

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Shannon Van Hoesen, shannon.vanhoesen@sierraclub.org
Lindsay Mader, lindsay.mader@sierraclub.org
"The People Always Pay" Exposes Harms of LNG Tax Breaks to Frontline Communities
A new report details the extent to which the export industry for liquefied methane gas, known as LNG, benefits from billions of dollars in tax breaks, also called tax abatements, in Louisiana and Texas, with local communities suffering as a result. As the incoming Trump administration threatens to lift pollution safeguards and offer giveaways to the fossil fuel industry, this report brings much-needed scrutiny to the true harm LNG export projects cause by depriving communities of valuable tax revenue for critical infrastructure and services such as bridges, hospitals, schools, and climate resiliency.
Using data and in-depth interviews with community members, the report, titled The People Always Pay: Tax Breaks Force Gulf Communities to Subsidize the LNG Industry, tells the story of how tax breaks cause economic and social harm to marginalized, often heavily industrialized communities in these Gulf Coast states. This report was submitted to the Department of Energy to inform the update to the agency’s studies which they rely on to make their public interest determinations.
"The immense scale of tax breaks granted to billion-dollar LNG projects—millions of dollars per job—is mind-blowing. These deals essentially pay industry to inflict more suffering on already climate-ravaged communities by polluting the air and water while depriving Gulf Coast communities of vital revenue for schools, infrastructure, healthcare, emergency services, coastal restoration and protection,” said James Hiatt, founder of For a Better Bayou and a resident of Calcasieu Parish in Louisiana featured in the report. “These tax exemptions are a burden to our communities, and bring absolutely no economic prosperity. It's time to stop these giveaways, make polluters pay, and ensure that economic benefits serve the people, not just Big Gas corporations."
The report looks at the primary tax abatement programs that have been granted to LNG export projects: Louisiana’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program (ITEP) and Quality Jobs (QJ), and Texas’s Chapter 312 Property Tax Abatement Program and Chapter 313 Value Limitation Agreement Program.
The analysis finds that the nine operating and proposed LNG export terminals sited in the Louisiana LNG hotspots reviewed have together been gifted $21.6 billion in tax breaks from ITEP and QJ – though 41% of the giveaways under ITEP are for planned projects, meaning the subsidies could still be avoided if the projects never come online. In Texas, all the terminals in this report’s scope receive tax abatements under Chapter 312 and four have agreements under Chapter 313 that amount to $2.1 billion in corporate subsidies, 21% of which are for planned projects and thus could potentially be avoided if the harmful projects are never built. In both states, so few new jobs are promised by the LNG industry in exchange for these tax abatements that every promised job equates to millions of dollars in subsidies received by the LNG industry.
“For communities situated near LNG export projects, there are few facets of life that are not negatively impacted by these facilities. Yet, local and state officials forgo vast sums of public money in tax giveaways, sacrificing everything from public health to local fishing and tourism industries, in exchange for inadequate promises of jobs or investment,” said Alison Kirsch, Sierra Club senior analyst and report author. “This lopsided deal with the industry means that communities are left cleaning up the mess, literally and figuratively, without proper resources.”
The People Always Pay makes it clear that these massive tax exemptions deprive local communities of sorely needed funds for decades, all while subsidizing rich fossil fuel companies that disrupt local industries, causes premature deaths and millions of dollars in health costs, and threatens precious ecosystems. This story is told through data, but also through interviews with residents in the “hotspot” locations, areas most impacted by LNG, who share the harms caused by LNG exports in the area, as well as the impact of lost tax revenue to invest into their communities.
“In Texas it is common to disguise corporate tax handouts as job creation – and that’s exactly what is happening in the Rio Grande Valley,” said Bekah Hinojosa of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network. “Cameron County, for example, voted to allow one fossil fuel developer to avoid paying 100% of its property taxes for ten years – money that should instead be spent on critical community services. Tax breaks for LNG corporations result in pollution that causes numerous health conditions and premature deaths and degrades the environment and sacred land of the Carrizo Comecrudo Tribe of Texas. Meanwhile, they shift a huge burden to our low-income and middle-class people who must pay much more to get healthcare for themselves and their kids and to sustain basic county services. If the LNG industry wants to come in and ruin our air and water, tear up our roads, and deplete our water resources, they should at least pay their fair share of taxes.”
The facilities built with the tax abatement subsidies threaten the Gulf, and also have far reaching impacts on people across the United States and the world. As the US continues investing billions in LNG infrastructure, there are dire warnings that gas exports put climate commitments out of reach—commitments that are critical in order to mitigate the worst impacts of the climate crisis, such as fatal heat waves, mass extinction, and agricultural scarcity. LNG exports also have a clear link to higher domestic heating prices in homes and threaten to crowd out cheaper renewable energy from the market, adding to the economic burden of many people already struggling to afford their bills.
The report concludes that rejecting permits to build pending LNG export projects would be the best course of action to avert the worst of the climate crisis and keep tax revenue in local communities to enable many of the critical investments explored by frontline community members interviewed in the report.
The People Always Pay was released by Sierra Club with Better Brazoria, For a Better Bayou, Healthy Gulf, Ingleside on the Bay Coastal Watch Association, Port Arthur Community Action Network, Sierra Club Delta Chapter, Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter, South Texas Environmental Justice Network, and The Vessel Project of Louisiana.
Read the full report at sc.org/LNGtax.
The Sierra Club is the most enduring and influential grassroots environmental organization in the United States. We amplify the power of our 3.8 million members and supporters to defend everyone's right to a healthy world.
(415) 977-5500"Together, we can break the siege, save lives, and stand up for the cause of Cuban self-determination," said the mission's organizers.
As the Trump administration tightens an already devastating economic embargo of Cuba by targeting the island's fuel imports in a bid to topple the country's socialist government, a coalition of progressive groups on Thursday announced plans for a flotilla to deliver food, medicine, and other essential supplies to the besieged Cuban people.
Members of Progressive International, CodePink, and other direct action and advocacy groups plan to set sail for Cuba next month in the Nuestra América—or Our America—Flotilla, which they said is inspired by the Global Sumud Flotilla missions to break Israel's illegal blockade of Gaza amid the ongoing genocide in the Palestinian exclave.
"We are sailing to Cuba, bringing critical humanitarian aid for its people," the flotilla organizers said on their website. "The Trump administration is strangling the island, cutting off fuel, flights, and critical supplies for survival. The consequences are lethal, for newborns and parents, for the elderly and the sick."
"That is why we are launching the Nuestra América Flotilla, setting sail from across the Caribbean Sea in solidarity with the Cuban people," the organizers continued. "And we are asking for your support, to help us prepare the mission and purchase the food and medicine that we will bring to the Cuban people."
"Together, we can break the siege, save lives, and stand up for the cause of Cuban self-determination," they added.
The announcement of the flotilla came as the Trump administration ratchets up pressure on Cuba's socialist government by further suffocating the island's economy via an oil embargo similar to the one imposed on Venezuela before last month's US invasion and abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
At the time, President Donald Trump threatened the leaders of Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico that they could be next.
Trump reversed former President Joe Biden's eleventh-hour move in January 2025 to remove Cuba from the US state sponsors of terrorism list, a designation utterly divorced from reality. Trump officials have cited Cuba's baseless inclusion on the list as justification for measures taken against the country's government and people.
The US embargo on Cuba dates to the early 1960s when the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations responded to the successful revolution that overthrew a brutal US-backed dictatorship with a blockade accompanied by a decadeslong campaign of state-sponsored terrorism against the Cuban people that left thousands dead and more than $1 trillion in economic damages, according to the Cuban government.
Every year since 1992—with the exception of the Covid-19 pandemic year of 2020—the United Nations General Assembly has voted overwhelmingly to condemn and call for an end to the US blockade of Cuba.
Progressive International co-general coordinator David Adler told El País' Veronica Garrido Thursday, "The US government is drowning the Cuban people, who are running out of light, have no food, no medicine, no energy."
"I do not exaggerate when I say that we are seeing in Cuba the same playbook that Israel applied to the people of Gaza: an encirclement, an act of collective punishment that violates every aspect of international law,” he continued.
"We hope that [the flotilla] will be a mechanism of popular pressure to the governments of the world that have the responsibility, before international law, to protect the fundamental rights of the Cuban people and export the energy required by the island,” Adler said.
“There is nothing illegal about what we are doing," he added. "We are coming to a sovereign country and delivering humanitarian aid. We are ready to take risks in the name of humanity and the fundamental right of the Cuban people."
One expert expressed fear that "something truly spectacular is going to happen in which our 2026 midterm elections are not administered like past elections have been."
A pair of experts warned this week that President Donald Trump is clearly telegraphing his intention to meddle in the 2026 midterm elections.
Stephen Richer, former recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, said during an interview with The Atlantic published Wednesday that he's grown worried that "something truly spectacular is going to happen in which our 2026 midterm elections are not administered like past elections have been."
When asked to flesh out how Trump could potentially rig the upcoming elections, Richer said it was unlikely that he would deploy US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to polling places across the country, if for no other reason than he lacks the manpower to accomplish such an operation.
However, Richer did express concern about the president's ability to muddy waters in tight races and put pressure on his Republican allies to refuse to seat Democratic winners when he is claiming there are disputes about the results.
"Where I think President Trump is most potent is still in the post-election procedures," he explained, "still in sowing doubt in the minds of enough Americans that they don’t think the elections are legitimate and, therefore... the Congress doesn’t have to seat its new members. That’s certainly a popular theory that’s floating about: that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), the outgoing speaker, will choose not to seat the new members, because they’re in allegedly disputed elections."
Richer argued that California could be particularly vulnerable to this, since the state infamously takes so long to finish tallying its votes.
In a New York Times editorial published Thursday, Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the Brennan Center for Justice's voting rights and elections program, argued that Trump's "campaign to rig our elections is well underway," and he pointed to the president's mass pardon last year of rioters who violently stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 as the beginning of his election subversion campaign.
"We have every reason to expect more actions like these in the coming months," wrote Morales-Doyle. "A few weeks ago, Mr. Trump reiterated his threats to prosecute election officials who ran the 2020 election. Just days later, FBI agents seized ballots and election records from 2020 in Fulton County, Georgia."
However, Morales-Doyle also said there was reason to believe that the American system can withstand the president's assault on its election integrity, and he gave a nod toward several efforts across the country to fight back, including states resisting Trump's demands to hand over their voter rolls and Democrats refusing to let new voter suppression legislation pass through Congress.
"We are already seeing how effective people can be in pushing back," he concluded, "whether on the streets of Minneapolis or at town halls hosted by their representatives in Congress. It will be incumbent on all of us—election officials, advocates, state law enforcement, and voters—to see the administration’s efforts for what they are and to fight back."
Repealing the EPA's endangerment finding "isn’t about saving taxpayers’ money, it’s about saving an industry that has already been exposed as a permanent danger to American families," said the head of 350.org.
In what the Sierra Club described as an act to "formalize climate denialism as official government policy," the Trump administration announced Thursday that it has revoked the long-standing "endangerment finding" that allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to pass regulations fighting the climate crisis.
The 2009 endangerment finding determined that the emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases posed a hazard to public health and welfare by causing the planet to warm dramatically, citing overwhelming scientific evidence, which has only grown more indisputable in the nearly two decades since.
With the US Supreme Court having ruled in 2007 that the EPA could make regulations on climate change if it were deemed a health risk, this finding served as the basis for virtually every climate-related EPA regulation under the 1970 Clean Air Act, including those limiting emissions from motor vehicles, power plants, oil and gas facilities, and other sources of pollution.
The finding has been a target of the fossil fuel industry since it was reached. Under President Donald Trump, who has boasted openly of serving the fossil fuel industry in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars of financial support during his last election, they have found their hero.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who has enthusiastically backed Trump's initiatives to expand oil drilling and coal mining, called the repeal of the finding "the largest deregulatory action in the history of America."
Indeed, it is expected to immediately eviscerate fuel-efficiency standards and electric vehicle requirements for cars and trucks, which are already the largest single source of carbon dioxide emissions in the US, contributing about 1.8 billion metric tons in 2022.
While the White House has said the reduced efficiency standards will “save the American people $1.3 trillion in crushing regulations,” this is a drop in the ocean compared to the $87 trillion in economic disruption that a study by researchers at the University of Chicago and the University of Pennsylvania estimated will come over the next 25 years as a result of increased natural disasters and sea-level rise caused by American corporations' fossil fuel outputs.
In the United States, weather disasters—exacerbated by global warming—caused $115 billion in total damages last year, the third most since tracking began in 1980, behind only 2023 and 2024. Last year had more billion-dollar disasters than any other year on record.
Anne Jellema, the executive director of the environmental group 350.org, said repealing the endangerment finding "isn’t about saving taxpayers’ money, it’s about saving an industry that has already been exposed as a permanent danger to American families."
"While the Trump administration can manipulate scientific agencies, it can never suppress the truth that ordinary people in the US and around the world are paying the real price for Big Oil’s profits: Lives are being lost, homes are being destroyed, and costs are soaring," she said.
The Trump administration does not have the last word on the endangerment finding. Climate groups, including Earthjustice, have already stated their intention to challenge the legality of the decision.
"The courts have repeatedly affirmed EPA’s obligation to clean up climate pollution," said Earthjustice president Abigail Dillen. "There is no way to reconcile EPA’s decision with the law, the science, and the reality of disasters that are hitting us harder every year."
Dillen said, "Earthjustice and our partners will see the Trump administration in court.” But it may face an uphill battle.
Though the Supreme Court laid the groundwork for the finding's creation, the current right-wing majority has rolled back its authority in recent years, most notably in 2022, when the justices limited the EPA's authority to impose emissions standards on power plants.
David Arkush, the director of Public Citizen’s climate program, said that "if left to stand," the rollback of the endangerment finding "will hamstring the government’s ability to combat the most terrible environmental threat in human history, harming Americans and the world for decades to come."
“Abundant scientific evidence supports the EPA’s prior conclusion that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare," he added. "Americans feel the effects of climate change constantly, as we experience more dangerous hurricanes, furnace-like heat domes, walls of water slamming into our children’s summer camps, raging wildfires, and other extreme weather driven by greenhouse gases.”