U.S. President Donald Trump greets then-governor of Florida Rick Scott during a campaign rally in Pensacola, Florida on November 3, 2018. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm / AFP via Getty Images)
Joining Trump to Undermine Election Results, GOP Senator Proposes Nullifying All Mail-In Ballots Not Counted Within 48-Hour Window
"It's just wild that they're introducing a bill like this in the light of day."
A new bill proposed by Republican Sen. Rick Scott is "entirely unworkable," Slate reported Thursday evening, but demonstrates the GOP's intense desire to make sure millions of votes aren't counted in the general election by severely restricting the time frame during which they can be tallied.
The Orwellian-named "Help America Vote Act of 2020," which Scott proposed Thursday, would help to codify President Donald Trump's desire, stated last week, to ensure that the preliminary tally of votes on Election Day will count as the final vote count in the election.
The preliminary count would leave out absentee ballots and a record number of mail-in ballots, which nearly half of voters plan to either send to election officials or place in a drop box before Election Day, according to a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll conducted earlier this month.
The proposal, as Slate's Jeremy Stahl explains:
would require that mail-in ballots be counted within 24 hours of when voting closes on Election Day. Scott's proposed legislation would also prevent mail-in ballots received prior to Election Day from being processed and counted until the morning of Nov. 3, contradicting state election statutes across the country including one that he signed when he was governor of Florida. Basically, the bill would move back the date by which votes can start to be counted and move up the date by which the count must end. This would limit the count to a single less-than-48-hour window, shortening the count in some cases by weeks.
"Any conflicting state laws would be preempted," Chris Hartline, communications director for Scott, told Slate--including rules in the senator's own home state of Florida, where the counting of votes can legally begin 22 days before Election Day.
Officials would have about 48 hours to tally all the votes, but Scott's proposal includes no funding that would help states make this possible by hiring more poll workers or providing them with personal protective equipment. The bill would shorten the time during which officials generally have to count votes by several weeks, and would leave out many absentee voters, who made up more than 17% of voters in 2016 and more than 20% in previous years.
Tallying every vote within 24 hours of polls closing would be "impossible" in many states, legal scholar Richard L. Hasen told Slate.
Critics on social media expressed shock at Scott's blatant attempt to leave millions of American voters out of the democratic process.
"I'm hung up on this stuff not because I necessarily think they'll succeed--the more people vote, the harder it will be for them to nullify--but because the attempt should be, in itself, completely disqualifying," tweeted Seth D. Michaels, communications official for the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Scott proposed the legislation on the same day that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), in an interview with Fox News, dismissed the notion that Republicans would not allow for a peaceful transition of power, as Trump said this week, by saying he would accept whatever decision the U.S. Supreme Court--not the majority of U.S. voters--reached.
Such sentiments "betray a lack of confidence in Trump's ability to win," tweeted journalist Adam Serwer. "No idea if they are right; but they wouldn't be saying things like this if they thought he was in good shape."
While Scott's bill is a "nonstarter," as Jeremy Stahl wrote at Slate, because of the Democratic-controlled House, "it shows you exactly where the GOP's head is at with 40 days left to go before the last votes are cast."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A new bill proposed by Republican Sen. Rick Scott is "entirely unworkable," Slate reported Thursday evening, but demonstrates the GOP's intense desire to make sure millions of votes aren't counted in the general election by severely restricting the time frame during which they can be tallied.
The Orwellian-named "Help America Vote Act of 2020," which Scott proposed Thursday, would help to codify President Donald Trump's desire, stated last week, to ensure that the preliminary tally of votes on Election Day will count as the final vote count in the election.
The preliminary count would leave out absentee ballots and a record number of mail-in ballots, which nearly half of voters plan to either send to election officials or place in a drop box before Election Day, according to a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll conducted earlier this month.
The proposal, as Slate's Jeremy Stahl explains:
would require that mail-in ballots be counted within 24 hours of when voting closes on Election Day. Scott's proposed legislation would also prevent mail-in ballots received prior to Election Day from being processed and counted until the morning of Nov. 3, contradicting state election statutes across the country including one that he signed when he was governor of Florida. Basically, the bill would move back the date by which votes can start to be counted and move up the date by which the count must end. This would limit the count to a single less-than-48-hour window, shortening the count in some cases by weeks.
"Any conflicting state laws would be preempted," Chris Hartline, communications director for Scott, told Slate--including rules in the senator's own home state of Florida, where the counting of votes can legally begin 22 days before Election Day.
Officials would have about 48 hours to tally all the votes, but Scott's proposal includes no funding that would help states make this possible by hiring more poll workers or providing them with personal protective equipment. The bill would shorten the time during which officials generally have to count votes by several weeks, and would leave out many absentee voters, who made up more than 17% of voters in 2016 and more than 20% in previous years.
Tallying every vote within 24 hours of polls closing would be "impossible" in many states, legal scholar Richard L. Hasen told Slate.
Critics on social media expressed shock at Scott's blatant attempt to leave millions of American voters out of the democratic process.
"I'm hung up on this stuff not because I necessarily think they'll succeed--the more people vote, the harder it will be for them to nullify--but because the attempt should be, in itself, completely disqualifying," tweeted Seth D. Michaels, communications official for the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Scott proposed the legislation on the same day that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), in an interview with Fox News, dismissed the notion that Republicans would not allow for a peaceful transition of power, as Trump said this week, by saying he would accept whatever decision the U.S. Supreme Court--not the majority of U.S. voters--reached.
Such sentiments "betray a lack of confidence in Trump's ability to win," tweeted journalist Adam Serwer. "No idea if they are right; but they wouldn't be saying things like this if they thought he was in good shape."
While Scott's bill is a "nonstarter," as Jeremy Stahl wrote at Slate, because of the Democratic-controlled House, "it shows you exactly where the GOP's head is at with 40 days left to go before the last votes are cast."
A new bill proposed by Republican Sen. Rick Scott is "entirely unworkable," Slate reported Thursday evening, but demonstrates the GOP's intense desire to make sure millions of votes aren't counted in the general election by severely restricting the time frame during which they can be tallied.
The Orwellian-named "Help America Vote Act of 2020," which Scott proposed Thursday, would help to codify President Donald Trump's desire, stated last week, to ensure that the preliminary tally of votes on Election Day will count as the final vote count in the election.
The preliminary count would leave out absentee ballots and a record number of mail-in ballots, which nearly half of voters plan to either send to election officials or place in a drop box before Election Day, according to a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll conducted earlier this month.
The proposal, as Slate's Jeremy Stahl explains:
would require that mail-in ballots be counted within 24 hours of when voting closes on Election Day. Scott's proposed legislation would also prevent mail-in ballots received prior to Election Day from being processed and counted until the morning of Nov. 3, contradicting state election statutes across the country including one that he signed when he was governor of Florida. Basically, the bill would move back the date by which votes can start to be counted and move up the date by which the count must end. This would limit the count to a single less-than-48-hour window, shortening the count in some cases by weeks.
"Any conflicting state laws would be preempted," Chris Hartline, communications director for Scott, told Slate--including rules in the senator's own home state of Florida, where the counting of votes can legally begin 22 days before Election Day.
Officials would have about 48 hours to tally all the votes, but Scott's proposal includes no funding that would help states make this possible by hiring more poll workers or providing them with personal protective equipment. The bill would shorten the time during which officials generally have to count votes by several weeks, and would leave out many absentee voters, who made up more than 17% of voters in 2016 and more than 20% in previous years.
Tallying every vote within 24 hours of polls closing would be "impossible" in many states, legal scholar Richard L. Hasen told Slate.
Critics on social media expressed shock at Scott's blatant attempt to leave millions of American voters out of the democratic process.
"I'm hung up on this stuff not because I necessarily think they'll succeed--the more people vote, the harder it will be for them to nullify--but because the attempt should be, in itself, completely disqualifying," tweeted Seth D. Michaels, communications official for the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Scott proposed the legislation on the same day that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), in an interview with Fox News, dismissed the notion that Republicans would not allow for a peaceful transition of power, as Trump said this week, by saying he would accept whatever decision the U.S. Supreme Court--not the majority of U.S. voters--reached.
Such sentiments "betray a lack of confidence in Trump's ability to win," tweeted journalist Adam Serwer. "No idea if they are right; but they wouldn't be saying things like this if they thought he was in good shape."
While Scott's bill is a "nonstarter," as Jeremy Stahl wrote at Slate, because of the Democratic-controlled House, "it shows you exactly where the GOP's head is at with 40 days left to go before the last votes are cast."