Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

heatwave

Flames surround the drought-stricken Shasta Lake in Lakehead, California on July 2, 2021. (Photo: Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)

"This Was Avoidable," Climate Activists Say About Apocalyptic UN Climate Report

The United Nation's latest climate report says capping global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C target is imperative—and still within reach through immediate, aggressive action.

The United Nations COP 26 climate summit this November was already set to be one of the most important diplomatic gatherings in history, a meeting where world leaders will, without exaggeration, decide the future of life on earth. In a landmark report released Monday by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), some of the world's foremost climate scientists added further urgency to the summit by clarifying that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit), as envisioned in the Paris Agreement signed at the last major climate summit in 2015, is imperative. Temperatures have already risen by 1.1 degrees C; current trends point to a rise of a ruinous 3 degrees C later this century. 

"If [President Joe] Biden really wants to be a world leader on climate, he'll heed this call and pass the boldest reconciliation bill possible. … Anything less … is ignoring science, ignoring the IPCC report, and failing our generation."

The record-shattering heat waves, droughts, fires, and floods that have roiled the planet in recent years are evidence of "widespread, rapid, and intensifying" climate change that is "unprecedented in thousands of years," Ko Barrett, the vice chair of the United Nations IPCC, told journalists on the eve of releasing volume one of the Sixth Global Assessment report. To close followers of climate science, many of the report's findings will be familiar—but there are a few surprises. Above all, the report underscores that a temperature rise of more than 1.5 degrees C above the pre-industrial era risks absolute, perhaps irreversible, catastrophe for people and natural systems worldwide. 

But humans can make an enormous difference through the actions they take in the next 10 years, Barrett added. "It's still possible to forestall many of the most dire impacts, but it requires unprecedented, transformational change: a rapid and immediate reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050," said Barrett, a senior climate adviser at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). "But the idea that there still is a pathway forward, I think, is a point that should give us some hope."

"The bad news is, dangerous climate change has arrived," climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State University told ABC News. "The good news is, we can prevent it from getting worse. The latest science tells us that if we bring our carbon emissions down to zero, the planet stops warming up." Noting that the Biden administration has pledged to cut US emissions by a factor of two by 2030, Mann added that if other countries do the same, "we can prevent the planet from warming beyond a catastrophic level…."

The new IPCC report represents a vindication of climate activists and government officials from the Global South who insisted in 2015 that the Paris Agreement endorse keeping temperature rise "well below" 2 degrees C and preferably to 1.5 degrees C. The United States and most other high-income countries favored a goal of 2 degrees C, a level that today's report warns would be utterly disastrous.

Although 1.5 degrees C of temperature rise will bring significantly worse impacts than those occurring today, the impacts would be dramatically more severe at 2 degrees C and almost inconceivably more punishing if temperatures rise beyond that. Extreme heat waves like the one that broiled North America's Pacific Northwest this summer now occur five times as often as they did historically. But if temperature rise reaches 2 degrees C, such heat waves will occur 14 times as often, scientists concluded. 

Likewise, sea levels have risen faster over the last century than they have "in at least 3,000 years," said Robert Kopp, the director of the Rutgers Institute of Earth, Oceans, and Atmospheric Sciences, leading to "a near doubling in the frequency of coastal flooding since the 1960s…." If emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat trapping gases are unchecked, Kopp added, scientists cannot rule out 2 meters (almost 7 feet) of sea level rise by 2100—enough to put large parts of New York, Washington, Shanghai, Lagos, and countless other coastal cities underwater. But if temperature rise is instead kept "well below 2 degrees C, we're still going to have 2 meters of sea level rise, but it's going to take centuries and possibly millennia," he explained, a much more manageable time scale for adaptation.

One ray of hope emerges from the report's apparent endorsement of a major shift in scientific understanding of the climate challenge. No longer, it seems, do scientists believe there is necessarily a large amount of additional warming "in the pipeline" that is bound to surface no matter how quickly emissions of heat trapping gases end. Instead, if emissions were to end overnight—a hypothetical scenario employed to illuminate policy options—temperature rise would halt within the next two decades, said Kim Cobb, the director of the Global Change Program at Georgia Tech University. Cutting emissions of methane is especially important, the new report finds, because methane is an exceptionally powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas whose elimination would buy extra time to slash emissions of carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas. Thus, if humanity does move aggressively to cut emissions, Cobb added, "the next two decades of global warming could be our last, and [we could] begin cooling globally later this century."

That is the challenge awaiting world leaders at this November's COP 26 summit scheduled to take place in Glasgow, Scotland. Calling the new IPCC report "the starkest warning yet that human behavior is alarmingly accelerating global warming," Alok Sharma, the COP 26 president, told The Observer that "COP 26 is the moment we have to get this right. We can't afford to wait two years, five years, ten years—this is the moment."

"Let's be clear—this was avoidable," Varshini Prakash, the executive director of the Sunrise Movement, said in response to the IPCC report. "Today, I and so many other young people wake up enraged—the IPCC report is apocalyptic, catastrophic, and nothing we haven't been screaming about from the rooftops for years. … If [President Joe] Biden really wants to be a world leader on climate, he'll heed this call and pass the boldest reconciliation bill possible. … Anything less … is ignoring science, ignoring the IPCC report, and failing our generation."


This story is republished here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalistic collaboration—of which Common Dreams is a part—to strengthen coverage of the climate story. ©2020 Covering Climate Now
Mark Hertsgaard

Mark Hertsgaard

Mark Hertsgaard is the environmental correspondent and investigative editor at large at The Nation and a co-founder of Covering Climate Now. He has covered climate change since 1989, reporting from 25 countries and much of the US in his books "Earth Odyssey: Around the World In Search of Our Environmental Future" (1999) and "HOT: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth" (2012),  as well as for various outlets. His website is markhertsgaard.com.

 

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Sunrise Movement Warns of 'Betrayal' as Pelosi Bends Toward Corporate Democrats

"We need Dems to hold the line for a $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill, full stop."

Jake Johnson ·


Progressive Groups Warn Congress Against Including Carbon Tax in Reconciliation Package

"If lawmakers are really concerned about holding the costs of this spending bill, they should get rid of the billions of dollars we waste every year on subsidies to polluters."

Jessica Corbett ·


Opposing His Renomination, Warren Calls Fed Chair Powell 'A Dangerous Man'

"Your record gives me grave concern," Sen. Elizabeth Warren told Jerome Powell. "Over and over, you have acted to make our banking system less safe."

Jake Johnson ·


California Wildfire Victims Lead Calls for Tougher PG&E Criminal Penalties

"The power company is the biggest serial killer in state history, and all it gets is fines?"

Brett Wilkins ·


Progressives Warn Democrats Against Means-Testing Reconciliation Bill to Death

"Raising taxes on the rich is much more efficient than means-testing benefits and accomplishes exactly what the spending hawks claim to be concerned about!"

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo