September, 15 2009, 04:17pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Nell Greenberg, 510.847.9777;
Eriel Deranger, 587.785.1558
Rainforest Action Network Releases Seventy-Foot Banner Over Niagara Falls to 'Welcome' Prime Minister Harper to the U.S.
Banner: Canadian Tar Sands Oil Undermines North America's Clean Energy Future
NIAGARA FALLS
Three concerned U.S. citizens have just released a vivid 70-foot
banner above the Niagara Falls. Just one day before Prime Minister
Harper's first official visit to the U.S. to meet with President Obama,
the banner is intended to call attention to Harper's efforts to lock up
the U.S. market for tar sands oil, and the threat tar sands holds for
the climate. Against the dramatic Niagara Falls background, the most
well recognized border between the U.S. and Canada, the banner is
intended to send the message that Canadian tar sands oil threatens
North America's clean energy future. The banner reads: clean energy
future with an arrow pointing in one direction, and tar sands oil with
an arrow pointing in the other.
During Harper's first official trip to meet Obama in the
U.S., the two leaders are expected to discuss climate change and energy
policy ahead of the upcoming G20 Summit. Canada supplies 19% of U.S.
oil imports, more than half of which now comes from the tar sands,
making the region the largest single source of U.S. oil imports.
Unconventional tar sands oil is derived from lower-grade, difficult and
expensive-to-access raw materials that have enormous consequences for
air quality, drinking water and the climate.
U.S., the two leaders are expected to discuss climate change and energy
policy ahead of the upcoming G20 Summit. Canada supplies 19% of U.S.
oil imports, more than half of which now comes from the tar sands,
making the region the largest single source of U.S. oil imports.
Unconventional tar sands oil is derived from lower-grade, difficult and
expensive-to-access raw materials that have enormous consequences for
air quality, drinking water and the climate.
"Tar sands oil, the dirtiest oil on Earth, has no place in
our clean energy future," said Brant Olson, director of the tar sands
campaign for the Rainforest Action Network. "President Obama's meeting
with Prime Minister Harper will be a moment of truth. Is President
Obama serious about moving the country toward a clean energy economy or
will he allow pollution to be piped in from Canada?"
our clean energy future," said Brant Olson, director of the tar sands
campaign for the Rainforest Action Network. "President Obama's meeting
with Prime Minister Harper will be a moment of truth. Is President
Obama serious about moving the country toward a clean energy economy or
will he allow pollution to be piped in from Canada?"
Tar sands oil has serious environmental, climate and human
health impacts. Described by the United Nations Environment Program as
one of the world's top "environmental hot spots," global warming
pollution from tar sands production is three times that of conventional
crude oil.
health impacts. Described by the United Nations Environment Program as
one of the world's top "environmental hot spots," global warming
pollution from tar sands production is three times that of conventional
crude oil.
Tomorrow's visit to the U.S. by Prime Minister Harper is
the latest attempt by Canadian Federal and Provincial officials to lock
in subsidies for 22 new and expanded refinery projects and oil
pipelines crisscrossing 28 states, which would transport and process
the dirty tar sands oil. Many are concerned that Prime Minister Harper
wants to protect the tar sands oil industry from climate regulation,
even though it is one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas
emissions in Canada.
the latest attempt by Canadian Federal and Provincial officials to lock
in subsidies for 22 new and expanded refinery projects and oil
pipelines crisscrossing 28 states, which would transport and process
the dirty tar sands oil. Many are concerned that Prime Minister Harper
wants to protect the tar sands oil industry from climate regulation,
even though it is one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas
emissions in Canada.
"Climate change, one of the biggest security threats of our
time, is something Canada and the United States face together.
Extracting tar sands oil, which sends three times more climate-changing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than conventional oil, puts us all
at risk," said Eriel Deranger a member of the Athabasca Chipewyan First
Nation and Rainforest Action Network's Tar Sands Campaigner in Alberta.
time, is something Canada and the United States face together.
Extracting tar sands oil, which sends three times more climate-changing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than conventional oil, puts us all
at risk," said Eriel Deranger a member of the Athabasca Chipewyan First
Nation and Rainforest Action Network's Tar Sands Campaigner in Alberta.
Opposition to tar sands oil has been rising on both sides
of the border. Just last month, four Native American and environmental
groups sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Deputy Secretary James
Steinberg and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over Enbridge Energy's
Alberta Clipper pipeline. If built, the 1,375 mile pipeline would pump
800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Northern Alberta to
Midwestern refineries.
of the border. Just last month, four Native American and environmental
groups sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Deputy Secretary James
Steinberg and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over Enbridge Energy's
Alberta Clipper pipeline. If built, the 1,375 mile pipeline would pump
800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Northern Alberta to
Midwestern refineries.
"Americans need to know that tar sands oil from Canada will
prevent progress on climate change," said Logan Price, one of the lead
climbers in today's action. "Expansion of tar sands oil consumption in
the U.S. undermines domestic and international efforts to achieve real
greenhouse gas emissions reductions."
prevent progress on climate change," said Logan Price, one of the lead
climbers in today's action. "Expansion of tar sands oil consumption in
the U.S. undermines domestic and international efforts to achieve real
greenhouse gas emissions reductions."
Canada has no regulations to reduce greenhouse gas
pollution, and the federal government's climate change plan would allow
total pollution from the tar sands to increase almost 70 percent by
2020. Tar sands oil production is the fastest growing source of
greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and was recently cited as one of the
most important reasons Canada will miss its Kyoto targets by over 30%.
pollution, and the federal government's climate change plan would allow
total pollution from the tar sands to increase almost 70 percent by
2020. Tar sands oil production is the fastest growing source of
greenhouse gas emissions in Canada and was recently cited as one of the
most important reasons Canada will miss its Kyoto targets by over 30%.
Mining oil from tar sands requires churning up huge tracts
of ancient boreal forest and polluting so much clean water with
poisonous chemicals that the resulting waste ponds can be seen from
outer space. The health impacts to Alberta's First Nation communities
are severe, with cancer rates up in some communities as much as 400
times its usual frequency. In addition, as this oil spills into the
U.S., communities living near oil refineries face increased air and
water pollution from tar sands oil, which contains 11 times more sulfur
and nickel and five times more lead than conventional oil.
of ancient boreal forest and polluting so much clean water with
poisonous chemicals that the resulting waste ponds can be seen from
outer space. The health impacts to Alberta's First Nation communities
are severe, with cancer rates up in some communities as much as 400
times its usual frequency. In addition, as this oil spills into the
U.S., communities living near oil refineries face increased air and
water pollution from tar sands oil, which contains 11 times more sulfur
and nickel and five times more lead than conventional oil.
Despite hopes that carbon capture and storage (CCS) can
solve the problem, recent reports commissioned by the Governments of
Alberta and Canada show that just a small percentage of the carbon
dioxide released in the tar sands could be captured through this
expensive and unproven technology.
solve the problem, recent reports commissioned by the Governments of
Alberta and Canada show that just a small percentage of the carbon
dioxide released in the tar sands could be captured through this
expensive and unproven technology.
To follow today's action online through live blogs, video
and photos, visit www.ran.org/tarsands. You can also follow the
climbers on a live Twitter.com text loop at "follow ran actions". High
resolution images and b-roll available upon request.
and photos, visit www.ran.org/tarsands. You can also follow the
climbers on a live Twitter.com text loop at "follow ran actions". High
resolution images and b-roll available upon request.
For quick facts on tar sands and the protest, visit www.ran.org/tarsands
Rainforest Action Network (RAN) is headquartered in San Francisco, California with offices staff in Tokyo, Japan, and Edmonton, Canada, plus thousands of volunteer scientists, teachers, parents, students and other concerned citizens around the world. We believe that a sustainable world can be created in our lifetime and that aggressive action must be taken immediately to leave a safe and secure world for our children.
LATEST NEWS
Million-Dollar Ad Blitz Targets Senate Dems Who Voted for 'Trump Loyalist Judges'
"This isn’t normal," said the president of the group behind the ad campaign. "If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will."
Dec 03, 2025
The progressive advocacy group Demand Justice on Wednesday launched a seven-figure advertising campaign targeting three members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees, enabling the ongoing right-wing takeover of the nation's courts.
The first series of ads will target Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Angus King (D-Maine), three of the 16 members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm at least one Trump judge this year. Other Senate Democrats who have voted with Republicans in support of at least one Trump judicial pick include Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Adam Schiff of California, and Chris Coons of Delaware.
"It is outrageous that Senate Democrats are voting to confirm Trump’s judicial nominees who refuse to tell the truth about January 6th and the 2020 election,” Josh Orton, the president of Demand Justice, said in a statement. “This isn’t normal. If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will. And we won’t let up.”
The group's campaign will also include a national cable TV ad buy and "coordinated digital rollout across key battleground states" naming and shaming Democrats who support "Trump loyalist judges" even as the lawmakers condemn the president's authoritarian assault on democracy.
Watch the Demand Justice ad targeting Maggie Hassan, who on Tuesday voted to confirm Lindsey Ann Freeman, Trump's nominee to the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina:
Freeman, like other Trump judicial picks, refused during her confirmation process to say directly that the president lost the 2020 election.
"President Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 presidential election and served as the 46th President of the United States," Freeman wrote in response to questions from Durbin, who ultimately voted in favor of her confirmation.
In a report released last month, Demand Justice analyzed Trump judicial picks' written responses to senators' questions. The analysis shows that "nominees' responses appear nearly identical, with many nominees using verbatim phrasing, repeating key words, and, overall, using unusual and evasive language that’s almost entirely outside the normal, historical, and common lexicon used to describe such events."
"Every nominee provided near-identical phrasing to avoid a direct answer about the 2020 election, instead referencing the results of the congressional 'certification' process, or answering by noting that President Biden 'served' as president," the report notes. "And 21 of 27 nominees provided extremely similar responses in regard to January 6, often describing what transpired as a 'political issue' and refusing to comment further."
Orton of Demand Justice said that "it is unprecedented for lifetime nominees to the federal bench to provide dishonest and misleading answers about historical facts—and it is deeply concerning that Trump’s nominees are parroting such strikingly similar language, the president’s own language, to avoid telling the truth."
That more than a dozen Senate Democrats still voted to confirm at least one of those nominees is "simply unacceptable," said Orton.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Yikes’: New Jobs Data Further Undermines Trump Fiction of Thriving Economy
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," said economist Dean Baker.
Dec 03, 2025
Economists on Wednesday expressed significant concerns after new data from global payroll processing firm ADP estimated that the US economy lost 32,000 jobs last month.
As reported by CNBC, small businesses bore the brunt of the job losses, as firms with fewer than 50 employees shed a total of 120,000 jobs, more than offsetting the 90,000 in job gains reported by firms with 50 or more employees.
The loss of 32,000 jobs in November marked a major miss for economists' consensus estimate of 40,000 jobs added on the month, and CNBC noted that the total number of jobs lost according to ADP data "was the biggest drop since March 2023."
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted in a post on X that the job losses recorded by ADP were widespread across the US economy.
"Yikes," she wrote in reaction to the report. "Most industries were doing layoffs. The only ones still are hiring are hospitality and healthcare."
Long also said the disparity between small and large businesses in terms of job growth was more evidence that the US is experiencing a "K-shaped" economy in which those at the top of the economic ladder thrive, even as everyone else struggles.
"Larger companies are still hiring," she explained. "Smaller firms (under 50 workers) are doing the layoffs. It's been a very tough year for small biz due to tariffs and more selective spending from lower and middle-class consumers."
Kevin Gordon, head of macro research and strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, observed that ADP hasn't reported such a big drop in small-business employment since October 2020, when the US economy was suffering through the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, cautioned against reading too much into ADP data, although he added that "in the absence of up to date government payrolls, all other signs point to a further deteriorating labor market."
Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at financial planner Creative Planning, argued that the ADP jobs numbers were part of a negative three-month trend in which the US economy lost an estimated 4,000 jobs per month, which he said was "the first three-month decline since the 2020 recession."
Bilello added that "a year ago, we were adding over 200,000 jobs per month."
Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG, argued that the ADP report showed job losses in the US economy were "broad based" and "were accompanied by a cooling of wage gains" for workers who still have jobs or are switching from one job to another.
"Those with a job are clinging on, while those without are left wanting," she explained.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, argued that the ADP report blows up President Donald Trump's spin about the health of the US economy.
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," he wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pope Leo Presses Trump to End Military Escalation Against Venezuela
"So often, who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities," the first American pope said as another regime change war looms.
Dec 03, 2025
Amid escalating threats from the White House in recent days, Pope Leo XIV pleaded for President Donald Trump to pursue diplomacy with Venezuela rather than another regime change war.
"It is better to search for ways of dialogue, or perhaps pressure, including economic pressure," said the first American pope as he returned to Rome from Lebanon.
Since September, the Trump administration has launched airstrikes against at least 22 boats mostly in the Southern Caribbean that have extrajudicially killed at least 83 people. While the administration has claimed these people are "narcoterrorists" from Venezuela, it has provided no evidence to support this.
Trump said he had ordered the closing of Venezuela’s airspace on Saturday, which has left many observers holding their breath in expectation of military action against the South American nation.
As Reuters reported Monday, Trump also offered safe passage to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro last month if he left the country, suggesting that regime change is the administration’s ultimate goal.
"On one hand, it seems there was a call between the two presidents," said the pope, referring to that ultimatum from Trump last month. "On the other hand, there is the danger, there is the possibility there will be some activity, some [military] operation."
"The voices that come from the United States, they change with a certain frequency," Leo added.
The pope has been a frequent critic of the Trump administration’s policies since he was elected earlier this year, with harsh rebukes issued towards the White House's attacks on immigrants.
While the pope did not denounce the idea of US-imposed regime change in Venezuela entirely, he said it should search for other means "if that is what they want to do in the United States.”
The US has notably already applied a great deal of "economic pressure" to Venezuela, via a regime of crippling sanctions that are considered one of the major causes of the nation's economic instability in recent years.
On Tuesday, Abigail Hall, a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, warned that "a US invasion, however framed, would impose steep costs on both nations."
"For the United States, an attempt at regime change in Venezuela would likely be another foray into failed foreign policy, with all the costs that go with it," she said. "A destabilized Venezuela could also trigger another wave of migration across the region, straining neighboring countries and potentially reaching US shores."
"For Venezuelans, the costs would be even greater," she added. "Beyond the immediate human toll of conflict, the long-term costs are incalculable. Even if Maduro were removed, a chaotic transition could destroy prospects for rebuilding Venezuela’s institutions, economy, and civil society."
Amid Trump's latest series of threats, Pope Leo echoed this warning aboard the papal plane. He said Venezuela's bishops are "looking for ways to calm the situation" and pursue "the good of the people, because so often who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular