September, 15 2009, 04:17pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Nell Greenberg, 510.847.9777;
Eriel Deranger, 587.785.1558
Rainforest Action Network Releases Seventy-Foot Banner Over Niagara Falls to 'Welcome' Prime Minister Harper to the U.S.
Banner: Canadian Tar Sands Oil Undermines North America's Clean Energy Future
NIAGARA FALLS
Three concerned U.S. citizens have just released a vivid 70-foot
banner above the Niagara Falls. Just one day before Prime Minister
Harper's first official visit to the U.S. to meet with President Obama,
the banner is intended to call attention to Harper's efforts to lock up
the U.S. market for tar sands oil, and the threat tar sands holds for
the climate. Against the dramatic Niagara Falls background, the most
well recognized border between the U.S. and Canada, the banner is
intended to send the message that Canadian tar sands oil threatens
North America's clean energy future. The banner reads: clean energy
future with an arrow pointing in one direction, and tar sands oil with
an arrow pointing in the other.
During Harper's first official trip to meet Obama in the
U.S., the two leaders are expected to discuss climate change and energy
policy ahead of the upcoming G20 Summit. Canada supplies 19% of U.S.
oil imports, more than half of which now comes from the tar sands,
making the region the largest single source of U.S. oil imports.
Unconventional tar sands oil is derived from lower-grade, difficult and
expensive-to-access raw materials that have enormous consequences for
air quality, drinking water and the climate.
U.S., the two leaders are expected to discuss climate change and energy
policy ahead of the upcoming G20 Summit. Canada supplies 19% of U.S.
oil imports, more than half of which now comes from the tar sands,
making the region the largest single source of U.S. oil imports.
Unconventional tar sands oil is derived from lower-grade, difficult and
expensive-to-access raw materials that have enormous consequences for
air quality, drinking water and the climate.
"Tar sands oil, the dirtiest oil on Earth, has no place in
our clean energy future," said Brant Olson, director of the tar sands
campaign for the Rainforest Action Network. "President Obama's meeting
with Prime Minister Harper will be a moment of truth. Is President
Obama serious about moving the country toward a clean energy economy or
will he allow pollution to be piped in from Canada?"
our clean energy future," said Brant Olson, director of the tar sands
campaign for the Rainforest Action Network. "President Obama's meeting
with Prime Minister Harper will be a moment of truth. Is President
Obama serious about moving the country toward a clean energy economy or
will he allow pollution to be piped in from Canada?"
Tar sands oil has serious environmental, climate and human
health impacts. Described by the United Nations Environment Program as
one of the world's top "environmental hot spots," global warming
pollution from tar sands production is three times that of conventional
crude oil.
health impacts. Described by the United Nations Environment Program as
one of the world's top "environmental hot spots," global warming
pollution from tar sands production is three times that of conventional
crude oil.
Tomorrow's visit to the U.S. by Prime Minister Harper is
the latest attempt by Canadian Federal and Provincial officials to lock
in subsidies for 22 new and expanded refinery projects and oil
pipelines crisscrossing 28 states, which would transport and process
the dirty tar sands oil. Many are concerned that Prime Minister Harper
wants to protect the tar sands oil industry from climate regulation,
even though it is one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas
emissions in Canada.
the latest attempt by Canadian Federal and Provincial officials to lock
in subsidies for 22 new and expanded refinery projects and oil
pipelines crisscrossing 28 states, which would transport and process
the dirty tar sands oil. Many are concerned that Prime Minister Harper
wants to protect the tar sands oil industry from climate regulation,
even though it is one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas
emissions in Canada.
"Climate change, one of the biggest security threats of our
time, is something Canada and the United States face together.
Extracting tar sands oil, which sends three times more climate-changing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than conventional oil, puts us all
at risk," said Eriel Deranger a member of the Athabasca Chipewyan First
Nation and Rainforest Action Network's Tar Sands Campaigner in Alberta.
time, is something Canada and the United States face together.
Extracting tar sands oil, which sends three times more climate-changing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than conventional oil, puts us all
at risk," said Eriel Deranger a member of the Athabasca Chipewyan First
Nation and Rainforest Action Network's Tar Sands Campaigner in Alberta.
Opposition to tar sands oil has been rising on both sides
of the border. Just last month, four Native American and environmental
groups sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Deputy Secretary James
Steinberg and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over Enbridge Energy's
Alberta Clipper pipeline. If built, the 1,375 mile pipeline would pump
800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Northern Alberta to
Midwestern refineries.
of the border. Just last month, four Native American and environmental
groups sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Deputy Secretary James
Steinberg and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over Enbridge Energy's
Alberta Clipper pipeline. If built, the 1,375 mile pipeline would pump
800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Northern Alberta to
Midwestern refineries.
"Americans need to know that tar sands oil from Canada will
prevent progress on climate change," said Logan Price, one of the lead
climbers in today's action. "Expansion of tar sands oil consumption in
the U.S. undermines domestic and international efforts to achieve real
greenhouse gas emissions reductions."
prevent progress on climate change," said Logan Price, one of the lead
climbers in today's action. "Expansion of tar sands oil consumption in
the U.S. undermines domestic and international efforts to achieve real
greenhouse gas emissions reductions."
Canada has no regulations to reduce greenhouse gas
pollution, and the federal government's climate change plan would allow
total pollution from the tar sands to increase almost 70 percent by
2020. Tar sands oil production is the fastest growing source of
greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and was recently cited as one of the
most important reasons Canada will miss its Kyoto targets by over 30%.
pollution, and the federal government's climate change plan would allow
total pollution from the tar sands to increase almost 70 percent by
2020. Tar sands oil production is the fastest growing source of
greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and was recently cited as one of the
most important reasons Canada will miss its Kyoto targets by over 30%.
Mining oil from tar sands requires churning up huge tracts
of ancient boreal forest and polluting so much clean water with
poisonous chemicals that the resulting waste ponds can be seen from
outer space. The health impacts to Alberta's First Nation communities
are severe, with cancer rates up in some communities as much as 400
times its usual frequency. In addition, as this oil spills into the
U.S., communities living near oil refineries face increased air and
water pollution from tar sands oil, which contains 11 times more sulfur
and nickel and five times more lead than conventional oil.
of ancient boreal forest and polluting so much clean water with
poisonous chemicals that the resulting waste ponds can be seen from
outer space. The health impacts to Alberta's First Nation communities
are severe, with cancer rates up in some communities as much as 400
times its usual frequency. In addition, as this oil spills into the
U.S., communities living near oil refineries face increased air and
water pollution from tar sands oil, which contains 11 times more sulfur
and nickel and five times more lead than conventional oil.
Despite hopes that carbon capture and storage (CCS) can
solve the problem, recent reports commissioned by the Governments of
Alberta and Canada show that just a small percentage of the carbon
dioxide released in the tar sands could be captured through this
expensive and unproven technology.
solve the problem, recent reports commissioned by the Governments of
Alberta and Canada show that just a small percentage of the carbon
dioxide released in the tar sands could be captured through this
expensive and unproven technology.
To follow today's action online through live blogs, video
and photos, visit www.ran.org/tarsands. You can also follow the
climbers on a live Twitter.com text loop at "follow ran actions". High
resolution images and b-roll available upon request.
and photos, visit www.ran.org/tarsands. You can also follow the
climbers on a live Twitter.com text loop at "follow ran actions". High
resolution images and b-roll available upon request.
For quick facts on tar sands and the protest, visit www.ran.org/tarsands
Rainforest Action Network (RAN) is headquartered in San Francisco, California with offices staff in Tokyo, Japan, and Edmonton, Canada, plus thousands of volunteer scientists, teachers, parents, students and other concerned citizens around the world. We believe that a sustainable world can be created in our lifetime and that aggressive action must be taken immediately to leave a safe and secure world for our children.
LATEST NEWS
Climate Crisis to Cost Global Economy $38 Trillion a Year by 2050
"This clearly shows that protecting our climate is much cheaper than not doing so, and that is without even considering noneconomic impacts such as loss of life or biodiversity," a new study's lead author said.
Apr 18, 2024
The climate crisis will shrink the average global income 19% in the next 26 years compared to what it would have been without global heating caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels, a study published in Nature Wednesday has found.
The researchers, from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), said that economic shrinkage was largely locked in by mid-century by existing climate change, but that actions taken to reduce emissions now could determine whether income losses hold steady at around 20% or triple through the second half of the century.
"These near-term damages are a result of our past emissions," study lead author and PIK scientist Leonie Wenz said in a statement. "We will need more adaptation efforts if we want to avoid at least some of them. And we have to cut down our emissions drastically and immediately—if not, economic losses will become even bigger in the second half of the century, amounting to up to 60% on global average by 2100."
"I am used to my work not having a nice societal outcome, but I was surprised by how big the damages were."
Put in dollar terms, the climate crisis will take a yearly $38 trillion chunk out of the global economy in damages by 2050, the study authors found.
"That seems like… a lot," writer and climate advocate Bill McKibben wrote in response to the findings. "The entire world economy at the moment is about $100 trillion a year; the federal budget is about $6 trillion a year."
This means that the costs of inaction have already exceeded the costs of limiting global heating to 2°C by six times, the study authors said. However, limiting warming to 2°C can still significantly reduce economic losses through 2100.
"This clearly shows that protecting our climate is much cheaper than not doing so, and that is without even considering noneconomic impacts such as loss of life or biodiversity," Wenz said.
The damages predicted by the study were more than twice those of similar analyses because the researchers looked beyond national temperature data to also incorporate the impacts of extreme weather and rainfall on more than 1,600 subnational regions over a 40-year period, The Guardian explained.
"Strong income reductions are projected for the majority of regions, including North America and Europe, with South Asia and Africa being most strongly affected," PIK scientist and first author Maximilian Kotz said in a statement. "These are caused by the impact of climate change on various aspects that are relevant for economic growth such as agricultural yields, labor productivity, or infrastructure."
However, Wenz told the paper that the paper's projected reduction was likely a "lower bound" because the study still doesn't include climate impacts such as heatwaves, tropical storms, sea-level rise, and harms to human health.
Unlike previous studies, the research predicted economic losses for most wealthier countries in the Global North, with the U.S. and German economies shrinking by 11% by mid-century, France's by 13%, and the U.K.'s by 7%. However, the countries set to suffer the most are countries closer to the equator that have lower incomes already and have historically done much less to contribute to the climate crisis. Iraq, for example, could see incomes drop by 30%, Botswana 25%, and Brazil 21%.
"Our study highlights the considerable inequity of climate impacts: We find damages almost everywhere, but countries in the tropics will suffer the most because they are already warmer," study co-author Anders Levermann, who leads Research Department Complexity Science at PIK, said in a statement. "Further temperature increases will therefore be most harmful there. The countries least responsible for climate change, are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60% greater than the higher-income countries and 40% greater than higher-emission countries. They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Wenz told The Guardian that the results were "devastating."
"I am used to my work not having a nice societal outcome, but I was surprised by how big the damages were. The inequality dimension was really shocking," Wenz said.
Levermann said the paper presented society with a clear choice:
It is on us to decide: Structural change towards a renewable energy system is needed for our security and will save us money. Staying on the path we are currently on, will lead to catastrophic consequences. The temperature of the planet can only be stabilized if we stop burning oil, gas, and coal.
McKibben, meanwhile, argued that the findings should persuade major companies to embrace climate action for self-interested reasons. He noted that most corporate emissions come from how company money is invested by banks, particularly in the continued exploitation of fossil fuel resources.
"If Amazon and Apple and Microsoft wanted to avoid a world where, by century's end, people had 60% less money to spend on buying whatever phones and software and weird junk (doubtless weirder by then) they plan on selling, then they should be putting pressure on their banks to stop making the problem worse. They should also be unleashing their lobbying teams to demand climate action from Congress," McKibben wrote.
"These people are supposed to care about money, and for once it would help us if they actually did," he continued. "Stop putting out ads about how green your products are—start making this system you dominate actually work."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Congressional Progressives Unveil 'Bold' Agenda for Second Biden Term
The Congressional Progressive Caucus says its legislative blueprint for 2025 and beyond aims to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
Apr 18, 2024
The Congressional Progressive Caucus on Thursday published a "comprehensive domestic policy legislative agenda" for U.S. President Joe Biden's possible second White House term that seeks to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
The CPC's Progressive Proposition Agenda is a seven-point plan aimed at lowering the cost of living, boosting wages and worker power, advancing justice, combating climate change and protecting the environment, strengthening democracy, breaking the corporate stranglehold on the economy, and bolstering public education.
"Progressives are proud to have been part of the most significant Democratic legislative accomplishments of this century. We have made real progress for everyday Americans—but there's much more work to be done," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement.
"That's why the Progressive Caucus has identified these popular, populist, and possible solutions," she added. "Democrats in Congress can meet the urgent needs people are facing; rewrite the rules to ensure majorities of this country are no longer barred from the American promise of equality, justice, and economic opportunity; and motivate people with a vision of progressive governance under Democratic majorities in the House and Senate and a Democratic White House."
Progressive lawmakers have already introduced bills for many items on the agenda, including a Green New Deal for Public Schools, expanding the Supreme Court, comprehensive voting rights protection, and legalizing marijuana.
Critics noted the conspicuous absence of Medicare for All—once a top progressive agenda item—and foreign policy issues including ending Israel's genocide, apartheid, occupation, settler colonization, and ethnic cleansing in Palestine.
Jayapal toldNBC News that the CPC is focusing its blueprint exclusively on domestic goals—especially ones it feels can be achieved.
"The way we came to this agenda is to say that we were going to put into this agenda things that were populist and possible... and affected a huge number of people," she said. "We haven't taken a position on particularly Israel and Gaza in the progressive caucus, and so that's not on here."
The CPC agenda is backed by a wide range of labor, climate, environmental, civil rights, consumer, faith-based, and other organizations.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus is leading the way for Congress to address the major issues affecting working families, from reducing healthcare and housing costs to strengthening workers' rights to join unions, earn living wages and benefits, and have safe workplaces," Service Employees International Union president Mary Kay Henry said in a statement.
"SEIU is proud to partner with the CPC to move these priorities forward and build a more equitable economy in which corporations are held accountable for their actions," she added.
Mary Small, chief strategy officer at Indivisible, said: "House progressives were the engine at the heart of our legislative accomplishments in 2021 and 2022. They've continued that momentum to be true governing partners to the Biden administration as those laws and programs are implemented."
"That's why Indivisible is so supportive of the CPC's Proposition Agenda, a bold vision for progressive governance in 2025 and beyond. From reproductive rights to saving our democracy to economic security for all, the CPC is driving forward exactly the sort of legislative goals we want to see in our next governing moment."
That moment is far from guaranteed, with not only the White House hanging in the balance as Biden will all but certainly face former Republican President Donald Trump in November's election but also the Senate Democratic Caucus clinging to a single-seat advantage over the GOP. Republicans currently hold the House of Representatives by a five-seat margin.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'McCarthyism Is Alive and Well': Google Fires 28 for Protesting Israel Contract
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," said organizers. "Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Apr 18, 2024
The peace coalition No Tech for Apartheid accused Google of a "flagrant act of retaliation" late Wednesday night as the Silicon Valley giant announced it had fired 28 workers over protests against its cloud services contract with the Israeli government.
The firings came after Google organizers held two 10-hour sit-ins at the company's offices in Sunnyvale, California and New York City, demanding the termination of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract under which Google and Amazon provide cloud infrastructure and data services for Israel—without any oversight regarding whether the Israel Defense Forces uses the services in its occupation of Palestinian territories and bombardment of Gaza.
Workers have denounced Project Nimbus since it was announced in 2021, but Israel's killing of at least 33,970 Palestinians in Gaza since October and its intentional starvation of civilians led employees to escalate their protests.
No Tech for Apartheid said in a statement that Google officials called the police to both offices to arrest nine protesters—dubbed the Nimbus Nine—on Tuesday morning, before utilizing "a dragnet of in-office surveillance" to fire nearly two dozen other employees on Wednesday.
"They punished all of the workers they could associate with this action in wholesale firings," said the coalition, which includes Jewish Voice for Peace and MPower Change, a Muslim-led anti-war group.
Google accused the workers of "bullying," "harassment," defacing property, and physically impeding other employees—allegations No Tech for Apartheid rejected as it noted organizers "have yet to hear from a single executive about" their concerns over Google's collaboration with Israel.
"This excuse to avoid confronting us and our concerns directly, and attempt to justify its illegal, retaliatory firings, is a lie," said the workers. "Even the workers who were participating in a peaceful sit-in and refusing to leave did not damage property or threaten other workers. Instead they received an overwhelmingly positive response and shows of support."
The organizers staged the sit-ins on the heels of reporting in Time magazine about new negotiations between Google and the Israeli government regarding further potential tech contracts.
Kate J. Sim, a child safety policy adviser at Google who said she was among those fired this week, said the terminations show "how terrified [executives] are of worker power."
Google employees have a history of harnessing worker power to change policies at the company. In 2018, Google terminated a deal with the U.S. Defense Department to develop drone and artificial intelligence (AI) technology through a contract called Project Maven. The decision followed the resignations of several employees and the condemnation of thousands of workers.
Calling Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian "genocide profiteers," No Tech for Apartheid said Wednesday that they will not stop demonstrating against Project Nimbus until they get a similar result.
"The truth is clear: Google is terrified of us," said the group. "They are terrified of workers coming together and calling for accountability and transparency from our bosses... The corporation is trying to downplay and discredit our power.
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," No Tech for Apartheid added. "On the contrary, they only serve as further fuel for the growth of this movement. Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular