

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Will Matthews, (212) 549-2582 or 2666; media@aclu.org
The
American Civil Liberties Union and the Los Angeles-based law firm
Caldwell Leslie and Proctor, PC today asked President Obama to commute
the remaining sentence of Kenneth J. Lumpkin, a father of four serving
the 15th year of an unjust 20-year prison sentence for a non-violent
offense. Along with a commutation petition, the ACLU today filed with
the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney over 30
letters in support of commutation for Lumpkin, including several from
staff members at the Taft Correctional Institution in California, the
minimum security facility where Lumpkin is currently incarcerated.
"I accept full
responsibility for what I did, and it is not an exaggeration to say I
regret it every day," Lumpkin said. "But my hope is that you see clearly
the man I have become and that I have made a lifetime commitment to
change. My 20-year prison sentence is clearly excessive, and if you find
it in your heart to commute my sentence there would be no words to
express my deepest gratitude."
Lumpkin was
convicted in 1996 of a non-violent drug-related offense for playing a
minor role in a conspiracy to sell and distribute crack cocaine.
Lumpkin's 20-year sentence was mandated by law under unfair and
discriminatory U.S. sentencing guidelines that, at the time of his
sentencing, punished crack cocaine related offenses 100 times more
severely than offenses related to powder cocaine. At the time of his
sentencing, the judge in Lumpkin's case lamented what he called the
"very, very harsh" nature of the sentence called for by law, saying that
his "hands [we]re tied." And after presiding over a recent motion to
have Lumpkin's sentence reduced, U.S. District Court Judge David O.
Carter praised Lumpkin for his efforts to rehabilitate himself before
reluctantly concluding that "the law as it stands does not allow for
this Court to reduce Lumpkin's sentence."
Lumpkin is one of
thousands of people in this country, a disproportionate number of whom
are people of color, who have been given extremely long sentences under
the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. The Fair
Sentencing Act passed by Congress last year reduced the disparity from
100-to-1 to 18-to-1 but did not fully eliminate it.
Had Lumpkin's
offense involved powder instead of crack cocaine - the same quantity of
the same drug in a different form - his mandatory minimum sentence would
have been 10 years instead of 20, he would have already served his
entire sentence, he would have been there to watch his children graduate
from high school and the birth of his first grandchild and he would
have been able to help care for his mother, who is recuperating from a
stroke she suffered several years ago.
"The case of Kenny
Lumpkin exemplifies why it is so urgent that our country re-think
mandatory minimum sentences and a one-size-fits-all approach to
sentencing," said Scott Michelman, staff attorney with the ACLU Criminal
Law Reform Project. "The Fair Sentencing Act was a step in the right
direction, but individuals like Kenny have fallen through the cracks,
and it is essential that the president use his commutation power to
right these historical, but still ongoing, wrongs."
Lumpkin is the
latest person to seek commutation as part of a larger project designed
by the ACLU called "Dear Mr. President, Yes You Can," which brings
together civil rights advocates, legal scholars, law school clinics, pro
bono counsel and others to urge President Obama to use his pardon and
commutation power in a principled way, consistent with his
administration's position that the crack sentencing guidelines have been
far too harsh. The project also aims to promote the president's
clemency power as a means to correct historical injustices. Last year,
the ACLU filed a commutation petition with President Obama on behalf of
Hamedah Hasan, a mother and grandmother now serving the 18th year of an
unjust 27-year prison sentence for a first time, non-violent crack
cocaine conspiracy offense. That petition is still pending after nearly a
full year.
Though Lumpkin's
excessive punishment as a result of the crack-powder sentencing
disparity is not unique, his conduct while incarcerated has demonstrated
a level of rehabilitation that officials at his correctional
institution consider extraordinary. After being transferred several
years ago from a medium security prison to a fenceless minimum security
camp several years ago, Lumpkin has taken virtually all of the college
courses available to him, teaches two art classes a week to fellow
prisoners and leads them in a community mural painting project, is
active in his Native American religious group, and is executive chairman
of a group called Those Outspoken Against Drugs (TOAD), a select group
of prisoners who speak to teenagers at local schools and juvenile halls
about taking responsibility for one's own actions, making good choices
and the dangers of drugs.
Lumpkin's conduct
at the camp has earned the respect and sincere admiration of not only
fellow inmates - both long-timers and those recently incarcerated - but
also of members of the prison staff, including the Associate Warden, who
have all written to declare their support for Mr. Lumpkin's early
release.
"Only the
president can do what is right for Kenny, his family and friends, all
the other prisoners who look up to Kenny as a role model for their own
rehabilitation and the correctional officers who point to Kenny as a
model prisoner," said Michael V. Schafler of Caldwell Leslie &
Proctor, PC. "Granting Kenny's commutation will signal to everyone who
has watched Kenny work tirelessly to better himself, including his
fellow prisoners, the children in his neighborhood and church, and those
with whom he has worked through the TOAD program, that it is never too
late to change."
Additional
information about the ACLU's work on behalf of Lumpkin and Hasan,
including a newly released video documenting Hasan's story, is available
online at: www.dearmrpresidentyesyoucan.org
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666The companies avoided more than $26.7 billion in income taxes last year, enough to give free school lunches to every child in America.
Dozens of America's most profitable corporations avoided paying any federal income taxes in 2025, according to an analysis out on Tuesday from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
The 88 companies—which include Tesla, Southwest Airlines, Live Nation, Palantir, Citigroup, and many others listed in the S&P 500—brought in a collective $105 billion in pretax income last year.
ITEP found that 2025 saw a spike in corporate tax avoidance, enabled in part by new loopholes created by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by President Donald Trump and by his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% from its previous 35%.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is expected to hand the wealthiest 1% of Americans $117 billion in tax cuts this year, while those in the bottom 95% are set to pay more in taxes while facing across-the-board cuts to social safety net programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
It also allowed multimillion- and billion-dollar corporations to find new ways to avoid paying taxes. More than half of the tax-avoiders listed in the report used a provision in the new tax law allowing companies to immediately write off capital investments, reducing their collective taxes by $11.4 billion.
Pharmaceutical and tech companies, meanwhile, were able to take advantage of tax write-offs for research and development, exempting them from approximately another $4.4 billion.
In total, the corporate tax avoidance documented in 2025 by the researchers helped to rob the public coffers of yet another $26.7 billion, enough to give every public school student a free lunch for a year, according to a University of Missouri analysis of the National School Lunch Program.
The researchers said that the full scale of corporate tax avoidance remains unclear, since corporate tax returns are not publicly available. Some companies were also excluded because they are not part of the S&P 500 or have not yet reported their 2025 taxes.
“These findings are not isolated cases—they reflect systemic deficiencies in the corporate tax code,” said Amy Hanauer, the executive director for ITEP. “Without meaningful reform, profitable corporations will continue to pay less than their fair share.”
"We have a solemn duty to play our defined role under the 25th Amendment by setting up this body to act alongside the vice president and the Cabinet."
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Tuesday unveiled legislation that would establish a congressional commission tasked with determining whether the president is able to continue executing the duties of the office.
The bill, titled the Commission on Presidential Capacity Act, would also set up "expedited" emergency procedures under which Congress could activate the newly created commission and fast-track its consideration of presidential fitness.
As envisioned by Raskin, this commission would act as a legislative counterpart to the US vice president and the president's Cabinet, which the text of the 25th Amendment grants the power to declare the president incapacitated. The 25th Amendment also gives that power to a majority "of such other body as Congress may by law provide."
"The Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to create a body that will guarantee the successful continuity of government by responding to presidential incapacity to discharge the powers and duties of office," said Raskin. "We have a solemn duty to play our defined role under the 25th Amendment by setting up this body to act alongside the vice president and the Cabinet."
Raskin pointed to Trump's recent erratic behavior to argue that Congress needed to take a more assertive role in determining whether he has the mental capacity to serve in the most powerful office in the federal government.
"Public trust in Donald Trump’s ability to meet the duties of his office has dropped to unprecedented lows," the Maryland Democrat said, "as he threatens to destroy entire civilizations, unleashes chaos in the Middle East while violating Congressional war powers, aggressively insults the pope of the Catholic Church, and sends out artistic renderings online likening himself to Jesus Christ."
Raskin went on to warn that "we are at a dangerous precipice, and it is now a matter of national security for Congress to fulfill its responsibilities under the 25th Amendment to protect the American people from an increasingly volatile and unstable situation."
Fifty House Democrats signed on as original co-sponsors of Raskin's bill, which is unlikely to pass the Republican-controlled US House of Representatives.
Calls for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office grew louder last week after Trump declared that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," unless Iran agreed to meet his demands.
In a letter sent to congressional leaders on Monday, four psychiatrists warned that Trump's "behavior and rhetoric... have crossed a threshold that demands the immediate and bipartisan attention of Congress."
The psychiatrists added that Trump "exhibits what forensic mental health experts have, across dozens of independent assessments, identified as the 'Dark Triad' of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy."
One expert called the new IMF forecast "extremely concerning for the global economy," noting that "the most dire impacts of our economic situation will be felt by the poor and the vulnerable."
The International Monetary Fund warned Tuesday that the US-Israeli war on Iran could slow global economic growth, stoke inflation, and increase the possibility of a worldwide recession and energy crisis.
The illegal war of choice on Iran being waged by US President Donald Trump and the government of fugitive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already had wide-ranging negative impacts on the global economy, from soaring fuel prices caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to supply chain disruptions and financial market volatility.
However, a major global economic crisis has thus far been averted. That could soon change.
"Despite major trade disruptions and policy uncertainty, last year ended on an upbeat note," International Monetary Fund director of research Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas wrote in an analysis of the IMF's latest World Economic Outlook report. "The private sector adapted to a changing business environment, while powerful offsets came from lower US tariffs than originally announced, some fiscal support, and favorable financial conditions coupled with strong productivity gains and a tech boom."
"Despite some downside risks, the momentum was expected to carry over into 2026, lifting the pre-conflict global growth forecast to 3.4%," Gourinchas continued. "War in the Middle East has halted this momentum. The closing of the Strait of Hormuz and serious damage to critical facilities in a region central to global hydrocarbon supply raise the prospect of a major energy crisis should hostilities continue."
The IMF said that even if the war ends quickly, lasting damage to the world's economy will still happen.
According to the IMF report:
Under the assumption of a limited conflict, global growth is projected at 3.1% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027, below recent outcomes and well under pre-pandemic averages. Global inflation is expected to tick up in 2026 and resume its decline in 2027. Pressures are concentrated in emerging market and developing economies, especially commodity importers with preexisting vulnerabilities. Risks are decisively on the downside. A prolonged conflict, deeper geopolitical fragmentation, disappointment over [artificial intelligence]-driven productivity, or renewed trade tensions could weaken growth and unsettle markets. High public debt and eroded policy buffers add vulnerability. Policies should foster adaptability, enhance credibility, and reinforce international cooperation.
The IMF said that "the shock’s ultimate magnitude will depend on the conflict’s duration and scale—and how quickly energy production and shipment normalize once hostilities end," and that effects will vary by location.
"Countries will feel the impact differently," Gourinchas wrote. "As in past commodity-price surges, importers are highly exposed. Low-income and developing economies—especially those with vulnerabilities and limited buffers—are likely to be hit hardest. Gulf energy exporters will face economic fallout from damaged infrastructure, production disruptions, export constraints, and weaker tourism and business activity. Remittances will fall in countries that supply migrant workers to the region."
Eric LeCompte, executive director of the religious development group Jubilee USA Network and a United Nations finance expert, called the new IMF forecast "extremely concerning for the global economy," lamenting that "the most dire impacts of our economic situation will be felt by the poor and the vulnerable."
The new report comes as the IMF's annual Spring Meetings are underway in Washington, DC.
“World leaders coming to Washington are receiving a very dark picture of the global economy,” said LeCompte. “The war is causing greater poverty and increases in our fuel and food costs."
Other groups have also warned of the adverse economic effects of the US-Israeli war on Iran.
Ben May, Bridget Payne, and Paul Moroz of Oxford Economics recently published a report warning that a longer war in Iran "could tip the global economy into recession."
In such a situation, "the Gulf states suffer most acutely—GDP down over 8% in 2026—before rebounding sharply as production recovers," they wrote. "Advanced Asian economies, which are especially reliant on Gulf oil, take a heavy blow from energy import cost surges and supply chain disruption."
"Europe faces a painful squeeze on gas and electricity," the trio added. "The US fares somewhat better given its domestic energy production, but an equity market decline of nearly 20% weighs heavily on consumer spending."
Some US-based organizations have focused on the war's domestic economic impacts.
Dean Baker, a senior fellow at the Center for Economic Policy Research, published an analysis earlier this month asserting that "making enemies makes us poorer."
"Secretary of Defense (or War) Pete Hegseth seems to be having a really great time killing people in Iran, but his live action video games come at a big cost—not just in lives, but in budget dollars," Baker wrote. "To be clear, the main reason to oppose this pointless war is its impact on the people of Iran and elsewhere in the region. But it also has a huge economic cost that is seriously underappreciated."
"In addition to reducing our security and jeopardizing the well-being of people around the world, Donald Trump’s belligerence will cost us a huge amount of money," he said. Focusing on US military spending, Baker noted that "Trump wants the country to spend 5% of GDP, or $1.5 trillion a year, on the military. This comes to $12,000 per household."
Trump and his Republican Party are seeking to offset some of their record military spending with devastating cuts to social programs upon which tens of millions of Americans rely. Already reeling from the biggest cuts to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program spending in those programs' histories, Trump’s budget request for fiscal year 2027 contains $73 billion in total reductions in nondefense spending.
"It is striking to see that Congress might be willing to quickly cough up this money," said Baker, referring to military funding, "when it has refused far smaller sums that could have made a huge difference in the lives of tens of millions of people."