To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
2020 Democratic candidate for President Senator Elizabeth Warren does a pinky swear with a little girl while walking through the Iowa voters at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa on Saturday August, 10, 2019. (Photo: Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday evening used an attack from the right about her past experience with gender discrimination to lead a national conversation about a common occurrence in American workplaces--the firing, demotion, and unfair treatment of workers who become pregnant.
"Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
--Rebecca Traister, journalist
On Tuesday evening, a day after the Washington Free Beacon claimed Warren had lied about experiencing gender discrimination, the Massachusetts Democrat and 2020 presidential candidate released a video detailing her experience of being fired from a teaching job after she became visibly pregnant in 1971.
The video also included stories from a number of women who had suffered similar treatment at work--some recounting incidents that took place decades ago, like Warren's, and others detailing their treatment at work in the very recent past.
"When I was 22 years old, I had an experience that a lot of women will recognize," Warren said, as she has at many campaign events. "I had been hired for the next year, all hired and set to go. And then when they realized I was pregnant, the job was given to someone else."
"This kind of stuff still happens now," she added.
Watch:
\u201cAfter I became visibly pregnant, I was told that the job I'd been promised for next year would go to someone else. Pregnancy discrimination is real, and it still happens today\u2014but telling our stories is one way we can fight back. Here are some of your stories that I heard today.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1570593980
The senator shared the story of a woman named Summer, who said she was not offered a job based on gender discrimination.
"Women are still fired or not hired at all basically for looking like they might one day soon want to become pregnant," Summer wrote. "Someone at the U.N. once told me to my face this was why I didn't get a job."
Another woman wrote about mistreatment her mother faced in 1989:
"My mother had to threaten to sue to keep her job when she was pregnant with me. Her colleagues made a big stink about her asking for maternity leave a second time (I was her second kid)...Things haven't improved much for pregnancy discrimination since."
Warren posted the video on social media after the Free Beacon published a story on Monday claiming she lied about her experience. The publication reported that Riverdale, New Jersey school board records refuted her claim that she had not been asked back to teach for a second year due to her pregnancy:
Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a "2nd year" contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job. That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching. Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren's resignation was "accepted with regret."
TheFree Beacon also pointed to tweets posted byJacobin journalist Meagan Day on October 1 suggesting "that Warren's story appeared to have changed over the years." The Free Beacon noted that Warren's two retellings of her experience--that she wasn't asked back when her pregnancy began to show and that she decided, "I don't think this is going to work out for me" while pregnant--"aren't necessarily incompatible."
Many observers quickly defended Warren, with Vox.com journalist Emily Crockett writing, "It's actually trivially easy to reconcile what some believe are contradictions" in Warren's story.
\u201cApril: School board approves her for another year (per Free Beacon). She's about 4 months pregnant and likely not showing much.\n\nJune: 6 months and "visibly pregnant," principal hires someone else (per Warren 2019). School board is informed she "resigned"\u2014common in such cases.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSummer: Tries taking classes so she won't need emergency certification to get another job. But she's about to pop, so who'd hire her? Plus husband wants her to stay home.\n\nSource: 2007 interview. The events above *are not mentioned.*\n\n"I did that for a year, and then..."\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSeptember: Warren gives birth to her first child and stays home a few years. She feels "restless" about it. Then some old debate pals encourage her to go to law school, and she does.\n\nIt's easy to imagine her continuing teaching special ed for years had she kept that first job.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
In an interview with CBS News Tuesday, Warren said she was indeed offered a job for the next school year in April 1971, as the records showed, but that the offer was rescinded in June when she was 6 months along in her pregnancy.
The story led many women on social media on Tuesday to share their own stories of pregnancy discrimination--and their frustration at the suggestion that Warren's story wasn't believable.
\u201cAny woman whose been super super casually asked in a job interview \u201coh you\u2019re married? Planning on kids?\u201d Knows very well how pregnancy discrimination- even discrimination on your *potential* to be pregnant - is alive and well.\u201d— Jessica Ellis (@Jessica Ellis) 1570548279
\u201cAsk any woman who has been pregnant if pregnancy discrimination at work still exists ffs. I actually regretted being so open on social media about having a baby because I know at least one employer ghosted me after they reached out for a job interview once they found out\u201d— amil (@amil) 1570621270
\u201cPregnancy discrimination is rarely direct. When I was four months into a new job, got pregnant with no. 2 bebe. When returned to work, one editor delivered terrible review with no concrete data except "not giving 100 percent." Was filled with doubt and lost confidence.\u201d— Cecilia Kang (@Cecilia Kang) 1570579493
\u201cI could fill a supreme court with the number of women I know who had to pretend not to be pregnant while working or while looking for work because they knew it was a "liability." So many roomy garments strategically deployed!\u201d— Lydia Kiesling (@Lydia Kiesling) 1570553509
"Insisting that a woman who has described (and perhaps understood) her own professional trajectory in different ways at different points in her life is 'obfuscating' contributes to the sense that those who've faced discrimination and felt confused or ashamed about it, can't be trusted to tell us that they've experienced it," wrote journalist Rebecca Traister. "Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday evening used an attack from the right about her past experience with gender discrimination to lead a national conversation about a common occurrence in American workplaces--the firing, demotion, and unfair treatment of workers who become pregnant.
"Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
--Rebecca Traister, journalist
On Tuesday evening, a day after the Washington Free Beacon claimed Warren had lied about experiencing gender discrimination, the Massachusetts Democrat and 2020 presidential candidate released a video detailing her experience of being fired from a teaching job after she became visibly pregnant in 1971.
The video also included stories from a number of women who had suffered similar treatment at work--some recounting incidents that took place decades ago, like Warren's, and others detailing their treatment at work in the very recent past.
"When I was 22 years old, I had an experience that a lot of women will recognize," Warren said, as she has at many campaign events. "I had been hired for the next year, all hired and set to go. And then when they realized I was pregnant, the job was given to someone else."
"This kind of stuff still happens now," she added.
Watch:
\u201cAfter I became visibly pregnant, I was told that the job I'd been promised for next year would go to someone else. Pregnancy discrimination is real, and it still happens today\u2014but telling our stories is one way we can fight back. Here are some of your stories that I heard today.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1570593980
The senator shared the story of a woman named Summer, who said she was not offered a job based on gender discrimination.
"Women are still fired or not hired at all basically for looking like they might one day soon want to become pregnant," Summer wrote. "Someone at the U.N. once told me to my face this was why I didn't get a job."
Another woman wrote about mistreatment her mother faced in 1989:
"My mother had to threaten to sue to keep her job when she was pregnant with me. Her colleagues made a big stink about her asking for maternity leave a second time (I was her second kid)...Things haven't improved much for pregnancy discrimination since."
Warren posted the video on social media after the Free Beacon published a story on Monday claiming she lied about her experience. The publication reported that Riverdale, New Jersey school board records refuted her claim that she had not been asked back to teach for a second year due to her pregnancy:
Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a "2nd year" contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job. That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching. Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren's resignation was "accepted with regret."
TheFree Beacon also pointed to tweets posted byJacobin journalist Meagan Day on October 1 suggesting "that Warren's story appeared to have changed over the years." The Free Beacon noted that Warren's two retellings of her experience--that she wasn't asked back when her pregnancy began to show and that she decided, "I don't think this is going to work out for me" while pregnant--"aren't necessarily incompatible."
Many observers quickly defended Warren, with Vox.com journalist Emily Crockett writing, "It's actually trivially easy to reconcile what some believe are contradictions" in Warren's story.
\u201cApril: School board approves her for another year (per Free Beacon). She's about 4 months pregnant and likely not showing much.\n\nJune: 6 months and "visibly pregnant," principal hires someone else (per Warren 2019). School board is informed she "resigned"\u2014common in such cases.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSummer: Tries taking classes so she won't need emergency certification to get another job. But she's about to pop, so who'd hire her? Plus husband wants her to stay home.\n\nSource: 2007 interview. The events above *are not mentioned.*\n\n"I did that for a year, and then..."\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSeptember: Warren gives birth to her first child and stays home a few years. She feels "restless" about it. Then some old debate pals encourage her to go to law school, and she does.\n\nIt's easy to imagine her continuing teaching special ed for years had she kept that first job.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
In an interview with CBS News Tuesday, Warren said she was indeed offered a job for the next school year in April 1971, as the records showed, but that the offer was rescinded in June when she was 6 months along in her pregnancy.
The story led many women on social media on Tuesday to share their own stories of pregnancy discrimination--and their frustration at the suggestion that Warren's story wasn't believable.
\u201cAny woman whose been super super casually asked in a job interview \u201coh you\u2019re married? Planning on kids?\u201d Knows very well how pregnancy discrimination- even discrimination on your *potential* to be pregnant - is alive and well.\u201d— Jessica Ellis (@Jessica Ellis) 1570548279
\u201cAsk any woman who has been pregnant if pregnancy discrimination at work still exists ffs. I actually regretted being so open on social media about having a baby because I know at least one employer ghosted me after they reached out for a job interview once they found out\u201d— amil (@amil) 1570621270
\u201cPregnancy discrimination is rarely direct. When I was four months into a new job, got pregnant with no. 2 bebe. When returned to work, one editor delivered terrible review with no concrete data except "not giving 100 percent." Was filled with doubt and lost confidence.\u201d— Cecilia Kang (@Cecilia Kang) 1570579493
\u201cI could fill a supreme court with the number of women I know who had to pretend not to be pregnant while working or while looking for work because they knew it was a "liability." So many roomy garments strategically deployed!\u201d— Lydia Kiesling (@Lydia Kiesling) 1570553509
"Insisting that a woman who has described (and perhaps understood) her own professional trajectory in different ways at different points in her life is 'obfuscating' contributes to the sense that those who've faced discrimination and felt confused or ashamed about it, can't be trusted to tell us that they've experienced it," wrote journalist Rebecca Traister. "Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday evening used an attack from the right about her past experience with gender discrimination to lead a national conversation about a common occurrence in American workplaces--the firing, demotion, and unfair treatment of workers who become pregnant.
"Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
--Rebecca Traister, journalist
On Tuesday evening, a day after the Washington Free Beacon claimed Warren had lied about experiencing gender discrimination, the Massachusetts Democrat and 2020 presidential candidate released a video detailing her experience of being fired from a teaching job after she became visibly pregnant in 1971.
The video also included stories from a number of women who had suffered similar treatment at work--some recounting incidents that took place decades ago, like Warren's, and others detailing their treatment at work in the very recent past.
"When I was 22 years old, I had an experience that a lot of women will recognize," Warren said, as she has at many campaign events. "I had been hired for the next year, all hired and set to go. And then when they realized I was pregnant, the job was given to someone else."
"This kind of stuff still happens now," she added.
Watch:
\u201cAfter I became visibly pregnant, I was told that the job I'd been promised for next year would go to someone else. Pregnancy discrimination is real, and it still happens today\u2014but telling our stories is one way we can fight back. Here are some of your stories that I heard today.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1570593980
The senator shared the story of a woman named Summer, who said she was not offered a job based on gender discrimination.
"Women are still fired or not hired at all basically for looking like they might one day soon want to become pregnant," Summer wrote. "Someone at the U.N. once told me to my face this was why I didn't get a job."
Another woman wrote about mistreatment her mother faced in 1989:
"My mother had to threaten to sue to keep her job when she was pregnant with me. Her colleagues made a big stink about her asking for maternity leave a second time (I was her second kid)...Things haven't improved much for pregnancy discrimination since."
Warren posted the video on social media after the Free Beacon published a story on Monday claiming she lied about her experience. The publication reported that Riverdale, New Jersey school board records refuted her claim that she had not been asked back to teach for a second year due to her pregnancy:
Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a "2nd year" contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job. That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching. Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren's resignation was "accepted with regret."
TheFree Beacon also pointed to tweets posted byJacobin journalist Meagan Day on October 1 suggesting "that Warren's story appeared to have changed over the years." The Free Beacon noted that Warren's two retellings of her experience--that she wasn't asked back when her pregnancy began to show and that she decided, "I don't think this is going to work out for me" while pregnant--"aren't necessarily incompatible."
Many observers quickly defended Warren, with Vox.com journalist Emily Crockett writing, "It's actually trivially easy to reconcile what some believe are contradictions" in Warren's story.
\u201cApril: School board approves her for another year (per Free Beacon). She's about 4 months pregnant and likely not showing much.\n\nJune: 6 months and "visibly pregnant," principal hires someone else (per Warren 2019). School board is informed she "resigned"\u2014common in such cases.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSummer: Tries taking classes so she won't need emergency certification to get another job. But she's about to pop, so who'd hire her? Plus husband wants her to stay home.\n\nSource: 2007 interview. The events above *are not mentioned.*\n\n"I did that for a year, and then..."\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
\u201cSeptember: Warren gives birth to her first child and stays home a few years. She feels "restless" about it. Then some old debate pals encourage her to go to law school, and she does.\n\nIt's easy to imagine her continuing teaching special ed for years had she kept that first job.\u201d— Emily Crockett (@Emily Crockett) 1570491827
In an interview with CBS News Tuesday, Warren said she was indeed offered a job for the next school year in April 1971, as the records showed, but that the offer was rescinded in June when she was 6 months along in her pregnancy.
The story led many women on social media on Tuesday to share their own stories of pregnancy discrimination--and their frustration at the suggestion that Warren's story wasn't believable.
\u201cAny woman whose been super super casually asked in a job interview \u201coh you\u2019re married? Planning on kids?\u201d Knows very well how pregnancy discrimination- even discrimination on your *potential* to be pregnant - is alive and well.\u201d— Jessica Ellis (@Jessica Ellis) 1570548279
\u201cAsk any woman who has been pregnant if pregnancy discrimination at work still exists ffs. I actually regretted being so open on social media about having a baby because I know at least one employer ghosted me after they reached out for a job interview once they found out\u201d— amil (@amil) 1570621270
\u201cPregnancy discrimination is rarely direct. When I was four months into a new job, got pregnant with no. 2 bebe. When returned to work, one editor delivered terrible review with no concrete data except "not giving 100 percent." Was filled with doubt and lost confidence.\u201d— Cecilia Kang (@Cecilia Kang) 1570579493
\u201cI could fill a supreme court with the number of women I know who had to pretend not to be pregnant while working or while looking for work because they knew it was a "liability." So many roomy garments strategically deployed!\u201d— Lydia Kiesling (@Lydia Kiesling) 1570553509
"Insisting that a woman who has described (and perhaps understood) her own professional trajectory in different ways at different points in her life is 'obfuscating' contributes to the sense that those who've faced discrimination and felt confused or ashamed about it, can't be trusted to tell us that they've experienced it," wrote journalist Rebecca Traister. "Rendering subjects of discrimination untrustworthy narrators, because they can't prove it, or perhaps aren't even sure if it was definitely wrong--is part of how discrimination works."
