October, 08 2008, 01:00am EDT
Jordan: Torture in Prisons Routine and Widespread
Reforms Fail to Tackle Abuse, Impunity Persists
AMMAN, Jordan
Jordan should end routine and widespread torture in its prisons, Human
Rights Watch said in a new report released today. Human Rights Watch
called on the government to overhaul mechanisms for investigating,
disciplining and prosecuting abusers, and in particular to transfer
prosecutor's investigations into prison abuse from police to civilian
prosecutors.
The 95-page report,
"Torture and Impunity in Jordan's Prisons: Reforms Fail to Tackle
Widespread Abuse," documents credible allegations of ill-treatment,
often amounting to torture, from 66 out of 110 prisoners interviewed at
random in 2007 and 2008, and in each of the seven of Jordan's 10
prisons visited. Human Rights Watch's evidence suggests that five
prison directors personally participated in torturing detainees.
"Torture in Jordan's prison system is widespread even two
years after King Abdullah called for reforms to stop it once and for
all," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights
Watch. "The mechanisms for preventing torture by holding torturers
accountable are simply not working."
The most common forms of torture include beatings with
cables and sticks and the suspension by the wrists from metal grates
for hours at a time, during which guards flog a defenseless prisoner.
Prison guards also torture prisoners for perceived infractions of
prison rules. Human Rights Watch found evidence that at times Islamists
accused or convicted of crimes against national security (Tanzimat)
were punished en masse.
Prison officials say beatings and other ill-treatment are
isolated incidents and that a prison reform program initiated in 2006
is improving prison conditions and accountability for abuse. Human
Rights Watch's research shows that while the reform program may well be
improving the chief areas of its focus - health services, overcrowding,
visitation, and recreation facilities - impunity for physical abuse
remains the norm.
In October 2007, an amendment to the Penal Code made
torture a crime for the first time, and in early 2008, the Public
Security Directorate (PSD) assigned prosecutors to investigate abuses
at seven prisons. But to date there have been no prosecutions under
that law.
In February 2008, the PSD allowed the National Center for
Human Rights to set up an office inside Swaqa prison. However, critical
reporting about a prison riot there in April 2008 led the PSD to stop
its cooperation with the center.
"Jordan has made some attempts to address the problem of
torture in prison, but the bottom line is that the measures have been
insufficient, and torture persists as a consequence," Whitson said.
Two separate incidents involving the torture and abuse of
large groups of detainees highlight failures in accountability. Despite
extensive evidence that guards in Juwaida and Swaqa prisons tortured
Islamist prisoners following a successful escape by two Islamist
prisoners from Juwaida in June 2007, the Jordanian authorities failed
to launch any investigation. In a third incident, the PSD, which
directs security agencies including the prison service, did launch an
extensive investigation into events surrounding the prison riot and
fire on April 14, 2008 at Muwaqqar prison that left three prisoners
dead. The investigators did not prosecute a guard who prisoners alleged
had tortured some of them just prior to the fire, included some who
died in it. An independent non-judicial investigation by the National
Center for Human Rights found ill-treatment at the heart of the prison
riot. Despite this evidence, the investigation concluded that no
official had done anything wrong.
Part of the problem lies in the authority of prison
officials to discipline internally, which is used as way of avoiding
formal prosecution of torturers. For example, in 2007, while the PSD
investigated 19 allegations of torture across Jordan, referring six to
court for prosecution, the directors of three prisons, Muwaqqar,
Qafqafa, and Swaqa, told Human Rights Watch that they had internally
disciplined six guards for abuse without involving the PSD. Prison
directors in Jordan have authority to settle abuse cases as
"misdemeanors," including ill-treatment, without resorting to the
Police Court.
"The PSD's reluctance to prosecute and punish torturers
within its ranks stems from a misguided desire to preserve the
reputation of the prison service," Whitson said. "Instead, protecting
guards who torture from prosecution tarnishes the image of the entire
profession, including those guards who fulfill their duties without
resorting to torture and abuse of prisoners."
Furthermore, Human Rights Watch pointed out that it is
police prosecutors and police judges who are responsible for
investigating, prosecuting and trying their fellow officers for prison
abuses, including torture, in the Police Court. Grievances officials,
who investigate prison abuses, referred cases for prosecutions only in
a small number of cases where there was overwhelming evidence.
Even where the government has prosecuted some egregious
cases of torture, the Police Court's verdicts have been flawed. In one
case, the Police Court sentenced former Swaqa prison director Majid
al-Rawashda to a fine of JOD 120 (around US$180) for ordering and
participating in the beating of 70 prisoners in August 2007. The court
found 12 other guards who had participated in the beatings not guilty
because they were "following orders." The court sentenced prison guards
who had beaten Firas Zaidan to death in Aqaba prison in May 2007 to
two-and-a-half years in prison. The court also reduced to
two-and-a-half years the sentence of guards who had beaten Abdullah
Mashaqba to death in Juwaida prison in 2004 because they were "in the
prime of their youth."
"The police and prison service cannot credibly investigate
itself," said Whitson. "Civilian prosecutors and judges should take
over all investigations of prison abuse to end impunity for torturers
and begin to provide redress for victims of torture."
Since beginning its prison reform program in 2006, Jordan
has sought international advice on improving prison conditions. The New
York-based Kerik Group provided training and advised on prison
management, equipment, and new construction, including a super-maximum
security prison with 240 solitary confinement-only cells to be opened
in late 2008. Currently, Austria's Ministry of Justice is in an
EU-sponsored "twinning project" with the PSD to reform the penitentiary
system.
Human Rights Watch calls on Jordan's donors to address the
widespread torture, and to condition part of their assistance on the
establishment of independent investigation and prosecution mechanisms.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
'Make Polio Great Again': Alarm Over RFK Jr. Lawyer Who Targeted Vaccine
"So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is," said one critic.
Dec 13, 2024
Public health advocates, federal lawmakers, and other critics responded with alarm to The New York Timesreporting on Friday that an attorney helping Robert F. Kennedy Jr. select officials for the next Trump administration tried to get the U.S. regulators to revoke approval of the polio vaccine in 2022.
"The United States has been a leader in the global fight to eradicate polio, which is poised to become only the second disease in history to be eliminated from the face of the earth after smallpox," said Liza Barrie, Public Citizen's campaign director for global vaccines access. "Undermining polio vaccination efforts now risks reversing decades of progress and unraveling one of the greatest public health achievements of all time."
Public Citizen is among various organizations that have criticized President-elect Donald Trump's choice of Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, with the watchdog's co-president, Robert Weissman, saying that "he shouldn't be allowed in the building... let alone be placed in charge of the nation's public health agency."
Although Kennedy's nomination requires Senate confirmation, he is already speaking with candidates for top health positions, with help from Aaron Siri, an attorney who represented RFK Jr. during his own presidential campaign, the Times reported. Siri also represents the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in petitions asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "to withdraw or suspend approval of vaccines not only for polio, but also for hepatitis B."
According to the newspaper:
Mr. Siri is also representing ICAN in petitioning the FDA to "pause distribution" of 13 other vaccines, including combination products that cover tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and hepatitis A, until their makers disclose details about aluminum, an ingredient researchers have associated with a small increase in asthma cases.
Mr. Siri declined to be interviewed, but said all of his petitions were filed on behalf of clients. Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy, said Mr. Siri has been advising Mr. Kennedy but has not discussed his petitions with any of the health nominees. She added, "Mr. Kennedy has long said that he wants transparency in vaccines and to give people choice."
After the article was published, Siri called it a "typical NYT hit piece plainly written by those lacking basic reading and thinking skills," and posted a series of responses on social media. He wrote in part that "ICAN's petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection."
The Times pointed out that experts consider placebo-controlled trials that would deny some children polio shots unethical, because "you're substituting a theoretical risk for a real risk," as Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, explained. "The real risks are the diseases."
Ayman Chit, head of vaccines for North America at Sanofi, told the newspaper that development of the vaccine began in 1977, over 280 million people worldwide have received it, and there have been more than 300 studies, some with up to six months of follow-up.
Trump, who is less than six weeks out from returning to office, has sent mixed messages on vaccines in recent interviews.
Asked about RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine record during a Time "Person of the Year" interview published Thursday, the president-elect said that "we're going to be able to do very serious testing" and certain vaccines could be made unavailable "if I think it's dangerous."
Trump toldNBC News last weekend: "Hey, look, I'm not against vaccines. The polio vaccine is the greatest thing. If somebody told me to get rid of the polio vaccine, they're going to have to work real hard to convince me. I think vaccines are—certain vaccines—are incredible. But maybe some aren't. And if they aren't, we have to find out."
Both comments generated concern—like the Friday reporting in the Times, which University of Alabama law professor and MSNBC columnist Joyce White Vance called "absolutely terrifying."
She was far from alone. HuffPost senior front page editor Philip Lewis said that "this is just so dangerous and ridiculous" while Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan declared, "We are so—and I use this word advisedly—fucked."
Ryan Cooper, managing editor at The American Prospect, warned that "they want your kids dead."
Author and musician Mikel Jollett similarly said, "So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is."
Multiple critics altered Trump's campaign slogan to "Make Polio Great Again."
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded with a video on social media:
Without naming anyone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a polio survivor, put out a lengthy statement on Friday.
"The polio vaccine has saved millions of lives and held out the promise of eradicating a terrible disease. Efforts to undermine public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed—they're dangerous," he said in part. "Anyone seeking the Senate's consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Pardon of 'Kids-for-Cash' Judge Michael Conahan Sparks Outrage
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," said one of the disgraced judge's victims.
Dec 13, 2024
Victims of a scheme in which a pair of Pennsylvania judges conspired to funnel thousands of children into private detention centers in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks expressed outrage following U.S. President Joe Biden's Thursday commutation of one of the men's sentences.
In 2010, former Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges and was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison after he and co-conspirator Mark Ciavarella shut down a county-run juvenile detention facility and then took nearly $3 million in payments from the builder and co-owner of for-profit lockups, into which the judges sent children as young as 8 years old.
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," Amanda Lorah—who was sentenced by Conahan to five years of juvenile detention over a high school fight—toldWBRE.
Sandy Fonzo, whose son killed himself after being sentenced to juvenile detention, said in a statement: "I am shocked and I am hurt. Conahan's actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son's death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power."
"This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer," Fonzo added. "Right now I am processing and doing the best I can to cope with the pain that this has brought back."
Many of Conahan's victims were first-time or low-level offenders. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court would later throw out thousands of cases adjudicated by the Conahan and Ciaverella, the latter of whom is serving a 28-year sentence for his role in the scheme.
Conahan—who is 72 and had been under house arrest since being transferred from prison during the Covid-19 pandemic—was one of around 1,500 people who received commutations or pardons from Biden on Thursday. While the sweeping move was welcomed by criminal justice reform advocates, many also decried the president's decision to not grant clemency to any of the 40 men with federal death sentences.
Others have called on Biden—who earlier this month pardoned his son Hunter Biden after promising he wouldn't—to grant clemency to people including Indigenous activist Leonard Peltier and environmental lawyer Steven Donziger.
"There's never going to be any closure for us."
"So he wants to talk about Conahan and everybody else, but what is Joe Biden doing for all of these kids who absolutely got nothing, and almost no justice in this whole thing that happened?" said Lorah. "So it's nothing for us, but it seems that Conahan is just getting a slap on the wrist every which way he possibly could still today."
"There's never going to be any closure for us," she added. "There's never going to be, somehow, some way, these two men are always going to pop up, but now, when you think about the president of the United States letting him get away with this, who even wants to live in this country at this point? I'm totally shocked, I can't believe this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
77 House Dems Call for 'Full Assessment' of Israeli Compliance With US Law
Lawmakers told the Biden administration they are "deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza."
Dec 13, 2024
As Israel continues to decimate the Gaza Strip with American weapons, 77 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives this week demanded that the Biden administration "provide a full assessment of the status of Israel's compliance with all relevant U.S. policies and laws, including National Security Memorandum 20 (NSM-20) and Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act."
Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) spearheaded the Thursday letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, with less than six weeks left in President Joe Biden's term.
Since Biden issued NSM-20 in February, his administration has repeatedly accepted the Israel government's assurances about the use of U.S. weapons, despite reports from journalists and human rights groups about how they have helped Israeli forces slaughter at least 44,875 Palestinians and injure another 106,454 people in the besieged enclave over the past 14 months.
"Our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes."
House Democrats' letter begins by declaring support for "Israel's right to self-defense," denouncing the Hamas-led October 2023 attack, and endorsing the Biden administration's efforts "to broker a bilateral cease-fire that includes the release of hostages," noting the deal recently negotiated for the Israeli government and the Lebanese group Hezbollah.
"Further, we condemn the unprecedented Iranian attacks against Israel launched on April 13, 2024, and October 1, 2024," the letter states, declining to mention the Israeli actions that led to those responses. "We must continue to avoid a major regional conflict—and we welcome the concerted diplomatic efforts by the U.S. and our allies to prevent further escalation."
"We are also deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza," the lawmakers wrote, citing the administration's October 13 letter imposing a 30-day deadline for Israel to improve humanitarian conditions in Palestinian territory. "That deadline has expired, and while some progress has been made, we believe the Israeli government has not yet fulfilled the requirements outlined in your letter."
Asked during a November 12 press conference if the Israeli government has met the administration's demands, State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said that "we have not made an assessment that they are in violation of U.S. law."
Shortly after that, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) forced votes on resolutions to block the sale of 120mm tank rounds, 120mm high-explosive mortar rounds, and Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) to Israel, but they didn't pass.
Progressives and Democrats in Congress have been sounding the alarm about U.S. government complicity in Israel's armed assault and starvation campaign—which have led to an ongoing genocide case at the International Court of Justice—to varying degrees since October 2023, including with a May letter led by Crow and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) and signed by 85 others.
Citing that letter on Thursday, the 77 House Democrats wrote that "our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes, among others. As a result, Gaza's civilian population is facing dire famine."
"We believe further administrative action must be taken to ensure Israel upholds the assurances it provided in March 2024 to facilitate, and not directly or indirectly obstruct, U.S. humanitarian assistance," the letter concludes. "We remain committed to a negotiated solution that can bring an end to the fighting, free the remaining hostages, surge humanitarian aid, and lay the groundwork to rebuild Gaza with a legitimate Palestinian governing body. We thank you and the administration for its ongoing work to achieve those shared goals."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular