

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rob Lamontagne, 202-822-8200 x110,
press@vpc.org
Board members of the National Rifle Association and
its affiliated organization the NRA Foundation, as well as the NRA's
lobbying division, have a financial interest in allowing the continued sale of
high-capacity ammunition magazines like those used in the Arizona mass shooting according to a
just-released investigation by the Washington, DC-based Center for Public
Integrity (CPI). The article, "High-Capacity Magazine Sellers Raise
Millions for NRA," is available at https://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/2839/.
Following release of the CPI investigation, Josh Sugarmann, executive director of the Violence
Policy Center (VPC), stated, "The NRA's opposition to a ban on
high-capacity magazines isn't about protecting millions of gun owners,
but protecting millions of dollars for its board members and itself.
Given that the NRA's coffers benefit directly from the sale of
high-capacity ammunition magazines, it's easy to understand why the NRA
opposes any proposal to regulate them."
The Center for Public Integrity investigation, with
subsequent additional research by the Violence Policy
Center, reveals the
following.
--NRA board member Pete
Brownell owns Brownells Inc., which sells a wide-range of high-capacity
ammunition magazines for pistols and assault weapons, including the same
capacity Glock magazine as the 33-round magazine used in the Arizona shooting. Brownells also manufactures
high-capacity ammunition magazines.
On his website supporting his campaign to join the
NRA's board, Brownell states, "Having directors who intimately
understand and work in leadership positions within the firearms industry
ensures the NRA's focus is honed on the overall mission of the
organization. These individuals bring a keen sense of the industry and of
the bigger fight to the table." Brownells, which describes
itself as the "world's largest supplier of firearms accessories and
gunsmithing tools" also sponsors the NRA's National Youth
Shooting Sports Ambassadors.
--Brenda Potterfield serves as
vice-president of the NRA Foundation's board of trustees and is co-owner
of MidwayUSA, which through its "Round-Up" program has raised
millions of dollars for the NRA's lobbying arm, the Institute for
Legislative Action (ILA).
Like Brownells, MidwayUSA sells a wide range of
high-capacity ammunition magazines for pistols and assault weapons, including
33-round magazines for Glock pistols. The Potterfields are the founders of the
NRA "Round-Up' Program, which since 1992 has asked customers
"to 'Round-Up' the total of each order and donate the change
to the NRA/ILA." Since the program's inception, MidwayUSA has
collected more than $5.7 million for the NRA's lobbying efforts. On
its website, MidwayUSA states that other "shooting industry"
companies have followed their lead, resulting in a total of more than 7.5
million dollars contributed to the NRA from "shooting industry"
companies (MidwayUSA and others) since 1992. MidwayUSA claims to stock,
"Just about everything for shooting, reloading, gunsmithing and
hunting."
--NRA board member Ronnie Barrett owns
Barrett, which manufactures an AR-15 style assault rifle which comes with two
30-round ammunition magazines.
Ronnie Barrett is best known for the invention and civilian
marketing of the 50 caliber sniper rifle: a military weapon used by U.S. troops in Iraq
and Afghanistan
that can penetrate armor-plating from a mile away and down airliners on
take-off and landing, but under federal law is sold with no greater
restrictions than a standard hunting rifle. Barrett also manufacturers
and sells the REC7, an AR-15 style assault rifle that comes with two 30-round
magazines.
Also today, the Violence
Policy Center
released a report, "Accessories to Murder," which shows the variety
of high-capacity magazines the gun industry currently markets to its shrinking
customer base. (Read "Accessories to Murder: High-Capacity Ammunition
Magazines," at https://www.vpc.org/studies/accessories.pdf.)
Last week, the VPC released a report on high-capacity
magazines used in 10 of America's
most notorious mass shootings. (Read "Ten Examples of High-Profile Mass
Shootings in the United States Involving High-Capacity Ammunition
Magazines," at https://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/VPCshootinglist.pdf).
The Violence Policy Center (VPC) works to stop gun death and injury through research, education, advocacy, and collaboration. Founded in 1988 by Executive Director Josh Sugarmann, a native of Newtown, Connecticut, the VPC informs the public about the impact of gun violence on their daily lives, exposes the profit-driven marketing and lobbying activities of the firearms industry and gun lobby, offers unique technical expertise to policymakers, organizations, and advocates on the federal, state, and local levels, and works for policy changes that save lives. The VPC has a long and proven record of policy successes on the federal, state, and local levels, leading the National Rifle Association to acknowledge us as "the most effective ... anti-gun rabble-rouser in Washington."
"The case for windfall taxes has never been clearer," said 350.org's chief executive.
An analysis released Monday estimates that oil and gas price spikes driven by the US-Israeli war on Iran have so far cost consumers and businesses around the world over $100 billion—money that has flowed into the coffers of some of the wealthiest, most powerful fossil fuel companies on the planet.
The new analysis by 350.org finds that, just over a month into the war, consumers and businesses have lost between $104.2 billion and $111.6 billion to rising oil and gas prices—an estimate that the environmental group acknowledges is likely conservative, given it doesn't account for "wider knock-on effects, such as rising fertiliser and food costs, declines in economic output and employment, or broader inflation driven by fossil fuel price volatility. "
The more than $100 billion, 350.org said, "has been siphoned from ordinary people to oil and gas companies."
“On top of the incalculable suffering of families and communities torn apart by the war, ordinary people around the world are paying an extraordinary price through fossil fuel-driven energy spikes," said Anne Jellema, 350.org's chief executive. "Over $100 billion has gone straight into the pockets of fossil fuel companies, while families struggle to afford energy and basic necessities."
"The case for windfall taxes," Jellema added, "has never been clearer.”

The analysis was published as global oil prices rose again following a weekend missile attack on Israel by Yemen's Houthis and Trump's threat to "take the oil in Iran," signaling another potential escalation in a war that has already killed thousands, sparked an appalling humanitarian crisis, and destabilized the global economy.
One key beneficiary of the chaos is the fossil fuel industry, which is set to reap billions in windfall profits thanks to rising oil and gas prices. Reuters reported late last week that analysts covering Chevron, Shell, and ExxonMobil have significantly raised earnings estimates for the fossil fuel giants in response to war-fueled price surges.
"US shale producers and other companies without major operations in the Middle East should gain the most, benefiting from higher prices without costs associated with shut-in production, stranded tankers, or expensive repairs to war-hit facilities," Reuters noted. "Still, executives said the big profits will probably not boost their planned capital spending on new production."
Earlier this month, Democratic lawmakers in the US Congress introduced legislation that would impose a windfall profit tax on large American oil companies and return the money to consumers in the form of quarterly rebates. The bill stands no realistic chance of getting through the Republican-controlled Congress, which is awash in Big Oil campaign cash.
“American consumers are once again getting squeezed at the gas pump as President Trump’s war of choice in Iran sends gas prices soaring and money flowing to his Big Oil donors,” said US Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), the bill's lead sponsor in the Senate. “We should send any big windfall for Big Oil back to the hardworking people who paid for it at the gas pump."
The president's decision means the US "will not illegally intercept and seize the entirely legal and legitimate sovereign trade in oil," said one observer.
President Donald Trump said Sunday that his administration would let a Russia-owned tanker carrying an estimated 730,000 barrels of oil to reach Cuba, loosening the illegal fuel blockade that has intensified the island's already-grave humanitarian crisis.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said that "if a country wants to send some oil into Cuba right now, I have no problem," backing off his previous threat to tariff any nation that supplied the besieged island with fuel. Cuba has not received any oil imports since January 9, sparking nationwide blackouts and food shortages and leaving hospitals without critical supplies—with deadly consequences for patients.
Trump insisted that the oil on the Russian tanker—which experts say is enough to buy Cuba at least several weeks of energy—is "not going to have an impact," declaring, "Cuba is finished."
"They have a bad regime, and they have very bad and corrupt leadership," added Trump, who presides over what analysts have deemed the most corrupt administration in US history. "Whether or not they get a boat of oil is not going to matter."
Reporter: There's a report that the US is going to let a Russian oil tanker go to Cuba?
Trump: If a country wants to send some oil into Cuba, I have no problem with that.
Reporter: Do you worry that that helps Putin?
Trump: It doesn’t help him. He loses one boatload of oil.… pic.twitter.com/8Vh6gHwaxs
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 30, 2026
Trump's comments came after The New York Times reported that, "barring orders instructing it otherwise," the US Coast Guard would not intercept the Russian tanker as it approached Cuba.
The Russian vessel, known as the Anatoly Kolodkin, is expected to reach the island by Monday night, providing some reprieve to a nation whose economy has been strangled by unlawful US economic warfare for decades. In recent days, an international convoy of activists has delivered tons of food, medicine, and other aid to the island, but the shipments are a Band-Aid on a gaping wound.
Michael Gallant, a member of the Progressive International Secretariat, welcomed news that the US is allowing the Russian tanker to reach Cuba as "very good news"—but said Trump's decision is hardly deserving of praise.
Very good news. “The US will allow,” of course, means “will not illegally intercept and seize the entirely legal and legitimate sovereign trade in oil” https://t.co/YF2RRIXC2S
— Michael Galant (@michael_galant) March 29, 2026
Trump imposed the fuel blockade in January, absurdly characterizing Cuba as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security.
Earlier this month, Trump threatened to "take" Cuba by force, calling it a "very weakened nation." Trump's remarks prompted Cuba's president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, to vow "impregnable resistance" to any US attempt to seize the island. The Trump administration is reportedly seeking Díaz-Canel's removal as a necessary condition in talks with the Cuban government.
Trump's threats led Reps. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) to introduce legislation last week that would prohibit the administration from using federal funds for any attack on Cuba without congressional authorization.
"Trump has started illegal regime change conflicts in Venezuela and Iran and is now threatening Cuba," Jayapal said in a statement. "These military attacks put our troops in danger, endanger innocent civilians, waste billions of taxpayer dollars, and are not what the American people want."
"Trump promised to end forever wars—he lied," Jayapal added. "Congress alone has the power to declare war, something Trump clearly does not respect. He has no plan to improve conditions for the Cuban people or promote democracy, and we must pass this legislation to block him from acting on a whim."
"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war."
Pope Leo XIV used his Palm Sunday sermon to take what appears to be a shot at US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
In his sermon, excerpts of which he published on social media, the pope emphasized Christian teachings against violence while criticizing anyone who would invoke Jesus Christ to justify a war.
"This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war," Pope Leo said. "He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them."
The pope also encouraged followers to "raise our prayers to the Prince of Peace so that he may support people wounded by war and open concrete paths of reconciliation and peace."
While speaking at the Pentagon last week, Hegseth directly invoked Jesus when discussing the Trump administration's unprovoked and unconstitutional war with Iran.
Specifically, Hegseth offered up a prayer in which he asked God to give US soldiers "wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy," adding that "we ask these things with bold confidence in the mighty and powerful name of Jesus Christ."
Mother Jones contributing writer Alex Nguyen described the pope's sermon as a "rebuke" of Hegseth, whom he noted "has been open about his support for a Christian crusade" in the Middle East.
Pope Leo is not the only Catholic leader speaking against using Christian faith to justify wars of aggression. Two weeks ago, Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin patriarch of Jerusalem, said "the abuse and manipulation of God’s name to justify this and any other war is the gravest sin we can commit at this time."
“War is first and foremost political and has very material interests, like most wars," Cardinal Pizzaballa added.