Why Not Talk to North Korea Instead of Scaring Us with Nuclear Attack Warning Sirens

Are you ready for nuclear attack warning sirens in your community? I live in Hawaii and the State of Hawaii decided two months ago in December 2107 to begin monthly nuclear attack warning siren drills, similar to the monthly tsunami warning sirens that are tested each month.

You know what happened--an employee of the State of Hawaii Emergency Management Department, whether he mistakenly believed an attack was underway or because he simply pushed the wrong button, and the siren went off--and no one alerted the public for nearly 38 minutes that this was a drill. Cell phone alerts to everyone in the 808 area code flashed "Nuclear attack warning-take cover" and residents and tourists alike went into crisis mode.

"Successive administrations have lied our country into wars--from Vietnam to Iraq. We do not agree for the need for war with North Korea and refuse to accept the attempted US intimidation of North Korea which could lead to war. "

Three days prior to the mistaken warning siren, 20 of us attempted to call to the attention of the state government that the sirens are being used for political advancement of a hysteria for war with North Korea. We do not believe the North Korean government is going to attack the United States and that the nuclear sirens and "duck and cover" drills are purposeful and dangerous forms of fearmongering.

The sirens heighten the anxiety and stress of impending conflict and devastation, make citizens afraid. With that fear, many people are more likely to accept whatever the government feeds them on how great threats to our nation are.

Successive administrations have lied our country into wars--from Vietnam to Iraq. We do not agree for the need for war with North Korea and refuse to accept the attempted US intimidation of North Korea which could lead to war. The sirens normalize the potential for war.

Certainly, if the U.S. initiates military action against North Korea, militarized Hawaii with its four major military bases on Oahu--the headquarters of the U.S. military Pacific Command that covers half the world, the Army's 25^th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks, Marine Expeditionary Force at Kaneohe, Hickam Air Force Base and Pearl Harbor Navy Base, the huge NSA underground listening station near Wahaiwa, the massive practice bombing area called Pohakuloa, on the Big Island and the Pacific Missile Range on Kauai would be a retaliatory target for North Korea and any other nation threatened by the United States.

Therefore, it is in Hawaii's survival interest that we demand that the U.S. government resolve issues with North Korea in a nonviolent manner.

The national government in Washington, DC does not feel the need to have nuclear warning sirens, so why should Hawaii? One would think the politicians who make the decisions for war and the Pentagon would be bigger targets than Hawaii.

We held our protest outside the State Capitol and got media coverage, but the siren program continued--until the false alert siren went off. However, after the mistaken alert fiasco, the governor has suspended the siren warnings.

As this was going on in Hawaii, I joined a sixteen-woman delegation from five countries who participated in a Civil Society Round Table held in Vancouver, British Columbia sponsored by the government of Canada and in a public forum on security and stability on the Korean peninsula in conjunction with the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of twenty countries of the US led Korean command.

Some of our delegates had long collective experience engaging with North Koreans through citizen diplomacy and humanitarian initiatives and others had expertise on militarism, nuclear disarmament, economic sanctions and the human cost of the unresolved Korean War.

Instead of approving of the warmongering of the Trump administration, our delegations' recommendations to the meeting of Foreign Ministers appealed for sanity in dealing with the North Korean government:

• Immediately engage all relevant parties in dialogue, without preconditions, to work toward achieving a nuclear-free Korean peninsula;
• Abandon the strategy of maximum pressure, lift sanctions which have deleterious effects on the North Korean people, work toward the normalization of diplomatic relations, remove barriers to citizen -to-citizen engagement and strengthen humanitarian cooperation;
• Extend the spirit of the Olympic truce and affirm the resumption for inter-Korean dialogue by supporting:
  1). Negotiations for the continued suspension of joint US-ROK military exercises in the south, and the continued suspension of nuclear and missile tests in the north;
  2). A pledge not to conduct a first strike, nuclear or conventional; and
  3). A process to replace the Armistice Agreement with a Korea Peace Agreement;
• Adhere to all the Security Council recommendations on Women, Peace and Security. In particular urge the Foreign Ministers to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, which acknowledges that the meaningful participation of women in all stages of conflict resolution and peacebuilding strengthens peace and security for all.

Despite our best efforts at the Civil Society Round Table and individual meeting with the U.S. and Canadian delegations, the Foreign Ministers chose to continue the "maximum pressure" strategy on North Korea through rigorous enforcement of UN sanctions and underscoring that a nuclear-armed North Korea would never be accepted.

Our delegation responded that the Foreign Ministers had chosen to further isolate and threaten North Korea, a strategy that had utterly failed to halt North Korea's nuclear and missile program and had only furthered the DPRK's resolve to develop its nuclear arsenal. We know that the sanctions that have been imposed have cruel and punishing effects on ordinary North Koreans and are considered by North Korea as warfare-economic warfare, just as military war preparations (games) are considered as pre-invasion and regime overthrow warfare.

We are profoundly disappointed by the Foreign Ministers who represent countries with a commitment to peaceful diplomacy and feminist foreign policies. At a time of great global instability, we looked to them for leadership for true global peace and security, but found instead continuation of threats, isolation and economic and military warfare.

At the state level, we hope that the State of Hawaii will discontinue its monthly (and accidental?) siren and cell phone war-mongering and requiring schools to show "duck and cover" videos that are conditioning the public for war and increased military spending, instead of the less expensive and more successful strategy--dialogue.