February, 04 2009, 03:01pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Andrew Fahlund, American Rivers, 202-347-7550 x3022
Angela Dicianno, American Rivers, 202-347-7550 x3103
US Water Infrastructure Transformation Needed to Protect Public Health, Safety, and Save Money
American Rivers provides recommendations to House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
WASHINGTON
Water infrastructure in the United States is deteriorating and needs
a major overhaul to avoid further declines in our clean water supplies
and to deal with the more extreme weather that is coming with global
warming, American Rivers said today in testimony before the House
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
"Water is life. Yet we manage it with 19th Century approaches of
overcoming nature rather than with a 21st Century vision that takes the
best of the built and natural environments. The new way forward is to
work with nature instead of against it. Green infrastructure is
gaining favor in cities and counties across America because it is
effective, inexpensive, and because it has many other benefits like
reducing floods or beautifying communities.," said Andrew Fahlund, vice
president for conservation at American Rivers, who spoke at the
Sustainable Wastewater Management hearing before the Subcommittee on
Water Resources and the Environment.
"We need to seriously step up investments in green infrastructure
and water efficiency solutions if we are to protect the health and
safety of our communities. These projects will also create tens of
thousands of good jobs and help boost the economy," said Fahlund.
Fahlund urged the Committee to promote green infrastructure
investments and to hold agencies like the Environmental Protection
Agency accountable for fostering green infrastructure solutions in
their policies. He also recommended that Congress protect natural
infrastructure like wetlands that are critical for clean water by
passing legislation to affirm the historic protections of the Clean
Water Act. And, Fahlund advised the Committee to require consideration
of the climate and energy impacts of all water infrastructure decisions.
In recent years, water quality around the country has deteriorated:
According
to the EPA, an estimated 1.8 million to 3.5 million people get sick
from recreational contact with sewage from sanitary sewage overflows
every year. The level of sewage pollution in the nation's waterways is
predicted to increase to pre-1970 levels by 2025 the highest ever
recorded. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives water and
wastewater systems a D-, the lowest grade of any infrastructure
category. In 2006 the EPA found that only 28 percent of the nation's stream miles were in good condition.
"Investments in green infrastructure and water efficiency will
protect clean water, ensure sustainable water supplies, save money,
create jobs, and safeguard public health and safety for generations to
come," said Fahlund.
Green infrastructure incorporates natural systems that can help
supply clean water, reduce polluted runoff, reduce sewer overflows,
minimize flooding and enhance community health and safety. It means
planting trees and installing green roofs, rather than enlarging sewers
or building a costly new treatment plant. It means restoring
floodplains instead of building taller and taller levees. And it means
retrofitting buildings and homes with water-efficient plumbing instead
of constructing an expensive water supply dam.
These solutions create good jobs. American Rivers estimates that if
600 U.S. cities installed green roofs on just 1 percent of their large
roofs, over 190,000 jobs would be created. An economic analysis
conducted by the Alliance for Water Efficiency estimates that total
economic output per million dollars of investment in water efficiency
programs is between $2.5 and $2.8 million. It estimates that a direct
investment of $10 billion in water efficiency programs can boost U.S.
employment by 150,000 to 220,000 jobs.
Communities across the country are already benefiting from these solutions:
New York City's $600 million investment in Catskills land
protection and restoration saved $6 billion in capital costs to
construct a water filtration plant, as well as $200-$300 million in
annual operation and maintenance costs. By using wetlands, trees
and residential modifications to reduce stormwater flows into their
combined sewer system, Indianapolis is able to reduce the diameter of a
new sewer pipe, saving over $300 million, while also beautifying the
city. Clayton County, Georgia constructed a wetland system to
receive treated wastewater and recharge reservoirs, and has had a
consistent supply of water through the recent drought. While
surrounding communities had severe water restrictions and saw
reservoirs drop below 50 percent capacity, Clayton County never dipped
below 77 percent of reservoir capacity.
"We have reached a crossroads in how we manage our nation's water,"
said Fahlund. "Traditional water infrastructure will continue to play a
role, but it is designed to solve only a single problem and requires a
huge capital investment. Today, we need green infrastructure solutions
that are cost-effective, flexible, and will meet the needs of the 21st
Century."
Testimony
American Rivers is the only national organization standing up for healthy rivers so our communities can thrive. Through national advocacy, innovative solutions and our growing network of strategic partners, we protect and promote our rivers as valuable assets that are vital to our health, safety and quality of life. Founded in 1973, American Rivers has more than 65,000 members and supporters nationwide, with offices in Washington, DC and the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, California and Northwest regions.
LATEST NEWS
Million-Dollar Ad Blitz Targets Senate Dems Who Voted for 'Trump Loyalist Judges'
"This isn’t normal," said the president of the group behind the ad campaign. "If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will."
Dec 03, 2025
The progressive advocacy group Demand Justice on Wednesday launched a seven-figure advertising campaign targeting three members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees, enabling the ongoing right-wing takeover of the nation's courts.
The first series of ads will target Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Angus King (D-Maine), three of the 16 members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm at least one Trump judge this year. Other Senate Democrats who have voted with Republicans in support of at least one Trump judicial pick include Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Adam Schiff of California, and Chris Coons of Delaware.
"It is outrageous that Senate Democrats are voting to confirm Trump’s judicial nominees who refuse to tell the truth about January 6th and the 2020 election,” Josh Orton, the president of Demand Justice, said in a statement. “This isn’t normal. If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will. And we won’t let up.”
The group's campaign will also include a national cable TV ad buy and "coordinated digital rollout across key battleground states" naming and shaming Democrats who support "Trump loyalist judges" even as the lawmakers condemn the president's authoritarian assault on democracy.
Watch the Demand Justice ad targeting Maggie Hassan, who on Tuesday voted to confirm Lindsey Ann Freeman, Trump's nominee to the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina:
Freeman, like other Trump judicial picks, refused during her confirmation process to say directly that the president lost the 2020 election.
"President Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 presidential election and served as the 46th President of the United States," Freeman wrote in response to questions from Durbin, who ultimately voted in favor of her confirmation.
In a report released last month, Demand Justice analyzed Trump judicial picks' written responses to senators' questions. The analysis shows that "nominees' responses appear nearly identical, with many nominees using verbatim phrasing, repeating key words, and, overall, using unusual and evasive language that’s almost entirely outside the normal, historical, and common lexicon used to describe such events."
"Every nominee provided near-identical phrasing to avoid a direct answer about the 2020 election, instead referencing the results of the congressional 'certification' process, or answering by noting that President Biden 'served' as president," the report notes. "And 21 of 27 nominees provided extremely similar responses in regard to January 6, often describing what transpired as a 'political issue' and refusing to comment further."
Orton of Demand Justice said that "it is unprecedented for lifetime nominees to the federal bench to provide dishonest and misleading answers about historical facts—and it is deeply concerning that Trump’s nominees are parroting such strikingly similar language, the president’s own language, to avoid telling the truth."
That more than a dozen Senate Democrats still voted to confirm at least one of those nominees is "simply unacceptable," said Orton.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Yikes’: New Jobs Data Further Undermines Trump Fiction of Thriving Economy
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," said economist Dean Baker.
Dec 03, 2025
Economists on Wednesday expressed significant concerns after new data from global payroll processing firm ADP estimated that the US economy lost 32,000 jobs last month.
As reported by CNBC, small businesses bore the brunt of the job losses, as firms with fewer than 50 employees shed a total of 120,000 jobs, more than offsetting the 90,000 in job gains reported by firms with 50 or more employees.
The loss of 32,000 jobs in November marked a major miss for economists' consensus estimate of 40,000 jobs added on the month, and CNBC noted that the total number of jobs lost according to ADP data "was the biggest drop since March 2023."
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted in a post on X that the job losses recorded by ADP were widespread across the US economy.
"Yikes," she wrote in reaction to the report. "Most industries were doing layoffs. The only ones still are hiring are hospitality and healthcare."
Long also said the disparity between small and large businesses in terms of job growth was more evidence that the US is experiencing a "K-shaped" economy in which those at the top of the economic ladder thrive, even as everyone else struggles.
"Larger companies are still hiring," she explained. "Smaller firms (under 50 workers) are doing the layoffs. It's been a very tough year for small biz due to tariffs and more selective spending from lower and middle-class consumers."
Kevin Gordon, head of macro research and strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, observed that ADP hasn't reported such a big drop in small-business employment since October 2020, when the US economy was suffering through the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, cautioned against reading too much into ADP data, although he added that "in the absence of up to date government payrolls, all other signs point to a further deteriorating labor market."
Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at financial planner Creative Planning, argued that the ADP jobs numbers were part of a negative three-month trend in which the US economy lost an estimated 4,000 jobs per month, which he said was "the first three-month decline since the 2020 recession."
Bilello added that "a year ago, we were adding over 200,000 jobs per month."
Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG, argued that the ADP report showed job losses in the US economy were "broad based" and "were accompanied by a cooling of wage gains" for workers who still have jobs or are switching from one job to another.
"Those with a job are clinging on, while those without are left wanting," she explained.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, argued that the ADP report blows up President Donald Trump's spin about the health of the US economy.
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," he wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pope Leo Presses Trump to End Military Escalation Against Venezuela
"So often, who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities," the first American pope said as another regime change war looms.
Dec 03, 2025
Amid escalating threats from the White House in recent days, Pope Leo XIV pleaded for President Donald Trump to pursue diplomacy with Venezuela rather than another regime change war.
"It is better to search for ways of dialogue, or perhaps pressure, including economic pressure," said the first American pope as he returned to Rome from Lebanon.
Since September, the Trump administration has launched airstrikes against at least 22 boats mostly in the Southern Caribbean that have extrajudicially killed at least 83 people. While the administration has claimed these people are "narcoterrorists" from Venezuela, it has provided no evidence to support this.
Trump said he had ordered the closing of Venezuela’s airspace on Saturday, which has left many observers holding their breath in expectation of military action against the South American nation.
As Reuters reported Monday, Trump also offered safe passage to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro last month if he left the country, suggesting that regime change is the administration’s ultimate goal.
"On one hand, it seems there was a call between the two presidents," said the pope, referring to that ultimatum from Trump last month. "On the other hand, there is the danger, there is the possibility there will be some activity, some [military] operation."
"The voices that come from the United States, they change with a certain frequency," Leo added.
The pope has been a frequent critic of the Trump administration’s policies since he was elected earlier this year, with harsh rebukes issued towards the White House's attacks on immigrants.
While the pope did not denounce the idea of US-imposed regime change in Venezuela entirely, he said it should search for other means "if that is what they want to do in the United States.”
The US has notably already applied a great deal of "economic pressure" to Venezuela, via a regime of crippling sanctions that are considered one of the major causes of the nation's economic instability in recent years.
On Tuesday, Abigail Hall, a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, warned that "a US invasion, however framed, would impose steep costs on both nations."
"For the United States, an attempt at regime change in Venezuela would likely be another foray into failed foreign policy, with all the costs that go with it," she said. "A destabilized Venezuela could also trigger another wave of migration across the region, straining neighboring countries and potentially reaching US shores."
"For Venezuelans, the costs would be even greater," she added. "Beyond the immediate human toll of conflict, the long-term costs are incalculable. Even if Maduro were removed, a chaotic transition could destroy prospects for rebuilding Venezuela’s institutions, economy, and civil society."
Amid Trump's latest series of threats, Pope Leo echoed this warning aboard the papal plane. He said Venezuela's bishops are "looking for ways to calm the situation" and pursue "the good of the people, because so often who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


