a previous JEC report on climate financial risks discussed other potential solutions like parametric insurance (a supplemental insurance plan that can pay homeowners faster), community-based catastrophe insurance that incentivizes community-level resilience efforts, and attempts to use risk-pooling, data, and AI to better price risk."

The new document also promotes the Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act, introduced by JEC Chair Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) "to address these data needs and study wildfire risk, insurance, and mitigation to help Americans make more informed decisions about the risks to their homes," and the Shelter Act, which "would create a new tax credit, allowing taxpayers to deduct 25% of disaster mitigation expenditures."

The report further recommends improvements to several Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs, including:

  • Expanding the flagship pre-disaster mitigation grant funding available through FEMA's Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program beyond the nearly $3 billion it received in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) to meet growing demand (only 22 states received funding in FY23; although, applications were received from all 50).
  • Making it easier for states to apply for FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which gives funds to states hit by a disaster that they can use to protect against future damage. The Biden-Harris administration recently streamlined the program's application process.
  • Enacting a National Disaster Safety Board (similar to the National Transportation Safety Board), which would provide data-informed recommendations to help communities become more resilient to disasters.
  • Expanding the Community Wildfire Defense Program, created by the BIL.

The JEC publication comes as the country prepares for President-elect Donald Trump to take office next month after running a campaign backed by billionaires and fossil fuel executives and pledging to "drill, baby, drill," which would increase planet-heating pollution as scientists warn of the need for cutting emissions. Republicans will also have control of both chambers of Congress.

Heinrich on Monday called out the GOP for its climate record, saying that "Republicans have denied that climate change is real for over 40 years, and as a result, homeowners are seeing their insurance costs rise."

"Homeowners in New Mexico have seen their premiums increase by $400 over the last three years because of Republicans' refusal to act," he added, citing the 2020-2023 data. "The longer climate deniers keep up this charade, the more expensive things will get."

SEE ALL
Vice President Kamala Harris Speaks At Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority's Boule In Houston
News

Democrats' Working-Class Failures, Analysis Finds, Are 'Why Trump Beat Harris'

Further bolstering the post-election argument that U.S. working-class voters have ditched the Democratic Party because they feel abandoned by Democrats, a Tuesday analysis details why Vice President Kamala Harris lost to Republican President-elect Donald Trump.

The report by Data for Progress, a left-leaning think tank, uses dozens of national surveys of likely voters conducted throughout 2024 to back up assertions that the party needs to improve its messaging and policies targeting working people if Democrats want to win future U.S. elections, after losing the White House and both chambers of Congress last month.

Data for Progress found that before Democratic President Joe Biden passed the torch to Harris this summer following a disastrous debate performance against Trump, "voters were highly concerned about his age, and swing voters overwhelmingly cited it as the main reason they wouldn't vote for Biden."

"Voters were also deeply unsatisfied with Biden's economy," the 40-page report states. "A strong majority perceived the economy as getting worse for people like them, with more than 3 in 4 consistently reporting they were paying more for groceries. Voters blamed Biden more than any other person or group for U.S. economic conditions."

"While voters across party lines strongly supported Biden's populist economic policies, many were not aware that his administration had enacted them," the document details. "When Harris entered the race, her favorability surged, along with Democrats' and Independents' enthusiasm for voting in the election."

However, "on the economy—voters' top issue—Harris struggled to escape Biden's legacy. Half of voters said that Harris would mostly continue the same policies as Biden, leading swing state voters to prefer Trump on handling inflation," Data for Progress explained. This, despite warnings from economic justice advocates and Nobel Prize-winning economists that Harris' plan for the economy was "vastly superior" to the Trump agenda.

"Harris was effective at communicating to voters that she supported increasing taxes on billionaires, but struggled to break through with other aspects of her popular economic agenda," the think tank noted. "Most voters heard only 'a little' or 'nothing at all' about her plans to crack down on corporate price gouging, protect Social Security and Medicare, and lower the price of groceries, prescription drugs, and childcare."

The report on "why Trump beat Harris" also highlights that "beyond the economy, Democrats struggled mightily on immigration and foreign policy, with a surge of border crossings at the end of 2023 and major international conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine damaging trust in Biden and Harris on these issues."

"While Democrats had some success breaking through on their stronger issues—abortion and democracy—they struggled with these issues being less important to voters, and with the fact that many voters were unsure of Trump's support for Project 2025," the document adds, referencing the Heritage Foundation-led playbook crafted for the next Republican president.

Although billionaire-backed Trump is a well-documented liar expected to now implement a series of right-wing Project 2025 policies, the former reality television star has demonstrated an ability to capture attention via traditional press and newer media, launching his Truth Social platform, appearing on various podcasts, and reportedly taking advice from his 18-year-old son about reaching young people.

Data for Progress observed that "while Harris held an advantage with voters who regularly consume political news, those who consume little or no political news—a group that disproportionately consumes content on social media—supported Harris at much lower rates."

As the think tank concluded:

Broadly, these findings indicate that the Democratic Party needs to do far more work to break through to voters—particularly those who are politically disengaged—on the economy. Democrats' economically populist agenda is overwhelmingly popular, but they need to more clearly communicate it to voters and engage in more robust communications. Earlier this year, President Biden declined the traditional pre-Super Bowl interview for the second year in a row, when 123 million Americans tuned in—the most-watched Super Bowl in history. In fact, Biden will leave office having done the fewest number of press conferences among recent presidents. Even when Harris took over the top of the ticket in July, she waited weeks before doing her first major broadcast interview in late August. Democrats need to do the basics of actively communicating their agenda to the American people, including through non-traditional media to reach disengaged voters. Voters crave authenticity and engagement, which they found in Trump.

Democrats also need to more actively demonstrate to voters that they are the party of change. They need to show voters that they are capable of fixing our country's immigration system and foreign conflicts by taking a serious but humane approach to border security and supporting popular solutions to conflicts abroad.

"By branding itself as an active party of economic populism that fights for needed changes for the working class," the group stressed, "the Democratic Party can put itself in a position to regain the support of the voters it lost in 2024."

Echoing that conclusion in a Tuesday statement, Data for Progress executive director Danielle Deiseroth declared that "this report should serve as a clarion call to Democrats who let a billionaire con man outflank them on cost-of-living issues."

"Voters are tired of the status quo, one in which the ultrarich and largest corporations rake in record profits while working families struggle to afford groceries," she said. "If Democrats want to take back Congress, they need to recruit candidates who can buck the unpopular establishment and authentically communicate to the communities they seek to represent."

Progressives in Congress—such as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020; "Squad" members like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.); and Congressional Progressive Caucus leaders, including outgoing Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and incoming Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas)—have long made that same point, but they have been particularly vocal about it after the devastating federal electoral losses in November.

On Tuesday, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) narrowly defeated Ocasio-Cortez to lead Democrats on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee in the next congressional session—a contest that was widely seen as a proxy fight between the party's younger, more progressive faction and the establishment that couldn't win over voters last month.

SEE ALL
Patrick Soon-Shiong
News

'Meddling for MAGA': Billionaire Owner Asks LA Times Editorial Board to Stop Writing About Trump

Patrick Soon-Shiong—the biotech billionaire whose moves as owner of the Los Angeles Times have prompted a wave of resignations and subscription cancellations—is reportedly now asking the paper's editorial board to refrain from publishing pieces about Republican President-elect Donald Trump.

Oliver Darcy's Status newsletter accused Soon-Shiong of "meddling for MAGA" by requesting that Times members of the board and opinion writers, according to an internal memo, "take a break from writing about Trump."

Based on the memo viewed by Darcy, Soon-Shiong has asked editors to send him "the text of every editorial and the name of its writer" prior to publication, prompting staff "concerns about the ability of the board to do its job without fear of retaliation," according to Status.

Darcy wrote that the memo came from staffers who "said they were notifying [executive editor Terry] Tang, who oversees both the newsroom and opinion section, of Soon-Shiong's alarming actions because the newspaper's ethics policy requires employees to report 'anything that might cast a shadow on the Times' reputation.'"

"Glad I already resigned or I would have to do it now."

Responding Wednesday to the Status report, former Times senior legal affairs columnist Harry Litman wrote on social media, "Glad I already resigned or I would have to do it now."

Darcy's newsletter follows reporting last week that Soon-Shiong scuppered a draft editorial criticizing some of Trump's Cabinet nominees, telling editors that it could not run unless accompanied by a piece presenting an opposing view.

Earlier this month, Soon-Shiong said he planned to embed an artificial intelligence-powered "bias meter" in Times articles and editorials.

Soon-Shiong—a surgeon by training—has praised three doctors tapped for Trump's Cabinet. He has also dined with Trump, calling it an "incredible honor."

While Soon-Shiong has owned the Times—for which he paid $500 million as part of a multi-outlet deal—since 2018, the extent of his involvement in the paper's operations made headlines in October after he blocked its editorial board from endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president.

The decision—which Soon-Shiong said was based partly on a desire for more balance in the Times opinion section and partly on Harris' complicity in the U.S.-backed Israeli war on Gaza—prompted the resignation of editorials editor Maria Garza.

Other resignations have followed as "morale in the newsroom has plummeted," according to Darcy.

Litman explained on his Substack following his resignation earlier this month that he does not "want to continue to work for a paper that is appeasing Trump and facilitating his assault on democratic rule for craven reasons."

"My resignation is a protest and visceral reaction against the conduct of the paper's owner, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong," he wrote. "Soon-Shiong has made several moves to force the paper, over the forceful objections of his staff, into a posture more sympathetic to Donald Trump."

Contrasting Soon-Shiong's hands-on leadership style with The Washington Post's multicentibillionaire owner,Chicago Tribune contributor Steve Chapman wrote on social media:

Jeff Bezos: "Nobody ever wrecked the reputation of a respected newspaper as fast as I did."

Patrick Soon-Shiong: "Hold my beer."

The Los Angeles TimestoldThe Guardian that its management team "is currently reviewing the concerns" expressed in the editors' memo.

SEE ALL
Donald Trump and Mike Johnson
News

Free Speech Coalition Vows to Defend Nonprofits From 'Unprecedented' Threat

An alliance of labor unions and advocacy groups launched a new coalition on Tuesday aimed at defending nonprofit organizations from "unprecedented government attacks on free speech," a move that comes amid a Republican-led effort to empower the incoming Trump administration to shutter dissenting organizations.

Americans Against Government Censorship—whose founding members include the AFL-CIO, Oxfam America, Service Employees International Union, and Indivisible—said it was founded to combat the threat posed by bills such as H.R. 9495, which would allow the U.S. Treasury Department to unilaterally strip nonprofits of their tax-exempt status if they're deemed supporters of terrorism.

The legislation, which the ACLU said provides merely an "illusion of due process" for accused groups, represents a potentially existential threat to human rights organizations, news outlets, government watchdogs, and other nonprofits that could be key to uncovering and fighting abuses by the incoming administration.

"This sweeping authority could be weaponized against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum, depending on which party is in power at a given moment," Caitlin Legacki, a spokesperson for the new coalition, said in a statement. "Presenting a strong and united front against political and ideological censorship is the only way to protect Americans' right to stand up for what they believe in under the First Amendment."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration."

The coalition was launched weeks after the U.S. House passed H.R. 9495, with 15 Democrats joining nearly every Republican to push the legislation through the lower chamber.

It appears unlikely that the bill will get a vote in the Senate before the new Congress is sworn in next month, but Republicans could revive the measure once they take control of both chambers and the White House.

On its website, Americans Against Government Censorship warns that "increasingly aggressive activists have been very clear about their intent to use the full force of the federal government to target their enemies and hinder the ability of any opposition to slow or stop their policy agenda—including new efforts to target and weaponize tax status through the IRS."

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is among the Republicans pushing the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of a number of nonprofit groups that support Palestinian rights, including Jewish Voice for Peace and American Muslims for Palestine.

Americans Against Government Censorship emphasized that the powers included in bills such as H.R. 9495 "could be weaponized by any administration against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration," the coalition said. "At any time, this agenda would allow a sitting president—Democratic or Republican—to use their power to punish ideological opponents without fundamental due process."

SEE ALL
Close Gitmo
News

Amnesty Welcomes Release of Uncharged Guantánamo Detainee, Urges Biden to Free Others

Human rights defenders led by Amnesty International on Tuesday welcomed the Pentagon's announcement that a Kenyan man imprisoned in the notorious Guantánamo Bay military prison in Cuba for nearly 18 years without charge or trial has been released and repatriated to Kenya, while imploring U.S. President Joe Biden to transfer other uncharged Gitmo inmates before leaving office next month.

"We welcome the news that Mohammed Abdul Malik Bajabu, who has been indefinitely detained without charge at Guantánamo for more than 17 years, is finally being transferred out of the prison," Daphne Eviatar, director of the Security With Human Rights program at Amnesty International USA, said in a statement. "The U.S. government now has an obligation to ensure that the government of Kenya will respect and protect his human rights."

Twenty-nine men now remain imprisoned at Guantánamo, which became a symbol of deadly torture, extraordinary rendition, illegal indefinite detention, and an allegedly "rigged" military commissions regime during the so-called War on Terror launched after 9/11 by the George W. Bush administration and ongoing to this day.

"Transferring Mohammed Abdul Malik Bajabu is certainly a move in the right direction, but it isn't enough," Eviatar stressed. "We hope to see more transfers in the coming days. Fifteen men remain who have never been charged with any crimes and have long been cleared by U.S. security agencies to leave Guantánamo, some for more than a decade. As a matter of justice, they should be transferred as soon as possible."

"President Biden must transfer these men before he leaves office, or he will continue to bear responsibility for the abhorrent practice of indefinite detention without charge or trial by the U.S. government," Eviatar added. "It has been 23 years; President Biden can, and must, put an end to this now."

SEE ALL