To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Robert A. Wood, deputy permanent representative of the United States to the United Nations, vetoes Palestine's U.N. membership during the Security Council meeting on April 18, 2024.
The vote demonstrated that the international community remains largely united in its support of the Palestinians.
The outcome of the Palestinevote and the American veto at the United Nations Security Council on April 18 was predictable. Though European countries are becoming increasingly supportive of a Palestinian state, the United States is not yet ready for this commitment.
These are some of the reasons that the U.S. deputy envoy to the U.N., Robert Wood, vetoed the resolution.
One, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East is still governed by Israeli priorities. And since the majority of Israelis reject the idea of a Palestinian state, or any “concessions” or even the most basic rights for Palestinians, the weak U.S. president neither has the courage, nor the desire to defy the Israeli position.
The outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Two, the fact that Israel, as per the words of its ambassador at the U.N., Gilad Erdan, saw that a vote for Palestine would be equivalent to “rewarding terror with a Palestinian state,” created the kind of political discourse that would have made a positive American vote, or an abstention, akin to supporting this so-called terrorism.
Three, U.S. President Joe Biden, in his own Democratic Party’s calculations, cannot politically afford supporting an independent Palestine only a few months ahead of one of the most contested and decisive elections in U.S. history.
His position remains that of supporting a strong Palestinian Authority—which only exists to “secure” Israel against Palestinian Resistance—while giving the illusion that a Palestinian state is forthcoming.
“There needs to be a Palestinian Authority. There needs to be a path to a Palestinian state,” Biden said in October 2023.
The same position was, for the lack of a better word, articulated by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in January 2024: There is a need for a “pathway to a Palestinian state.”
But what does this mean in practice?
“The problem is getting from here to there, and of course, it requires very difficult, challenging decisions. It requires a mindset that is open to that perspective,” according to Blinken. In other words, more illusions and newspeak.
On the other hand, the Republican Party leadership made it clear that their support for Israel is blind and unconditional. They are also ready to exploit any comment—let alone action—by Biden and his officials that may seem critical of Israel in any way. All of these factors combined made the American veto quite predictable.
However, the vote was still important, as it, according to Palestinian political leaders and officials, showed that it is the U.S., not the Palestinians, who are isolated within the international community.
Indeed, the vote demonstrated that:
One, the international community remains largely united in its support of the Palestinians.
Two, the positive vote by France, an influential European country, signals a shift in the perception of the European body politic toward Palestine.
“The time has come for a comprehensive political settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, based on the two-state solution,” the French Delegation at the U.N. tweeted on April 19.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
Three, the strong statements emanating from Ireland, Norway, Spain, and others in this regard indicate that the trajectory of support of Palestine in Europe will continue in the coming months and years.
Ireland’s Foreign Minister, Michael Martin, expressed his disappointment “at the outcome of the U.N. Security Council vote on Palestinian U.N. membership,” he tweeted.
“It is past time for Palestine to take its rightful place among the nations of the world. (Ireland) fully supports U.N. membership and will vote in favor of any UNGA resolution to that end.”
The same position was also adopted by Norway.
“Norway regrets that the Security Council did not agree on admitting Palestine as a full member of the UN,” Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide tweeted, adding:“Norway is a staunch supporter of Palestine’s right to statehood. The Two State Solution is the only way to durable peace.”
Four, the outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Despite the Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, Washington remains the main line of defense for Tel Aviv, allowing it to violate the rights of the Palestinian people and to deny them the very political horizon needed for a just peace.
And, finally, the vote and veto further accentuate Biden’s inability to liberate himself from the stronghold imposed on him and his party by Israel’s supporters—Israel’s backers within the Democratic Party institution and the pro-Israel lobby from without.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
In truth, this collective feeling of hope and empowerment is not the outcome of the strong support for Palestine at the UNSC and the General Assembly, but of the growing sympathy and support for Palestine worldwide and, even more important, the continued resistance of Palestinians in Gaza.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
The outcome of the Palestinevote and the American veto at the United Nations Security Council on April 18 was predictable. Though European countries are becoming increasingly supportive of a Palestinian state, the United States is not yet ready for this commitment.
These are some of the reasons that the U.S. deputy envoy to the U.N., Robert Wood, vetoed the resolution.
One, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East is still governed by Israeli priorities. And since the majority of Israelis reject the idea of a Palestinian state, or any “concessions” or even the most basic rights for Palestinians, the weak U.S. president neither has the courage, nor the desire to defy the Israeli position.
The outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Two, the fact that Israel, as per the words of its ambassador at the U.N., Gilad Erdan, saw that a vote for Palestine would be equivalent to “rewarding terror with a Palestinian state,” created the kind of political discourse that would have made a positive American vote, or an abstention, akin to supporting this so-called terrorism.
Three, U.S. President Joe Biden, in his own Democratic Party’s calculations, cannot politically afford supporting an independent Palestine only a few months ahead of one of the most contested and decisive elections in U.S. history.
His position remains that of supporting a strong Palestinian Authority—which only exists to “secure” Israel against Palestinian Resistance—while giving the illusion that a Palestinian state is forthcoming.
“There needs to be a Palestinian Authority. There needs to be a path to a Palestinian state,” Biden said in October 2023.
The same position was, for the lack of a better word, articulated by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in January 2024: There is a need for a “pathway to a Palestinian state.”
But what does this mean in practice?
“The problem is getting from here to there, and of course, it requires very difficult, challenging decisions. It requires a mindset that is open to that perspective,” according to Blinken. In other words, more illusions and newspeak.
On the other hand, the Republican Party leadership made it clear that their support for Israel is blind and unconditional. They are also ready to exploit any comment—let alone action—by Biden and his officials that may seem critical of Israel in any way. All of these factors combined made the American veto quite predictable.
However, the vote was still important, as it, according to Palestinian political leaders and officials, showed that it is the U.S., not the Palestinians, who are isolated within the international community.
Indeed, the vote demonstrated that:
One, the international community remains largely united in its support of the Palestinians.
Two, the positive vote by France, an influential European country, signals a shift in the perception of the European body politic toward Palestine.
“The time has come for a comprehensive political settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, based on the two-state solution,” the French Delegation at the U.N. tweeted on April 19.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
Three, the strong statements emanating from Ireland, Norway, Spain, and others in this regard indicate that the trajectory of support of Palestine in Europe will continue in the coming months and years.
Ireland’s Foreign Minister, Michael Martin, expressed his disappointment “at the outcome of the U.N. Security Council vote on Palestinian U.N. membership,” he tweeted.
“It is past time for Palestine to take its rightful place among the nations of the world. (Ireland) fully supports U.N. membership and will vote in favor of any UNGA resolution to that end.”
The same position was also adopted by Norway.
“Norway regrets that the Security Council did not agree on admitting Palestine as a full member of the UN,” Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide tweeted, adding:“Norway is a staunch supporter of Palestine’s right to statehood. The Two State Solution is the only way to durable peace.”
Four, the outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Despite the Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, Washington remains the main line of defense for Tel Aviv, allowing it to violate the rights of the Palestinian people and to deny them the very political horizon needed for a just peace.
And, finally, the vote and veto further accentuate Biden’s inability to liberate himself from the stronghold imposed on him and his party by Israel’s supporters—Israel’s backers within the Democratic Party institution and the pro-Israel lobby from without.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
In truth, this collective feeling of hope and empowerment is not the outcome of the strong support for Palestine at the UNSC and the General Assembly, but of the growing sympathy and support for Palestine worldwide and, even more important, the continued resistance of Palestinians in Gaza.
The outcome of the Palestinevote and the American veto at the United Nations Security Council on April 18 was predictable. Though European countries are becoming increasingly supportive of a Palestinian state, the United States is not yet ready for this commitment.
These are some of the reasons that the U.S. deputy envoy to the U.N., Robert Wood, vetoed the resolution.
One, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East is still governed by Israeli priorities. And since the majority of Israelis reject the idea of a Palestinian state, or any “concessions” or even the most basic rights for Palestinians, the weak U.S. president neither has the courage, nor the desire to defy the Israeli position.
The outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Two, the fact that Israel, as per the words of its ambassador at the U.N., Gilad Erdan, saw that a vote for Palestine would be equivalent to “rewarding terror with a Palestinian state,” created the kind of political discourse that would have made a positive American vote, or an abstention, akin to supporting this so-called terrorism.
Three, U.S. President Joe Biden, in his own Democratic Party’s calculations, cannot politically afford supporting an independent Palestine only a few months ahead of one of the most contested and decisive elections in U.S. history.
His position remains that of supporting a strong Palestinian Authority—which only exists to “secure” Israel against Palestinian Resistance—while giving the illusion that a Palestinian state is forthcoming.
“There needs to be a Palestinian Authority. There needs to be a path to a Palestinian state,” Biden said in October 2023.
The same position was, for the lack of a better word, articulated by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in January 2024: There is a need for a “pathway to a Palestinian state.”
But what does this mean in practice?
“The problem is getting from here to there, and of course, it requires very difficult, challenging decisions. It requires a mindset that is open to that perspective,” according to Blinken. In other words, more illusions and newspeak.
On the other hand, the Republican Party leadership made it clear that their support for Israel is blind and unconditional. They are also ready to exploit any comment—let alone action—by Biden and his officials that may seem critical of Israel in any way. All of these factors combined made the American veto quite predictable.
However, the vote was still important, as it, according to Palestinian political leaders and officials, showed that it is the U.S., not the Palestinians, who are isolated within the international community.
Indeed, the vote demonstrated that:
One, the international community remains largely united in its support of the Palestinians.
Two, the positive vote by France, an influential European country, signals a shift in the perception of the European body politic toward Palestine.
“The time has come for a comprehensive political settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, based on the two-state solution,” the French Delegation at the U.N. tweeted on April 19.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
Three, the strong statements emanating from Ireland, Norway, Spain, and others in this regard indicate that the trajectory of support of Palestine in Europe will continue in the coming months and years.
Ireland’s Foreign Minister, Michael Martin, expressed his disappointment “at the outcome of the U.N. Security Council vote on Palestinian U.N. membership,” he tweeted.
“It is past time for Palestine to take its rightful place among the nations of the world. (Ireland) fully supports U.N. membership and will vote in favor of any UNGA resolution to that end.”
The same position was also adopted by Norway.
“Norway regrets that the Security Council did not agree on admitting Palestine as a full member of the UN,” Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide tweeted, adding:“Norway is a staunch supporter of Palestine’s right to statehood. The Two State Solution is the only way to durable peace.”
Four, the outcome of the vote further isolates the United States precisely as much as the Israeli genocide in Gaza has also exposed and isolated Washington.
Despite the Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip, Washington remains the main line of defense for Tel Aviv, allowing it to violate the rights of the Palestinian people and to deny them the very political horizon needed for a just peace.
And, finally, the vote and veto further accentuate Biden’s inability to liberate himself from the stronghold imposed on him and his party by Israel’s supporters—Israel’s backers within the Democratic Party institution and the pro-Israel lobby from without.
Despite the negative outcome of the vote, however, Palestinians now have a renewed resolve that they will ultimately prevail, despite the numerous obstacles created by the U.S. and Israel.
In truth, this collective feeling of hope and empowerment is not the outcome of the strong support for Palestine at the UNSC and the General Assembly, but of the growing sympathy and support for Palestine worldwide and, even more important, the continued resistance of Palestinians in Gaza.