

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Will Matthews, (212) 549-2582 or 2666; media@aclu.org
The
American Civil Liberties Union and the Los Angeles-based law firm
Caldwell Leslie and Proctor, PC today asked President Obama to commute
the remaining sentence of Kenneth J. Lumpkin, a father of four serving
the 15th year of an unjust 20-year prison sentence for a non-violent
offense. Along with a commutation petition, the ACLU today filed with
the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney over 30
letters in support of commutation for Lumpkin, including several from
staff members at the Taft Correctional Institution in California, the
minimum security facility where Lumpkin is currently incarcerated.
"I accept full
responsibility for what I did, and it is not an exaggeration to say I
regret it every day," Lumpkin said. "But my hope is that you see clearly
the man I have become and that I have made a lifetime commitment to
change. My 20-year prison sentence is clearly excessive, and if you find
it in your heart to commute my sentence there would be no words to
express my deepest gratitude."
Lumpkin was
convicted in 1996 of a non-violent drug-related offense for playing a
minor role in a conspiracy to sell and distribute crack cocaine.
Lumpkin's 20-year sentence was mandated by law under unfair and
discriminatory U.S. sentencing guidelines that, at the time of his
sentencing, punished crack cocaine related offenses 100 times more
severely than offenses related to powder cocaine. At the time of his
sentencing, the judge in Lumpkin's case lamented what he called the
"very, very harsh" nature of the sentence called for by law, saying that
his "hands [we]re tied." And after presiding over a recent motion to
have Lumpkin's sentence reduced, U.S. District Court Judge David O.
Carter praised Lumpkin for his efforts to rehabilitate himself before
reluctantly concluding that "the law as it stands does not allow for
this Court to reduce Lumpkin's sentence."
Lumpkin is one of
thousands of people in this country, a disproportionate number of whom
are people of color, who have been given extremely long sentences under
the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. The Fair
Sentencing Act passed by Congress last year reduced the disparity from
100-to-1 to 18-to-1 but did not fully eliminate it.
Had Lumpkin's
offense involved powder instead of crack cocaine - the same quantity of
the same drug in a different form - his mandatory minimum sentence would
have been 10 years instead of 20, he would have already served his
entire sentence, he would have been there to watch his children graduate
from high school and the birth of his first grandchild and he would
have been able to help care for his mother, who is recuperating from a
stroke she suffered several years ago.
"The case of Kenny
Lumpkin exemplifies why it is so urgent that our country re-think
mandatory minimum sentences and a one-size-fits-all approach to
sentencing," said Scott Michelman, staff attorney with the ACLU Criminal
Law Reform Project. "The Fair Sentencing Act was a step in the right
direction, but individuals like Kenny have fallen through the cracks,
and it is essential that the president use his commutation power to
right these historical, but still ongoing, wrongs."
Lumpkin is the
latest person to seek commutation as part of a larger project designed
by the ACLU called "Dear Mr. President, Yes You Can," which brings
together civil rights advocates, legal scholars, law school clinics, pro
bono counsel and others to urge President Obama to use his pardon and
commutation power in a principled way, consistent with his
administration's position that the crack sentencing guidelines have been
far too harsh. The project also aims to promote the president's
clemency power as a means to correct historical injustices. Last year,
the ACLU filed a commutation petition with President Obama on behalf of
Hamedah Hasan, a mother and grandmother now serving the 18th year of an
unjust 27-year prison sentence for a first time, non-violent crack
cocaine conspiracy offense. That petition is still pending after nearly a
full year.
Though Lumpkin's
excessive punishment as a result of the crack-powder sentencing
disparity is not unique, his conduct while incarcerated has demonstrated
a level of rehabilitation that officials at his correctional
institution consider extraordinary. After being transferred several
years ago from a medium security prison to a fenceless minimum security
camp several years ago, Lumpkin has taken virtually all of the college
courses available to him, teaches two art classes a week to fellow
prisoners and leads them in a community mural painting project, is
active in his Native American religious group, and is executive chairman
of a group called Those Outspoken Against Drugs (TOAD), a select group
of prisoners who speak to teenagers at local schools and juvenile halls
about taking responsibility for one's own actions, making good choices
and the dangers of drugs.
Lumpkin's conduct
at the camp has earned the respect and sincere admiration of not only
fellow inmates - both long-timers and those recently incarcerated - but
also of members of the prison staff, including the Associate Warden, who
have all written to declare their support for Mr. Lumpkin's early
release.
"Only the
president can do what is right for Kenny, his family and friends, all
the other prisoners who look up to Kenny as a role model for their own
rehabilitation and the correctional officers who point to Kenny as a
model prisoner," said Michael V. Schafler of Caldwell Leslie &
Proctor, PC. "Granting Kenny's commutation will signal to everyone who
has watched Kenny work tirelessly to better himself, including his
fellow prisoners, the children in his neighborhood and church, and those
with whom he has worked through the TOAD program, that it is never too
late to change."
Additional
information about the ACLU's work on behalf of Lumpkin and Hasan,
including a newly released video documenting Hasan's story, is available
online at: www.dearmrpresidentyesyoucan.org
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666"Clearly, the international repression of the Palestinian cause knows no bounds."
Ninety-five-year-old Richard Falk—world renowned scholar of international law and former UN special rapporteur focused on Palestinian rights—was detained and interrogated for several hours along with his wife, legal scholar Hilal Elver, as the pair entered Canada for a conference focused on that nation's complicity with Israel's genocide in Gaza.
"A security person came and said, ‘We’ve detained you both because we’re concerned that you pose a national security threat to Canada,'” Falk explained to Al-Jazeera in a Saturday interview from Ottawa in the wake of the incident that happened at the international airport in Toronto ahead of the scheduled event.
“It was my first experience of this sort–ever–in my life,” said Falk, professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, author or editor of more than 20 books, and formerly the UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories.
Falk, who is American, has been an outspoken critic of the foreign policy of Canada, the United States, and other Western nations on the subject of Israel-Palestine as well as other issues. He told media outlets that he and his wife, also an American, were held for over four hours after their arrival in Toronto. They were in the country to speak and participate at the Palestine Tribunal on Canadian Responsibility, an event scheduled for Friday and Saturday in Ottawa, the nation's capital.
The event, according to the program notes on the website, was designed to "document the multiple ways that Canadian entities – including government bodies, corporations, universities, charities, media, and other cultural institutions–have enabled and continue to enable the settler colonization and genocide of Palestinians, and to articulate what justice and reparations would require."
In his comments to Al-Jazeera, Falk said he believes the interrogation by the Canadian authorities—which he described as "nothing particularly aggressive" but "random" and "disorganized" in its execution—is part of a global effort by powerful nations complicit with human rights abuses and violations of international law to “punish those who endeavour to tell the truth about what is happening” in the world, including in Gaza.
Martin Shaw, a British sociologist and author of The New Age of Genocide, said the treatment of Falk and Elver should be seen as an "extraordinary development" for Canada, and not in a good way. For a nation that likes to think of itself as a "supporter of international justice," said Shaw, "to arrest the veteran scholar and former UN rapporteur Richard Falk while he is attending a Gaza tribunal. Clearly, the international repression of the Palestinian cause knows no bounds."
Canadian Senator Yuen Pau Woo, a supporter of the Palestine Tribunal, told Al-Jazeera he was “appalled” by the interrogation.
“We know they were here to attend the Palestine Tribunal. We know they have been outspoken in documenting and publicizing the horrors inflicted on Gaza by Israel, and advocating for justice,” Woo said. “If those are the factums for their detention, then it suggests that the Canadian government considers these acts of seeking justice for Palestine to be national security threats–and I’d like to know why.”
"I refuse to believe that in a state like Maine where people work as hard as we do here, that it is merely hard work that gets you that kind of success. We all know it isn't. We all know it's the structures. It's the tax code."
Echoing recent viral comments by music superstar Billie Eilish, Maine Democratic candidate for US Senate Graham Planter is also arguing that the existence of billionaires cannot be justified in a world where working-class people with multiple jobs still cannot afford the basic necessities of life.
In video clip posted Friday of a campaign event in the northern town of Caribou from last month, Platner rails against the "structures" of an economy in which billionaires with vast personal fortunes use their wealth to bend government—including the tax code—to conform to their interests while working people are left increasingly locked out of controlling their own destinies, both materially and politically.
"Nobody works hard enough to justify $1 billion," the military veteran and oyster farmer told potential voters at the event. "Not in a world where I know people that have three jobs and can't even afford their rent."
With audience members nodding their heads in agreement, Platner continued by saying, "I refuse to believe that in a state like Maine, where people work as hard as we do here, that it is merely hard work that gets you that kind of success. We all know it isn't. We all know it's the structures. It's the tax code. That is what allows that money to get accrued."
No one works hard enough to justify being a billionaire. pic.twitter.com/Ezvf5fPLfv
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) November 14, 2025
The systemic reasons that create vast inequality, Platner continued, are also why he believes that the process of the super wealthy becoming richer and richer at the expense of working people can be reversed.
"The world that we live in today," he explained, "is not organic. It is not natural. The political and economic world we have did not happen because it had to. It happened because politicians in Washington and the billionaires who write the policies that they pushed made this happen. They changed the laws, and they made it legal to accrue as much wealth and power as they have now."
The solution? "We need to make it illegal again to do that," says Platner.
The comments questioning the justification for billionaires to even exist by Platner—though made in early October—echo more recent comments that went viral when spoken by Billie Eilish, a popular musician, who told a roomful of Wall Street movers and shakers in early November that they should do a better job reflecting on their outrageous wealth.
"Love you all, but there’s a few people in here that have a lot more money than me," Eilish said during an award event in New York City. "If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire? No hate, but yeah, give your money away, shorties."
"If you're a billionaire, why are you a billionaire?"
— Billie Eilish clocking billionaires.pic.twitter.com/BVpRExp1GQ
— Billie Eilish Spotify (@BillieSpotify_) October 30, 2025
While those remarks took a long spin around the internet, Eilish on Friday doubled down on uncharitable billionaires by colorfully calling Elon Musk, who could end up being the world's first trillionaire, a "fucking pathetic pussy bitch coward" for not donating more of his vast fortune, among the largest in the world, to humanitarian relief efforts.
This week, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of economists and policy experts called for the creation of a new international body to address the global crisis of inequality.
Like Platner, the group behind the call—including economists like Joseph Stiglitz, Thomas Piketty, Ha-Joon Chang, and Jayati Ghosh—emphasized the inequality-as-a-policy-choice framework. Piketty, who has called for the mass taxation of dynastic wealth as a key part of the solution to runaway inequality, said “we are at a dangerous moment in human history” with “the very essence of democracy” under threat if something is not done.
On the campaign trail in Maine, Platner has repeatedly suggested that only organized people can defeat the power of the oligarchs, which he has named as the chief enemy of working people in his state and beyond. The working class, he said at a separate rally, "have an immense amount of power, but we only have it if we're organized."
No one from above is coming to save us. It’s up to us to organize, use our immense power as the working class, and win the world we deserve. pic.twitter.com/Xm3ZIhfCJI
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) November 11, 2025
"No one from above is coming to save us," Platner said. "It’s up to us to organize, use our immense power as the working class, and win the world we deserve."
"I am not buying Starbucks and you should not either."
The mayors-elect in both Seattle and New York City are backing the nationwide strike by Starbucks baristas launched this week, calling on the people of their respective cities to honor the consumer boycott of the coffee giant running parallel to the strike so that workers can win their fight for better working conditions.
“Together, we can send a powerful message: No contract, no coffee,” Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who will take control of the New York City's mayor office on January 1, declared in a social media post to his more than 1 million followers.
In Seattle, mayor-elect Katie Wilson, who on Thursday was declared the winner of the race in Seattle, where Starbucks was founded and where its corporate headquarters remains, joined the picket line with striking workers in her city on the very same day to show them her support.
"I am not buying Starbucks and you should not either,” Wilson told the crowd.
She also delivered a message directly to the corporate leadership of Starbucks. "This is your hometown and mine," she said. "Seattle's making some changes right now, and I urge you to do the right thing. Because in Seattle, when workers' rights are under attack, what do we do?" To which the crowd responded in a chant-style response: "Stand up! Fight back!"
Socialist Seattle Mayor-elect Katie Wilson's first move after winning the election was to boycott Starbucks, a hometown company. pic.twitter.com/zPoNULxfuk
— Ari Hoffman 🎗 (@thehoffather) November 14, 2025
In his post, Mamdani said, "Starbucks workers across the country are on an Unfair Labor Practices strike, fighting for a fair contract," as he called for people everywhere to honor the picket line by not buying from the company.
At a rally with New York City workers outside a Starbucks location on Thursday, Mamdani referenced the massive disparity between profits and executive pay at the company compared to what the average barista makes.
Zohran Mamdani says that New York City stands with Starbucks employees!He points out their CEO made 96 billion last year. That’s 6,666 times the median Starbucks worker salary. Boycott Starbucks. Support the workers. Demand they receive a living wage.
[image or embed]
— Kelly (@broadwaybabyto.bsky.social) November 12, 2025 at 10:45 PM
The striking workers, said Mamdani, "are asking for a salary they can actually live off of. They are asking for hours they can actually build their life around. They are asking for the violations of labor law to finally be resolved. And they deserve a city that has their back and I am here to say that is what New York City will be."