August, 26 2010, 03:12pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Dylan Blaylock, Communications Director
202.457.0034, ext. 137,
dylanb@whistleblower.org
Judge Rules D.C. Whistleblower Law Retroactively Applies to Cases
D.C. Fire Department Whistleblower Case Opens Door for Previously Barred Claims
WASHINGTON
A decision by a Superior Court
Judge last week, involving the case of a whistleblower from the Washington, D.C.
Fire & Emergency Medical Services (FEMS) department, may help open the door
for a slew of whistleblower cases from current/former District employees to be
brought against the city.
Theresa Cusick served as FEMS General Counsel until
2007, when she informed an Assistant U.S. Attorney that a FEMS officer had a
conflict of interest in working with the Office of the U.S. Attorney (USA).
Cusick also blew the whistle to the D.C. Office of Inspector General (DC-OIG)
that Assistant D.C. Fire Chief Brain Lee illegally prohibited her from
communicating with either DC-OIG or USA regarding the officer under
investigation. (A full
background of Cusick's case appears below)
Cusick brought suit in September 2008 under the
District's Whistleblower Protection Act (DCWPA), seeking reinstatement to
her former position and damages. Recently, attorneys for the District sought
dismissal of the case claiming, in part, that Cusick violated D.C. Code SS12-309
by failing to timely notify the District of her whistleblower claim within six
months after the circumstances giving rise to her lawsuit.
However, recent amendments to the DCWPA,
effective March 2010, abolished this notice requirement after city lawmakers
recognized that the short time period for notification was a significant
impediment to whistleblowers. Last week, Senior Superior Court Judge Leonard
Braman held that the repeal of the notice requirement in the WPA should be applied retroactively.
"This is a great victory for D.C. employees who
have suffered retaliation for whistleblowing," stated GAP Senior Counsel
Richard Condit, a lawyer for Cusick. "This means that District employees
and their lawyers - who may have previously believed that the notice
requirement barred a claim under the DCWPA - should absolutely reconsider
whether the claim can be brought."
The Court summarized its analysis of the issue as
follows:
...the
Court is of the view that the statutory notice provision, section 12-309, was
repealed, that not only was it -- was the amendment a repealer of the previous
provision that made the statutory notice provision applicable to the
Whistleblower's Act but that the law of the District as declared in the
Montgomery case and cases cited in the Montgomery case [590 A.2d at 162], based
upon the legislative history of the amendment to the Whistleblower's Act as
stated in the committee report, based upon the Uniform Law Commissioner's Model
Statutory Construction Act, all of these authorities constrain the Court to apply the amendment
notwithstanding that this case was pending before the amendment. [emphasis added]
The transcript of the hearing, Cusick v. District of Columbia, Civil No.
08-6915 (MPA) can be
viewed here (the passage above appears on page 35).
Under Chief Dennis Rubin, FEMS has exhibited a pattern
of retaliation against fire department personnel. Retaliatory actions under the
Rubin administration include ordering a fire department captain to undergo a
psychological evaluation after she raised concerns regarding the management
practices of certain Fire and EMS high-ranking officials, the involuntary
reassignment of fire investigators who blew the whistle on Fire/EMS failures in
investigating the 2007 fire in Eastern Market, and the termination of a
firefighter following his testimony at a D.C. City Council hearing.
Background on Theresa Cusick
Theresa Cusick is a former senior attorney of the
District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General (OAG) who served as the
General Counsel of FEMS from June 1998 to June 2007. While serving as General
Counsel, Cusick blew the whistle to an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) that a
FEMS officer in the Fire Prevention Division was being investigated by the
DC-OIG for his alleged involved in a cheating scandal in the FEMS Training
Academy. She advised the
AUSA that this EMS officer should not be
involved in an unrelated criminal investigation involving a fire inspector in
the Fire Prevention Division. Her concern was that FEMS, or the Office of the
U.S. Attorney for the District of
Columbia, should not rely on the officer under
investigation until he was cleared of any involvement in the scandal.
Cusick also blew the whistle to the DC-OIG, the D.C.
OAG and to D.C. Fire Chief Dennis Rubin that she was given an illegal order by
Assistant Fire Chief Brain Lee, prohibiting her from communicating with DC-OIG
and the AUSA regarding the officer under investigation. Subsequent to her
whistleblowing and upon request by Chief Rubin, the OAG removed Ms. Cusick from
her position as FEMS General Counsel. The controversy surrounding Chief
Rubin's request for Cusick's removal is revealed, in part, in sworn
deposition testimony given by Chief Rubin. A GAP
produced video of a portion of this deposition was released
earlier this year.
After her removal from FEMS, Cusick was given a
temporary position within the OAG with the promise from the Chief Deputy
Attorney General, Eugene Adams, that he would assist her in securing permanent
employment within the OAG. However, Cusick was never offered a permanent
position, ultimately ending her career as a senior attorney with OAG.
The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is a 30-year-old nonprofit public interest group that promotes government and corporate accountability by advancing occupational free speech, defending whistleblowers, and empowering citizen activists. We pursue this mission through our Nuclear Safety, International Reform, Corporate Accountability, Food & Drug Safety, and Federal Employee/National Security programs. GAP is the nation's leading whistleblower protection organization.
LATEST NEWS
US College Students Demonstrate in Solidarity With Palestinians, Columbia Protesters
"Columbia University made a huge mistake calling the cops on student protesters," said one educator. "It has transformed the activism of hundreds of students into a student movement of thousands."
Apr 19, 2024
Undeterred by Columbia University's sanctioning of a crackdown by the New York Police Department in which at least 108 people were arrested on Thursday for protesting Israel's war on Gaza, dozens of students continued to camp out on the campus' West Lawn Friday as solidarity protests cropped up at other schools across the country.
Students at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC) set up tents at a rally, while the Harvard College Palestine Solidarity Committee announced a walkout to express solidarity with "steadfast Columbia students" and emergency protests were announced at Boston University; Miami University in Oxford, Ohio; and Ohio State University.
"Columbia University made a huge mistake calling the cops on student protesters," said Jairo I. Fúnez-Flores, a faculty member at Texas Tech University. "It has transformed the activism of hundreds of students into a student movement of thousands with millions around the world watching."
National Students for Justice in Palestine, whose Columbia University chapter was shut down late last year after members protested against the institution's investments in Israeli companies and partnership with Tel Aviv University, called on all of its chapters across college campuses to join in solidarity actions.
"The supposed power of these administrators pales in comparison to the combined strength of the students, staff, and faculty committed to realizing justice and upholding Palestinian liberation on campus," said the national group.
At the impromptu rally at UNC, students chanted, "No justice, no peace!"
The solidarity actions came a day after Columbia president Minouche Shafik authorized the police to dismantle an encampment set up by dozens of students. Shafik testified before a Republican-controlled U.S. House committee on Wednesday where the focus was antisemitism on the school's campus, and admitted she has not witnessed anti-Jewish protests at Columbia since Israel began its assault on Gaza last October.
After the students were arrested Thursday, one student Barnard College—which is part of Columbia—posted on social media an email she had received from vice president and dean Leslie Grinage about the suspension of several students.
The students were forced to leave their housing and have had their access to all campus facilities revoked during the suspension.
Several members of the press reported being denied entry to Columbia's campus on Thursday and Friday, prompting the university's journalism school to offer its assistance and reiterate its support for a free press.
Barnaby Raine, an historian earning his Ph.D. at Columbia, urged fellow educators at the Ivy League school to demonstrate solidarity with the student-led protests.
"As my employer, Columbia University, calls armed riot police into campus to smash a peaceful protest against a genocide, we must all speak out," said Raine. "My former students have been arrested. I'm proud of you. History will be too."
Actor, activist, and former New York gubernatorial candidate Cynthia Nixon, who graduated from Barnard, condemned the administrators' response to the protests.
"I am shocked and ashamed that [Barnard] and Columbia are violently crushing the right of students to peacefully protest," said Nixon. "This is not who we are. Both schools must immediately reinstate these students and protect their right to fight for a free Palestine."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Indigenous Brazilians Lament Lula's Unfulfilled Land Demarcation Promises
"This is revolting for us Indigenous peoples to have had so much faith in the government's commitments to our rights and the demarcation of our territories," said one Indigenous leader.
Apr 19, 2024
Friday is Indigenous Peoples Day in Brazil, and tribal leaders and activists used the occasion to criticize the left-wing government of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva for falling short on promises to safeguard native land rights.
On Thursday, the Brazilian government announced the demarcation of Aldeia Velha, land of the Pataxó people, in the northeastern state of Bahia, as well as the territory of the Karajá people in Cacique Fontoura, Mato Grosso.
"Since the beginning of the current government, 10 areas have been regularized out of a total of 14 routed for approval," the government said in a statement. "The act reaffirms the focus of the federal government on the protection and respect of Indigenous peoples."
However, Indigenous peoples were anticipating the demarcation of six new territories. Lula acknowledged their disappointment.
"I know you are apprehensive and expected the demarcation of six Indigenous lands. But now we only announce two. And I'm being real with you," he said.
"Some of this missing land is occupied either by farmers or peasants," the president explained. "We cannot arrive without giving these people an alternative. Some governors asked for time to resolve, in a negotiated manner, the eviction of these territories so that we can demarcate them."
"The definition of these lands is already ready. What we do not want is to promise you today, and tomorrow you read in the newspaper, that a contrary decision was made," Lula added. "The frustration would be greater."
But the frustration was already there—and growing.
"This is revolting for us Indigenous peoples to have had so much faith in the government's commitments to our rights and the demarcation of our territories," Alessandra Korap Munduruku, a member of the Munduruku people and a 2023 winner of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize, told Amazon Watch in a statement published Friday.
"We hear all of these discussions about environmental and climate protection, but without support for Indigenous peoples on the front lines, suffering serious attacks and threats. Lula cannot speak about fighting climate change without fulfilling his duty to demarcate our lands," she added.
Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB), an umbrella group, said in a statement earlier this week that "the most serious thing is that the Lula government is tarnishing its historical trajectory."
"Since campaigning for his first term in 2002, the president has committed to demarcating Indigenous lands, but he was one of the governments that demarcated the least," the group contended. "And now, like other old and conservative governments, in the name of the country's progress and economic development, [Lula's government] undermines the basis of Indigenous peoples' existence, becoming hostage to the market, the powerbrokers, agribusiness, evangelicals, and the military."
APIB demanded that Lula "put an end to the criminal organizations that intimidate our people and communities, persecute and murder our leaders" and "dedicate farms for agrarian reform and demarcate our lands, which have been invaded and plundered for centuries by the invaders who arrived here 524 years ago and their current descendants."
Thousands of Indigenous peoples from throughout Brazil are expected to rally in the capital BrasÃlia next week for the Terra Livre—or Free Land, camp—the country's largest annual native mobilization. Two years ago, Lula, then a presidential candidate, told Terra Livre attendees that he would end illegal mining on Indigenous lands. Despite a crackdown that resulted in an initial dramatic drop in illicit mineral extraction on Indigenous lands, illegal miners have returned with a vengeance in places including land belonging to the Yanomami people.
Criticism of Lula's demarcation process and the Brazilian government's Indigenous rights record came from outside Brazil as well.
"Human rights defenders are under extreme threat in Brazil. The federal government knows this but has so far failed to put the structures in place to provide them with better protection and tackle the root causes of the risks they face," Mary Lawlor, the United Nations special rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, in a Friday statement after an official visit to Brazil.
"Land is also the key to the protection of these defenders," she continued. "When I asked them what they thought would protect them they were clear: removal of invaders and demarcation now; accountability for environmental crimes. This for them is what collective protection, which is what is needed, means."
"There must be demarcation and titling," Lawlor added. "There can be no more delay."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Person Self-Immolates Outside Courthouse of Trump's NY Trial
An unverified online manifesto identifies the person as "an investigative researcher" who has discovered that "our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup."
Apr 19, 2024
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
Law enforcement officials confirmed to CNN that someone lit themself on fire Friday outside the New York City courthouse where former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, is on trial for allegedly falsifying business records.
"The man walked into the park across the street from the courthouse, throwing flyers into the air," the network reported, citing law enforcement. "He then pulled something out of a backpack—it was not immediately clear what the item was—and lit himself on fire."
Journalists were in the area for the historic trial and CNN anchor Laura Coates was among those who described the scene live on-air as New York Police Department officers and emergency responders worked to extinguish the fire.
Police were "slow to respond in part because of barricades around park," Politico's Emily Ngo explained, sharing photos and videos from the scene on social media. There is "only one way to get into park outside the courthouse without jumping the fence. It's been barricaded in anticipation of protests. And since there hasn't been much in the way of protests, police presence is light. Police had to run all the way around to get to the man."
The person who self-immolated "was responsive when he was removed but he is very, very badly burned. Body charred," Ngo said.
CNN reported that the flyers featured allegations of wrongdoings against New York University and said, "NYU is a mob front."
A self-identified citizen journalist named Jack shared on social media a photo of a booklet the person reportedly left in the dirt.
An unverified Substack post says in part: "My name is Max Azzarello, and I am an investigative researcher who has set himself on fire outside of the Trump trial in Manhattan. This extreme act of protest is to draw attention to an urgent and important discovery: We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup."
Inside Manhattan Criminal Court, the remaining jurors were sworn in for Trump's case, in which he faces 34 charges for records related to alleged hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. There are 12 jurors and six alternates.
The former president was indicted by a New York grand jury last spring. He also faces two federal criminal cases—one related to his handling of classified material and another for trying to overturn his 2020 loss, which culminated in the January 6, 2021 insurrection—as well as an election interference case in Georgia.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular