May, 19 2020, 12:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
With Wide-Ranging Support, Jayapal Introduces Paycheck Recovery Act to Keep Workers in Their Jobs, Stop Mass Unemployment, and Deliver Direct Relief to Businesses of All Sizes
Estimated to benefit more than 36 million workers, the bill is widely supported by 93 members of Congress, economists, labor leaders and business owners.
SEATTLE
U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Co-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, introduced H.R. 6918, the Paycheck Recovery Act today as a policy solution that delivers working people immediate relief and certainty while matching the scale of the current public health and economic crisis. The Paycheck Recovery Act ends mass unemployment, keeps workers connected to their paychecks, returns millions of workers who have been laid off or furloughed since March 1 back to payroll and health care and prevents employers of all sizes from being forced to close permanently. H.R. 6918 is co-sponsored by 93 members of Congress from across the ideological spectrum, including many Frontline Members. Text of the legislation is available here. A white paper is also available here.
"Mass unemployment is a policy choice, and we must choose differently by passing an urgent proposal that matches the scale of this crisis while delivering certainty and direct relief to workers, businesses of all sizes and the economy," said Congresswoman Jayapal. "The Paycheck Recovery Act will end mass unemployment, put workers back on their paychecks and health care and keep businesses from closing permanently while ensuring workers aren't forced to return to work before it is safe to do so."
At a time when the unemployment rate is at its highest level since the Great Depression and more than 37 million workers have lost their jobs during Covid-19, the Paycheck Recovery Act would deliver certainty and stability by covering the full wages of workers earning salaries up to $90,000 and ensuring employers can rehire those laid-off or furloughed since March 1. It does this in a quick and direct manner by utilizing existing payroll tax infrastructure instead of relationships with banks and lending institutions.
The Paycheck Recovery Act is not just an economic recovery plan; it's a public health plan too. At a time when at least 27 million people have lost their health care and 87 million are uninsured or underinsured, this legislation returns individuals to their employer-sponsored benefits, including health care.
As more than 100,000 small businesses have already closed permanently and thousands of others are unable to pay their essential expenses, H.R. 6918 covers a portion of operating costs such as rent to ensure businesses can re-open when the pandemic ends. It does this without picking winners and losers, covering businesses of all sizes including non-profits and state and local governments.
The Paycheck Recovery Act is estimated to cover more than 36 million workers and cost less than what has already been spent on two rounds of Paycheck Protection Program loans, which have failed to successfully stabilize unemployment. Proven to be a highly effective program in other parts of the world--from European countries like Germany and Denmark to Asian countries like Singapore and South Korea--direct grants to businesses to keep workers on payroll is overwhelmingly supported by the public. A recent Data for Progress and Tufts University poll found 79% of those surveyed supported the proposal.
While H.R. 6918 is co-sponsored by nearly 100 members of Congress, the idea for a paycheck guarantee also has bipartisan, bicameral support. Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Doug Jones (D-Ala.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) have unveiled a similar proposal--the Paycheck Security Act--to cover the wages and benefits of employees at businesses and nonprofits affected by Covid-19. Additionally, the proposal has been endorsed by Nobel-Prize winning economists, former Federal Reserve Chairs and vice presidents, labor leaders, business owners and major national groups across the country.
"We must act to ensure that millions more workers are paid for as long as this crisis endures by making support for employers who keep workers on payroll simpler, faster and more universal," said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka. "The Paycheck Recovery Act does just that."
"A bold and workable solution that addresses the true severity, scope and potential duration of the financial crisis that small business owners and their employees are facing," said Main Street Alliance Executive Director Amanda Ballantyne. "It is exactly the type of policy that will secure our small business economy and keep millions of workers in their jobs and homes until the threat of the virus has passed."
"This type of bill is vital to ensuring that the economy is ready to restart when the pandemic ends by protecting the health, safety and long-term economic well-being of working people across America," said SEIU President Mary Kay Henry.
"The Paycheck Recovery Act is critically needed to avoid job losses and support businesses of all sizes as Covid-19 continues to ravage the economy," said Chief Economist of Moody's Analytics Mark Zandi.
"Congresswoman Jayapal's proposal would definitely be a shot in the arm not just for myself but for so many of the millions of small business owners around the country," said Melba Wilson, the owner of a third-generation family-owned restaurant in Harlem, N.Y.
"Helping businesses to keep paying their workers is the most effective way to stop millions of Americans from being laid off and protect access to health care at a time when it is especially needed," said Nobel Prize Winning Economist Joseph Stiglitz.
"Representative Jayapal's Paycheck Recovery Act is a smart, quick and effective way to channel aid to workers through their firms," said Former Chair of the Federal Reserve Janet Yellen. "It can keep businesses, large and small, from shuttering and their workers on the payroll."
"Congresswoman Jayapal's Paycheck Recovery Act is another step forward in this fight because it would provide much-needed relief by helping employers keep workers paid and out of the unemployment line and by keeping workers enrolled in employer-sponsored benefits, including health care -- something that's paramount during a global pandemic," said NEA President Lily Eskelsen Garcia.
"The Paycheck Recovery Act is the type of bold legislation that deserves support because it could have a major impact on reducing the number of jobs lost permanently--including small business and union jobs--while including provisions to ensure that aid is not misused to unjustly enrich companies," said Former Director of the National Economic Council and National Economic Advisor Gene Sperling.
"This urgently needed legislation will help ensure that America's workforce and businesses remain intact, said IAM President Robert Martinez, Jr. "It would end the current wave of mass layoffs, bring previously displaced workers back onto their employers' payroll, prevent employers from being forced to permanently close their doors, and keep workers connected to their employer-sponsored health care."
"It's clear that Congress needs to do more to stop the economic devastation we are facing as we combat this pandemic," said Former Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor Heidi Shierholz. "Rep. Jayapal's bold proposal will keep workers paid, eligible for benefits, and connected to their employers."
"This is the best economic policy, but it's also going to save lives and help our medical professionals because the vast majority of Americans will have the means to stay healthy and be helpful," said Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO President Sara Nelson.
"Millions of Americans have lost their jobs," said Former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor Robert Reich. "They need help immediately. The Paycheck Recovery Act is the fastest and most efficient way of getting it to them."
"During the last recession, unemployment and under-employment hit Black and brown communities the hardest, and the scale of our current unemployment crisis will deepen our racial wealth gap," said Center For Popular Democracy Co-Executive Director Jennifer Epps-Addison. "Keeping working people on payroll at their employers is the best way to allow working people to minimize the economic dislocation that is compounding our public health crisis."
"The payroll guarantee idea is a big policy intervention that solves several problems at once--a vast improvement over the PPP," said Former Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan S. Blinder.
"The government is shutting down businesses. It should cover workers' paychecks and benefits. It's that simple," said Progressive Caucus Action Fund Executive Director Liz Watson. "Rep. Jayapal's Paycheck Recovery Act would do exactly that."
Today's legislation is co-sponsored by U.S. Representatives Haley Stevens, Adam Schiff, Sean Casten, Katie Porter, Mark Pocan, Veronica Escobar, Alma S. Adams, Ph.D., Nanette Diaz Barragan, Karen Bass, Joyce Beatty, Donald S. Beyer Jr., Earl Blumenauer, Lisa Blunt Rochester, Suzanne Bonamici, Brendan Boyle, Julia Brownley, G.K. Butterfield, Joaquin Castro, Andre Carson, Judy Chu, David N. Cicilline, Katherine Clark, Yvette D. Clarke, Emanuel Cleaver, II, James E. Clyburn, Steve Cohen, Gerald E. Connolly, Peter DeFazio, Rosa DeLauro, Debbie Dingell, Adriano Espaillat, Dwight Evans, Marcia L. Fudge, Ruben Gallego, Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia, Sylvia R. Garcia, Vicente Gonzalez, Raul M. Grijalva, Deb Haaland, Alcee L. Hastings, Jahana Hayes, Denny Heck, Steven Horsford, Sheila Jackson Lee, Hakeem Jeffries, Henry C. "Hank" Johnson Jr., Joseph P. Kennedy, III, Ro Khanna, Ann Kirkpatrick, John B. Larson, Barbara Lee, Susie Lee, Andy Levin, Mike Levin, Ted W. Lieu, Alan Lowenthal, Tom Malinowski, Carolyn B. Maloney, James P. McGovern, Grace Meng, Joseph D. Morelle, Jerrold Nadler, Grace F. Napolitano, Joe Neguse, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Frank Pallone, Jr., Chellie Pingree, Ayanna Pressley, Jamie Raskin, Cedric L. Richmond, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Bobby L. Rush, Tim, Ryan, John Sarbanes, Mary Gay Scanlon, Jan Schakowsky, Kim Schrier M.D., Jose E. Serrano, Donna Shalala, Mikie Sherrill, Adam Smith, Darren Soto, Jackie Speier, Thomas R. Suozzi, Rashida Tlaib, Lori Trahan, Juan Vargas, Filemon Vela, Nydia M. Velazquez, Bonnie Watson Coleman and Peter Welch.
Groups supporting the Paycheck Recovery Act include Americans for Financial Reform; the American Federation of Teachers; AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka; Asian Counseling and Referral Service; Asian Pacific Islander Coalition of Washington; Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO; CAIR Washington; Center for American Progress; Center for Economic Policy Research; Center for Popular Democracy/CDP Action; Climate Justice Alliance; Color of Change; Communications Workers of America; Community Change Action; the Congressional Hispanic Caucus; Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition; Economic Policy Institute; GSBA: Washington's LGBTQ Chamber; Indivisible; International Association of Machinists; International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers; International Community Health Services; Main Street Alliance; MoveOn; National Domestic Workers Alliance; National Education Association; Pacific Northwest Ballet; People's Action; Seattle Aquarium; Seattle Children's Theatre; SEIU; Sierra Club; UAW Western States; UNITE HERE; Woodland Park Zoo; 350 Seattle; and other organizations.
LATEST NEWS
Warned That Republicans Will Make Him 'Poster Child of Democratic Party,' Mamdani Says: 'Let Them'
"We don’t have to ask ourselves what life looks like if a socialist wins," said the New York City mayor.
Jun 28, 2026
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is not afraid to be seen as the future of the Democratic Party, even as Republicans and members of his own party's establishment wing—with a bit of help from corporate media journalists and pundits—try to paint the wave of democratic socialist victories as somehow a scary prospect.
"Republicans are going to make you the poster child for the Democratic Party," said Jonathan Karl of ABC News in an interview with Mamdani that aired Saturday.
"Let them," Mamdani responded without hesitation. "We don’t have to ask ourselves what life looks like if a socialist wins. I won last November, and over the course of these last six months, what we’ve delivered for working people are the very things we were told were impossible."
- YouTube
"We’ve delivered free child care for two-year-olds for the first time in New York City history," Mamdani continued. "We’ve delivered tens of millions of dollars back to tenants who were taken advantage of by bad landlords. We’ve delivered 165,000 potholes being paved. And we’ve done all of these things while also delivering the lowest recorded crime in our city’s history. That’s what it looks like to have democratic socialism."
Mamdani also referenced the slate of three democratic socialists candidates running for US Congress—Brad Lander, Claire Valdez, and Darializa Avila Chevalier—who last week swept the Democratic primary in districts representing city voters.
"What you’re seeing," said Mamdani of the primary wins, "is that New Yorkers experienced this for six months and made the decision that they wanted to see more of it on the national stage as well."
"I think we are seeing a hunger that is not just felt by New Yorkers, but frankly by Americans from coast to coast, for a new kind of politics, one that puts working people at the heart of it." —Mayor Zohran Mamdani
He also said that this kind of politics need not be isolated to large cities like New York. "A democratic socialist can get elected anywhere across this country for any position," Mamdani argued. "I think we are seeing a hunger that is not just felt by New Yorkers, but frankly by Americans from coast to coast, for a new kind of politics, one that puts working people at the heart of it."
The victories of Avila Chevalier, Valdez, and Lander sparked a broader conversation across the political world in the US as members of the party's more pro-corporate establishment issued blistering warnings that progressive candidates are a threat, not a boon, to Democratic strength heading into the midterms and beyond.
In a satirical takedown of such thinking, USA Today columnist Rex Huppke on Sunday ripped into the mythical "center" (whatever that is) by calling it an "ambiguous blob-like thing that exists only in the minds of Democratic strategists whose brains stopped working in the 1990s."
In the column—titled "I am centrist Democrat and I am terrified of success"—Huppke writes:
Hello, I am a centrist Democrat who is terrified that progressive liberal candidates keep winning primary elections. I am also terrified of my own shadow, but this is somehow worse.
Suddenly, voters are being won over by liberal candidates—even a few who are democratic socialists!—who aren’t afraid to lean into populist messages with passion and an apparent drive to actually do things that will make people’s lives better.
What is that all about? Since when did the things voters want become so important?
"AUGH!" the tongue-in-cheek column continues. "What kind of radical Democrat would talk about taxing billionaires in a moment when income inequality is at the top of voters’ minds and people are struggling to afford food? That’s edging too far away from the center, which is the safe place where I reside and insist all other Democrats must reside. It’s nice here. There are comfy pillows a corporate lobbyist once gave me, and we just sit and occasionally furrow our brows."
Progressives inspired by Mamdani and the political breakthrough spearheaded by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) over recent years, say it is time to stop listening to corporate Democrat scolds like Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), former Obama White House advisor Rahm Emanuel, and other Blue Dog and Third Way hangers-on.
Speaking at a Saturday event for Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, running as a progressive champion of Medicare for All and taking on corporate power in the race for a US Senate seat in Michigan, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who served as national co-chair of the 2020 Sanders campaign, said that he doesn't want to hear from members of the party establishment fearmongering over candidates who are winning support—not to mention primaries and elections—with strong working-class agendas.
@RoKhanna campaigning for @AbdulElSayed:
“The last people who have any right to lecture us about electability are the establishment who lost to Donald Trump twice. I don’t want to hear it. If you had anything to do with those campaigns, please sit down or exit stage left.” pic.twitter.com/VXfK8s4nFQ
— David Sirota (@davidsirota) June 27, 2026
“The last people who have any right to lecture us about electability are the establishment who lost to Donald Trump twice," said Khanna. "I don’t want to hear it. If you had anything to do with those campaigns, please sit down or exit stage left.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
As Trump's Reflecting Pool Disaster Turns 'Dystopian,' Fully-Dressed Mamdani Jumps Into NYC Public Pool With a Joyful Smile
"He’s in the running as best mayor NYC has ever had. Look out LaGuardia."
Jun 27, 2026
As the disastrous saga surrounding President Donald Trump's efforts to make the Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC more, uh, reflective—the democratic socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani brought more fresh joy to his city on Saturday by jumping into one of the city's public pools—fully dressed in a suit and tie—with a smile on his face.
The scenes could not be more symbolically divergent as critics of the mess Trump has created in DC—where ducks are reportedly dying, a mysterious number of people have now been given criminal citations, fences have been erected, and an "Orwellian" recording telling people they are not allowed to "loiter" in one of the nation's capital's most iconic parks—reached new levels of absurdity over recent days.
Meanwhile, as Trump's claims of arrests made amid unproven allegations of "vandalism" are being met with growing suspicion and derision, this was Mayor Mamdani as he joined with city residents to celebrate the beginning of the summer pool season:
💦 Mayor Mamdani kicked off NYC’s outdoor pool season today by jumping into the Thomas Jefferson Pool in East Harlem!
This year marks the 90th anniversary of New York City’s iconic WPA-era outdoor pools. Summer is officially here! ☀️🏊♂️🌊 pic.twitter.com/Km6eUjdyMa
— New York City Kopp (@NYCkopp) June 27, 2026
"Mamdani kicked off NYC’s outdoor pool season today by jumping into the Thomas Jefferson Pool in East Harlem!" declared the photographer who took the video. "This year marks the 90th anniversary of New York City’s iconic WPA-era outdoor pools. Summer is officially here!"
As The Gothamist reports:
The parks department is honoring the 90th anniversary of the summer of 1936, when then-Mayor Fiorello La Guardia and city Parks Commissioner Robert Moses opened 11 large pools across the five boroughs. They served as a place to cool off during the Great Depression — and were part of a wave of New York City public works projects funded by the New Deal’s Works Progress Administration.
Mamdani has been running on a political high in recent weeks. After leading joyful celebrations of the New York Knicks becoming NBA world champions after a 53-year drought, the democratic socialist mayor also claimed big political victories this week with a trifecta win for the congressional candidates he endorsed in the Democratic primary on Tuesday as well as a city council vote that delivered on his campaign promise to freeze rent for city residents.
"We're so excited to be celebrating 90 years of public swimming in our city," Mamdani told reporters after his fully-dressed dip. "This is a moment that New Yorkers are celebrating across the five boroughs."

Earlier this month, Mamdani and NYC Parks Commissioner Tricia Shimamura announced the opening of registration for an expanded number of free summer Learn to Swim classes at 18 outdoor pools across the city.
“Every child deserves to enjoy the water safely," Mamdani said at the time. "That’s why we’re expanding free swim lessons across the five boroughs—giving more young New Yorkers access to an essential life skill, saving families money and making sure every child feels confident in the water.”
"He’s in the running as best mayor NYC has ever had," said filmmaker Jesse Newman in response to Saturday's footage from Harlem. "Look out LaGuardia."
In the nation's capital, however, "dystopian" scenes continued as National Guard troops continued to guard the Reflecting Pool at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial from anyone who might "touching the water" as a so-called "surveillance machine" told passersby that "Loitering is not permitted in this area. Please proceed to a designated location."
“Loitering is not permitted in this area. Please proceed to a designated location. Thank you for your cooperation,” a surveillance machine tells a small cluster of National Guard troops as they patrol the fenced off Reflecting Pool in the rain. pic.twitter.com/5yGSOZbtgv
— amanda moore 🐢 (@noturtlesoup17) June 26, 2026
"This is absolutely insane," exclaimed Allegria Harpootlian, who works for the ACLU, in a social media post. "What is a park meant for if not for 'loitering'?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Newsom Does Not Want to Tax Billionaires,' Say Campaigners, 'But Wants You to Think He Does'
"Pretending to propose his own national solution is clearly a cynical smoke screen to let California billionaires off the hook," argues the Billionaire Tax Now campaign as it seeks to counter "5 tricks" being deployed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and his allies.
Jun 27, 2026
Campaigners behind the one-time 5% billionaires wealth tax in California are calling out what they describe as trickery and deception by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who on Friday released a proposal for a national billionaire's income tax even as he actively opposes the effort to tax the wealth of billionaires in the state that he and his party currently control.
"Newsom does not want to tax billionaires," said the Billionaire Tax Now campaign in a statement, "but he wants you to think he does."
As Common Dreams reported Friday, critics of Newsom warn that the governor thinks "he can fool everyone" with his proposal for a national tax on the income of billionaires while simultaneously opposing a wealth tax headed for a referendum vote in November designed to fill a massive healthcare funding gap in the state created by the budget bill passed by Republicans and signed by President Donald Trump last year.
While the so-called "One, Big Beautiful Bill" offered another windfall tax giveaway to super-wealthy individuals and corporations, it eviscerated funding for healthcare and other key social programs nationwide.
The Friday statement from the coalition behind the campaign, headed by SEIU—United Health Wealth, details "5 tricks" that Newsom has already deployed in order to fool voters about the wealth tax in California while concealing what they say are "his real motivations: to continue giving billionaires tax breaks at the expense of working people."
According to the group:
TRICK 1: Pretend to take on billionaires while really giving them a pass.
Over his many months of plainly attempting to sink the California billionaire tax, Governor Newsom has made it clear that he is more interested in protecting billionaires than working people. A federal billionaire tax has already been proposed by US Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna—and while you don’t need to be a political insider to know it would require a profound reshaping of Congress to pass that bill, Newsom has nonetheless failed to endorse it.
TRICK 2: Conveniently say that a federal, not state-based solution is the best way forward on this issue—despite having supported state-based policy solutions in the past.
Pretending to propose his own national solution is clearly a cynical smoke screen to let California billionaires off the hook. It’s just a PR tactic to give himself more cover to oppose the California Billionaire Tax. The Governor has supported state-based solutions to federally-created policy problems in the past—just conveniently not this state-based solution, which would involve a 5% tax on about 200 Californian billionaires who hold $2.2 trillion in wealth to save lives and keep hospitals open.
TRICK 3: Attempt to divide support by saying the California Billionaire Tax is bad policy for not fixing every problem in the state.
It’s pretty simple: the California Billionaire Tax is a direct response to the healthcare cuts facing our state, so the funding goes to healthcare. 90% of funds will prevent ER and hospital closures, and 10% will go toward food assistance and public education.
No, the funding will not go toward housing, 911 operators, and other public services the Governor listed out to try to generate additional opposition—just the massive $100 billion healthcare crisis that is putting patient lives at risk. The fact that this measure doesn’t fix every problem in the Governor’s budget is a problem for the Governor, not a problem with the proposal itself.
TRICK 4: Spread misinformation about the California Billionaire Tax’s impact on Planned Parenthood.
The Governor is hoping you don’t know that the massive federal healthcare cuts in Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” gutted funding for California’s Planned Parenthood clinics and that the California Billionaire Tax is the only viable way to generate the funding needed to save this critical reproductive healthcare. Luckily, frontline healthcare workers, including those who work at Planned Parenthood clinics, along with actual Planned Parenthood patients have been hard at work spreading the truth to voters across the state.
TRICK 5: Falsely claim that “one stakeholder” is driving the California Billionaire Tax.
Governor Newsom continues desperately trying to make the California Billionaire Tax sound fringe, when in fact voters consistently support the tax by double-digit margins. The Billionaire Tax Now coalition has a growing army of more than 5,000 volunteers, and submitted over 1.6 million signatures—more than double the number needed to qualify for the ballot. The tax is supported by elected officials including US Senator Bernie Sanders Representative Ro Khanna, and Senator Chris Murphy, and community and labor groups including Teamsters California, AFSCME California, CIR, UNITE HERE Local 11 and Local 30, AFT Local 1521, Oxfam America, Our Revolution, CA, Color of Change, and Democratic Socialists of America–CA. Does that sound like “one stakeholder”?
The launch of Newsom's proposal for a national income tax, his team acknowledged, comes as the governor considers a run for president in 2028.
Citing the threat of capital flight and billionaires fleeing California for states with friendlier tax codes, Newsom argues that the fight for a tax on the super-rich "belongs at the federal level, where this broken system was created in the first place."
However, as the campaign behind the state-level tax points out and studies have shown, the mythical threat of the wealthy packing their bags has been shown to be largely that—threats and a myth.
Nadia Rahman, an activist and organizer in San Francisco, was among those urging people not to be duped by the Newsom's position on the California ballot initiative.
"Do not be fooled," Rahman warned. "Newsom is an avowed incrementalist pitching a “national billionaires tax” to have something to deflect to when he runs for president and is questioned about why he worked so hard to kill the wealth tax in his home state of California in his final act as Governor."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


