May, 03 2018, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Emily Arasim - emily@wecaninternational.org, +1(505) 920-0153, Michelle Cook - divestinvestprotect@gmail.com
Calls For Justice Raised By Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation During Meetings With Fossil Fuel Funders
Over the past week, the third Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe was present in Switzerland and Germany - working to expose harms and injustices, and engage in high-level meetings with Credit Suisse, UBS, Deutsche Bank, and Swiss government officials, during which Delegates demanded adherence to the standards of Indigenous rights and human rights law, and meaningful action to divest funds from the fossil fuel companies pushing unwanted extractive
ZURICH, Switzerland
Over the past week, the third Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe was present in Switzerland and Germany - working to expose harms and injustices, and engage in high-level meetings with Credit Suisse, UBS, Deutsche Bank, and Swiss government officials, during which Delegates demanded adherence to the standards of Indigenous rights and human rights law, and meaningful action to divest funds from the fossil fuel companies pushing unwanted extractive development in Indigenous territories, while further endangering the global climate.
The Spring 2018 Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe was comprised of both frontline community leaders, and tribal officials who serve or have served in official capacities for their Tribal Nations, including - Charlene Aleck (Elected councillor for Tsleil Waututh Nation, Sacred Trust Initiative, Canada); Dr. Sara Jumping Eagle (Oglala Lakota and Mdewakantonwan Dakota pediatrician, living and working on the Standing Rock Reservation, North Dakota); Michelle Cook (Dine/Navajo, human rights lawyer); Waste Win Yellowlodge Young (Ihunktowanna/Hunkpapa of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Former Tribal Historic Preservation Officer); and Monique Verdin (Member of South Louisiana's United Houma Nation Tribal Council and the Another Gulf Is Possible Collaborative) - along with Osprey Orielle Lake (WECAN International Executive Director and Delegation organizer). [Full speaker biographies available here].
Building off of the successes and steps taken by the first two Divestment Delegations, Indigenous women leaders spoke their truth as women living and working on the frontlines in impacted communities during meetings with banks, officials, media, and Swiss and German community members. Delegates shared stories, data, and calls for accountability focused on the dire social and environmental impacts of projects including Energy Transfer Partners' Dakota Access and Bayou Bridge Pipelines, Kinder Morgan's TransMountain Pipeline, and Enbridge's Line 3 Pipeline.
Face to face meetings with both Deutsche Bank and UBS bank officials were held, as women leaders followed up on previous demands and discussions, and continued to make impassioned calls for divestment of funding from fossil fuel development, and respect for Indigenous rights to free, prior and informed consent as enshrined in the United Nations Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
As part of the Delegation's work in Zurich, an action was held outside of the Credit Suisse and UBS headquarters in the city's financial district, during which Indigenous women Delegates and local women from Swiss Klimaseniorinnen (Senior Women for Climate Protection) raised a Tipi structure, and spoke out for Indigenous rights and urgent climate action. The direct-action was a response to a promise made by Delegates to Credit Suisse during 2017 meetings, that if meaningful action was not taken by the bank, Indigenous women would return to their doorstep with their messages and symbols of their homelands.
Following the action, the representatives of the Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe delivered a memorandum of demands and their analysis to Credit Suisse, before entering into a meeting with Swiss government representatives, including officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Labor and Economics.
As one of the central actions of the Spring 2018 Delegation, women leaders also attended the Credit Suisse Annual Shareholders Meeting. Each woman took the floor and shared powerful testimony in front of some 1,200 Credit Suisse executives, employees, and shareholders, exposing exactly how the bank's money has contributed both historically and currently to egregious violations of Indigenous rights, human rights, and the health of the global climate.
The Delegation's powerful remarks were featured on Swiss national television, and a full recording of the Credit Suisse annual shareholder meeting is available here, with testimony by the Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation beginning at minute 1:51:28.
A special evening forum was also held in Zurich [full video here], providing a platform for Indigenous women delegates to address the public, and build important collaborations with European climate, Indigenous, and women's rights organizations and activists.
Despite purportedly high ethical and human rights standards, Germany and Switzerland are home to several of the world's largest financial institutions supporting extraction projects across Indigenous territories in the United States and around the world, making these two countries the focus of this and the previous two Divestment Delegations.
The third Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe was facilitated by the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) International in partnership with Indigenous women leaders and their directives, as part of an international movement which is pursuing institutional divestment as a strategy to advocate for change from banks and investors, and protect the climate, and rights and lives of Indigenous communities and others experiencing the impacts of fossil fuel development.
Members of the media are encouraged to reach out with all questions and interview requests. Photos from the third Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation to Europe are available for download here.
"We are incredibly honored, humbled, and thankful for the reception, recognition, welcoming, and the compassion shown by the good people of Switzerland who have heard our cries for justice and accountability for Swiss investments in Indigenous territories in the U.S. and Canada. I observed, however, that the banks and financial institutions often do not reflect the contemporary heart or values of the Swiss people in my opinion. The world and our nations must work together to capture and make accountable to the people, the financial systems which were created to serve and secure humanity's resources for our collective future and wellbeing." explains Michelle Cook (Dine/Navajo, human rights lawyer)
"By meeting with these financial institutions who have invested in companies and projects that impacted my community, they are able to hear and see first hand how their investments were complicit in human, Indigenous and environmental abuses. There is nothing more powerful than the truth." explains Waste Win Yellowlodge Young (Ihunktowanna/Hunkpapa of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Former Tribal Historic Preservation Officer)
"Our drinking water and Lakota way of life is threatened by the Dakota Access Pipeline and the unethical corporation Energy Transfer Partners. Until our families are safe, we will continue to hold corporations and the financial institutions who fund them accountable. Where is your money going? We are downstream of your decisions. Make a difference and divest." explains Dr. Sara Jumping Eagle (Oglala Lakota and Mdewakantonwan Dakota pediatrician, living and working on the Standing Rock Reservation, North Dakota)
"I found it incredible how detached the people are at these big financial institutions, how unaware they are of the realities of the projects they are investing in. This divestment trip really highlighted this. As I spoke of the Orca Whales being threatened by tanker traffic and our water being contaminated by more tar sands pipelines, the guy at the bank said, 'get to your point', and 'ask a question...if you have one!'. Aghast, I exclaimed, 'Stop funding these corporations that are violating Indigenous rights and are a huge threat to our environment!'. Being accompanied by beautiful, strong leaders from Standing Rock and South Louisiana and Navajo Nation was powerful. I'm sure these Bankers will remember for some time." explains Charlene Aleck (Elected councillor for Tsleil Waututh Nation, Sacred Trust Initiative, Canada)
"I travelled all the way to Switzerland to better understand how shortsighted investments threatening our Houma Bayou territories in south Louisiana are linked to the protection of the sacred inlet waters of the Tseil Waututh Nation and to the Lakota, Dakota, Nakota in the watershed upriver from my homelands. Our delegation of women spoke our truths from the frontlines, connected to each other by pipeline projects, as we met with bankers in blue suits in big buildings where international investments fuel collaborations with corporations invested in violating human and Indigenous rights and the rights of our Mother Earth. Paths of resistance, against pipeline companies Energy Transfer Partners and Kinder Morgan, led us to the doorsteps of Deutsche Bank, UBS and Credit Suisse to petition these institutions to divest from bad business practices gambling with false promises of profit over the generational respect of water quality, people lives and their ways of life." explains Monique Verdin (Member of south Louisiana's United Houma Nation Tribal Council and the Another Gulf Is Possible Collaborative)
"The Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) International is honored to have the opportunity to organize the Indigenous Women's Divestment Delegation with the directives of strong women leaders standing bravely for fossil fuel divestment, for the water and climate, and for the health and survival of their Indigenous Nations and all people. As a group of diverse Indigenous women living and working in impacted lands including British Columbia, the Gulf Bayou, and the Standing Rock Sioux Nation, the Delegates faced intensive meetings where we addressed institutionalized environmental racism, and fiercely advocated to bring about direly needed changes to financial and political systems. It is far past time for financial institutions to be accountable, and for justice to be served in all cases of violation of the land and lives of Indigenous peoples due to the continued expansion of the fossil fuel industry. The work of the Delegates is a pivotal contribution to the ongoing global struggle to transition off of fossil fuels, and there is no doubt that the women have had an impact on the bank and government officials whom they looked in the eye and demanded morality and action from." explains Osprey Orielle Lake, Executive Director of the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) International
The Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) International is a solutions-based organization established to engage women worldwide in policy advocacy, on-the-ground projects, direct action, trainings, and movement building for global climate justice.
LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular