

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Federal prosecutors today charged Uber driver Jonathan Rinderknech with setting a fire on New Year’s Eve 2024 that eventually grew to devastate the Los Angeles community of Pacific Palisades. The fire, which was initially contained by the Los Angeles Fire Department after burning 7 acres, rekindled itself as a windstorm blowing across the Santa Ana Mountains drove the fire into the community. At the time of the fires, Southern California was in the middle of the driest 9-month period in over 150 years. In response, Aaron Regunberg, director of Public Citizen’s Climate Accountability Project, issued the following statement:
“The person who lit a spark that turned into the horrific Los Angeles fires should face accountability for their recklessness. But let’s be clear—that spark wasn’t the most impactful cause of those fires.
“A fire not only requires a spark, but the tinder to fuel the flames. What created the fuel that turned a spark into the catastrophe that destroyed lives and homes across the region in January was climate change, which drove the reduced rainfall, dried out vegetation, and increasing overlap between flammable drought conditions and Santa Ana winds that caused the conditions for the firestorm.
“These climate effects were the direct, foreseeable—and, in fact, foreseen—consequences of a small number of fossil fuel companies that knowingly generated a huge portion of all the greenhouse gas emissions that caused these fire conditions, and fraudulently deceived the public to block and delay solutions that could have ameliorated this catastrophe. If prosecutors want to hold the actors who are responsible for this disaster to account, they should also be pursuing these Big Oil companies.”
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"Far from stopping illegal practices," said one critic, "it gives a green light to algorithmic price-fixing across the economy."
The Trump Justice Department on Monday announced a settlement with the real estate software giant RealPage, which the federal government and multiple states accused of illegally facilitating collusion between landlords to drive up rents.
The settlement, which must be reviewed by a court, would require RealPage to "cease having its software use competitors’ nonpublic, competitively sensitive information to determine rental prices," among other mandates.
Abigail Slater, head of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, cast the agreement as a win for competition and for renters. But RealPage downplayed the settlement's impact on its business model, saying the deal's terms "bless the legality of RealPage’s prior and planned product changes"—alluding to the company's voluntary decision last year to let its customers remove nonpublic data when using the software to calculate recommended rents.
The company emphasized that the settlement does not include any financial penalties or admissions of guilt.
"What a total farce," Lee Hepner, senior legal counsel for the American Economic Liberties Project, said in response to the DOJ announcement. "This sham settlement violates the first thing we tell every lawmaker: Fixing prices based on public data sets is still price fixing!"
"This is lipstick on a pig and terrible for renters," Hepner added.
The Justice Department initially sued RealPage last year under the Biden administration, accusing the company of running an "unlawful scheme to decrease competition among landlords in apartment pricing and to monopolize the market for commercial revenue management software that landlords use to price apartments."
"RealPage contracts with competing landlords who agree to share with RealPage nonpublic, competitively sensitive information about their apartment rental rates and other lease terms to train and run RealPage’s algorithmic pricing software," the Biden DOJ said. "This software then generates recommendations, including on apartment rental pricing and other terms, for participating landlords based on their and their rivals’ competitively sensitive information."
The DOJ complaint used RealPage's own words against it, citing the company's description of its products as "driving every possible opportunity to increase price."
A White House report released late last year estimated that the kind of algorithmic pricing that RealPage enables cost renters across the US a total of nearly $4 billion in 2023 alone. The report characterized that estimate as conservative.
Basel Musharbash, managing attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel, warned following Monday's settlement announcement that "far from stopping illegal practices, it gives a green light to algorithmic price-fixing across the economy."
The states that joined the DOJ lawsuit were not listed on the settlement.
Last week, California, North Carolina, and other states announced a separate settlement with the apartment management giant Greystar, one of the companies that used RealPage software to set rents.
Under the state deal, Greystar agreed to pay $7 million in penalties and stop using RealPage’s software or similar products for pricing.
"Whether it's through smoke-filled backroom deals or through an algorithm on your computer screen, colluding to drive up prices is illegal,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta. “Families across the country are staring down an affordability crisis. Companies that intentionally fuel this unaffordability by raising prices to line their own pockets can be sure I will use the full force of my office to hold them accountable."
"They're not even hiding it anymore. A US-led regime change war abroad to line the pockets of Big Oil—where have we heard this one before?"
"Going to war for oil, the sequel."
That's how one film and television producer responded to a Monday clip of US Rep. María Salazar (R-Fla.) discussing President Donald Trump's potential military invasion of Venezuela on Fox Business.
Amid mounting alarm that Trump may take military action, Salazar said there were three reasons why "we need to go in" to the South American country. The first, she said, is that "Venezuela, for the American oil companies, will be a field day."
After journalist Aaron Rupar noted her remarks on social media, many critics weighed in, including Justice Democrats, which works to elect progressives to Congress.
"They're not even hiding it anymore. A US-led regime change war abroad to line the pockets of Big Oil—where have we heard this one before?" the group said, referring to the invasion of Iraq.
Fred Wellman, a US Army combat veteran and podcast host running as a Democrat in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District, replied on social media: "They are sending our troops to war for the oil companies and not even pretending to lie about it. These sick SOBs are going to get our kids killed and it's all a big joke."
Salazar also described Venezuela as a launching pad for enemies of the US and claimed the country's president, Nicolás Maduro, leads the alleged Cartel de los Soles, or the Cartel of the Suns—which the Trump administration on Monday designated as a foreign terrorist organization.
Venezuela's interior and justice minister, Diosdado Cabello, has long claimed the cartel doesn't exist, calling it an "invention." As the UK's BBC reported Monday:
Cabello, who is alleged to be one of the high-ranking members of the cartel, has accused US officials of using it as an excuse to target those they do not like.
"Whenever someone bothers them, they name them as the head of the Cartel de los Soles," he said in August.
Gustavo Petro, the left-wing president of Venezuela's neighbour, Colombia, has also denied the cartel's existence.
"It is the fictional excuse of the far right to bring down governments that do not obey them," he wrote on X in August.
The terrorist designation and Salazar's comments came as the Trump administration is under fire for blowing up boats it claims are running drugs off the coast of Venezuela, and after a CBS News/YouGov survey showed on Sunday that 70% of Americans—including 91% of Democrats and 42% of Republicans—are against the "US taking military action in Venezuela."
Tariffs Cost US on Monday announced a holiday campaign highlighting how President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs are driving up the prices of food, gifts, and more for American families and businesses during the busiest shopping season of the year.
"Tariffs are the Grinch this year," declares one visual advertisement from the organization. Another features a woman with a frustrated expression and says, "Joy shouldn't cost extra."
The effort comes as many Americans plan large family meals for Thanksgiving on Thursday. A third ad says, "Tariffs don't belong at the table."
The campaign also features a 30-second video showing a woman checking out and reacting to the high price of each item, with clips of Trump's actual remarks about his import taxes playing in the background.
Tariffs Cost US also circulated comments from business leaders across the country, such as Mary Carroll Dodd, owner of Red Scout Farm in North Carolina.
"The cost of many of the materials we use for farming has increased this year," she said. "That increases the price of the fresh produce we sell in our community, and it means the food on your Thanksgiving table costs more too."
As the Associated Press reported Monday:
The shrinking population is expected to cause wholesale turkey prices to rise 44% this year, according to the US Department of Agriculture. Despite the increase, many stores are offering discounted or even free turkeys to soften the potential blow to Thanksgiving meal budgets. But even if the bird is cheaper than last year, the ingredients to prepare the rest of the holiday feast may not be. Tariffs on imported steel, for example, have increased prices for canned goods.
As of November 17, a basket of 11 Thanksgiving staples—including a 10-pound frozen turkey, 10 Russet potatoes, a box of stuffing, and cans of corn, green beans, and cranberry sauce—cost $58.81, or 4.1% more than last year, according to Datasembly, a market research company that surveys weekly prices at 150,000 US stores. That’s higher than the average price increase for food eaten at home, which rose 2.7% in September, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
As Common Dreams reported last week, polling by the think tank Data for Progress found that 53% of Americans said it would be harder to afford a typical Thanksgiving meal than last year.
That polling was conducted in collaboration with the American Federation of Teachers, Century Foundation, and Groundwork Collaborative. They also published a report showing the soaring cost of holiday staples, which includes the graphic below.

"Everything from cheeses to spices to chocolates are costing more this year," said Mary Chapman Sissle, co-owner of Maine's Sissle & Daughters Cheesemongers & Grocers, in a statement from the new campaign. "Tariffs drive up costs at every stop on the supply chain, and by the holidays those increases are impossible to ignore. It affects every part of our business, and what's on your holiday shopping list."
The day after Thanksgiving is known as Black Friday. It's widely considered the beginning of the winter holiday gift shopping season, and businesses big and small often aim to attract customers with major deals.
"Most of the beauty products our customers count on are imported," said Trinita Rhodes, co-owner of Beauty Supply Refresh in Missouri. "Tariffs have raised costs at every step, and by the time products reach our shelves we have no choice but to increase prices. During the holidays, people are buying gifts and stocking up, and these added costs make it harder for us to offer the prices they expect."
Rachel Lutz, who owns the Peacock Room, a boutique with two locations in Michigan, shared a specific example of how Trump's tariffs have recently impacted her business.
"As a small business, we are already feeling the squeeze heading into the holiday season," Lutz explained. "Tariffs have increased the cost of doing business, and we find ourselves working harder for even less. I just placed a $700 jewelry order and was hit with a $100 tariff bill."
"That adds up fast and is unsustainable in the long run," she continued. "It has been heartbreaking to wake up so many mornings and see yet another family-owned business closing in our community because they cannot absorb these costs. Some of these businesses have been around for generations, and it's hard to watch."
A message at the end of a Tariffs Cost US video ad urges Americans to contact Congress about tariffs causing "sticker shock." So far, the Republican-controlled chambers have declined to take action to rein in the president's trade war—despite proposals such as Sen. Jacky Rosen's (D-Nev.) No Tariffs on Groceries Act.
"Donald Trump lied to the American people when he promised to bring prices down 'on day one,'" Rosen charged last week. "His reckless tariffs have done the opposite, raising grocery costs and making it harder for hardworking families to put food on the table."
"I'm proud to introduce this bill to help lower the cost of groceries by stopping Donald Trump from putting tariffs on the everyday essentials Americans rely on most," she added. "I'm going to do everything in my power to pass this bill to fight against Trump's harmful trade policies."
Ahead of a looming US Supreme Court ruling that could take out Trump's import taxes, he announced earlier this month that he's dropping tariffs on beef; cocoa and spices; coffee and tea; bananas, oranges, and tomatoes; other tropical fruits and fruit juices; and fertilizers.
"After months of increasing grocery prices, Donald Trump is finally admitting he was wrong," US Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said at the time. "Americans are literally paying the price for Trump's mistakes."