October, 08 2008, 01:00am EDT
Jordan: Torture in Prisons Routine and Widespread
Reforms Fail to Tackle Abuse, Impunity Persists
AMMAN, Jordan
Jordan should end routine and widespread torture in its prisons, Human
Rights Watch said in a new report released today. Human Rights Watch
called on the government to overhaul mechanisms for investigating,
disciplining and prosecuting abusers, and in particular to transfer
prosecutor's investigations into prison abuse from police to civilian
prosecutors.
The 95-page report,
"Torture and Impunity in Jordan's Prisons: Reforms Fail to Tackle
Widespread Abuse," documents credible allegations of ill-treatment,
often amounting to torture, from 66 out of 110 prisoners interviewed at
random in 2007 and 2008, and in each of the seven of Jordan's 10
prisons visited. Human Rights Watch's evidence suggests that five
prison directors personally participated in torturing detainees.
"Torture in Jordan's prison system is widespread even two
years after King Abdullah called for reforms to stop it once and for
all," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights
Watch. "The mechanisms for preventing torture by holding torturers
accountable are simply not working."
The most common forms of torture include beatings with
cables and sticks and the suspension by the wrists from metal grates
for hours at a time, during which guards flog a defenseless prisoner.
Prison guards also torture prisoners for perceived infractions of
prison rules. Human Rights Watch found evidence that at times Islamists
accused or convicted of crimes against national security (Tanzimat)
were punished en masse.
Prison officials say beatings and other ill-treatment are
isolated incidents and that a prison reform program initiated in 2006
is improving prison conditions and accountability for abuse. Human
Rights Watch's research shows that while the reform program may well be
improving the chief areas of its focus - health services, overcrowding,
visitation, and recreation facilities - impunity for physical abuse
remains the norm.
In October 2007, an amendment to the Penal Code made
torture a crime for the first time, and in early 2008, the Public
Security Directorate (PSD) assigned prosecutors to investigate abuses
at seven prisons. But to date there have been no prosecutions under
that law.
In February 2008, the PSD allowed the National Center for
Human Rights to set up an office inside Swaqa prison. However, critical
reporting about a prison riot there in April 2008 led the PSD to stop
its cooperation with the center.
"Jordan has made some attempts to address the problem of
torture in prison, but the bottom line is that the measures have been
insufficient, and torture persists as a consequence," Whitson said.
Two separate incidents involving the torture and abuse of
large groups of detainees highlight failures in accountability. Despite
extensive evidence that guards in Juwaida and Swaqa prisons tortured
Islamist prisoners following a successful escape by two Islamist
prisoners from Juwaida in June 2007, the Jordanian authorities failed
to launch any investigation. In a third incident, the PSD, which
directs security agencies including the prison service, did launch an
extensive investigation into events surrounding the prison riot and
fire on April 14, 2008 at Muwaqqar prison that left three prisoners
dead. The investigators did not prosecute a guard who prisoners alleged
had tortured some of them just prior to the fire, included some who
died in it. An independent non-judicial investigation by the National
Center for Human Rights found ill-treatment at the heart of the prison
riot. Despite this evidence, the investigation concluded that no
official had done anything wrong.
Part of the problem lies in the authority of prison
officials to discipline internally, which is used as way of avoiding
formal prosecution of torturers. For example, in 2007, while the PSD
investigated 19 allegations of torture across Jordan, referring six to
court for prosecution, the directors of three prisons, Muwaqqar,
Qafqafa, and Swaqa, told Human Rights Watch that they had internally
disciplined six guards for abuse without involving the PSD. Prison
directors in Jordan have authority to settle abuse cases as
"misdemeanors," including ill-treatment, without resorting to the
Police Court.
"The PSD's reluctance to prosecute and punish torturers
within its ranks stems from a misguided desire to preserve the
reputation of the prison service," Whitson said. "Instead, protecting
guards who torture from prosecution tarnishes the image of the entire
profession, including those guards who fulfill their duties without
resorting to torture and abuse of prisoners."
Furthermore, Human Rights Watch pointed out that it is
police prosecutors and police judges who are responsible for
investigating, prosecuting and trying their fellow officers for prison
abuses, including torture, in the Police Court. Grievances officials,
who investigate prison abuses, referred cases for prosecutions only in
a small number of cases where there was overwhelming evidence.
Even where the government has prosecuted some egregious
cases of torture, the Police Court's verdicts have been flawed. In one
case, the Police Court sentenced former Swaqa prison director Majid
al-Rawashda to a fine of JOD 120 (around US$180) for ordering and
participating in the beating of 70 prisoners in August 2007. The court
found 12 other guards who had participated in the beatings not guilty
because they were "following orders." The court sentenced prison guards
who had beaten Firas Zaidan to death in Aqaba prison in May 2007 to
two-and-a-half years in prison. The court also reduced to
two-and-a-half years the sentence of guards who had beaten Abdullah
Mashaqba to death in Juwaida prison in 2004 because they were "in the
prime of their youth."
"The police and prison service cannot credibly investigate
itself," said Whitson. "Civilian prosecutors and judges should take
over all investigations of prison abuse to end impunity for torturers
and begin to provide redress for victims of torture."
Since beginning its prison reform program in 2006, Jordan
has sought international advice on improving prison conditions. The New
York-based Kerik Group provided training and advised on prison
management, equipment, and new construction, including a super-maximum
security prison with 240 solitary confinement-only cells to be opened
in late 2008. Currently, Austria's Ministry of Justice is in an
EU-sponsored "twinning project" with the PSD to reform the penitentiary
system.
Human Rights Watch calls on Jordan's donors to address the
widespread torture, and to condition part of their assistance on the
establishment of independent investigation and prosecution mechanisms.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Sanders: 'The Netanyahu Gov't Should Not Receive Another Penny from US'
The bill passed the Senate in a 74-24 vote at 2:03AM
Mar 23, 2024
Following the passing of the U.S. government appropriations bill early Saturday morning, Senator Bernie Sanders said:
I voted NO on the appropriations bill that the Senate passed last night. While hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children face starvation in Gaza, this bill actually prohibits funding to UNWRA, the key United Nations aid agency delivering life-saving humanitarian support. This will only intensify the already horrific situation in Gaza. This bill also provides another $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid for Netanyahu’s right-wing government to continue this barbaric war. The Netanyahu government should not receive another penny from U.S. taxpayers.
The bill passed the Senate in a 74-24 vote at 2:03AM Saturday morning following hours of intense negotiations.
Later on Saturday, President Biden signed the $1.2 trillion government funding bill to stave off a government shutdown.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Modi Government Crackdown on Dissent Hits 'Crisis Point' Before Indian Elections
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," said one Amnesty International campaigner.
Mar 22, 2024
As India's right-wing government cracks down on opposition ahead of next month's general elections, Amnesty International on Friday urged authorities to "stop weaponizing the criminal justice system to intimidate and harass" political candidates, activists, and others.
Protests broke out in the capital New Delhi and other Indian cities after police on Thursday arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, an opposition leader from the Aam Aadmi Party, over corruption allegations AAP members say are politically motivated. Two other AAP leaders were previously arrested in connection with the same case, which involves the alleged favoring of certain alcohol vendors and illegal campaign financing.
Authorities also froze the bank accounts of another leading opposition party, the Indian National Congress, over a tax dispute that dates back to 2018. Party leader Sonia Gandhi accused Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party of perpetrating "a systematic effort to cripple the party financially."
“They want to know we are corrupt like them, which is not the case.” – AAP chief spokesperson Priyanka Kakkar on the BJP’s crackdown on opposition politicians.
AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal was arrested just today on charges of corruption.
The India Report: https://t.co/rxPr6zKnWx pic.twitter.com/P3eSbxVTVm
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 21, 2024
Gandhi, Kejriwal and others have repeatedly accused of Modi's government of misusing federal agencies and resources to repress opposition figures as elections loom. The BJP denies the allegations.
"The Bharatiya Janata Party-led Indian government's crackdown on peaceful dissent and opposition has now reached a crisis point," Amnesty International India board chair Aakar Patel said in a statement.
"The authorities have repeatedly exploited and weaponized various financial and terrorism laws to systematically crack down on human rights defenders, activists, critics, nonprofit organizations, journalists, students, academics, and political opposition," Patel added. "The arrest of Arvind Kejriwal and the freezing of Indian National Congress' bank accounts a few weeks before India holds its general elections show the authorities' blatant failure to uphold the country's international human rights obligations."
Patel continued:
What we are witnessing is a brutal crackdown on human rights including through the misuse of central investigative and financial agencies, attacks on peaceful protests, arbitrary arrests, use and export of invasive spyware for unlawful surveillance, [and] systematic discrimination against religious minorities to feed into their majoritarian Hindutva politics and targeted suspension of opposition leaders from the Parliament who dare to hold the authorities to account.
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," Patel added. "Authorities must respect, protect, promote, and fulfill the human rights of everyone in the country including human rights defenders, activists, and opposition candidates before, during, and after the general elections which are due to begin in April 2024. Authorities must also ensure access to justice and effective remedies for victims of human rights violations."
On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on the situation in India.
The commission noted that in recent years, as Modi and the BJP have consolidated power, "concerns about human rights abuses in India have grown" over "a wide range of significant rights issues, including restrictions on religious and press freedoms, violence or threats of violence targeting members of national/racial/ethnic and religious minorities, harassment of and restrictions on civil society and human rights organizations, corruption, and lack of accountability."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House GOP 'Imploding' as Gallagher Resigns and Greene Moves to Oust Speaker
"House Republicans had a bad day," said one reporter, listing challenges and changes to leadership as a government shutdown looms.
Mar 22, 2024
The U.S. House of Representatives started a two-week recess on Friday, but not before a series of events that provoked fresh declarations of what has become a familiar phrase over the past few years: "Republicans in disarray."
Before leaving Capitol Hill, House members passed a spending package intended to prevent a partial government shutdown that could still occur unless the Senate acts. Fewer than two dozen Democrats and over 100 Republicans opposed the bill. Democratic opposition was largely related to Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
Meanwhile, far-right Republicans like Texas Congressman Chip Roy have made comments like, "Everyone that I know and trust about the border, about overall spending, see it as a complete and total failure and a capitulation by Republicans. And leadership worked the deal, so it's on leadership."
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) not only opposed the package but also filed a motion to vacate, hoping to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)—which would only require a simple majority if it came up for a vote.
The \u201cRepublican-controlled\u201d House just passed a $1.2 trillion spending bill that doesn\u2019t secure our border, but funds full term abortion and trans ideology on our youth.\n\nI filed a Motion to Vacate because the House needs a Speaker who\u2019s able to win for Republicans and our\u2026— (@)
House Republicans elected Johnson to the leadership role in late October, after ousting former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)—who then opted to leave office at the end of last year—and rejecting three other candidates for the post: Reps. Tom Emmer (D-Minn.), Steve Scalise (R-La.), and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
Noting that Greene filed a regular motion rather than a privileged one, meaning it could be referred to a committee, "where it would likely languish," NBC Newsreported Friday:
Greene told reporters that her motion to vacate was "more of a warning than a pink slip," saying she does not want to "throw the House into chaos," like the three and a half weeks that the chamber was without a speaker when McCarthy, her close ally, was ousted.
"I'm not saying that it won't happen in two weeks or it won't happen in a month or who knows when. But I am saying the clock has started. It's time for our conference to choose a new speaker," she said.
Johnson's October election led Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.)—who filed the motion to vacate targeting McCarthy—to declare that "MAGA is ascendant," a reference to the "Make America Great Again" campaign slogan of former President Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee for the November election.
While Gaetz voted against the spending package on Friday, he also said that "if we vacated this speaker we'd end up with a Democrat. You know, when I vacated the last one, I made a promise to the country that we would not end up with a Democrat speaker and I was right. I couldn't make that promise again today."
Asked if he thinks Johnson's job is safe, Gaetz responded, "It is."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also responded dismissively when questioned about Greene's motion on Friday, tellingPunchbowl News, "She's a joke."
A spokesperson for Johnson, Raj Shah, toldPolitico that the speaker "always listens to the concerns of members, but is focused on governing. He will continue to push conservative legislation that secures our border, strengthens our national defense, and demonstrates how we'll grow our majority."
However, Johnson's limited control over the House is dwindling. Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), who backed the spending bill, revealed that he is resigning from his seat effective April 19 after previously saying that he would not seek reelection. Friday was also the last day of Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who announced earlier this month that he would step down from his seat.
The Washington Post noted Friday that "Buck and Gallagher are the sixth and seventh members of the House who are quitting midterm simply to leave for the private sector, a trend we dubbed 'the Great Resignation' last weekend. It's also the highest number of lawmakers quitting public service altogether in at least 40 years."
Responding to Gallager's announcement on social media, HuffPost's Jennifer Bendery said that "House Republicans are imploding in plain sight."
In yet another disruption to the chamber's GOP leadership, Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas)—who announced last year that she wouldn't seek reelection—wrote in a Friday letter to Johnson that she plans to step down as chair of the House Appropriations Committee.
Granger told the speaker she would stay in the post until the Republican Steering Committee chooses her replacement and then remain on the panel through the end of her term to offer "advice and counsel for my colleagues when it is needed."
The Texas Tribunepointed out that "the Appropriations Committee will need to pass another set of federal funding bills before the end of September to keep the government funded. Congress has failed to meet that deadline for nearly 30 years, and Granger acknowledged in her letter that election years in particular often distract Congress from passing spending bills on time."
GOP members of the upper chamber were also accused of sowing chaos on Friday, as the midnight shutdown deadline loomed.
Senate Budget Committee Chair Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said on social media, "Well, it looks like we're headed for a shutdown at the hands of Senate Republican gremlins who (1) know that amendments can't pass because there's no House to send an amended bill back to (they adjourned) and (2) want amendments anyway."
"And (3) can't decide amongst themselves what won't-pass amendments they want," Whitehouse added. "I sure hope I'm wrong. But the Republican Senate caucus is a rudderless ship right now, so the gremlins are running the show."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular