December, 02 2024, 02:01pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Shannon Van Hoesen, shannon.vanhoesen@sierraclub.org
Lindsay Mader, lindsay.mader@sierraclub.org
New Report: Tax Handouts to Wealthy LNG Developers Deprive Communities of Needed Funds
"The People Always Pay" Exposes Harms of LNG Tax Breaks to Frontline Communities
A new report details the extent to which the export industry for liquefied methane gas, known as LNG, benefits from billions of dollars in tax breaks, also called tax abatements, in Louisiana and Texas, with local communities suffering as a result. As the incoming Trump administration threatens to lift pollution safeguards and offer giveaways to the fossil fuel industry, this report brings much-needed scrutiny to the true harm LNG export projects cause by depriving communities of valuable tax revenue for critical infrastructure and services such as bridges, hospitals, schools, and climate resiliency.
Using data and in-depth interviews with community members, the report, titled The People Always Pay: Tax Breaks Force Gulf Communities to Subsidize the LNG Industry, tells the story of how tax breaks cause economic and social harm to marginalized, often heavily industrialized communities in these Gulf Coast states. This report was submitted to the Department of Energy to inform the update to the agency’s studies which they rely on to make their public interest determinations.
"The immense scale of tax breaks granted to billion-dollar LNG projects—millions of dollars per job—is mind-blowing. These deals essentially pay industry to inflict more suffering on already climate-ravaged communities by polluting the air and water while depriving Gulf Coast communities of vital revenue for schools, infrastructure, healthcare, emergency services, coastal restoration and protection,” said James Hiatt, founder of For a Better Bayou and a resident of Calcasieu Parish in Louisiana featured in the report. “These tax exemptions are a burden to our communities, and bring absolutely no economic prosperity. It's time to stop these giveaways, make polluters pay, and ensure that economic benefits serve the people, not just Big Gas corporations."
The report looks at the primary tax abatement programs that have been granted to LNG export projects: Louisiana’s Industrial Tax Exemption Program (ITEP) and Quality Jobs (QJ), and Texas’s Chapter 312 Property Tax Abatement Program and Chapter 313 Value Limitation Agreement Program.
The analysis finds that the nine operating and proposed LNG export terminals sited in the Louisiana LNG hotspots reviewed have together been gifted $21.6 billion in tax breaks from ITEP and QJ – though 41% of the giveaways under ITEP are for planned projects, meaning the subsidies could still be avoided if the projects never come online. In Texas, all the terminals in this report’s scope receive tax abatements under Chapter 312 and four have agreements under Chapter 313 that amount to $2.1 billion in corporate subsidies, 21% of which are for planned projects and thus could potentially be avoided if the harmful projects are never built. In both states, so few new jobs are promised by the LNG industry in exchange for these tax abatements that every promised job equates to millions of dollars in subsidies received by the LNG industry.
“For communities situated near LNG export projects, there are few facets of life that are not negatively impacted by these facilities. Yet, local and state officials forgo vast sums of public money in tax giveaways, sacrificing everything from public health to local fishing and tourism industries, in exchange for inadequate promises of jobs or investment,” said Alison Kirsch, Sierra Club senior analyst and report author. “This lopsided deal with the industry means that communities are left cleaning up the mess, literally and figuratively, without proper resources.”
The People Always Pay makes it clear that these massive tax exemptions deprive local communities of sorely needed funds for decades, all while subsidizing rich fossil fuel companies that disrupt local industries, causes premature deaths and millions of dollars in health costs, and threatens precious ecosystems. This story is told through data, but also through interviews with residents in the “hotspot” locations, areas most impacted by LNG, who share the harms caused by LNG exports in the area, as well as the impact of lost tax revenue to invest into their communities.
“In Texas it is common to disguise corporate tax handouts as job creation – and that’s exactly what is happening in the Rio Grande Valley,” said Bekah Hinojosa of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network. “Cameron County, for example, voted to allow one fossil fuel developer to avoid paying 100% of its property taxes for ten years – money that should instead be spent on critical community services. Tax breaks for LNG corporations result in pollution that causes numerous health conditions and premature deaths and degrades the environment and sacred land of the Carrizo Comecrudo Tribe of Texas. Meanwhile, they shift a huge burden to our low-income and middle-class people who must pay much more to get healthcare for themselves and their kids and to sustain basic county services. If the LNG industry wants to come in and ruin our air and water, tear up our roads, and deplete our water resources, they should at least pay their fair share of taxes.”
The facilities built with the tax abatement subsidies threaten the Gulf, and also have far reaching impacts on people across the United States and the world. As the US continues investing billions in LNG infrastructure, there are dire warnings that gas exports put climate commitments out of reach—commitments that are critical in order to mitigate the worst impacts of the climate crisis, such as fatal heat waves, mass extinction, and agricultural scarcity. LNG exports also have a clear link to higher domestic heating prices in homes and threaten to crowd out cheaper renewable energy from the market, adding to the economic burden of many people already struggling to afford their bills.
The report concludes that rejecting permits to build pending LNG export projects would be the best course of action to avert the worst of the climate crisis and keep tax revenue in local communities to enable many of the critical investments explored by frontline community members interviewed in the report.
The People Always Pay was released by Sierra Club with Better Brazoria, For a Better Bayou, Healthy Gulf, Ingleside on the Bay Coastal Watch Association, Port Arthur Community Action Network, Sierra Club Delta Chapter, Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter, South Texas Environmental Justice Network, and The Vessel Project of Louisiana.
Read the full report at sc.org/LNGtax.
The Sierra Club is the most enduring and influential grassroots environmental organization in the United States. We amplify the power of our 3.8 million members and supporters to defend everyone's right to a healthy world.
(415) 977-5500LATEST NEWS
FCC Moves to Yank Disney Broadcast Licenses as Trumps Demand ABC Fire Kimmel
"This is a clear attack on the First Amendment and a political stunt designed to intimidate critics, retaliate against a comedian practicing free speech through satire, and send a message to anyone who dares to speak out."
Apr 28, 2026
Press freedom advocates on Tuesday forcefully condemned the Republican-dominated Federal Communications Commission—and FCC Chair Brendan Carr in particular—for moving to challenge Disney-owned ABC's broadcast licenses as President Donald Trump again pressures to network to fire late-night television host Jimmy Kimmel.
"The First Amendment and the FCC's mandate do not permit the agency to use broadcast licenses as weapons to punish broadcasters for constitutionally protected content they air," declared Freedom of the Press Foundation chief of advocacy Seth Stern.
"Brendan Carr was once a serious communications lawyer, and has repeatedly and correctly said that the FCC has no role in policing content, whether news reporting or comedians’ late night jokes," Stern pointed out. "Carr's decision to abandon his principles to kiss up to Trump to advance his career does not change the law that Carr knows full well applies."
"The FCC is neither the journalism police nor the humor police," he added. "This is nothing but illegal jawboning intended to intimidate ABC into kissing the ring."
Kimmel—whom ABC briefly suspended last year amid pressure from Carr over comments the comedian made about assassinated right-wing activist Charlie Kirk—joked last Thursday that the first lady, Melania Trump, had "a glow like an expectant widow." Two days later, a gunman attempted to enter the White House Correspondents' Dinner—and on Monday, he was charged with trying to assassinate the president.
Also on Monday, both Donald and Melania Trump separately took to social media, calling for Kimmel to be fired. The comedian, meanwhile, opened his Monday night monologue to crowd chants of "Jimmy" and defended his joke, highlighting the Trumps' age gap.
On Tuesday, Semafor reported the FCC's plans to challenge the ABC licenses, which weren't slated for review until at least 2028. Other outlets began confirming the reporting, citing unnamed sources, and the agency ultimately issued the anticipated order—which says that "the FCC has been investigating Disney's ABC stations for possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and the FCC’s rules, including the agency's prohibition on unlawful discrimination."
The order, signed by David J. Brown, chief of the Video Division, directs ABC to "file license renewals for all of their licensed TV stations within 30 days—in other words, by May 28, 2026." Those stations are WABC-TV (New York), KABC-TV (Los Angeles), WLS-TV (Chicago), WPVI-TV (Philadelphia), KTRK-TV (Houston), KGO-TV (San Francisco), WTVD-TV (Raleigh-Durham), and KFSN-TV (Fresno).
As CNN chief media analyst Brian Stelter explained: "The order will not affect the local stations right away. It is just the start of a protracted legal process, and ABC has broad legal protections. Nevertheless, the FCC order is an extraordinary escalation by the Trump administration."
"The FCC had not filed an early-renewal order in decades, according to a source familiar with the matter, until Monday, when the agency took action against a small station license holder called Bridge News," Stelter noted. "Both Bridge and Disney will now go through a lengthy hearing process, giving the stations multiple chances to respond."
Disney said in a statement that "we have received the Federal Communications Commission's order initiating an accelerated review of the licenses held by ABC's owned television stations. ABC and its stations have a long record of operating in full compliance with FCC rules and serving their local communities with trusted news, emergency information, and public‑interest programming."
"We are confident that record demonstrates our continued qualifications as licensees under the Communications Act and the First Amendment, and are prepared to show that through the appropriate legal channels," the company continued. "Our focus remains, as always, on serving viewers in the local communities where our stations operate."
Commissioner Anna Gomez—currently the FCC's only Democratic appointee—said that "the effort to challenge the licenses of ABC/Disney-owned stations is the FCC's most egregious attack on the First Amendment to date. But it will fail. This should be a lesson to media companies that no amount of capitulation to this administration will buy them protection."
Jessica J. González, co-CEO of the advocacy group Free Press, was similarly optimistic. She said that "Carr will try to dress up this latest attack like a legitimate FCC procedure, but his motivations are clear. He is using his position of power to silence dissent at the president's beck and call. This extraordinary and unconstitutional attack on the media is nothing more than another favor to the most fragile president in U.S. history."
"The FCC’s ongoing attack on lawful and important diversity, equity, and inclusion programs is immoral," she argued. "The timing of this move suggests unconstitutional retribution for a joke Donald Trump didn't like. Either way, this dangerous attack on free speech won’t stand up to any First Amendment test. We've seen Carr violate his oath to uphold the Constitution again and again. It's time for Congress to impeach him."
González added that "for its part, ABC and Disney leadership need to stand strong on behalf of their First Amendment right to air content without government intrusion and censorship. Buckling in advance to pressure by this administration and its obsequious FCC chairman didn't work for the broadcaster when it suspended Kimmel last year. It would be a grave mistake to buckle in advance again to these kinds of chilling government threats from Trump's censorship czar."
The organization MoveOn has launched a petition in support of Kimmel, which already has over 257,000 signatures.
"The Trump administration's targeting of ABC's broadcast licenses sends a chilling message: Fall in line or face consequences," said MoveOn Civic Action chief communications officer Joel Payne. "This is a clear attack on the First Amendment and a political stunt designed to intimidate critics, retaliate against a comedian practicing free speech through satire, and send a message to anyone who dares to speak out."
"ABC and Disney must not back down to Donald Trump or any bureaucrat in his administration doing his bidding," Payne stressed. "This is bigger than just an attempt to bully Jimmy Kimmel—this is about telling the American people what to think, what to laugh at, what to say, and what to criticize. Our members will fight any efforts to weaponize the government to punish speech and will hold corporations who bow to this pressure accountable."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Rights Group Demands Release of Gaza's Dr. Abu Safiya After Israeli Court Extends Detention
“Dr. Abu Safiya is currently held in Negev Prison under harsh conditions, without access to his medication or receiving medical treatment, despite the deterioration of his health," said the Israeli-based Physicians for Human Rights Israel.
Apr 28, 2026
An Israeli human rights group is demanding the release of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, director of the Kamal Adwan Hospital in Gaza, after a court ordered his detention extended.
Physicians for Human Rights Israel on Tuesday blasted the Beersheba District Court for extending the detention of Abu Safiya, who has been held in prison since December 27, 2024, without being charged with any criminal offenses.
The court justified keeping Abu Saifya detained under Israel's Unlawful Combatants Law, which allows for the detention of Palestinians for long periods without trial.
“The court upheld the detention despite arguments that detaining a doctor while performing his medical duties constitutes unlawful detention,” said Physicians for Human Rights Israel. “Dr. Abu Safiya is currently held in Negev Prison under harsh conditions, without access to his medication or receiving medical treatment, despite the deterioration of his health."
The group added that it is demanding "the immediate release of Dr. Abu Safiya along with 13 other detained doctors, as well as all medical personnel currently held in Israel. We call on the international community to intervene and put an end to this abuse."
The US-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) also slammed the court ruling, calling Abu Safiya's detention "a grave injustice and a blatant violation of fundamental human rights and due process."
"As a physician and hospital director, Dr. Abu Safiya dedicated his life to saving others," CAIR added, "yet he now faces indefinite imprisonment under conditions that credible reports indicate include torture, denial of medical care, and severe mistreatment."
A 2025 report from Amnesty International, which has also called for Abu Safiya's release, said that the Gaza-based physician "was detained in the course of caring for his patients and carrying out his medical duties."
Amnesty also noted that, prior to his detention, Abu Safiya and other colleagues at the Kamal Adwan Hospital had "provided human rights and humanitarian organizations with reliable information about the health situation" in Gaza, which has been left devastated by years of Israeli attacks that have killed at least 72,000 Palestinians.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Amid Energy Crisis of His Own Making, Trump Slammed for Using Taxpayer Money to Cancel Wind Projects
"We the taxpayers are going to pay companies $900 million... to NOT build wind power at a time when electricity prices are spiking and we need more clean power?" said one expert.
Apr 28, 2026
President Donald Trump's administration this week shelled out even more US taxpayer money to get energy firms to cancel planned renewable energy projects.
As The New York Times reported, the US Department of the Interior on Monday announced plans to reimburse energy companies a combined $885 million in exchange for forfeiting their leases to build wind farms in federal waters off the coasts of New York, New Jersey, and California.
The companies involved in the projects have promised promised to invest in fossil fuel energy projects, "including liquefied natural gas facilities along the Gulf Coast," the Times reported.
The agreements with the energy companies are similar to a deal the administration struck earlier this year with French firm TotalEnergies, which agreed to forfeit its leases for projects off the coasts of New York and North Carolina in exchange for $928 million that would be plugged into fossil fuels.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) blasted the administration for killing the projects planned off the coast of his state, decrying "a reckless decision that hurts working families and the economy."
"Once again, Donald Trump is attacking New York offshore wind at the behest of his fossil fuel donors with no justification," Schumer said.
Costa Samaras, director of the Carnegie Mellon University Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, expressed disbelief that the administration was killing clean energy projects at a time when Americans are suffering from surging gas prices, which on Tuesday hit their highest level in four years.
"Hold on," he wrote in a social media post. "We the taxpayers are going to pay companies $900 million, which is more than six times what we spend on wind power research and development, to NOT build wind power at a time when electricity prices are spiking and we need more clean power?"
New polling suggests that Trump's blanket opposition to wind power projects is becoming politically costly.
As Gizmodo reported on Tuesday, a recent survey conducted by GOP public opinion research firm the Tarrance Group found that "nearly three-quarters (74%) of voters favor the construction of offshore wind projects off the coast of their own state, with majorities favoring in every state surveyed."
The poll found that even Republican voters have grown more supportive of wind power projects, with support for offshore wind rising by 30 percentage points over the last year.
In its analysis of the poll, the Tarrance Group said that more voters have come around to supporting offshore wind due in part to "ongoing concerns about energy prices," which have spiked since Trump launched an illegal war with Iran in February.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


