These bills could expand our understanding of sexism and racism in the media, and chip away at some of the barriers that have frozen out women and people of color from owning news outlets and shaping coverage. (Photo: Screenshot / Fox News)
Jan 14, 2020
As impeachment proceedings and the Iran crisis hover over Capitol Hill like a thick fog, a Wednesday hearing in the House of Representatives will examine an issue that's gone overlooked for decades. It's one that has a profound impact on how (and whether) the media hold power accountable in moments like these: ownership diversity.
We rely on our media to gather and report facts on the challenges and opportunities facing our country and communities so we can make informed decisions and participate in our society. Even in the internet era, broadcast radio reaches almost 90 percent of Americans per week, and broadcast television remains the most popular source for local news and information.
Countless journalists are reporting news and information in an environment that is increasingly hostile to them. Meanwhile, the internet is rife with disinformation, fraud and orchestrated chaos.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
If we're going to foster journalism that actually meets community needs, we must address how the foundation of the U.S. media system is built on racism and sexism. That affects the perspectives we're exposed to, the stories that are covered, whether the powerful are held accountable, the culture of newsrooms, and even what's considered objective truth.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
Congress tasked the Federal Communications Commission with tracking and increasing ownership diversity in the media industry. The FCC has completely fallen down on the job. And on four occasions in the past 16 years, a federal appeals court has directed the agency to examine how its broadcast regulations impact ownership opportunities for women and people of color before it changes any of those rules. The most recent ruling came down in September in response to a lawsuit my organization was part of. But under Democratic and Republican leaders alike, the FCC has refused to step up.
That's why it's more crucial than ever for Congress to lead the way forward. At Wednesday's hearing it will weigh legislation from both parties designed to promote media-marketplace diversity.
Rep. Val Demmings (D-Florida) has reintroduced H.Res. 549, a resolution reaffirming Congress' commitment to media diversity and pledging to work with media entities and other stakeholders to develop common-ground solutions to eliminate barriers to entry for diverse owners.
Rep. G. K. Butterfield (D-North Carolina) has reintroduced the Expanding Broadcast Ownership Opportunities Act of 2019, which would reestablish a tax-certificate program to incentivize sales of broadcast stations to women and people of color, and increase and improve the FCC's reporting on media-ownership diversity.
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-New York) has introduced the Enhancing Broadcasting DIVERSITY Data Act, a bill to force the FCC to complete its review of broadcast-and-cable equal-employment-opportunity rules, which has been outstanding since--wait for it--1998. This bill also mandates that the FCC improve its media-ownership-diversity data collection, better analyze that data and make this information more easily accessible to the public.
"We must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy."
Finally, Rep. Billy Long (R-Missouri) has introduced the MEDIA Diversity Act, which directs the FCC to examine market-entry barriers for "socially disadvantaged individuals" in its triennial media-marketplace report to Congress.
Taken together, these bills could expand our understanding of sexism and racism in the media, and chip away at some of the barriers that have frozen out women and people of color from owning news outlets and shaping coverage.
Of course, we will need much more comprehensive reforms to remedy historical discrimination in the delivery of news and information. The House Energy & Commerce Committee's memo on this hearing alludes to some of that history, but does not cover the full scope.
That's why Free Press Action is calling on the next president of the United States to convene an interagency task force to study the history of discrimination in our media system and in the government's oversight and regulation of that system.
As details emerge, we must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy. It's well past time to take decisive action to right these wrongs.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As impeachment proceedings and the Iran crisis hover over Capitol Hill like a thick fog, a Wednesday hearing in the House of Representatives will examine an issue that's gone overlooked for decades. It's one that has a profound impact on how (and whether) the media hold power accountable in moments like these: ownership diversity.
We rely on our media to gather and report facts on the challenges and opportunities facing our country and communities so we can make informed decisions and participate in our society. Even in the internet era, broadcast radio reaches almost 90 percent of Americans per week, and broadcast television remains the most popular source for local news and information.
Countless journalists are reporting news and information in an environment that is increasingly hostile to them. Meanwhile, the internet is rife with disinformation, fraud and orchestrated chaos.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
If we're going to foster journalism that actually meets community needs, we must address how the foundation of the U.S. media system is built on racism and sexism. That affects the perspectives we're exposed to, the stories that are covered, whether the powerful are held accountable, the culture of newsrooms, and even what's considered objective truth.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
Congress tasked the Federal Communications Commission with tracking and increasing ownership diversity in the media industry. The FCC has completely fallen down on the job. And on four occasions in the past 16 years, a federal appeals court has directed the agency to examine how its broadcast regulations impact ownership opportunities for women and people of color before it changes any of those rules. The most recent ruling came down in September in response to a lawsuit my organization was part of. But under Democratic and Republican leaders alike, the FCC has refused to step up.
That's why it's more crucial than ever for Congress to lead the way forward. At Wednesday's hearing it will weigh legislation from both parties designed to promote media-marketplace diversity.
Rep. Val Demmings (D-Florida) has reintroduced H.Res. 549, a resolution reaffirming Congress' commitment to media diversity and pledging to work with media entities and other stakeholders to develop common-ground solutions to eliminate barriers to entry for diverse owners.
Rep. G. K. Butterfield (D-North Carolina) has reintroduced the Expanding Broadcast Ownership Opportunities Act of 2019, which would reestablish a tax-certificate program to incentivize sales of broadcast stations to women and people of color, and increase and improve the FCC's reporting on media-ownership diversity.
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-New York) has introduced the Enhancing Broadcasting DIVERSITY Data Act, a bill to force the FCC to complete its review of broadcast-and-cable equal-employment-opportunity rules, which has been outstanding since--wait for it--1998. This bill also mandates that the FCC improve its media-ownership-diversity data collection, better analyze that data and make this information more easily accessible to the public.
"We must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy."
Finally, Rep. Billy Long (R-Missouri) has introduced the MEDIA Diversity Act, which directs the FCC to examine market-entry barriers for "socially disadvantaged individuals" in its triennial media-marketplace report to Congress.
Taken together, these bills could expand our understanding of sexism and racism in the media, and chip away at some of the barriers that have frozen out women and people of color from owning news outlets and shaping coverage.
Of course, we will need much more comprehensive reforms to remedy historical discrimination in the delivery of news and information. The House Energy & Commerce Committee's memo on this hearing alludes to some of that history, but does not cover the full scope.
That's why Free Press Action is calling on the next president of the United States to convene an interagency task force to study the history of discrimination in our media system and in the government's oversight and regulation of that system.
As details emerge, we must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy. It's well past time to take decisive action to right these wrongs.
As impeachment proceedings and the Iran crisis hover over Capitol Hill like a thick fog, a Wednesday hearing in the House of Representatives will examine an issue that's gone overlooked for decades. It's one that has a profound impact on how (and whether) the media hold power accountable in moments like these: ownership diversity.
We rely on our media to gather and report facts on the challenges and opportunities facing our country and communities so we can make informed decisions and participate in our society. Even in the internet era, broadcast radio reaches almost 90 percent of Americans per week, and broadcast television remains the most popular source for local news and information.
Countless journalists are reporting news and information in an environment that is increasingly hostile to them. Meanwhile, the internet is rife with disinformation, fraud and orchestrated chaos.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
If we're going to foster journalism that actually meets community needs, we must address how the foundation of the U.S. media system is built on racism and sexism. That affects the perspectives we're exposed to, the stories that are covered, whether the powerful are held accountable, the culture of newsrooms, and even what's considered objective truth.
According to the most recent data, women and people of color own just 10 percent of broadcast outlets even though we together make up over two thirds of the U.S. population. This is appalling.
Congress tasked the Federal Communications Commission with tracking and increasing ownership diversity in the media industry. The FCC has completely fallen down on the job. And on four occasions in the past 16 years, a federal appeals court has directed the agency to examine how its broadcast regulations impact ownership opportunities for women and people of color before it changes any of those rules. The most recent ruling came down in September in response to a lawsuit my organization was part of. But under Democratic and Republican leaders alike, the FCC has refused to step up.
That's why it's more crucial than ever for Congress to lead the way forward. At Wednesday's hearing it will weigh legislation from both parties designed to promote media-marketplace diversity.
Rep. Val Demmings (D-Florida) has reintroduced H.Res. 549, a resolution reaffirming Congress' commitment to media diversity and pledging to work with media entities and other stakeholders to develop common-ground solutions to eliminate barriers to entry for diverse owners.
Rep. G. K. Butterfield (D-North Carolina) has reintroduced the Expanding Broadcast Ownership Opportunities Act of 2019, which would reestablish a tax-certificate program to incentivize sales of broadcast stations to women and people of color, and increase and improve the FCC's reporting on media-ownership diversity.
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-New York) has introduced the Enhancing Broadcasting DIVERSITY Data Act, a bill to force the FCC to complete its review of broadcast-and-cable equal-employment-opportunity rules, which has been outstanding since--wait for it--1998. This bill also mandates that the FCC improve its media-ownership-diversity data collection, better analyze that data and make this information more easily accessible to the public.
"We must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy."
Finally, Rep. Billy Long (R-Missouri) has introduced the MEDIA Diversity Act, which directs the FCC to examine market-entry barriers for "socially disadvantaged individuals" in its triennial media-marketplace report to Congress.
Taken together, these bills could expand our understanding of sexism and racism in the media, and chip away at some of the barriers that have frozen out women and people of color from owning news outlets and shaping coverage.
Of course, we will need much more comprehensive reforms to remedy historical discrimination in the delivery of news and information. The House Energy & Commerce Committee's memo on this hearing alludes to some of that history, but does not cover the full scope.
That's why Free Press Action is calling on the next president of the United States to convene an interagency task force to study the history of discrimination in our media system and in the government's oversight and regulation of that system.
As details emerge, we must think critically about how to remedy the historical lack of diversity in mainstream news. It's robbed the American people of opportunities to understand the world around us, and reinforced and normalized systems of white supremacy and patriarchy. It's well past time to take decisive action to right these wrongs.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.