

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jess Levin (202) 772-8162
jlevin@mediamatters.org
Today, after Media Matters for America released a comprehensive review of the myths and
falsehoods media
conservatives have pushed in their efforts to prevent a repeal of the Don't
Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) law, a coalition of leading organizations and activists
joined together to issue an open letter to the news media demanding that
reports on DADT remain accurate and fair.
Media Matters' President Eric Burns joins
AMERICAblog's John Aravosis, Courage Campaign's Rick Jacobs, GLAAD's Jarrett T.
Barrios, Human Rights Campaign's Joe Solmonese, Knights Out's Becky Kanis,
National Center for Lesbian Rights' Kate Kendall, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Rea Carey, National
Security Network's Heather Hurlburt, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's Aubrey Sarvis,
Servicemembers United's Alex Nicholson, Truman National Security Project's Rachel Kleinfeld,
VoteVets' Jon Soltz, and Lt. Dan Choi, US Army Infantry Officer
and Arabic Linguist in signing on to the following letter:
Interested Parties:
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has announced he will be the
chief sponsor of legislation to repeal the Don't Ask, Don't Tell law. The
proposed repeal signifies a crucial step forward in the long-overdue process of
allowing gay men and lesbians to serve honestly and proudly in the United States
armed services.Since its inception, the Don't Ask, Don't Tell law has
resulted in the firing of at least 13,500 servicemembers and has reportedly
cost the military an estimated $555.2 million. Allowing gay men and lesbians to
serve openly has proven successful for many of our closest allies and enjoys
broad support in the United
States among the public and top military
leaders alike, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman
Adm. Mike Mullen, and former Joint Chiefs Chairmen Gen. Colin Powell and Gen. John Shalikashvili.Don't Ask, Don't Tell proponents too often paint a
distorted picture of what a repeal would mean. Today, Media Matters for America released a comprehensive review
detailing how opinion pages and cable news talk shows have been flooded with
falsehoods and anti-gay rhetoric to support the dubious argument that Don't
Ask, Don't Tell is working.Myths
that repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell would adversely affect unit cohesion,
retention, or the HIV rate among servicemembers are not based in reality.
Similarly, the anti-gay rhetoric permeating many of these arguments only serves
to cheapen the national discussion on this important issue.Because news outlets continue to repeat these
outrageous myths, a
coalition of organizations is banding together to combat misinformation about
the Don't Ask, Don't Tell law. As Congress moves forward on this legislation,
we will be vigilant in ensuring that news reports are accurate and fair. The
public deserves an honest debate -- not one marred by blatant falsehoods and
anti-gay attacks.Signed,
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis, Editor
Lt. Dan
ChoiUS Army Infantry Officer and Arabic Linguist, West
Point Graduate, Openly Gay and still servingCourage
CampaignRick Jacobs, Founder & Chairman
Gay
& Lesbian Alliance
Against Defamation (GLAAD)Jarrett T. Barrios, President
Human
Rights CampaignJoe Solmonese, President
Knights
Out: West Point LGBT GradsBecky Kanis, Chair
Media Matters for America
Eric Burns, President
National Center For Lesbian Rights
Kate Kendell, Executive Director
National
Gay and Lesbian Task ForceRea Carey, Executive Director
National
Security NetworkHeather Hurlburt, Executive Director
Servicemembers
Legal Defense NetworkAubrey Sarvis, Executive Director
Servicemembers
UnitedAlexander Nicholson, Executive Director
Truman
National Security ProjectRachel Kleinfeld, CEO & President
VoteVets
Jon Soltz, Co-Founder & Chairman
BACKGROUND
Media Matters'
review of myths and falsehoods about DADT include:
MYTH: Don't Ask, Don't Tell
is working
REALITY: Over
13,500 service members reportedly fired under law, including decorated officers
and those in "critical occupations."
MYTH: Repeal would undermine
morale and unit cohesion
REALITY: Unit
cohesion argument "not supported by any scientific studies."
MYTH: Military experts oppose
the repeal of DADT
REALITY: More than 100
retired generals and admirals have called for DADT's repeal.
MYTH: The public does not
support repeal of DADT
REALITY: Numerous
polls find broad support for gay men and lesbians serving openly in the
military
MYTH: Right-wing attacks on
DADT repeal are not anti-gay
REALITY: Prominent
right-wing figures opposing repeal have a history of anti-gay rhetoric.
MYTH: DADT repeal would
adversely affect retention
REALITY: Myth defies experiences of
several other countries that have allowed gay men and lesbians to serve openly.
MYTH: Experience of other
nations aren't relevant because "nobody counts on" their armies
REALITY: Several
nations have fought in wars after allowing gay men and lesbians to serve
openly.
MYTH: Only progressives
support the repeal of DADT
REALITY: Polls show
support for repeal of DADT among many Republicans, conservatives.
MYTH: DADT repeal would
expose servicemembers to greater HIV risk
REALITY: Military
regulations and procedures already exist to prevent the spread of HIV.
To read the entire review, please see: https://mediamatters.org/research/201002240012
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
"This president will stop at nothing to take food out of the mouths of hungry kids across America. Soulless," said Democratic Sen. Patty Murray.
President Donald Trump's Agriculture Department on Saturday threatened to penalize states that don't "immediately undo" steps taken to pay out full Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for November following a Supreme Court order that temporarily allowed the administration to withhold billions of dollars of aid.
In a memo, the US Department of Agriculture warned that "failure to comply" with the administration's directive "may result in USDA taking various actions, including cancellation of the federal share of state administrative costs and holding states liable for any overissuances that result from the noncompliance."
Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, said in a statement that it appears the Trump administration is "demanding that food assistance be taken away from the households that have already received it."
"They would rather go door to door, taking away people's food, than do the right thing and fully fund SNAP for November so that struggling veterans, seniors, and children can keep food on the table," said Craig.
The USDA memo came after Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that had required the Trump administration to distribute SNAP funds in full amid the ongoing government shutdown. SNAP is funded by the federal government and administered by states.
The administration took steps to comply with the district court order while also appealing it, sparking widespread confusion. Some states, including Massachusetts and California, moved quickly to distribute full benefits late last week. Some reported waking up Friday with full benefits in their accounts.
"In the dead of night, the Trump administration ordered states to stop issuing SNAP benefits," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said in response to the Saturday USDA memo. "This president will stop at nothing to take food out of the mouths of hungry kids across America. Soulless."
Under the Trump administration's plan to only partially fund SNAP benefits for November, the average recipient will see a 61% cut to aid and millions will see their benefits reduced to zero, according to one analysis.
Crystal FitzSimons, president of the Food Research & Action Center, stressed in a statement that "the Trump administration all along has had both the power and the authority to ensure that SNAP benefits continued uninterrupted, but chose not to act and to actively fight against providing this essential support."
"Meanwhile, millions of Americans already struggling to make ends meet have been left scrambling to feed their families," said FitzSimons. "Families and states are experiencing undue stress and anxiety with confusing messages coming from the administration. The Trump administration’s decision to continue to fight against providing SNAP benefits furthers the unprecedented humanitarian crisis driven by the loss of the nation’s most important and effective anti-hunger program."
"Trump said he’d leave abortion care up to the states. Well, this latest scheme makes it crystal clear: A de facto nationwide abortion ban has been his plan all along," said Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden.
Congressional Republicans are reportedly trying to insert anti-abortion language into government funding legislation as the shutdown continues, with the GOP and President Donald Trump digging in against a clean extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits as insurance premiums surge.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, sounded the alarm on Saturday about what he characterized as the latest Republican sneak attack on reproductive rights.
"Republicans said they might vote to lower Americans’ healthcare costs, but only if we agree to include a backdoor national abortion ban," Wyden said in remarks on the Senate floor.
The senator was referring to a reported GOP demand that any extension of ACA subsidies must include language that bars the tax credits from being used to purchase plans that cover abortion care.
But as the health policy organization KFF has noted, the ACA already has "specific language that applies Hyde Amendment restrictions to the use of premium tax credits, limiting them to using federal funds to pay for abortions only in cases that endanger the life of the woman or that are a result of rape or incest."
"The ACA also explicitly allows states to bar all plans participating in the state marketplace from covering abortions, which 25 states have done since the ACA was signed into law in 2010," according to KFF.
Wyden said Saturday—which marked day 39 of the shutdown—that "Republicans are spinning a tale that the government is funding abortion."
"It's not," Wyden continued. "What Republicans are talking about putting on the table amounts to nothing short of a backdoor national abortion ban. Under this plan, Republicans could weaponize federal funding for any organization that does anything related to women’s reproductive healthcare. They could also weaponize the tax code by revoking non-profit status for these organizations."
"The possibilities are endless, but the results are the same: a complete and total restriction on abortion, courtesy of Republicans," the senator added. "Trump said he'd leave abortion care up to the states. Well, this latest scheme makes it crystal clear: A de facto nationwide abortion ban has been his plan all along."
The GOP effort to attach anti-abortion provisions to government funding legislation adds yet another hurdle in negotiations to end the shutdown, which the Trump administration has used to throttle federal nutrition assistance and accelerate its purge of the federal workforce.
Trump is also pushing a proposal that would differently distribute federal funds that would have otherwise gone toward the enhanced ACA tax credits, which are set to expire at the end of the year.
"It sounds like it could be a plan for health accounts that could be used for insurance that doesn’t cover preexisting conditions, which could create a death spiral in ACA plans that do," said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF.
"They are willing to keep the government shut down, they are so determined to make you pay more for healthcare," said Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy.
US Sen. Chris Murphy said Saturday that the GOP's rejection of Democrats' compromise proposal to extend enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits for a year in exchange for reopening the federal government shows that the Republican Party is "absolutely committed to raising your costs."
" Republicans are refusing to negotiate," Murphy (D-Conn.) said in a video posted to social media, arguing that President Donald Trump and the GOP's continued stonewalling is "further confirmation" that Republicans are uninterested in preventing disastrous premium increases.
"They are willing to keep the government shut down, they are so determined to make you pay more for healthcare," the senator added.
An update on the shutdown.
Senate Republicans continue to refuse to negotiate. House Republicans refuse to even show up to DC.
Democrats just made a new reasonable compromise offer. And if Republicans reject it, it's proof of how determined they are to raise health premiums. pic.twitter.com/JUBPMMXKC7
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) November 8, 2025
More than 20 million Americans who purchase health insurance on the ACA marketplace receive enhanced tax credits that are set to expire at the end of the year if Congress doesn't act. So far, the Republican leadership in the Senate has only offered to hold a vote on the ACA subsidies, with no guarantee of the outcome, in exchange for Democratic votes to reopen the government.
People across the country are already seeing their premiums surge, and if the subsidies are allowed to lapse, costs are expected to rise further and millions will likely go uninsured.
“Clearly, the GOP didn’t learn their lesson after the shellacking they got in Tuesday’s elections,” said Protect Our Care president Brad Woodhouse. “They would rather keep the government shut down, depriving Americans of their paychecks and food assistance, than let working families keep the healthcare tax credits they need to afford lifesaving coverage. Good luck explaining that to the American people."
In a post to his social media platform on Saturday, Trump made clear that he remains opposed to extending the ACA tax credits, calling on Republicans to instead send money that would have been used for the subsidies "directly to the people so that they can purchase their own, much better healthcare."
Trump provided no details on how such a plan would work. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who was at the center of the largest healthcare fraud case in US history, declared that he is "writing the bill now," suggesting that the funds would go to "HSA-style accounts."
Democrats immediately panned the idea.
"This is, unsurprisingly, nonsensical," said Murphy. "Is he suggesting eliminating health insurance and giving people a few thousand dollars instead? And then when they get a cancer diagnosis they just go bankrupt? He is so unserious. That's why we are shut down and Americans know it."
Polling data released Thursday by the health policy group KFF showed that nearly three-quarters of the US public wants Congress to extend the ACA subsidies
"More than half (55%) of those who purchase their own health insurance say Democrats should refuse to approve a budget that does not include an extension for ACA subsidies," KFF found. "Notably, past KFF polls have shown that nearly half of adults enrolled in ACA marketplace plans identify as Republican or lean Republican."