SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Progressives Mount Final Push Against Bill That 'Threatens Everything You Care About'
As Obama pulls out all the stops on corporate trade push, public interest groups organize day of action focused on members of U.S. House
Jun 03, 2015
With President Barack Obama "in overdrive" pushing his trade agenda and the House expected to take up so-called Fast Track authority "any day now," progressives are flooding Capitol Hill on Wednesday with phone calls and petitions expressing their opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals.
Flanked by boxes holding upwards of two million petition signatures, elected officials including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.), and Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) stood with labor, environmental, public health, and civil society groups outside the Capitol building, vowing to defeat Fast Track as the battle moves into what the AFSCME trade union called "a critical stage."
| #StopFastTrack Tweets |
The Senate voted to give Obama Fast Track, or trade promotion authority, at the end of May—a move critics say will stifle the development of mammoth and troubling trade agreements like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
But the bigger fight was always expected to come in the House, where many Democrats and some Republicans are reluctant to approve a bill enabling the president to present trade agreements that Congress can ratify or reject, but not change. While it's unclear how many Democratic votes the president needs to pass Fast Track, its estimated that he'll need to win over as many as two dozen lawmakers due to opposition from Republican lawmakers who generally back free trade but are reluctant to grant Obama more power.
"Getting the needed number of House Democrats on board is the biggest test of Obama's legislative prowess in years," according to Politico, which adds: "The stakes couldn't be higher for the president. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is the top legislative priority for his final years in office and passage of the deal would mark the largest trade initiative in decades."
To that end, reports The Hill, "Obama is making an aggressive effort to sway undecided Democrats," making phone calls and trying to convince members of his own party it won't be politically dangerous for them to back him or the trade deals he supports.
According to The Hill,
President Obama believes he has 20 Democratic votes in the House for a bill to grant him fast-track authority to negotiate new trade deals.
The president revealed his whip count to Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.) during a phone call intended to talk the undecided Democrat into backing the legislation.
Obama's not the only one with a working telephone, however. Progressive groups are urging supporters to call their members of Congress on Wednesday, a national day of action in opposition to the legislation they say "threatens everything you care about: democracy, jobs, the environment, and the Internet."
"If we swamp them with phone calls, we will deliver a powerful message that can overpower the big corporate money that is pushing fast track and the Trans-Pacific Partnership," wrote Campaign for America's Future fellow Dave Johnson on Wednesday.
In a separate call-to-action, the AFL-CIO stated bluntly: "The time to stop Fast Track is now or never."
In recent weeks, critics have escalated their call for the Obama administration to "release the text" of the TPP--a call that culminated on Tuesday with simultaneous efforts by WikiLeaks, which announced a $100,000 'bounty' for the complete text of the agreement, and labor unions, which unfurled a giant banner outside the AFL-CIO before marching to the U.S. Trade Representative's office to literally ask to see the text. They were locked out.
Watch Sanders's speech from Wednesday's rally below:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
afl-ciobarack obamabernie sandersdonna edwardsfast trackfasttrack authoritylaborpeople powerraul grijalvatpptradettipus housewikileaksworkerstrans-pacific partnership
With President Barack Obama "in overdrive" pushing his trade agenda and the House expected to take up so-called Fast Track authority "any day now," progressives are flooding Capitol Hill on Wednesday with phone calls and petitions expressing their opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals.
Flanked by boxes holding upwards of two million petition signatures, elected officials including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.), and Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) stood with labor, environmental, public health, and civil society groups outside the Capitol building, vowing to defeat Fast Track as the battle moves into what the AFSCME trade union called "a critical stage."
| #StopFastTrack Tweets |
The Senate voted to give Obama Fast Track, or trade promotion authority, at the end of May—a move critics say will stifle the development of mammoth and troubling trade agreements like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
But the bigger fight was always expected to come in the House, where many Democrats and some Republicans are reluctant to approve a bill enabling the president to present trade agreements that Congress can ratify or reject, but not change. While it's unclear how many Democratic votes the president needs to pass Fast Track, its estimated that he'll need to win over as many as two dozen lawmakers due to opposition from Republican lawmakers who generally back free trade but are reluctant to grant Obama more power.
"Getting the needed number of House Democrats on board is the biggest test of Obama's legislative prowess in years," according to Politico, which adds: "The stakes couldn't be higher for the president. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is the top legislative priority for his final years in office and passage of the deal would mark the largest trade initiative in decades."
To that end, reports The Hill, "Obama is making an aggressive effort to sway undecided Democrats," making phone calls and trying to convince members of his own party it won't be politically dangerous for them to back him or the trade deals he supports.
According to The Hill,
President Obama believes he has 20 Democratic votes in the House for a bill to grant him fast-track authority to negotiate new trade deals.
The president revealed his whip count to Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.) during a phone call intended to talk the undecided Democrat into backing the legislation.
Obama's not the only one with a working telephone, however. Progressive groups are urging supporters to call their members of Congress on Wednesday, a national day of action in opposition to the legislation they say "threatens everything you care about: democracy, jobs, the environment, and the Internet."
"If we swamp them with phone calls, we will deliver a powerful message that can overpower the big corporate money that is pushing fast track and the Trans-Pacific Partnership," wrote Campaign for America's Future fellow Dave Johnson on Wednesday.
In a separate call-to-action, the AFL-CIO stated bluntly: "The time to stop Fast Track is now or never."
In recent weeks, critics have escalated their call for the Obama administration to "release the text" of the TPP--a call that culminated on Tuesday with simultaneous efforts by WikiLeaks, which announced a $100,000 'bounty' for the complete text of the agreement, and labor unions, which unfurled a giant banner outside the AFL-CIO before marching to the U.S. Trade Representative's office to literally ask to see the text. They were locked out.
Watch Sanders's speech from Wednesday's rally below:
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
With President Barack Obama "in overdrive" pushing his trade agenda and the House expected to take up so-called Fast Track authority "any day now," progressives are flooding Capitol Hill on Wednesday with phone calls and petitions expressing their opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals.
Flanked by boxes holding upwards of two million petition signatures, elected officials including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.), and Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) stood with labor, environmental, public health, and civil society groups outside the Capitol building, vowing to defeat Fast Track as the battle moves into what the AFSCME trade union called "a critical stage."
| #StopFastTrack Tweets |
The Senate voted to give Obama Fast Track, or trade promotion authority, at the end of May—a move critics say will stifle the development of mammoth and troubling trade agreements like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
But the bigger fight was always expected to come in the House, where many Democrats and some Republicans are reluctant to approve a bill enabling the president to present trade agreements that Congress can ratify or reject, but not change. While it's unclear how many Democratic votes the president needs to pass Fast Track, its estimated that he'll need to win over as many as two dozen lawmakers due to opposition from Republican lawmakers who generally back free trade but are reluctant to grant Obama more power.
"Getting the needed number of House Democrats on board is the biggest test of Obama's legislative prowess in years," according to Politico, which adds: "The stakes couldn't be higher for the president. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is the top legislative priority for his final years in office and passage of the deal would mark the largest trade initiative in decades."
To that end, reports The Hill, "Obama is making an aggressive effort to sway undecided Democrats," making phone calls and trying to convince members of his own party it won't be politically dangerous for them to back him or the trade deals he supports.
According to The Hill,
President Obama believes he has 20 Democratic votes in the House for a bill to grant him fast-track authority to negotiate new trade deals.
The president revealed his whip count to Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.) during a phone call intended to talk the undecided Democrat into backing the legislation.
Obama's not the only one with a working telephone, however. Progressive groups are urging supporters to call their members of Congress on Wednesday, a national day of action in opposition to the legislation they say "threatens everything you care about: democracy, jobs, the environment, and the Internet."
"If we swamp them with phone calls, we will deliver a powerful message that can overpower the big corporate money that is pushing fast track and the Trans-Pacific Partnership," wrote Campaign for America's Future fellow Dave Johnson on Wednesday.
In a separate call-to-action, the AFL-CIO stated bluntly: "The time to stop Fast Track is now or never."
In recent weeks, critics have escalated their call for the Obama administration to "release the text" of the TPP--a call that culminated on Tuesday with simultaneous efforts by WikiLeaks, which announced a $100,000 'bounty' for the complete text of the agreement, and labor unions, which unfurled a giant banner outside the AFL-CIO before marching to the U.S. Trade Representative's office to literally ask to see the text. They were locked out.
Watch Sanders's speech from Wednesday's rally below:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.