SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
January, 28 2009, 09:37am EDT
Contact:
Tom Devine, GAP Legal Director
240.888.4080
tomd@whistleblower.org
Charity Wilson, American Federation of Government Employees
202.639.6440
Dave Colapinto, National Whistleblower Center
202.342.6980
Donna Lenhoff, National Employment Lawyers Association
202.898.2880
Marthena Cowart, Project on Government Oversight
202.347.3958
Angela Canterbury, Public Citizen
202.454.5188
Celia Wexler, Union of Concerned Scientists
202.390.5481
Sarah Dufendach, Common Cause
202.736.5709
Whistleblower Rights Amendment to Receive Vote During Stimulus Debate Today
A Joint Statement by GAP, the American Federation of Government Employees, National Whistleblower Center, NELA, POGO, Public Citizen, Union of Concerned Scientists
WASHINGTON
Today, our seven
organizations strongly urge all members of the House of Representatives to pass
a bipartisan amendment that would bring genuine accountability and oversight to
the stimulus spending bill, H.R. 1. We applaud Representatives Chris Van Hollen
(D-MD) and Todd R. Platts (R-PA) for offering an amendment to expand and
strengthen protections for federal workers charged with safeguarding the public
trust and taxpayer dollars.
Click here to read the amendment: https://www.whistleblower.org/doc/2008/Amend128.pdf
The Platts/Van Hollen Whistleblower Amendment is
identical to the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (H.R. 985), which
passed by a large bipartisan vote of 331-94 in the previous Congress on March
14, 2007. In a letter of support for this proposal, a broad coalition of
more than 260 organizations representing millions of individuals stressed:
"Whistleblower
protection is a foundation for any change in which the public can believe. It
does not matter whether the issue is economic recovery, prescription drug
safety, environmental protection, infrastructure spending, national health
insurance, or foreign policy. We need conscientious public servants willing and
able to call attention to bureaucratic corruption on behalf of the
taxpayers."
Click here to read the letter, sent on Monday, January
26: https://www.whistleblower.org/doc/2008/CoalitionLetter.pdf
Our groups are deeply concerned about the economic
crisis and its impact on individuals and families. Because so many Americans
are suffering the consequences of a contracting economy, it is now more
important than ever that we have transparency and accountability for every tax
dollar spent. The Van Hollen/Platts amendment sets a new, best practices
standard for transparency through accountability. Most significant, it creates
a permanent shield for federal employee and contractor whistleblowers who
challenge any misspending, and it will keep protecting taxpayers long after
stimulus funds are gone.
While the stimulus bill in its current form provides
protections for federal contractors and state and local employees, it does not
cover federal workers. Congress should not stop short of ensuring federal
employees the same protections. The Platts/Van Hollen amendment closes the gap
and provides essential protection for all federal workers. It's time for
Congress to enact whistleblower rights and accountability measures before the
taxpayers' money is spent. Our groups agree: By supporting the Platts/Van
Hollen amendment, Members of Congress are not just protecting whistleblowers;
they are protecting the taxpayers.
LATEST NEWS
GOP Lawmaker Drowned Out by 'Tax the Rich' Chant at Town Hall in Deep-Red Nebraska District
Voters were not impressed with Rep. Mike Flood's claim that massive cuts to public spending are needed to achieve a "balanced budget."
Mar 19, 2025
A small Nebraska city where U.S. President Donald Trump easily won the 2024 election was the site of the latest chaotic Republican town hall on Tuesday evening, with Rep. Mike Flood facing a roomful of about 200 voters, many of whom refused to accept his excuses for the Trump administration's drastic cuts to the federal government.
Flood came to the Columbus High School auditorium prepared with a graphic showing the national debt, with a giant screen showing the sum ticking up to $36 trillion—evidently confident that the number would help explain to voters why Republicans are pushing for hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid and Social Security while backing billionaire Elon Musk's massive cuts to the federal workforce.
But when he displayed the number and told one voter who asked about cuts to the National Institutes of Health that, "ultimately, where we need to go is to a balanced budget," he was met with loud booing.
"How can you be against a balanced budget?" Flood asked the room—which prompted the reply, "tax the rich!" to ring out across the auditorium.
Flood was meeting with voters in Nebraska's deep-red 2nd District for the first time since Trump took office. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) recently advised GOP lawmakers to avoid town halls and claimed protesters who have shown up to numerous meetings with Republican representatives are "Democrat activists who don't live in the district," but he and other critics have presented no evidence that the anger directed at Trump's allies in Congress is coming from anywhere but their constituents.
Flood also faced questions about Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with one attendee asking, "What makes Elon Musk a better person to audit our government for waste, fraud, and abuse than the inspectors general that Donald Trump fired?"
"Elon Musk gets $40 billion a year in funding from the federal government. What makes you think he has no conflict of interest?" asked the voter. "Do you think he would cut that before he would cut our Medicare, or our Social Security, or our jobs?"
Flood replied that he supports both Musk and DOGE, prompting more loud booing and thumbs-down gestures.
With Republican lawmakers facing angry voters, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in recent weeks has toured states including Iowa, Nebraska, and Michigan, speaking to large crowds in Republican districts. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is scheduled to join him this week, while Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has also been holding town halls.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Alito and Thomas Urged to Recuse From Key Case Over 'Cozy Ties' to Right-Wing Kingpin
"Americans deserve a legal system that isn't influenced by billionaires and special interest backers pushing an agenda at the expense of working families," said a watchdog group leader.
Mar 19, 2025
Ahead of U.S. Supreme Court arguments next week, a watchdog group asserted Wednesday that right-wing Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas must recuse themselves from a case "whose outcome could have sweeping consequences," citing "significant conflicts of interest" due to their relationships with "conservative kingpin Leonard Leo."
In Federal Communications Commissionv. Consumers' Research, a right-wing group is challenging the constitutionality of the FCC's Universal Service Fund program.
Vox's Ian Millhiser reported Wednesday that "if the Supreme Court accepts an argument raised by a federal appeals court, which struck down the federal program, it would bring about one of the biggest judicial power grabs in American history, and hobble the government's ability to do, well, pretty much anything."
In the new report about Alito and Thomas, the watchdog Accountable.US issued a similar warning about the case's potential impacts: "Effectively defunct for almost a century, the nondelegation doctrine prohibits Congress from passing off its legislative power to federal agencies... Reviving the doctrine would cripple agencies' ability to govern consumer safeguards, social security, Medicare, and more during a time when the Trump administration has begun to slash federal agencies."
"Now before the high court, the case presents an obvious conflict of interest for many of the justices who are personally tied to (and in some cases, friends of) the conservative activist Leonard Leo, who is closely connected to Consumers' Research," the analysis explains, pointing to reporting that Leo is the group's "main backer."
While "all six conservatives now sitting on the Supreme Court can credit Leo with helping to shepherd their confirmations," the watchdog's report states, the right-wing legal activist is "close personal friends" with Alito and Thomas.
According to the report:
- Leo has known Justice Thomas since the early 1990s when Leo was clerking in D.C. Since then, Leo has traveled with Thomas and invited him to his personal residence in Maine. The justice is also the godfather to one of Leo's daughters. Justice Thomas' wife, Ginni, has previously called Leo her "hero" and "mentor." Over the past 15 years, Leo and Ginni have worked together on several projects, operationalizing the outside game of conservative dark money and politics.
- Leo has also traveled with Justice Alito, most notably to Alaska on a private fishing trip (which Justice Alito did not disclose at the time). Leo's Federalist Society has also sponsored numerous trips overseas for Alito, some of them attended by Leo himself.
"Americans deserve a legal system that isn't influenced by billionaires and special interest backers pushing an agenda at the expense of working families. Justices Thomas and Alito's cozy ties to Leonard Leo and thereby Consumers' Research fly straight in the face of that, and present a clear conflict of interest impeding their ability to rule impartially on the case," said Accountable.US president Caroline Ciccone in a statement.
"Public trust in the Supreme Court is already at an all-time low because of misguided conduct by justices–this case threatens to degrade it further," Ciccone continued. "The Supreme Court simply cannot be trusted to defend the Constitution if it doesn't adopt an obligatory, enforceable code of conduct that cleans up the impropriety that's existed on the court for years. Thomas and Alito must recuse themselves and restore a semblance of integrity to the highest court."
In addition to releasing the report, Accountable.US and two other groups, Take Back the Court and United for Democracy, argued for Alito and Thomas' recusal in a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts—who on Tuesday publicly condemned right-wing attacks on the federal judiciary.
"The Supreme Court has been engulfed by corruption scandals, many of which centering around the right-wing justices' overly friendly relationships with powerful billionaires and special interests," United for Democracy senior adviser Meagan Hatcher-Mays said Wednesday. "At the same time that Justices Thomas and Alito were accepting lavish gifts and trips from billionaires, they were hearing cases with those same billionaires' legal interests at stake."
"It's impossible for the American public to trust in Supreme Court rulings when this kind of glad-handing is taking place," she added. "The appearance of impropriety is clear in FCC v. Consumers' Research given Leonard Leo's long-time friendship with Justices Thomas and Alito and his financial entanglements with Consumers’ Research. Justices Thomas and Alito must recuse themselves immediately."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Federal Reserve Pick Called 'Gift to the Banking Industry'
"At a time when climate-related financial risks are only growing, the Fed should be stepping up to protect the economy—not retreating," said the head of the Sierra Club's sustainable finance campaign.
Mar 19, 2025
The watchdog group Public Citizen is warning that the U.S. President Donald Trump's pick to serve as in the Federal Reserve's stop supervisory role is a "banking industry favorite."
On Monday, Trump tapped Federal Reserve Gov. Michelle Bowman to take over as the new vice chair of supervision. Bowman must be confirmed by the Senate before taking the role, which was created by the Dodd-Frank Act in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis in order to develop policy recommendations for the Fed's Board of Governors around supervision and regulation.
Michael Barr, who was vice chair of supervision from July 2022 until earlier this year, stepped down from the role in February but remains a member of the Board of Governors.
"Bowman's nomination for vice chair for supervision is a gift to the banking industry," said Elyse Schupak, policy advocate with Public Citizen's climate program, in a statement on Tuesday. "Under her leadership we can expect loosening capital requirements, lax bank supervision, and neglect of emerging risks to the financial system, including from climate change."
According to Bloomberg, Bowman is expected to take a "lighter touch" to bank regulation compared to Barr.
Bowman, the former state bank commissioner of Kansas and former VP of Farmers & Drovers Bank in Kansas, has been a critic of a landmark plan to require banks to hold more capital. The plan, called "Basel III Endgame," is opposed by big banks that are lobbying against it, according to the think tank the Brookings Institution.
"I'd be excited to see Miki Bowman appointed," Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon toldFox News last week, after her likely appointment was reported by multiple outlets. "I think the industry would be excited."
Ben Cushing, director of the Sierra Club's sustainable finance campaign, also weighed in on the selection of Bowman.
"Major U.S. banks are exacerbating threats to financial stability and long-term economic growth through their continued financing of dirty energy and insufficient investment in clean energy. Regardless of changing political winds, the Federal Reserve has a duty to supervise and regulate these and other risky banking practices," Cushing said in a statement on Wednesday.
"At a time when climate-related financial risks are only growing, the Fed should be stepping up to protect the economy—not retreating under political pressure from climate deniers and Wall Street," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular