SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
President Donald Trump talks with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Jared Kushner in Jerusalem, May 22, 2017. (Photo by Kobi Gideon/GPO via Getty Images)
What follows is the text of an email I have just sent to Jared Kushner, in his role as Special Advisor to President Donald Trump, prior to the launch of his "peace plan" for Israel/Palestine.
Dear Jared Kushner:
I'm one of many Israeli peace activists you haven't met. I suspect you haven't tried to reach out to us, just as you didn't reach out to leading Palestinian businessmen such as Sam Bahour, before launching your "economic peace" plan--which to me suggests Golden Calf enslavement, not conflict resolution.
And since the United States closed its USAID program in Palestine this year, I'm more than skeptical (absent basic trust building measures to convince us) that delivery of billions from Bahrain could be logistically feasible without a mechanism for delivery or the necessary institutional memory to serve efficiency rather than corruption.
Although I've been regularly invited to the US embassy's July 4th celebrations, this year, together with most peace or human rights NGOs and other civil society representatives, I stayed away, sensing that attendance might indicate approval for American/Israeli policies--policies that are directly contrary to efforts for genuine peace. Having met with senior officers at both the embassy and consulate in preceding months, I noted even then that neither basic Palestinian civil rights nor their need to be able to live at peace with us in freedom were at the forefront of American thinking. When it came to Palestine, the magic word "viability" was no longer even being used.
As a peace activist, I see the denial of Palestinian freedom by Israel and the United States following a tragic trajectory: we create what we fear. If we deny higher purpose or give in to such lower motives as selfishness, greed or the inferiority that needs to feel superior or "chosen," I believe that we Israelis will never experience the freedom we yearn for, as referenced in our national anthem, HaTikva, while deliberately choking those we desperately seek to control.
Nor can we fulfill intrinsic Jewish values that warn us not to do to others what we wouldn't have done to us, nor raise coming generations to recognize the sacred and God's image in ALL life, if we continue on this path of moral destruction.
Jared Kushner, maybe you believe you're supporting Israel with your positions, statements and actions? For those of us who for many decades have fought for peace, nothing could be more mistaken. In our view, you're condemning Israel to suicide. As the saying goes, "friends don't let friends drive drunk." Because Israel is seriously addicted, high on hubris, following policies that are creating what Israelis most fear without a responsible adult laying down borders, metaphoric and literal.
You and your colleague Jason Greenblatt tend to blame the Palestinians for the years of failed negotiations. This goes 180 degrees against the reality watched first-hand by those of us living here. We remember the lies of Ehud Barak's 2000 election campaign, stating there was a generous offer rejected by Arafat (there was none - how could they be at peace with us when we weren't even prepared to share the water with them?). They claimed that there was no partner, or that the Palestinians rejected peace--all so that Barak could win the election by blaming Arafat. Today, Barak's aide Eldad Yaniv takes public responsibility for those positions in endless "mea culpas" on TV and in print, confessing he never realized our Israeli public would believe the lies then, and continue to believe them until now.
Israel, prejudicing its own long-term future--not least as a Jewish democratic state--has actively increased its highly strategic settler colonialism (220,000 settlers in 1991: 600,000+ today, largely located in the Jerusalem region, but also straddling all main mountain aquifer sources), while working to de-develop the Palestinian economy. According to the World Bank, due to Israeli occupation policies, the Palestinian economy is losing billions every year.
De facto gradual annexation is a reality, while outright annexation is regularly demanded by such as the Likud Central Committee or their partners in right-wing coalitions. Jared, even your father-in-law, soon after his inauguration called on Netanyahu to go easy on building new settlements. It's no secret that settlements have been built deliberately to prevent Palestinian viability. Yet neither of them has upheld that position.
As an Israeli I find it tragic that at no point has Israel recognized Palestinian rights or reached out to serve Palestinian viability. Not only that, our Israeli policies create conditions in which terror thrives. Have you studied issues of home demolitions or zoning and planning, which deliberately prevent Palestinian landowners from building on their own land, in East Jerusalem, Area C or even - more recently in Sur Baher - Areas A and B? The Oslo Accords, as signed by Israel (also a signatory to the Geneva and Hague Conventions) cite that Areas A and B are to be under Palestinian administrative control. And Area C was to be only temporarily under Israeli control, until 1999.
I hear your father-in-law believes he can ride the "tiger" of Christian fundamentalist Zionism (the Trump Administration's base, many of whom believe "the hand of God is on Donald Trump"), which fundamentally empowers those following an agenda of war, contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ. Surely the tested principles of conflict resolution, and such basics as the need for generosity, equality and trust-building would be more in tune with Christianity than seeking the Rapture in holocaust? Not least at a time when scientists agree that World War III might cause the extinction of Mother Earth, especially if such a war is nuclear. Only death cultists or the singularly stupid and ignorant could willingly go down that route! The Trump administration denies climate change, despite the science and evidence--Noam Chomsky accuses it of crimes against life for that complicity. Jesus taught his followers to turn the other cheek when hit; his Beatitudes say, "Blessed are the peacemakers"--not those sentencing others to wanton destruction by death cult!
Finally, let me relate a conversation I had in late 2013 with Ron Dermer, then newly appointed as our representative to the US. Recognising him at my local post office, I asked if I might pose a question.
"Yes, of course," he replied.
"You people aren't very serious about peace, are you?"
The reply came with knee-jerk immediacy: "No, of course we want peace! But... it takes two! You gotta have a partner!"
I rebutted with a swift, "No. The Palestinians want peace."
Ambassador Dermer was somewhat lost for words by my conviction, and then said, "So, what's your solution, then?"
I told him then what I say to you now: "We have to open our hearts and be generous, give them what they need to be able to be at peace with us, stop this wheeler-dealer mentality and stop abusing, killing and humiliating them. In the knowledge that as the stronger party, we have a larger share of responsibility in leading the way out of the current reality. And then go on to save the planet."
A mumbled thanks, almost no eye contact and Dermer disappeared. Because those who follow win-lose thinking, rather than win-win, those who need to dominate or rule supreme, are neither democratic by instinct, nor spiritual by principle. Since Palestinians are Semitic, one might even call them anti-Semites.
Jared Kushner, your project will not bring peace. It is a recipe for further stress and strain on those already stressed, strained, occupied and de-developed. While allowing Israel to continue to delete the many rich Palestinian cultures, not least that of Bedouin desert-dwellers who know how to live in desert with grace. At a time when Israeli desertification has made Israel the No. 2 most stressed country in the world when it comes to water resources, you might have thought that keeping alive the wisdom of how to survive sustainably in extreme weather conditions would be valued.
Ah, yes, but your father-in-law and his Administration don't believe in climate change or global warming, do they? Or in the holistic nature of survival, the need for empathy so that we remain human and full partners in the human race.
God help us. And protect us from so-called "friends" like you, sir.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
What follows is the text of an email I have just sent to Jared Kushner, in his role as Special Advisor to President Donald Trump, prior to the launch of his "peace plan" for Israel/Palestine.
Dear Jared Kushner:
I'm one of many Israeli peace activists you haven't met. I suspect you haven't tried to reach out to us, just as you didn't reach out to leading Palestinian businessmen such as Sam Bahour, before launching your "economic peace" plan--which to me suggests Golden Calf enslavement, not conflict resolution.
And since the United States closed its USAID program in Palestine this year, I'm more than skeptical (absent basic trust building measures to convince us) that delivery of billions from Bahrain could be logistically feasible without a mechanism for delivery or the necessary institutional memory to serve efficiency rather than corruption.
Although I've been regularly invited to the US embassy's July 4th celebrations, this year, together with most peace or human rights NGOs and other civil society representatives, I stayed away, sensing that attendance might indicate approval for American/Israeli policies--policies that are directly contrary to efforts for genuine peace. Having met with senior officers at both the embassy and consulate in preceding months, I noted even then that neither basic Palestinian civil rights nor their need to be able to live at peace with us in freedom were at the forefront of American thinking. When it came to Palestine, the magic word "viability" was no longer even being used.
As a peace activist, I see the denial of Palestinian freedom by Israel and the United States following a tragic trajectory: we create what we fear. If we deny higher purpose or give in to such lower motives as selfishness, greed or the inferiority that needs to feel superior or "chosen," I believe that we Israelis will never experience the freedom we yearn for, as referenced in our national anthem, HaTikva, while deliberately choking those we desperately seek to control.
Nor can we fulfill intrinsic Jewish values that warn us not to do to others what we wouldn't have done to us, nor raise coming generations to recognize the sacred and God's image in ALL life, if we continue on this path of moral destruction.
Jared Kushner, maybe you believe you're supporting Israel with your positions, statements and actions? For those of us who for many decades have fought for peace, nothing could be more mistaken. In our view, you're condemning Israel to suicide. As the saying goes, "friends don't let friends drive drunk." Because Israel is seriously addicted, high on hubris, following policies that are creating what Israelis most fear without a responsible adult laying down borders, metaphoric and literal.
You and your colleague Jason Greenblatt tend to blame the Palestinians for the years of failed negotiations. This goes 180 degrees against the reality watched first-hand by those of us living here. We remember the lies of Ehud Barak's 2000 election campaign, stating there was a generous offer rejected by Arafat (there was none - how could they be at peace with us when we weren't even prepared to share the water with them?). They claimed that there was no partner, or that the Palestinians rejected peace--all so that Barak could win the election by blaming Arafat. Today, Barak's aide Eldad Yaniv takes public responsibility for those positions in endless "mea culpas" on TV and in print, confessing he never realized our Israeli public would believe the lies then, and continue to believe them until now.
Israel, prejudicing its own long-term future--not least as a Jewish democratic state--has actively increased its highly strategic settler colonialism (220,000 settlers in 1991: 600,000+ today, largely located in the Jerusalem region, but also straddling all main mountain aquifer sources), while working to de-develop the Palestinian economy. According to the World Bank, due to Israeli occupation policies, the Palestinian economy is losing billions every year.
De facto gradual annexation is a reality, while outright annexation is regularly demanded by such as the Likud Central Committee or their partners in right-wing coalitions. Jared, even your father-in-law, soon after his inauguration called on Netanyahu to go easy on building new settlements. It's no secret that settlements have been built deliberately to prevent Palestinian viability. Yet neither of them has upheld that position.
As an Israeli I find it tragic that at no point has Israel recognized Palestinian rights or reached out to serve Palestinian viability. Not only that, our Israeli policies create conditions in which terror thrives. Have you studied issues of home demolitions or zoning and planning, which deliberately prevent Palestinian landowners from building on their own land, in East Jerusalem, Area C or even - more recently in Sur Baher - Areas A and B? The Oslo Accords, as signed by Israel (also a signatory to the Geneva and Hague Conventions) cite that Areas A and B are to be under Palestinian administrative control. And Area C was to be only temporarily under Israeli control, until 1999.
I hear your father-in-law believes he can ride the "tiger" of Christian fundamentalist Zionism (the Trump Administration's base, many of whom believe "the hand of God is on Donald Trump"), which fundamentally empowers those following an agenda of war, contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ. Surely the tested principles of conflict resolution, and such basics as the need for generosity, equality and trust-building would be more in tune with Christianity than seeking the Rapture in holocaust? Not least at a time when scientists agree that World War III might cause the extinction of Mother Earth, especially if such a war is nuclear. Only death cultists or the singularly stupid and ignorant could willingly go down that route! The Trump administration denies climate change, despite the science and evidence--Noam Chomsky accuses it of crimes against life for that complicity. Jesus taught his followers to turn the other cheek when hit; his Beatitudes say, "Blessed are the peacemakers"--not those sentencing others to wanton destruction by death cult!
Finally, let me relate a conversation I had in late 2013 with Ron Dermer, then newly appointed as our representative to the US. Recognising him at my local post office, I asked if I might pose a question.
"Yes, of course," he replied.
"You people aren't very serious about peace, are you?"
The reply came with knee-jerk immediacy: "No, of course we want peace! But... it takes two! You gotta have a partner!"
I rebutted with a swift, "No. The Palestinians want peace."
Ambassador Dermer was somewhat lost for words by my conviction, and then said, "So, what's your solution, then?"
I told him then what I say to you now: "We have to open our hearts and be generous, give them what they need to be able to be at peace with us, stop this wheeler-dealer mentality and stop abusing, killing and humiliating them. In the knowledge that as the stronger party, we have a larger share of responsibility in leading the way out of the current reality. And then go on to save the planet."
A mumbled thanks, almost no eye contact and Dermer disappeared. Because those who follow win-lose thinking, rather than win-win, those who need to dominate or rule supreme, are neither democratic by instinct, nor spiritual by principle. Since Palestinians are Semitic, one might even call them anti-Semites.
Jared Kushner, your project will not bring peace. It is a recipe for further stress and strain on those already stressed, strained, occupied and de-developed. While allowing Israel to continue to delete the many rich Palestinian cultures, not least that of Bedouin desert-dwellers who know how to live in desert with grace. At a time when Israeli desertification has made Israel the No. 2 most stressed country in the world when it comes to water resources, you might have thought that keeping alive the wisdom of how to survive sustainably in extreme weather conditions would be valued.
Ah, yes, but your father-in-law and his Administration don't believe in climate change or global warming, do they? Or in the holistic nature of survival, the need for empathy so that we remain human and full partners in the human race.
God help us. And protect us from so-called "friends" like you, sir.
What follows is the text of an email I have just sent to Jared Kushner, in his role as Special Advisor to President Donald Trump, prior to the launch of his "peace plan" for Israel/Palestine.
Dear Jared Kushner:
I'm one of many Israeli peace activists you haven't met. I suspect you haven't tried to reach out to us, just as you didn't reach out to leading Palestinian businessmen such as Sam Bahour, before launching your "economic peace" plan--which to me suggests Golden Calf enslavement, not conflict resolution.
And since the United States closed its USAID program in Palestine this year, I'm more than skeptical (absent basic trust building measures to convince us) that delivery of billions from Bahrain could be logistically feasible without a mechanism for delivery or the necessary institutional memory to serve efficiency rather than corruption.
Although I've been regularly invited to the US embassy's July 4th celebrations, this year, together with most peace or human rights NGOs and other civil society representatives, I stayed away, sensing that attendance might indicate approval for American/Israeli policies--policies that are directly contrary to efforts for genuine peace. Having met with senior officers at both the embassy and consulate in preceding months, I noted even then that neither basic Palestinian civil rights nor their need to be able to live at peace with us in freedom were at the forefront of American thinking. When it came to Palestine, the magic word "viability" was no longer even being used.
As a peace activist, I see the denial of Palestinian freedom by Israel and the United States following a tragic trajectory: we create what we fear. If we deny higher purpose or give in to such lower motives as selfishness, greed or the inferiority that needs to feel superior or "chosen," I believe that we Israelis will never experience the freedom we yearn for, as referenced in our national anthem, HaTikva, while deliberately choking those we desperately seek to control.
Nor can we fulfill intrinsic Jewish values that warn us not to do to others what we wouldn't have done to us, nor raise coming generations to recognize the sacred and God's image in ALL life, if we continue on this path of moral destruction.
Jared Kushner, maybe you believe you're supporting Israel with your positions, statements and actions? For those of us who for many decades have fought for peace, nothing could be more mistaken. In our view, you're condemning Israel to suicide. As the saying goes, "friends don't let friends drive drunk." Because Israel is seriously addicted, high on hubris, following policies that are creating what Israelis most fear without a responsible adult laying down borders, metaphoric and literal.
You and your colleague Jason Greenblatt tend to blame the Palestinians for the years of failed negotiations. This goes 180 degrees against the reality watched first-hand by those of us living here. We remember the lies of Ehud Barak's 2000 election campaign, stating there was a generous offer rejected by Arafat (there was none - how could they be at peace with us when we weren't even prepared to share the water with them?). They claimed that there was no partner, or that the Palestinians rejected peace--all so that Barak could win the election by blaming Arafat. Today, Barak's aide Eldad Yaniv takes public responsibility for those positions in endless "mea culpas" on TV and in print, confessing he never realized our Israeli public would believe the lies then, and continue to believe them until now.
Israel, prejudicing its own long-term future--not least as a Jewish democratic state--has actively increased its highly strategic settler colonialism (220,000 settlers in 1991: 600,000+ today, largely located in the Jerusalem region, but also straddling all main mountain aquifer sources), while working to de-develop the Palestinian economy. According to the World Bank, due to Israeli occupation policies, the Palestinian economy is losing billions every year.
De facto gradual annexation is a reality, while outright annexation is regularly demanded by such as the Likud Central Committee or their partners in right-wing coalitions. Jared, even your father-in-law, soon after his inauguration called on Netanyahu to go easy on building new settlements. It's no secret that settlements have been built deliberately to prevent Palestinian viability. Yet neither of them has upheld that position.
As an Israeli I find it tragic that at no point has Israel recognized Palestinian rights or reached out to serve Palestinian viability. Not only that, our Israeli policies create conditions in which terror thrives. Have you studied issues of home demolitions or zoning and planning, which deliberately prevent Palestinian landowners from building on their own land, in East Jerusalem, Area C or even - more recently in Sur Baher - Areas A and B? The Oslo Accords, as signed by Israel (also a signatory to the Geneva and Hague Conventions) cite that Areas A and B are to be under Palestinian administrative control. And Area C was to be only temporarily under Israeli control, until 1999.
I hear your father-in-law believes he can ride the "tiger" of Christian fundamentalist Zionism (the Trump Administration's base, many of whom believe "the hand of God is on Donald Trump"), which fundamentally empowers those following an agenda of war, contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ. Surely the tested principles of conflict resolution, and such basics as the need for generosity, equality and trust-building would be more in tune with Christianity than seeking the Rapture in holocaust? Not least at a time when scientists agree that World War III might cause the extinction of Mother Earth, especially if such a war is nuclear. Only death cultists or the singularly stupid and ignorant could willingly go down that route! The Trump administration denies climate change, despite the science and evidence--Noam Chomsky accuses it of crimes against life for that complicity. Jesus taught his followers to turn the other cheek when hit; his Beatitudes say, "Blessed are the peacemakers"--not those sentencing others to wanton destruction by death cult!
Finally, let me relate a conversation I had in late 2013 with Ron Dermer, then newly appointed as our representative to the US. Recognising him at my local post office, I asked if I might pose a question.
"Yes, of course," he replied.
"You people aren't very serious about peace, are you?"
The reply came with knee-jerk immediacy: "No, of course we want peace! But... it takes two! You gotta have a partner!"
I rebutted with a swift, "No. The Palestinians want peace."
Ambassador Dermer was somewhat lost for words by my conviction, and then said, "So, what's your solution, then?"
I told him then what I say to you now: "We have to open our hearts and be generous, give them what they need to be able to be at peace with us, stop this wheeler-dealer mentality and stop abusing, killing and humiliating them. In the knowledge that as the stronger party, we have a larger share of responsibility in leading the way out of the current reality. And then go on to save the planet."
A mumbled thanks, almost no eye contact and Dermer disappeared. Because those who follow win-lose thinking, rather than win-win, those who need to dominate or rule supreme, are neither democratic by instinct, nor spiritual by principle. Since Palestinians are Semitic, one might even call them anti-Semites.
Jared Kushner, your project will not bring peace. It is a recipe for further stress and strain on those already stressed, strained, occupied and de-developed. While allowing Israel to continue to delete the many rich Palestinian cultures, not least that of Bedouin desert-dwellers who know how to live in desert with grace. At a time when Israeli desertification has made Israel the No. 2 most stressed country in the world when it comes to water resources, you might have thought that keeping alive the wisdom of how to survive sustainably in extreme weather conditions would be valued.
Ah, yes, but your father-in-law and his Administration don't believe in climate change or global warming, do they? Or in the holistic nature of survival, the need for empathy so that we remain human and full partners in the human race.
God help us. And protect us from so-called "friends" like you, sir.
"This massacre and Israel's media blackout strategy, designed to conceal the crimes committed by its army for more than 21 months in the besieged and starving Palestinian enclave, must be stopped immediately."
The international advocacy group Reporters Without Borders on Monday called on the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting following the massacre of six Palestinian media professionals in an Israeli strike on the Gaza Strip.
Al Jazeera reporters Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa, and independent journalist Mohammed al-Khaldi were killed Sunday in a targeted Israel Defense Forces (IDF) strike on their tent outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.
The IDF claimed that al-Sharif—one of the most prominent Palestinian journalists—"was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell," repeating an allegation first made last year. However, independent assessments by United Nations experts, the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) concluded that Israel's allegations were unsubstantiated.
Investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill warned last year that the IDF's portrayal of al-Sharif and other Palestinian journalists as Hamas members was "an assassination threat and an attempt to preemptively justify their murder" for showing the world the genocidal realities of Israel's U.S.-backed war.
"Tonight Israel murdered the bravest journalistic hero in Gaza, Anas al-Sharif," Scahill said Sunday on social media. "For nearly two straight years, he documented the genocide of his people with courage and principle. Israel put him on a hit list because of his voice. Shame on this world and all who were silent."
Al Jazeera condemned Sunday's massacre as "a desperate attempt to silence the voices exposing the impending seizure and occupation of Gaza."
RSF issued a statement accusing the IDF of killing the six men "without providing solid evidence" of Hamas affiliation, a "disgraceful tactic" that is "repeatedly used against journalists to cover up war crimes."
The Paris-based nonprofit noted that Israeli forces have "already killed more than 200 media professionals"—including at least 19 Al Jazeera workers and freelancers—since the IDF began its annihilation and siege of Gaza in retaliation for the October 7, 2023 attack led by Hamas.
These include Al Jazeera reporter Ismail al-Ghoul and photographer Rami al-Rifi, who were killed in a targeted strike on the al-Shati refugee camp in July 2024 following an IDF smear campaign alleging without proof that al-Ghoul took part in the October 7 attack. The IDF claimed that al-Ghoul received Hamas military training at a time when he would have been just 10 years old.
"RSF strongly condemns the killing of six media professionals by the Israeli army, once again carried out under the guise of terrorism charges against a journalist," RSF director general Thibaut Bruttin said in a statement. "One of the most famous journalists in the Gaza Strip, Anas al-Sharif, was among those killed."
"This massacre and Israel's media blackout strategy, designed to conceal the crimes committed by its army for more than 21 months in the besieged and starving Palestinian enclave, must be stopped immediately," Bruttin continued. "The international community can no longer turn a blind eye and must react and put an end to this impunity."
"RSF calls on the U.N. Security Council to meet urgently on the basis of Resolution 2222 of 2015 on the protection of journalists in times of armed conflict in order to stop this carnage," he added.
Israel's latest killing of media professionals sparked international condemnation. On Monday, Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, called for an investigation into the massacre, saying that "journalists and media workers must be respected, they must be protected and they must be allowed to carry out their work freely, free from fear and free from harassment."
Recognizing the possibility that he would become one of the more than 61,500 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza since October 2023, al-Sharif, like many Palestinian journalists, prepared a statement to be published in the event of his death.
"This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice," he wrote. "I urge you not to let chains silence you, nor borders restrain you. Be bridges toward the liberation of the land and its people, until the sun of dignity and freedom rises over our stolen homeland."
"Make my blood a light that illuminates the path of freedom for my people and my family," al-Sharif added.
Since October 2023, RSF has filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court—which last year issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes—requesting investigations into IDF killings of journalists in Gaza and accusing Israel of a deliberate "eradication of the Palestinian media."
The six journalists' killings came as Israeli forces prepared to ramp up the Gaza invasion with the stated goal of occupying the entire coastal enclave and ethnically cleansing much of its Palestinian population.
The Gaza Health Ministry said Monday afternoon that at least 69 Palestinians, including at least 10 children and 29 aid-seekers, were killed in the past 24 hours. An IDF strike on Gaza City reportedly killed nine people, including six children. Five more Palestinians also reportedly died of starvation in a burgeoning famine that officials say has claimed at least 222 lives, including 101 children.
"The Trump-Vance administration is refusing to hand over documents that could show their culpability in hiding international human civil rights abuses," says the president of Democracy Forward.
A coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations filed a lawsuit Monday against the U.S. Department of State over its refusal to release congressionally mandated reports on international human rights abuses.
The Council for Global Equality (CGE) has accused the administration of a "cover-up of a cover-up" to keep the reports buried.
Each year, the department is required to report on the practices of other countries concerning individual, civil, political, and worker rights protected under international law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Governments and international groups have long cited these surveys as one of the most comprehensive and authoritative sources on the state of human rights, informing policy surrounding foreign aid and asylum.
The Foreign Assistance Act requires that these reports be sent to Congress by February 25 each year, and they are typically released in March or April. But nearly six months later, the Trump administration has sent nothing for the calendar year 2024.
Meanwhile, NPR reported in April on a State Department memo requiring employees to "streamline" the reports by omitting many of the most common human rights violations:
The reports... will no longer call governments out for such things as denying freedom of movement and peaceful assembly. They won't condemn retaining political prisoners without due process or restrictions on "free and fair elections."
Forcibly returning a refugee or asylum-seeker to a home country where they may face torture or persecution will no longer be highlighted, nor will serious harassment of human rights organizations...
...reports of violence and discrimination against LGBTQ+ people will be removed, along with all references to [diversity, equity, and inclusion] (DEI).
Among other topics ordered to be struck from the reports: involuntary or coercive medical or psychological practices, arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, serious restrictions to internet freedom, extensive gender-based violence, and violence or threats of violence targeting people with disabilities.
Last week, The Washington Post obtained leaked copies of the department's reports on nations favored by the Trump administration—El Salvador, Russia, and Israel. It found that they were "significantly shorter" than the reports released by the Biden administration and that they struck references to widely documented human rights abuses in these countries.
In the case of El Salvador, where the administration earlier this year began shipping immigrants deported from the United States, the department's report stated that were "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" there, even though such abuses—including torture, physical violence, and deprivation have been widely reported, including by Trump's own deportees.
Human rights violations against LGBTQ+ people were deleted from the State Department's report on Russia, while the report on Israel deleted references to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial and to his government's threats to the country's independent judiciary.
"Secretary Rubio's overtly political rewriting of the human rights reports is a dramatic departure from even his own past commitment to protecting the fundamental human rights of LGBTQI+ people," said Keifer Buckingham, the Council for Global Equality's managing director. "Strategic omission of these abuses is also directly in contravention to Congress's requirement of a 'full and complete report' regarding the status of internationally recognized human rights."
In June, the CGE sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the State Department calling for all communications related to these decisions to be made public. The department acknowledged the request but refused to turn over any documents.
Now CGE has turned to the courts. On Monday, the legal nonprofit Democracy Forward filed a complaint on CGE's behalf in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the department had violated its duties under FOIA to turn over relevant documents in a timely manner.
"The Trump-Vance administration is refusing to hand over documents that could show their culpability in hiding international human civil rights abuses," said Skye Perryman, Democracy Forward's president and CEO.
"The world is watching the United States. We cannot risk a cover-up on top of a cover-up," Perryman continued. "If this administration is omitting or delaying the release of information about human rights abuses to gain favor with other countries, it is a shameful statement of the gross immorality of this administration."
"Our elections should belong to us, not to corporations owned or influenced by foreign governments whose interests may not align with our own," said the head of the committee behind the measure.
The Associated Press reported Monday that a federal appeals court recently blocked Maine from enforcing a ban on foreign interference in elections that the state's voters passed in 2023.
After Hydro-Quebec spent millions of dollars on a referendum, 86% of Mainers voted for Question 2, which would block foreign governments and companies with 5% or more foreign government ownership from donating to state referendums.
Then, the Maine Association of Broadcasters, Maine Press Association, Central Maine Power, and Versant Power sued to block the ballot initiative. According to the AP, last month, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston affirmed a lower-court ruling that the measure likely violates the First Amendment to the federal Constitution.
Judge Lara Montecalvo wrote that "the prohibition is overly broad, silencing U.S. corporations based on the mere possibility that foreign shareholders might try to influence its decisions on political speech, even where those foreign shareholders may be passive owners that exercise no influence or control over the corporation's political spending."
As the AP detailed:
The matter was sent back to the lower court, where it will proceed, and there has been no substantive movement on it in recent weeks, said Danna Hayes, a spokesperson for the Maine attorney general's office, on Monday. The law is on the state's books, but the state cannot enforce it while legal challenges are still pending, Hayes said.
Just months before voters approved Question 2, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills vetoed the ban, citing fears that it could silence "legitimate voices, including Maine-based businesses." She previously vetoed a similar measure in 2021.
Still, supporters of the ballot initiative continue to fight for it. Rick Bennett, chair of Protect Maine Elections, the committee formed to support Question 2, said in a statement that "Mainers spoke with one voice: Our elections should belong to us, not to corporations owned or influenced by foreign governments whose interests may not align with our own."
A year after Maine voters approved that foreign election interference law, they also overwhelmingly backed a ballot measure to restrict super political action committees (PACs). U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen Frink Wolf blocked that measure, Question 1, last month.
"We think ultimately the court of appeals is going to reverse this decision because it's grounded in a misunderstanding of what the Supreme Court has said," Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard professor and founder of the nonprofit Equal Citizens that helped put Question 1 on the ballot, told News Center Maine in July. "We are exhausted, all of us, especially people in Maine, with the enormous influence money has in our politics, and we want to do something about it."