

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Kristen Monsell, kmonsell@biologicaldiversity.org
The Center for Biological Diversity filed a formal notice of intent today to sue the U.S. Department of the Interior and Bureau of Land Management for failing to protect imperiled polar bears from an oil exploration project in the Western Arctic.
"Every new oil well in the Arctic is another step toward the polar bear's extinction," said Kristen Monsell, a senior attorney at the Center. "Biden should be phasing out oil and gas activity in the Arctic, not flouting key environmental laws to let oil companies search and drill for more oil in this beautiful, increasingly fragile ecosystem."
The project -- 88 Energy's Peregrine Exploration Program -- is a 5-year, nearly year-round oil and gas exploration program. It's located in a portion of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska along the Colville River that's currently free from oil and gas development. The Trump administration approved the project just before leaving office, but the company needs the Biden administration's approval to drill any new wells.
The project involves building snow and ice roads and air strips, near constant air and vehicle traffic, and other drilling-related activity. Noise pollution from these activities can stop polar bears from feeding, disrupt their movements or scare mothers and cubs from their dens. The project will also increase the greenhouse gas emissions driving the species toward extinction.
Today's letter notes that the Endangered Species Act requires Interior to carefully analyze and mitigate these risks before allowing additional activity to proceed. It also argues that Interior is liable under the Endangered Species Act for any disturbance, harm or other impacts to polar bears that result from the project because the oil company has said it will not seek federal permission to disturb or harm polar bears.
Both the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act generally prohibit the killing, harming or harassing of polar bears. The statutes allow the federal government to issue special permits to authorize oil activities to harass polar bears, provided certain standards are met.
With only about 900 bears remaining, the Southern Beaufort Sea population is the most imperiled polar bear population in the world. Scientists have determined that the population cannot sustain any injuries or deaths from oil and gas activities.
Recent studies project that polar bears in Alaska will go extinct within this century -- and as early as mid-century -- unless there are immediate, aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas pollution.
"Polar bears shouldn't have to suffer from yet more noisy, harmful oil drilling," Monsell said. "Letting the oil industry ramp up drilling is also fundamentally inconsistent with addressing the climate crisis. Arctic drilling has got to go."
Today's 60-day notice of intent to sue is required before the Center can file a lawsuit to compel the agencies to comply with the Endangered Species Act. The letter notes that the best way to remedy the agency's violations is to suspend all activities under the exploration program and deny the company's pending application to drill.
The Center for Biological Diversity filed a formal notice of intent today to sue the U.S. Department of the Interior and Bureau of Land Management for failing to protect imperiled polar bears from an oil exploration project in the Western Arctic.
"Every new oil well in the Arctic is another step toward the polar bear's extinction," said Kristen Monsell, a senior attorney at the Center. "Biden should be phasing out oil and gas activity in the Arctic, not flouting key environmental laws to let oil companies search and drill for more oil in this beautiful, increasingly fragile ecosystem."
The project -- 88 Energy's Peregrine Exploration Program -- is a 5-year, nearly year-round oil and gas exploration program. It's located in a portion of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska along the Colville River that's currently free from oil and gas development. The Trump administration approved the project just before leaving office, but the company needs the Biden administration's approval to drill any new wells.
The project involves building snow and ice roads and air strips, near constant air and vehicle traffic, and other drilling-related activity. Noise pollution from these activities can stop polar bears from feeding, disrupt their movements or scare mothers and cubs from their dens. The project will also increase the greenhouse gas emissions driving the species toward extinction.
Today's letter notes that the Endangered Species Act requires Interior to carefully analyze and mitigate these risks before allowing additional activity to proceed. It also argues that Interior is liable under the Endangered Species Act for any disturbance, harm or other impacts to polar bears that result from the project because the oil company has said it will not seek federal permission to disturb or harm polar bears.
Both the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act generally prohibit the killing, harming or harassing of polar bears. The statutes allow the federal government to issue special permits to authorize oil activities to harass polar bears, provided certain standards are met.
With only about 900 bears remaining, the Southern Beaufort Sea population is the most imperiled polar bear population in the world. Scientists have determined that the population cannot sustain any injuries or deaths from oil and gas activities.
Recent studies project that polar bears in Alaska will go extinct within this century -- and as early as mid-century -- unless there are immediate, aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas pollution.
"Polar bears shouldn't have to suffer from yet more noisy, harmful oil drilling," Monsell said. "Letting the oil industry ramp up drilling is also fundamentally inconsistent with addressing the climate crisis. Arctic drilling has got to go."
Today's 60-day notice of intent to sue is required before the Center can file a lawsuit to compel the agencies to comply with the Endangered Species Act. The letter notes that the best way to remedy the agency's violations is to suspend all activities under the exploration program and deny the company's pending application to drill.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252"Recent actions by the Trump administration have further exacerbated an already US-manufactured humanitarian crisis," said Public Services International Inter-America.
The inter-American branch of a global labor federation representing tens of millions of workers issued a statement Monday condemning the Trump administration's intensifying economic assault on Cuba and threats of regime change, calling such actions "war by other means" and violations of international law.
"They are incompatible with peace, the human right to dignity, and the principle of national sovereignty," said Public Services International (PSI) Inter-America as the Trump administration's blockade of oil imports fueled a worsening humanitarian crisis for the island nation, bringing rolling blackouts, straining hospitals, and causing shortages of food and other necessities.
The labor federation said Monday that the Trump administration's policies are an extension of the catastrophic, decades-long economic US blockade on Cuba, "which constitutes a violation of the United Nations Charter and has been condemned year after year by the overwhelming majority of the international community."
"Recent actions by the Trump administration have further exacerbated an already US-manufactured humanitarian crisis," PSI Inter-America said, pointing to the White House's blockade of Venezuelan oil shipments to Cuba and threats of economic retaliation against any country that provides the island nation with fuel.
"These measures deliberately deepen suffering and place lives in danger," the union federation said. "The blockade itself causes avoidable hardship, illness, and death among the Cuban people every year. Its intensification follows months of sanctions, seizures, and interference targeting Venezuelan oil shipments, further depriving Cuba of essential energy supplies."
The federation called on all of its affiliates worldwide and trade unions in the Americas to:
During a news conference on Monday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum condemned the Trump administration's escalating economic warfare against Cuba as "deeply unjust" and vowed to "continue supporting Cuba"—even as her government halted oil shipments to its ally amid the US president's threats.
"You cannot strangle a people in this way," said Sheinbaum, who this past weekend authorized a shipment of more than 800 tons of humanitarian aid to Cuba, including food and other necessities.
"No one can ignore the situation that the Cuban people are currently experiencing because of the sanctions that the United States is imposing in a very unfair manner," the Mexican president added.
"This is a new kind of era of depravity opened up," said the congresswoman. "There was this stated commitment on human rights—that innocent civilians were almost exempt from the rules of war, from blockades."
As the Cuban government announced Monday that the Trump administration's oil blockade on the country would soon leave airlines without jet fuel, US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warned that the international community has become far too accepting of acts of economic warfare that collectively punish an entire population, not just government officials.
Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told Drop Site News reporter Julian Andreone that the stage for the worsened suffering of Cuban people was set in Gaza, where both Republican and Democratic US officials have backed Israel's starvation policy and military assault since October 2023.
"This is what we've seen with Gaza, right, this is a new kind of era of depravity opened up, where there used to be—or there was this stated commitment on human rights—that innocent civilians were almost exempt from the rules of war, from blockades," Ocasio-Cortez said.
🎥 WATCH | Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) reacted to Drop Site News reporting on internal divisions in the Trump administration’s Cuba policy by pointing to Gaza as evidence of a broader collapse in Western human rights norms.
She said the “entire Western world” is looking… pic.twitter.com/SnI4niD8JH
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) February 10, 2026
Cuban people have long been victimized by the US government's decadeslong, illegal trade embargo. But Trump's decision to cut off Cuba's oil supply from Venezuela, which was its largest energy supplier, and threaten to slap tariffs on any country that provides oil to the island nation, has left families facing lengthy blackouts and the threat that Cuba's healthcare system could soon grind to a halt without fuel to keep hospitals running.
Trump has claimed he aims to punish the Cuban government, which he said last month constitutes "an unusual and extraordinary threat" to the US. He accused the country, without evidence, of harboring terrorists. Cuban officials have vehemently condemned the accusations.
Ocasio-Cortez compared Trump's economic attack on Cuba to the catastrophe the US-backed Israeli military has imposed on Gaza since 2023, when it began its assault and humanitarian aid blockade in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel. A "ceasefire" deal was reached in October, but hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by the Israel Defense Forces since then and Israel has continued to block aid.
While persistently claiming Hamas is the target of the assault—which international experts and human rights groups have called a genocide—the Israeli military, with US support, has killed more than 71,000 Palestinians and has bombed homes, schools, hospitals, and other civilian infrastructure.
"What has transpired is that now it's kind of become acceptable that the entire Western world will look the other way as they starve and deprive a people because they find political actors or political regimes in that country to be objectionable," said Ocasio-Cortez. "What we are seeing here is the possible precipice of hospitals running out of fuel... We're talking about innocent children, women that could be put in harm's way."
"It's incumbent upon all of us to defend human rights no matter where they are," she added.
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, agreed with the congresswoman's analysis.
"Gaza was not just a genocide," he said, but was meant to further Israel's goal "to destroy much of international law and the norms around the use of force in order to make increasingly inhumane use of violence and coercion against CIVILIANS permissible."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, added that Ocasio-Cortez was "rightly picking up the banner of a rules-based international consensus" on human rights, which was abandoned by the Biden administration when it gave financial and political support for Israel's assault on Gaza.
Ocasio-Cortez echoed the concerns voiced earlier this week by Pierre-Emmanuel Dupont, an international expert on sanctions law, who told the Cuban storytelling outlet Belly of the Beast that the Trump administration was "posing the risk of imminent humanitarian collapse in relation to the lack of fuel, which may gravely affect basically all human rights of the civilian population there."
“Sanctions should be expected to be limited to officials," said Dupont. "They are not supposed to apply bluntly to the whole population—which they do. They constitute collective punishment to the extent that they hit each and every Cuban citizen irrespective of their relationship with the government or regime.”
"When you're counting the way that costs have gone up for American families over the last year, be sure to include the cost of getting cheated," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
The Trump administration's ongoing effort to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau cost Americans nearly $20 billion in just a year, according to a report released Monday as Democratic lawmakers and campaigners marked the anniversary of the White House's hostile takeover and gutting of the CFPB.
The new report was assembled by Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), an architect and champion of the CFPB. Citing bureau documents, publicly available data, and federal analyses, the report estimates that the Trump administration's mass dismissal of enforcement actions against abusive corporations, failure to distribute settlement payments, rescission of CFPB rules and guidance, and attack on the bureau's Consumer Complaint Program have collectively cost US consumers $19 billion over the past year.
That figure, the report emphasizes, "does not even begin to cover costs Americans could have been scammed out of due to a sidelined CFPB."
“Donald Trump promised to lower costs for Americans ‘On Day One.’ Instead, he is trying to shut down an agency that protects Americans from getting scammed out of their money by big banks and giant corporations,” Warren said in a statement. “As a result, Trump’s attempt to sideline the CFPB has cost families billions of dollars over the last year alone. We're going to keep fighting for the CFPB and against the billionaires who want to get rid of it.”
The report was released to mark one year since Russell Vought, the White House budget chief and acting CFPB director, ordered the bureau to effectively shut down its operations, including rulemaking and investigations into corporate wrongdoing.
Lawmakers have not confirmed Vought—a Project 2025 architect who has been explicit about his desire to kill the CFPB—as bureau chief, but he has remained in the acting director role thanks to White House legal maneuvers. In recent months, Vought has tried to starve the CFPB of funding—an effort that, for now, has been stymied in court.
"We want to put it out," Vought said in an interview late last year, boasting about mass firings that have left the consumer agency skeletal. "We will be successful probably within the next two or three months."
Another ridiculous price tag that Trump is forcing you to pay.
This is YOUR money.
You deserve a government that works for you, not against you and your financial interests. https://t.co/yd6hpYriXw
— Senator Andy Kim (@SenatorAndyKim) February 9, 2026
Prior to the start of President Donald Trump's second White House term, the CFPB had returned around $21 billion to US consumers scammed by banks and other corporations since the bureau's creation in the wake of the Great Recession.
"When you're counting the way that costs have gone up for American families over the last year, be sure to include the cost of getting cheated, because Donald Trump has driven that cost through the roof," Warren said during a rally with fellow Democratic lawmakers and advocates in Washington, DC on Monday.
"We are here today to remind Donald Trump and to remind all those Republicans who support him and enable him, to remind every one of them that they can kick this agency, they can try to hold this agency down, they can try to starve this agency, they can try to tie up the people who work at this agency, but at the end of the day, they will not kill this agency," said Warren. "We will stay in this fight, and we will win."