September, 10 2010, 02:58pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Darcey Rakestraw, 202-683-2467;
drakestraw (at) fwwatch.org
Food & Water Watch Asks Federal Court to Order BP to Shut Down One of World's Largest Oil and Gas Platforms
The national consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch today
filed its long awaited lawsuit against BP in federal court for violating
a number of federal laws in the operation of the BP Atlantis oil and
gas platform, one of the largest of its kind in the world.
HOUSTON, TX
The national consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch today
filed its long awaited lawsuit against BP in federal court for violating
a number of federal laws in the operation of the BP Atlantis oil and
gas platform, one of the largest of its kind in the world.
"We have evidence that Atlantis is unsafe and is in danger of
creating an even worse spill than the one caused by the Deepwater
Horizon explosion," said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food
& Water Watch. "Tony Hayward's failure to be forthcoming when
Congress questioned him about Atlantis and BP's inconsistent statements
over the last year are an indication that they are hiding the dangerous
truth about Atlantis."
In the suit, Food & Water Watch and
former-company-contractor-turned-whistleblower Kenneth Abbott allege
that BP began producing oil and gas at its Atlantis facility without
having, and then maintaining, a large percentage of critical engineering
documents that are needed for the facility to operate safely. The
company's document deficiencies violate its lease agreements as well as a
number of government regulations mandating that the company have, and
in some cases submit, such documents to get federal government approval
and third-party safety verification of the facility, and for it to start
and continue production under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
The suit alleges that the violations are flagrant and "present an
imminent risk of damage to the environment in and surrounding the Gulf
of Mexico, and to the general public health," and asks for the court to
order BP to cease all production operations at the BP Atlantis Project,
unless and until BP demonstrates that it is in full compliance with the
law.
"Since federal regulators have continuously dragged their feet in the
investigation of Atlantis, and BP has refused to take any corrective
action, we now are taking this fight to the courts," Hauter said. "The
platform must be shut down until proven safe."
In light of the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster and resulting
damages, 34 legislators nationally have called for the shut down of BP
Atlantis until it can be proven safe, fearing an even more catastrophic
accident. While the Minerals Management Service (MMS--now the Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement, or BOEMRE) has known
about the problem since April 2009 and has claimed an ongoing
investigation, it has yet to complete it. Recently, it said it would not
complete its investigation until mid-October 2010, even though experts
contend that determining BP's compliance with the law could take a mere
matter of days.
In May 2010, Food & Water Watch sued the MMS for its failed
oversight of the Atlantis facility. The organization was forced to
withdraw the case when BP intervened a month later, contending that the
company should have received official notice of the alleged violations.
Food & Water Watch fired back in July 2010, giving the BP and the
MMS official notice of its intent to sue. Federal law required the
organization to wait 60 days after notice is given to allow BP and the
agency to correct their behavior. Neither party responded.
The organization has since decided to focus its legal efforts solely
on BP. The organization brought its suit by amending it to an existing
lawsuit that whistleblower Kenneth Abbott brought against BP in 2009 for
essentially the same violations of the law, saying that BP violated the
federal False Claims Act when it illegally certified it was in
compliance with all environmental and safety regulations.
Atlantis is located 150 miles off the coast of Louisiana, drilling at
a depth of 7,000 feet. Last March, Mr. Abbott reported to the
authorities that Atlantis has been operating without a large percentage
of the engineer-approved documents needed for it to operate safely. BP
management has even noted that an accident resulting from "catastrophic
Operator errors" could occur on Atlantis due to its missing documents.
Food & Water Watch has been working with Mr. Abbott since last July to bring Atlantis's possible safety risk to light.
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular