

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Taylor Materio (202)
662-1530 x 227 taylor@nlihc.org
A family
in the United States
needs to earn $18.44 an hour, or nearly $38,360 a year, in order to afford a
modest rental home, according to a report released April 21 by the National Low
Income Housing Coalition. Despite the recession, the report finds that rents
continue to rise, while wages continue to fall across the country.
The amount a person working full-time must earn to afford the Fair Market Rent on a
two-bedroom unit is known as the Housing Wage, and Out of Reach calculates this wage for every state,
metropolitan area, non metropolitan area and county in the country. The report
alsocalculates
how many hours someone must work at the minimum and average renter wages in an
area to afford typical rents, and
provides local wage and income data for comparison purposes.
According
to Out of Reach 2010, the
national two-bedroom Fair Market Rent (FMR) is a staggering $959 a month. In
addition, 74% of metro renters live in an area where having two full-time jobs
at the minimum wage would still not allow them to afford the two-bedroom FMR. Other key
findings from Out of Reach 2010
include:
* The
two-bedroom Housing Wage topped $20.00 in 10 states: HI, DC, CA, MD, NJ, NY,
MA, CT, AK and FL.
*
In 2010, the estimated average wage for renters in the United States is only $14.44, a
decline from $14.69 in 2009.
* At
the federal minimum wage of $7.25, a household would have to work 102 hours
each week to afford the nation's average FMR for a two-bedroom home.
* There
is no county in the United
States in which a full-time minimum wage
worker can afford even a one-bedroom apartment at the FMR.
"Out of Reach 2010 shows once again that
prevailing incomes and wages are simply not enough to allow a family to afford
a decent home in their community," said Sheila Crowley, President of the
National Low Income Housing Coalition.
This
year's data demonstrate that the recession has only worsened an already
severe housing crisis. "The persistence of
high rates of unemployment and under-employment is making it ever more
difficult for families to secure decent housing. Unfortunately, the situation
is not likely to improve any time soon," Center for Economic Policy and
Research Co-Director Dean Baker said.
NLIHC has called on Congress to fund the National Housing Trust
Fund, which would provide communities with funds to build, rehabilitate and
preserve rental housing for people with the lowest incomes. Legislation
creating the National Housing Trust Fund passed in 2008, but Congress has not
yet capitalized the fund.
"Clearly,
the time to act is now. We must take steps to provide safe, decent and
affordable homes for the lowest income families across the country," Ms.
Crowley said. "Providing $1 billion for the National Housing Trust Fund
will help address the growing shortage of affordable housing, which is one of
the most serious economic problems facing the country. In addition, the NHTF
would create new jobs. Every $1 billion provided to the Trust Fund will support
the immediate construction of 10,000 rental homes, creating 15,100 new
construction jobs and 3,800 new jobs in ongoing operations."
"[NLIHC's] Out of Reach annual
report on rental housing affordability shows a growing need to preserve and
expand the current stock of affordable rental housing," House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said. "The hardships faced by many low income renters in an
economy recovering from the recession and record foreclosures make this need
all the more urgent. We are grateful for NLIHC's efforts, and we
will continue our partnership to ensure that more Americans have better access
to decent and affordable rental housing."
Extensive data for every state, metropolitan area and county in the
country are available online, at www.nlihc.org/oor2010/. Ranking
tables and maps are also available at the website, as is further analysis and
explanation of the data. The
five most expensive metro areas in the U.S. include:
Metro
Area
Housing Wage
* Stamford-Norwalk,
CT
$34.62
* San Francisco,
CA
$33.85
* Honolulu, HI
$32.77
* Santa
Cruz-Watsonville, CA
$31.85
* Westchester County, NY
$31.17
"It is extremely discouraging to see that the wage a worker needs
to earn in order to afford a decent rental home has gone up again, especially
at a time when it is harder than ever for people to find stable, well-paying
jobs," said NLIHC Research Analyst Megan
DeCrappeo. "As the nation's focus remains fixed
on the housing market, we have a unique opportunity to bring the issues facing
the lowest income households to the forefront and begin creating sustainable
solutions to the problems that have plagued these families for so long."
The National Low Income Housing Coalition is dedicated solely to ending America's affordable housing crisis. Established in 1974 by Cushing N. Dolbeare, NLIHC educates, organizes and advocates to ensure decent, affordable housing within healthy neighborhoods for everyone. NLIHC provides up-to-date information, formulates policy and educates the public on housing needs and the strategies for solutions.
"It’s a raw deal for working people: higher costs and less coverage, or no coverage at all," said Democratic Rep. Brendan Boyle.
The Republican bill that's set for a vote in the US House on Wednesday would leave around 100,000 more Americans uninsured per year over the next decade, according to a new analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The analysis published late Tuesday examines each major section of the legislation, which experts have characterized as an assortment of GOP healthcare ideas that—in combination—would do little to achieve its stated goal of "lower healthcare premiums for all."
The CBO estimates that the Republican bill, which stands no chance of passing the Senate even if it clears the House on Wednesday, would lower gross benchmark premiums by 11% on average between 2027 and 2035.
But the legislation does not extend enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies that expire at the end of the year, meaning premiums overall are poised to more than double on average in the coming year. Many Americans are expected to forgo insurance coverage entirely in the face of unaffordable premium increases.
Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said Tuesday that the CBO analysis "makes clear that the bill Republican leadership wants to pass tomorrow would make a bad situation even worse," compounding the widespread damage caused by the Medicaid cuts the party approved over the summer.
"It’s a raw deal for working people: higher costs and less coverage, or no coverage at all," said Boyle. "If Republicans were serious about fixing the healthcare crisis they created, they’d work with Democrats to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits and prevent costs from rising for tens of millions of Americans.”
"While Congress heads home for the holidays, it’s leaving millions of families behind to wonder how they will make ends meet in the new year."
The CBO analysis came hours after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) shot down a bipartisan push for a vote to extend the expiring ACA tax credits, which more than 20 million Americans relied on to afford health coverage.
But on Wednesday, four swing-district House Republicans—Brian Fitzpatrick, Rob Bresnahan, and Ryan Mackenzie of Pennsylvania and Mike Lawler of New York—revolted against the GOP leadership and signed onto a Democratic discharge petition aimed at forcing a floor vote on a proposed three-year extension of the enhanced ACA subsidies.
"The only policy that is worse than a clean three-year extension without any reforms, is a policy of complete expiration without any bridge," Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Unfortunately, it is House leadership themselves that have forced this outcome."
It's unclear when the House will vote on the extension, as lawmakers are leaving town for a two-week holiday recess on Friday. The House is set to return to session on January 6, 2026—after the official expiration of the ACA subsidies.
“While Congress heads home for the holidays, it’s leaving millions of families behind to wonder how they will make ends meet in the new year,” Ailen Arreaza, executive director of the advocacy group ParentsTogether, said in a statement Wednesday. “By refusing to fix this healthcare crisis, Republicans are choosing political games over families’ health and financial security."
"These subsidies have been a lifeline for millions, and letting them expire will force millions to make impossible choices or even go without coverage altogether," said Arreaza. "Make no mistake: Families around the country will pay the price for Congress’ inaction."
"Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war."
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday filed a complaint against the Nobel Foundation to stop its planned payouts to Venezuelan opposition leader and 2025 Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado, who has backed US President Donald Trump's campaign of military aggression against her own country.
According to a press release that WikiLeaks posted to X, Assange's lawsuit seeks to block Machado from obtaining over USD $1 million she's due to receive from the Nobel Foundation as winner of this year's Peace Prize.
The complaint notes that Alfred Nobel's will states that the Peace Prize named after him should only be awarded to those who have "conferred the greatest benefit to humankind” by doing “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."
In an interview that aired on Sunday on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Machado praised Trump’s policies of tightening economic sanctions and seizing Venezuelan oil tankers, acts of aggression that appear to go against Nobel's stated declaration that the Peace Prize winner must promote "fraternity between nations."
“Look, I absolutely support President Trump’s strategy, and we, the Venezuelan people, are very grateful to him and to his administration, because I believe he is a champion of freedom in this hemisphere,” Machado told CBS News.
Trump’s campaign against Venezuela has not only included sanctions and the seizing of an oil tanker, but a series of bombings of purported drug trafficking vessels that many legal experts consider to be acts of murder.
In his complaint, Assange claims that Machado's gushing praise of Trump in the wake of his illegal boat-bombing campaign is enough to justify the Nobel Foundation freezing its disbursements to the Venezuelan politician.
"Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war," Assange states, adding that "Machado has continued to incite the Trump Administration to pursue its escalatory path" against her own country.
The complaint also argues that there's a risk that funds awarded to Machado will be "diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes."
Were this to happen, the complaint alleges, it would violate Sweden's obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, which states that anyone who "aids, abets, or otherwise assists" in the commission of a war crime shall be subject to prosecution under the International Criminal Court.
Trump in recent days has ramped up his aggressive actions against Venezuela, and on Tuesday night he announced a "total and complete blockade" of all "sanctioned oil tankers" seeking to enter and leave the country.
“Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before.”
"I will give," said the Republican mega-donor with a smile.
Billionaire Miram Adelson on Tuesday night suggested the legal obstacles for President Donald Trump to serve an additional term in office after 2028 are not insurmountable as the far-right Republican megadonor vowed another $250 million to bolster a run that experts say would be unlawful and unconstitutional on its face.
Adelson, a hardline Zionist who, along with her now deceased husband, Sheldon Adelson, has given hundreds of millions to US lawmakers who back a strong relationship between the US and Israeli governments, was sharing the podium with Trump during a Hanukkah candlelighting event at the White House when she made the remarks.
With a reference to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, Adelson said they had discussed "the legal thing of four more years"—something Trump has repeatedly gestured toward and many of his backers have called for—and told Trump, “So, we can do it, think about it.”
A chant in the crowd then broke out for "For four more years!" as Adelson whispered something in Trump's ear.
“She said, ‘Think about it, I’ll give you another $250 million,’” Trump then said into the microphone. "I will give," Adelson said with a smile.
Watch the exchange:
Adelson: I met Alan Dershowitz.. he said.. four more years. We can do it. Think about it.
Crowd: *chants four more years*
Trump: She said think about it, I’ll give you another 250 million pic.twitter.com/eOc7Zazyns
— Acyn (@Acyn) December 17, 2025
For Trump's 2024 presidential campaign alone, Adelson gave at least $100 million to support the Republican candidate with Super PAC she established, according to federal filings.
In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump credited Adelson with providing him $250 million overall—"directly and indirectly"—during his 2024 bid.
"When someone can you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello," Trump said, when introducing her. "And Miriam, make it quick, because $250 million is not what it used to be."