October, 29 2021, 01:59pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jennifer K. Falcon, Indigenous Environmental Network, jennifer@ienearth.org
Indigenous, Youth, and Climate Activists in Boston Organize March Targeting Liberty Mutual and Chase
Action calls on banks and insurers stop supporting fossil fuel expansion and respect Indigenous rights.
WASHINGTON
As part of the national #FossilFreeFuture day of action, a coalition of youth, Indigenous communities, and climate activists are organizing a march in Boston from insurance giant Liberty Mutual to Wall Street megabank JPMorgan Chase, demanding an immediate end to the insuring and funding of fossil fuel expansion. Dozens of Massachusetts organizations have come together to call out financial institutions for their complicity in the climate crisis and Indigenous rights violations.
The Fossil Free Future: Day of Action event in Boston, MA begins outside Liberty Mutual's global headquarters in Back Bay (175 Berkeley St, Boston, MA 02116) at 3:45pm, where Indigenous leaders will expose the insurance giant's support of rights-violating projects like the Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline, Coastal GasLink fracked gas pipeline, and oil and gas drilling in the Arctic.
"Not only is Liberty Mutual a key-enabler of fossil fuel expansion, the Boston-based insurer has the most ties to the fossil fuel industry with 8 of the 15 directors (57%) having worked in the fossil fuel industry and 6 (43%) holding current leadership roles at fossil fuel companies. Frontline communities don't need Liberty Mutual's brand of incrementalism. We need radical change in policies and leadership," said Jean-Luc Pierite, Board President of the North American Indian Center of Boston.
The group will then march to the Downtown Crossing branch of JPMorgan Chase, where young people plan to deliver a message to Chase executives to stop destroying their futures and respect Indigenous rights.
"JPMorgan Chase is the #1 banker of fossil fuels in the world. Since the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015, Chase has given $317 billion to the fossil fuel industry, funding the corporations that are destroying our future. As young people, we are saying no more. We're taking to the streets to demand Chase stop funding climate destruction," said Grace Yang, a 16-year-old organizer with Fridays For Future.
"A few weeks ago, I joined with thousands of other activists in Washington DC to protest in front of the White House for President Biden to honor his commitments for climate justice he made during the campaign. Today, we're bringing that same energy to the actual financiers of the crisis: Liberty Mutual and Chase Bank. We call on Chase CEO Jamie Dimon to divest in oil and invest in the future," said Reggi Alkiewicz, organizer with the North American Indian Center of Boston.
Days before the world's most important climate change conference, COP26 in Glasgow, pressure is building in Boston and globally on financial institutions to take real climate action and cut the greenwashing.
"As we face unprecedented wildfires and storms caused by decades of reckless, harmful action by fossil fuel companies, the stakes of climate action are ever increasing. Spills in the Pacific, expansion into sacred Indigenous lands, a violent state response against activists, and disinformation campaigns are only some of the atrocities we see. And yet, our governments and leaders are refusing to hold these companies to account. Young people are not going to sit by and let that happen. We're standing together and demanding that all institutions, especially banks and insurers, take bold action immediately and stop funding fossil fuel projects," said Sam Crowley, organizer with Sunrise Boston.
Today's national day of action is kicking off a new youth-led campaign - titled Fossil Free Future - which will go after the financial institutions perpetuating the climate crisis. The Boston event is one of dozens that are taking place nationwide to spotlight Chase, Liberty Mutual, BlackRock, the Federal Reserve, and other major financial institutions.
"Youth activists, Indigenous activists, and all who stand for climate justice are standing together today. Those who've gathered for this march come from different generations and places across the country. We're united in our call for change. Liberty and Chase can't ignore us; we're representatives of something much larger than a single bank or insurance company," said Phoebe Barr, organizer with Fossil Fuel Divest Harvard.
"As we face the challenges of climate change, the Boston climate finance coalition is becoming more diverse, inclusive, and frontline and youth led. We are at an inflection point in our society and will continue to call for a financial system that works for everyone," added Nathan Phillips, Climate Finance Action board director.
Established in 1990 within the United States, IEN was formed by grassroots Indigenous peoples and individuals to address environmental and economic justice issues (EJ). IEN's activities include building the capacity of Indigenous communities and tribal governments to develop mechanisms to protect our sacred sites, land, water, air, natural resources, health of both our people and all living things, and to build economically sustainable communities.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


