Extreme Inequality Fueling Climate Change: Oxfam Study
Class analysis shows richest 10 per cent causing half of emissions
The evidence is clear: the rich are destroying the planet.
A new study released Wednesday by Oxfam highlights how extreme inequality is fueling climate change. The report, released earlier today in Paris at the COP21 UN climate summit, found that "the richest 1 per cent of the world's population produces 175 times as much CO2 per person as the bottom 10 per cent" and the richest 10 per cent produce fully half of all carbon emissions.
In an executive summary of the report, Oxfam argues that the fights against climate change and inequality are inextricably linked: "it's a crisis that is driven by the greenhouse gas emissions of the 'haves' that hits the 'have-nots' the hardest."
The new report will bolster the climate justice demands being pushed by tens of thousands of civil society, environmental and Indigenous activists gathered in Paris, who are for the most part not optimistic about the draft text being negotiated.
Even best-case scenarios seem to point to an agreement that falls short of an action plan to keep the world under 2 C of warming, the threshold scientists overwhelmingly agree can't be breached in order to avert catastrophic climate change. What's more, individual countries' emissions targets won't be legally binding, a position pushed by the U.S., China and other big polluters, and conceded in advance of the talks by Canada's new Liberal government.
Class analysis of climate crisis
The data analysis by Oxfam is significant for a couple of reasons, first and foremost because it goes beyond the country-to-country comparisons that set the basic framework of the UN climate negotiations. Simply put, the data allows for a class analysis of the climate crisis.
"Rich, high emitters should be held accountable for their emissions, no matter where they live," said Oxfam's climate policy head Tim Gore said in a statement accompanying the report.
According to Oxfam, the poorer half of humanity, roughly 3.5 billion people, are responsible for a mere 10 per cent of all emissions. Tragically, the poor also live in the countries most affected by climate change and with the least capacity for adaptation.
Furthermore, Oxfam explicitly cautions against leaving the task of reducing the carbon footprints of rich or poor to individual lifestyle choices, pointing to the importance of government policy on issues such as transportation and energy. This approach has long been advocated by the Climate Justice Project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, which emphasizes "structural changes and collective action to lower carbon footprints rather than individual behavioural change."
Billionaires as climate saviours?
The timing of Oxfam's release is auspicious, coming on the heels of the launch of theBreakthrough Energy Group, an alliance of billionaires mostly from the tech sector, who have announced major new investments in renewable, non-fossil-fuel energy.
So while the super-rich have been lavished with praise from politicians, and soaked up much of the media attention during the first week of the Paris climate summit, Oxfam's research serves as a reminder they are a disproportionate part of the problem.
Other recent studies have also made the case for making inequality reduction central to efforts to mitigate climate change. French economist Thomas Piketty, for example, published a major study last month entitled, "Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris."
"It is the rich Europeans, Americans and Chinese that emit the most CO2, while the emissions from the world's poorest citizens are falling," Piketty and co-author Lucas Chancel argue. "The richest 1 per cent of Americans, Luxembourgers, Singaporeans and Saudis emit more than 200 tonnes of CO2 per person per year; 2,000 times more than the poorest in Honduras, Rwanda or Malawi."
Piketty and Chancel recommend a number of measures to curb the emissions of the rich, including a new tax on air travel. Given Piketty's fame since the publication of his bestselling book, Capital, it's remarkable how little attention his recommendations on climate change have garnered.
It's high time for the findings of Oxfam and Piketty to be put centre stage in Paris at the UN climate talks. If world leaders are serious about evidence-based climate policies, then they should make the billionaires cede the spotlight to anti-poverty activists.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The evidence is clear: the rich are destroying the planet.
A new study released Wednesday by Oxfam highlights how extreme inequality is fueling climate change. The report, released earlier today in Paris at the COP21 UN climate summit, found that "the richest 1 per cent of the world's population produces 175 times as much CO2 per person as the bottom 10 per cent" and the richest 10 per cent produce fully half of all carbon emissions.
In an executive summary of the report, Oxfam argues that the fights against climate change and inequality are inextricably linked: "it's a crisis that is driven by the greenhouse gas emissions of the 'haves' that hits the 'have-nots' the hardest."
The new report will bolster the climate justice demands being pushed by tens of thousands of civil society, environmental and Indigenous activists gathered in Paris, who are for the most part not optimistic about the draft text being negotiated.
Even best-case scenarios seem to point to an agreement that falls short of an action plan to keep the world under 2 C of warming, the threshold scientists overwhelmingly agree can't be breached in order to avert catastrophic climate change. What's more, individual countries' emissions targets won't be legally binding, a position pushed by the U.S., China and other big polluters, and conceded in advance of the talks by Canada's new Liberal government.
Class analysis of climate crisis
The data analysis by Oxfam is significant for a couple of reasons, first and foremost because it goes beyond the country-to-country comparisons that set the basic framework of the UN climate negotiations. Simply put, the data allows for a class analysis of the climate crisis.
"Rich, high emitters should be held accountable for their emissions, no matter where they live," said Oxfam's climate policy head Tim Gore said in a statement accompanying the report.
According to Oxfam, the poorer half of humanity, roughly 3.5 billion people, are responsible for a mere 10 per cent of all emissions. Tragically, the poor also live in the countries most affected by climate change and with the least capacity for adaptation.
Furthermore, Oxfam explicitly cautions against leaving the task of reducing the carbon footprints of rich or poor to individual lifestyle choices, pointing to the importance of government policy on issues such as transportation and energy. This approach has long been advocated by the Climate Justice Project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, which emphasizes "structural changes and collective action to lower carbon footprints rather than individual behavioural change."
Billionaires as climate saviours?
The timing of Oxfam's release is auspicious, coming on the heels of the launch of theBreakthrough Energy Group, an alliance of billionaires mostly from the tech sector, who have announced major new investments in renewable, non-fossil-fuel energy.
So while the super-rich have been lavished with praise from politicians, and soaked up much of the media attention during the first week of the Paris climate summit, Oxfam's research serves as a reminder they are a disproportionate part of the problem.
Other recent studies have also made the case for making inequality reduction central to efforts to mitigate climate change. French economist Thomas Piketty, for example, published a major study last month entitled, "Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris."
"It is the rich Europeans, Americans and Chinese that emit the most CO2, while the emissions from the world's poorest citizens are falling," Piketty and co-author Lucas Chancel argue. "The richest 1 per cent of Americans, Luxembourgers, Singaporeans and Saudis emit more than 200 tonnes of CO2 per person per year; 2,000 times more than the poorest in Honduras, Rwanda or Malawi."
Piketty and Chancel recommend a number of measures to curb the emissions of the rich, including a new tax on air travel. Given Piketty's fame since the publication of his bestselling book, Capital, it's remarkable how little attention his recommendations on climate change have garnered.
It's high time for the findings of Oxfam and Piketty to be put centre stage in Paris at the UN climate talks. If world leaders are serious about evidence-based climate policies, then they should make the billionaires cede the spotlight to anti-poverty activists.
The evidence is clear: the rich are destroying the planet.
A new study released Wednesday by Oxfam highlights how extreme inequality is fueling climate change. The report, released earlier today in Paris at the COP21 UN climate summit, found that "the richest 1 per cent of the world's population produces 175 times as much CO2 per person as the bottom 10 per cent" and the richest 10 per cent produce fully half of all carbon emissions.
In an executive summary of the report, Oxfam argues that the fights against climate change and inequality are inextricably linked: "it's a crisis that is driven by the greenhouse gas emissions of the 'haves' that hits the 'have-nots' the hardest."
The new report will bolster the climate justice demands being pushed by tens of thousands of civil society, environmental and Indigenous activists gathered in Paris, who are for the most part not optimistic about the draft text being negotiated.
Even best-case scenarios seem to point to an agreement that falls short of an action plan to keep the world under 2 C of warming, the threshold scientists overwhelmingly agree can't be breached in order to avert catastrophic climate change. What's more, individual countries' emissions targets won't be legally binding, a position pushed by the U.S., China and other big polluters, and conceded in advance of the talks by Canada's new Liberal government.
Class analysis of climate crisis
The data analysis by Oxfam is significant for a couple of reasons, first and foremost because it goes beyond the country-to-country comparisons that set the basic framework of the UN climate negotiations. Simply put, the data allows for a class analysis of the climate crisis.
"Rich, high emitters should be held accountable for their emissions, no matter where they live," said Oxfam's climate policy head Tim Gore said in a statement accompanying the report.
According to Oxfam, the poorer half of humanity, roughly 3.5 billion people, are responsible for a mere 10 per cent of all emissions. Tragically, the poor also live in the countries most affected by climate change and with the least capacity for adaptation.
Furthermore, Oxfam explicitly cautions against leaving the task of reducing the carbon footprints of rich or poor to individual lifestyle choices, pointing to the importance of government policy on issues such as transportation and energy. This approach has long been advocated by the Climate Justice Project of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, which emphasizes "structural changes and collective action to lower carbon footprints rather than individual behavioural change."
Billionaires as climate saviours?
The timing of Oxfam's release is auspicious, coming on the heels of the launch of theBreakthrough Energy Group, an alliance of billionaires mostly from the tech sector, who have announced major new investments in renewable, non-fossil-fuel energy.
So while the super-rich have been lavished with praise from politicians, and soaked up much of the media attention during the first week of the Paris climate summit, Oxfam's research serves as a reminder they are a disproportionate part of the problem.
Other recent studies have also made the case for making inequality reduction central to efforts to mitigate climate change. French economist Thomas Piketty, for example, published a major study last month entitled, "Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris."
"It is the rich Europeans, Americans and Chinese that emit the most CO2, while the emissions from the world's poorest citizens are falling," Piketty and co-author Lucas Chancel argue. "The richest 1 per cent of Americans, Luxembourgers, Singaporeans and Saudis emit more than 200 tonnes of CO2 per person per year; 2,000 times more than the poorest in Honduras, Rwanda or Malawi."
Piketty and Chancel recommend a number of measures to curb the emissions of the rich, including a new tax on air travel. Given Piketty's fame since the publication of his bestselling book, Capital, it's remarkable how little attention his recommendations on climate change have garnered.
It's high time for the findings of Oxfam and Piketty to be put centre stage in Paris at the UN climate talks. If world leaders are serious about evidence-based climate policies, then they should make the billionaires cede the spotlight to anti-poverty activists.