October, 26 2010, 01:56pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Rob Mosrie, US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation (202) 332-0994,
Rebecca Vilkomerson, Jewish Voice for Peace (718) 310-8655
Human Rights Groups Ask State Department to Call for Release of Palestinian Nonviolent Activist
WASHINGTON
Representatives from four US human rights groups met with State Department
officials on Friday, October 22nd, and delivered a letter addressed to Secretary of State Clinton signed by more than 5,000 individuals
calling for the US government to demand that Israel free Abdallah Abu Rahmah, a leading Palestinian nonviolent protest organizer. Abu Rahmah, from
the West Bank village of Bil'in, was sentenced on October 11th in Israeli military court to
one year in prison for his part in organizing Bil'in's five-year campaign of
civil disobedience to Israel's construction of a fence and settlements on
village land in violation of international law. Abu Rahmah's conviction has been
denounced by the UK Foreign Office, the EU, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, B'Tselem and South African anti-apartheid leader Desmond Tutu.
Rob Mosrie, Executive Director of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation said, "Israel's arrest of non-violent activists like Abdallah Abu Rahmah mocks
President Obama's call in his Cairo speech for Palestinians to use only
nonviolent means to gain their freedom. What kind of message does it send to a community when their nonviolent
leadership is jailed?"
The letter delivered to the State Department and addressed to Hillary
Clinton was signed by 35 organizations and 5,270 individuals and written before
Abdallah Abu Rahmah's October 11th sentencing. The letter noted that in July 2010 in Krakow at a meeting of
the intergovernmental group Community of Democracies, Secretary of State Clinton saluted
"civil society activists around the world who have recently been harassed,
censored, cut off from funding, arrested, prosecuted, even killed," and called
for coordinated international efforts to defend them. The letter to Clinton
continued, "Abdallah Abu Rahmah is one of these activists who, in pursuit of
human rights, has been unjustly imprisoned."
Representatives from Adalah-NY, CODEPINK, Jewish Voice for Peace and the US
Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation stressed to State
Department officials that, in the next two weeks, the Israeli government is
expected to appeal to lengthen Abu Rahmah's one year sentence. Last week, an
Israeli military court extended the sentence for another Bil'in protester, Adeeb
Abu Rahmah, from one year to 18 months in response to an Israeli government
appeal.
"We
participated in the protest in Bil'in and found Abdallah Abu Rahmah to
be a great leader who emphasized the importance of non-violence," said
Medea Benjamin of CODEPINK. "Charging him and activists in the
neighboring village of Ni'lin with "incitement" and
organizing "illegal protests" effectively outlaw freedom of
expression and peaceful protest."
Human Rights Watch called Abdallah Abu Rahmah's conviction "the unjust result of an unfair
trial," noting that he was convicted of inciting stone throwing based on
statements of arrested children who had no legal representation, said they were
coerced by their Israeli interrogators into making the accusations and retracted
them in court. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem,
all criticized the 1967 Israeli military order 101 under which Abdallah Abu
Rahmah was convicted for its extremely broad definition of incitement -
"attempting to... influence public opinion in the area in a way that may disturb
the public peace or public order" - and its requirement for a permit for any
gathering of 10 people or more listening to a speech or walking for purposes
that can be interpreted as political. Though the Israeli military generally
films the demonstrations in Bil'in, the Israeli military did not present a single piece of video evidence linking Abdallah Abu
Rahmah with incitement or violence.
The Israeli military began the latest wave of protest arrests around
September, 2009, also arresting protest organizers and boycott activists
Mohammad Othman and Jamal Juma'
of the Palestinian organization Stop the Wall. After being held for a period
without access to their lawyers and without charges, both Othman and Juma' were
released three and a half months and four weeks respectively. 20 Palestinians
have been killed in protests against the wall since 2004, including one
individual from Bil'in and five from Ni'ilin. 79 protesters from Bil'in have
been arrested since 2004, and 116 protesters from Ni'ilin have been arrested
since May, 2008.
During protests the Israeli military has killed two US citizens, Rachel
Corrie and Furkan Dogan, and seriously injured two others, Tristan Anderson and
Emily Henochowicz.
CODEPINK is a women-led grassroots organization working to end U.S. wars and militarism, support peace and human rights initiatives, and redirect our tax dollars into healthcare, education, green jobs and other life-affirming programs.
(818) 275-7232LATEST NEWS
Trump’s Lax Approach to Antitrust Helps Spur Banner Year for Corporate Mergers
"Trump’s new antitrust enforcers have demonstrated a willingness to facilitate dealmaking through an uptick in early terminations and settlements," said the American Economic Liberties Project.
Dec 26, 2025
Global corporate mergers surged to near-record highs in 2025, driven in part by US President Donald Trump's lax approach to antitrust enforcement.
The Financial Times reported on Friday that global dealmaking in 2025 topped $4 trillion, including 68 mergers worth $10 billion or more, highlighted by Netflix's $72 billion bid to buy Warner Bros. Discovery and a proposed $85 billion mega-merger between railway giants Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.
The US alone accounted for $2.3 trillion worth of mergers and acquisitions, which the Financial Times said highlighted the Trump administration's role in green-lighting corporate consolidation.
"Top dealmakers said that the Trump administration’s push to loosen regulation had encouraged companies to explore tie-ups that they might otherwise have been hesitant to pursue," the Financial Times explained.
Andrew Nussbaum, co-chair of the executive committee at law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, told the Financial Times that corporate leaders "see a willingness of the regulators to engage in constructive dialogue" under the second Trump administration, which has given them "a willingness to take on regulatory risk for transactions that are strategic."
The American Economic Liberties Project has also taken note of the Trump administration's role in shepherding through big mergers, and created a Trump Merger Boom tracker earlier this year to document the massive wave of corporate consolidation.
In its analysis of the administration's lax approach to antitrust enforcement, the American Economic Liberties Project said that "Trump’s new antitrust enforcers have demonstrated a willingness to facilitate dealmaking through an uptick in early terminations and settlements."
"Despite pro-enforcement rhetoric early on from Trump’s heads of the FTC and DOJ Antitrust Division," the American Economic Liberties Project added, "it’s becoming increasingly clear that agency leadership is having trouble making their decisions in a vacuum—with a quiet tide of deals granted to companies that have been friendly to the White House."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Lina Khan ‘Scouring New York City Laws’ to Help Zohran Mamdani Drive Down Prices
Khan and members of her team are reportedly "dusting off a little-used 1960s price-gouging statute" in an effort to bolster the mayor-elect's affordability push in New York City.
Dec 26, 2025
Former Federal Trade Commission chair and antitrust trailblazer Lina Khan is reportedly poring over New York City's laws to help Democratic Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani fulfill the central promise of his campaign: making the metropolis more affordable.
According to the New York Times, Khan—in her capacity as co-chair of the mayor-elect's transition team—"has spent weeks scouring New York City’s laws to find dormant or underused mayoral authority that could allow Mr. Mamdani to take action in a hurry."
Potential actions "include specific attempts to drive down apartment rental fees and utility costs and compel businesses to be more transparent about pricing," as well as "dusting off a little-used 1960s price-gouging statute and policing new protections for food delivery workers," the Times reported, citing three unnamed people familiar with internal discussions.
As head of the FTC under former President Joe Biden, Khan took groundbreaking legal action against major corporations such as Amazon and, in the words of one antitrust advocacy group, "reinvigorated enforcement of the Robinson-Patman Act, a long-dormant law designed to prevent price discrimination by big corporations, through two separate cases against PepsiCo and Southern Glazer’s—major victories for smaller and independent businesses."
Khan, according to the Times, hopes to spur similar action in New York City. Members of her team, which includes former federal regulators, have "studied a 1969 consumer protection law meant to prohibit 'unconscionable' business tactics, to potentially target hospitals and sports stadiums where consumers typically have little choice but to pay high prices for products that are cheaper elsewhere."
Additionally, the newspaper reported, "they have looked at whether food delivery companies, which wield significant power in the city, are complying with laws that protect their drivers, and whether landlords are complying with a newly enacted law barring many real estate brokers from collecting thousands of dollars in fees."
Douglas Farrar, a spokesman for Khan, told the Times that the former FTC chair and her team have "worked closely" with the Mamdani transition "to provide key research support on ideas for hitting the ground running."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Bezos-Owned Newspaper Bashes Medicare for All in Christmas Day Editorial
The Washington Post editorial predictably ignores research showing that a single-payer system would save hundreds of billions of dollars—and tens of thousands of lives—each year.
Dec 26, 2025
An editorial published on Christmas by the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post inveighed against supporters of Medicare for All in the United States, pointing to the struggles of Britain's chronically underfunded National Health Service as a "cautionary tale" while ignoring research showing that a single-payer system would save the US hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands of lives each year.
The editorial, headlined "Socialized medicine can’t survive the winter," laments the "religious-like devotion to the NHS" in the United Kingdom even as "hospital corridors overflow and routine procedures get canceled due to a catastrophic event commonly known as 'winter.'"
The Post editorial board, led by opinion editor Adam O'Neal, waves away expert analyses showing that the UK government is underinvesting in its healthcare system relative to other countries in Europe, resulting in the kinds of problems the Thursday editorial attributed to the supposedly inherent flaws of single-payer systems.
"This is the dark reality of single-payer and a cautionary tale for the third of Americans who mistakenly believe Medicare for All is a good idea," the editorial declared ominously.
The editorial understates Medicare for All's popularity among US voters. A recent Data for Progress survey found that even after hearing common opposing arguments, 58% of voters strongly or somewhat support improving Medicare and expanding it to cover everyone in the US.
A separate poll conducted by GQR Research found that 54% of voters nationally, and 56% in battleground districts, support Medicare for All. US Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the co-leader of the Medicare for All Act in the House, is reportedly planning to present those findings to colleagues next month as she pushes Democrats to rally behind her legislation ahead of the critical midterm elections.
Welcome to the newest co-sponsors of my Medicare for All bill in the House!
Medicare for All is not only good policy — as premiums skyrocket for millions of Americans — it is incredibly popular. Let’s keep building momentum for universal health care and get this passed! pic.twitter.com/k5sg7hEkYR
— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) December 25, 2025
The renewed push for Medicare for All comes as the corporate-dominated healthcare status quo hits Americans with massive premium hikes stemming from congressional Republicans' refusal to extend Affordable Care Act tax credits.
Predictably, the Post's editorial board—which Bezos has instructed to write "every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets"—neglected to mention the myriad horrors of the United States' for-profit system in its diatribe against Medicare for All.
The editorial also ignores research showing potentially massive benefits from a transition to Medicare for All, which would virtually eliminate private insurance while providing comprehensive coverage to everyone in the US for free at the point of service.
One study published in The Lancet estimated that a Medicare for All system would save more than 68,000 lives and over $450 billion in healthcare expenditures annually.
An analysis by Yale researchers calculated that "if the US had had a single-payer universal healthcare system in 2020"—which marked the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic—"nearly 212,000 American lives would have been saved that year" and "the country would have saved $105 billion in Covid-19 hospitalization expenses alone."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


