SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Isabel Macdonald
212-633-6700 x 310
imacdonald@fair.org
One of the most glaring peculiarities about the Fox News Channel's
campaign coverage in the run-up to the November 4 election was the
channel's frequent insistence, in the waning days of the campaign, that
the election was remarkably close, with Republican John McCain surging.
In reality, few polls suggested this was happening (see PollingReport.com; Pollster.com), but Fox
chose to give a handful of outlying, unrepresentative surveys
considerable attention. It was as if the channel were less interested
in accurately reporting the state of the campaign than in presenting an
alternate reality that would be pleasing to partisan viewers.
Here's a sampling of that coverage, day by day:
October 27:
FOX NEWS ANALYST DICK MORRIS: I think that we have to understand that redistribution of income is liberal euphemism for socialism. And you know.
FOX NEWS HOST SEAN HANNITY: Well, I -- and I agree. But let me
move the ball a little bit here.... This is, obviously, a very sensitive
issue for the Obama campaign. They feel like they've been exposed. It
started with Joe the Plumber.
MORRIS: And they're hemorrhaging votes.... Zogby, Rasmussen, and
Gallup, all have this race five points apart.... Zogby down from 12,
Rasmussen down from eight, and Gallup down from six. And Investors
Business Daily has it to 2.8, and Zogby had a one-night finding of
three. The averages that over three nights.
October 28:
"Let me put up on the screen the latest polls,
because we've had a tightening in many of them. Likely voters, Gallup,
it's a two-point race. Zogby, now four-point. AP,
it's dead even. IDP, another close race. Obviously spread the wealth,
socialism, Obama's welfare plan is not going over well with the
American people."
--Sean Hannity
FOX NEWS ANALYST NEWT GINGRICH: "I got a
report earlier this evening that in the very, very close states that,
in fact, McCain has closed the gap substantially, and that internal
polling now shows him within pretty good striking distance in every
single close state.
HANNITY: Well, we're going to go over some of these polls. The likely voter poll, Gallup, now has a two-point race.
October 29:
FOX NEWS ANCHOR MARTHA MacCALLUM: McCain
is blasting Obama, saying his rival doesn't have what it takes to
protect America from terrorists. And that kind of tough talk may be
helping him a bit. Here's a look at new Rasmussen Poll showing McCain
gaining ground with Obama at 50 to McCain's 47. That's the first time
in this particular poll that McCain has been within three points of
Barack Obama in more than a month. Fox's Carl Cameron is with the McCain camp live in Riviera Beach, Florida tonight....
FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT CARL CAMERON: Well, for the last several
weeks, Senator McCain has been focusing on economic issues. And if
anything sort of to be credited with his apparent surge and the
tightening in the national polls, it would be presumably be his
emphasis on Barack Obama's economic policies, which McCain has sort of
tattooed as tax-and-spend liberalism.
***
NATIONAL REVIEW CONTRIBUTOR MARK STEYN:
Clearly, something is working. Because I think whatever one makes of
these polls, there is a general tightening direction. So, clearly,
people are taking a second look at Obama and taking a second look at
McCain.
HANNITY: Let me jump on that, Mark.... Look, it's Scott Rasmussen.
It's Gallup, likely voters. It's Investor's Business Daily and that
poll that's out. It's AP. It's Battleground. This is a two- or three-point race.
October 29:
"Fear is in the air. And while it initially
helped Barack Obama, fear is now beginning to hurt him. Both the
Rasmussen and Gallup daily tracking polls have the race getting
tighter. And in a remarkable turnabout, Rasmussen will release a poll
tomorrow that says Americans now trust McCain more on the economy than
Obama. So NBC News will have to tone down the victory dance.
A series of Obama issues regarding spreading the wealth around have
hurt him. Joe the Plumber and other expositions have caused some fear
among undecided voters that an Obama administration will harm the
economy more than help it. The USA remains a strong capitalist country,
much to the chagrin of the far left. And deviation from capitalism
isn't going to play well here, especially among older voters. And it is
here where the swings are taking place, especially in places like
Florida and Ohio."
--Fox News host Bill O'Reilly
October 30:
"But first--it is close, even closer than it was last night. It is now a three-point race for the White House. A new Fox News poll shows the race tightening, with Senator Obama at 47 percent and Senator McCain at 44 percent."
-- Fox News host Greta van Susteren
"Well, he [Obama] ought to be nervous because
of the margin of error, and he also ought to be nervous because,
clearly, the national race is tightening.... He's not a good closer. I
mean, there is a resistance to him, a doubt about whether or not he's
experienced and qualified enough to be president that causes people at
the tail end of the race not to end up in his column, and I suspect
we're seeing that again.... It's because of this persistent doubt that
people have about Senator Obama."
-- Fox News analyst Karl Rove
* * *
"Now the polling, the Fox News
poll, which shows Obama closing the gap from -- McCain closing it from
9 to 3 shows two completely different trends at work. Young people are
turning away from Obama and toward McCain, driven by the tax issue."
--Dick Morris
MORRIS: My bet is McCain wins all of the undecided in this race.
HANNITY: Well, if that happens, he wins the race.
MORRIS: Right now it's tied.
HANNITY: If that.
MORRIS: No, right now it's about tied.
"Brand new Fox polls are in and this race is tightening."
--Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly
"The latest Fox News/Opinion
Dynamics Poll of likely voters nationwide, which Major Garrett was just
mentioning, shows that the race is tightening considerably from last
week, with Barack Obama's overall lead over John McCain is shrinking
from nine points to three; that's within the margin of error."
--Fox News correspondent James Rosen
October 31:
"We are down to the wire. And guess what? The race is far from over. The Associated Press
is reporting that a study shows one in seven are persuadable. That
means this isn't over. And if you don't believe that, how about this
news? The polls are tightening. A new Fox News poll shows Senator Obama at 47 percent and Senator McCain at 44 percent."
--Greta van Susteren
HANNITY: One of the more amazing things is the numbers of
undecided, anywhere between eight and 14. You know Dick Morris
interprets that that is -- that means Obama can't close the deal and
that people have doubts about him and it appears by the tightening
that's going on that those voters are moving toward Senator McCain. Do
you share that analysis?
ROVE: I think Dick is largely right. There has been a persistent
nagging concern on the part of the American people about whether or not
Barack Obama is qualified to be president.
HANNITY: Are you looking at the polls? There's a real tightening
going on. Very interesting to me, as it's happening. Seems Barack Obama
cannot close. Why?
FOX NEWS ANALYST MIKE HUCKABEE: I think there is the lingering
doubt as to what he's going to do to people's personal income. This is
not about -- you know, right now it's not about even terrorism or
international affairs. Joe the plumber hit the reset button on this
entire election.
"Apparently, for our audience's sake, apparently, big move in the
polls. McCain up by one, Drudge is reporting, in the latest Zogby poll.
It's going to come out tomorrow."
--Sean Hannity
"In a surprise turnaround, get this, a brand new Fox News
poll find that John McCain is surging among younger voters, those under
30 years old. He is catching up to Barack Obama's 48 percent, McCain
has 43 percent. I think those numbers are wrong - 48 to 58 percent
among voters under the age of 30."
--Fox News host Heather Nauert
NAUERT: ... McCain has gained 10 points with the youth vote within the last week?
MORRIS: Yes. In the last week, among voters 18 to 30, McCain has vis-a- vis Obama has closed the gap by 20 points.
November 2:
"Two days and counting until you decide our next president. With the
polls tightening, is John McCain about to pull off one more remarkable
comeback?"
--Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace
November 3:
SEAN HANNITY: Investors Business Daily, which was the most
accurate poll in the last presidential election, now has it down to a
two-point race.... You know, Colorado was just, you know -- a week and a
half two weeks ago, it was supposed to be a blowout. It's now right
there at the margin of error. The same with the state of Virginia.
Again, that was, you know, supposed to be a blowout. And then we look,
for example, we've got Senator McCain is up in Florida. He's tied in
Missouri. He's now up in North Carolina, which was supposed to be a
blowout for Senator Obama. There--something has happened here fairly
dramatic. And do you think that this could even go further by the time
people vote tomorrow?
NEWT GINGRICH: Well, I think, first of all, that the mistake of
Senator Obama telling Joe the Plumber that he wanted to spread the
wealth has clearly slowed down all the momentum for the Obama campaign,
because it turns out most Americans are not very interested in having
politicians decide to take their money out of their wallet and spread
to it the politicians' friends. That may turn out, in retrospect, to
have been the biggest single mistake of the campaign by Senator Obama.
"I think that -- I don't believe these polls. I do not believe any, but
I agree with Dick Morris. Who knows what's going to happen tomorrow
night."
--Sean Hannity
For more information on the obvious and rather dramatic differences in the way Fox News Channel and MSNBC were covering the presidential race see the FAIR Blog. (11/2/02.)
ACTION: Ask Fox News Channel
why it failed to provide its viewers with an accurate picture of
presidential election polls in the lead-up to the November 4 election.
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints.
"Who was it? Trump? A family member? A White House staffer?" asked US Sen. Chris Murphy.
Just minutes before US President Donald Trump momentarily boosted the stock market—and sent oil prices tumbling—with his disputed Monday announcement of peace talks with Iran, unknown traders loaded up on positions that allowed them to profit from the resulting movement in equities and commodities.
The Financial Times reported that "roughly 6,200 Brent and West Texas Intermediate futures contracts changed hands between 6:49 am and 6:50 am New York time on Monday, just a quarter of an hour ahead of the US president’s post on Truth Social that there had in recent days been 'productive conversations' with Tehran to end the war in Iran."
FT added that the notional value of those trades was $580 million.
"Trading volumes for Brent and WTI leapt at the same time, 27 seconds before 6:50 am," the newspaper reported. "Futures tracking the S&P 500 share index jumped in price moments after the oil trade, with volumes also rising significantly during that timeframe. It was not known whether one entity or several entities were behind Monday’s trades."
An unnamed trader at a "major hedge fund" told FT that "my gut from watching markets for the last 25 years is this is really abnormal."
"It’s Monday morning, there’s no important data today, there aren’t any Fed speakers you’d want to front-run. It’s an unusually large trade for a day with no event risk," the trader said. "Somebody just got a lot richer.”
A BBC review of market data similarly found that "traders bet hundreds of millions of dollars on oil contracts just minutes before" Trump's announcement of talks with Iran. Iranian officials publicly denied that they are negotiating with the Trump administration, and Iran's top lawmaker accused the US president of peddling "fake news" in an attempt to "manipulate the financial and oil markets."
The suspiciously timed bets ahead of the US president's post heightened concerns that Trump administration insiders are illegally trading on—and profiting massively from—nonpublic knowledge.
Responding to a report that $1.5 billion worth of S&P 500 futures was purchased just five minutes before Trump's Monday announcement, US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) asked: "Who was it? Trump? A family member? A White House staffer?"
"This is corruption," the senator wrote. "Mind-blowing corruption."
Last week, Murphy joined US Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) in unveiling legislation that would ban prediction markets on "government actions, terrorism, war, assassination, and events where an individual knows or controls the outcome."
The bill came on the heels of suspiciously timed, highly profitable bets related to US military actions in Venezuela and Iran.
The Guardian reported Monday that several newly created accounts on the online prediction platform Polymarket "laid bets on a US-Iran ceasefire over the weekend that appeared to show signs of insider knowledge, according to experts."
Researcher Ben Yorke told the newspaper that the accounts—which are anonymous—"definitely" look like "someone with some degree of inside info."
The Guardian noted that "online crypto watchers and experts suggested that the bets bore the signs of insider trading—both because they bought their positions at market price, and because some of the accounts looked like they could belong to a single investor attempting to conceal their identity by splitting their bet between multiple wallets."
According to Yorke, "Typically, when you see wallet-splitting and deliberate attempts to obfuscate identity, it’s one of two scenarios: either a very large investor trying to shield their position from market impact, or insider trading."
The Trump White House insisted Monday that any suggestion of insider trading "is baseless and irresponsible reporting."
“The White House does not tolerate any administration official illegally profiteering off of insider knowledge," said White House spokesperson Kush Desai.
"Our job is to ensure that this new technology benefits working families and is not simply used as another tool to make the wealthiest people in the world unimaginably richer."
Sen. Bernie Sanders is demanding that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos testify about plans to use robots powered by artificial intelligence to replace human workers.
In a Monday announcement, Sanders (I-Vt.) cited a report published by The Wall Street Journal outlining Bezos' ambitions "to raise $100 billion for a new fund that would buy up manufacturing companies and seek to use AI technology to accelerate their path to automation."
The Journal obtained investor documents describing the new Bezos initiative as a "manufacturing transformation vehicle" that would buy up firms in key industries such as chipmaking, defense, and aerospace, and use AI to boost the efficiency of their operations.
Sanders, the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, warned that such a plan would risk putting millions of blue-collar manufacturing workers out of jobs.
Because of this, he asked Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chairman of the HELP Committee, to demand that Bezos testify about his new project’s impact on the working class.
"We must demand that Mr. Bezos come before our committee to explain to the American people why he believes it’s a good idea to replace millions of American workers with robots,” Sanders said. "We need to understand what will happen to these workers... will they simply be thrown out on the street in order to make Mr. Bezos even richer?"
Sanders emphasized the vital role of government in ensuring that advancements in technology are not used to further impoverish workers and erode their collective bargaining power.
"Our job is to ensure that this new technology benefits working families and is not simply used as another tool to make the wealthiest people in the world unimaginably richer," Sanders said. "The American people are increasingly apprehensive about the impact that AI and robotics will have on the economy and their lives. Congress needs to act."
In a separate social media post, Sanders described Bezos' plan as "a declaration of war against the working class."
Sanders for months has been raising alarms about the impact of AI on the global working class and democracy itself.
In December, Sanders called upon the US to impose a nationwide moratorium on the construction of AI data centers, warning of a future envisioned by tech moguls such as Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who has said that humans won’t be needed "for most things" thanks to advancements in AI.
"Do you believe that these guys, these multibillionaires, are staying up at night, worrying about what AI and robotics will do to working families of our country and the world?" Sanders asked. "Well, I don’t think so.”
States that have criminalized abortion are "getting much more explicit" in pushing to prosecute women for obtaining abortion care, said one rights advocate.
A state judge in Georgia on Monday set a bail payment at just $1 for a woman who was charged with murder earlier this month after she took abortion pills to end a pregnancy—a charge about which Judge Steven G. Blackerby of State Superior Court expressed extreme skepticism.
“I think that charge is extremely problematic,” Blackerby said during a hearing that the woman, Alexia Moore, attended virtually. “That is going to be a hard charge to convict upon.”
District Attorney Keith Higgins, who is overseeing the case against Moore, also did not appear convinced that the 31-year-old should be imprisoned for the medication abortion she had last December. He told the judge that "whatever bond the defendant can make that will allow her to get out of jail is appropriate," and noted that police in Kingsland, Georgia had brought charges against Moore without his office's support.
Higgins said he was not ready to drop the murder charge altogether, but said he was also not prepared to present the case to a grand jury.
Moore had been in jail for about two weeks when the hearing took place. Investigators in Kingsland accused her of “unlawfully and with malice aforethought [causing] the death of Baby Girl Moore.” In addition to malice murder they charged her with possession of a controlled substance and a dangerous drug.
She was rushed to Southeast Georgia Health Center on December 30 after experiencing severe abdominal pain. Court records showed Moore told the medical staff she had taken about eight pills of misoprostol, a pill that can be used for medication abortion, and oxycodone for pain. She went into labor at the hospital and delivered a baby who was determined to be in the second trimester of development. The baby was declared dead about an hour after birth.
She said she had bought the medication online and believed herself to be less than 14 weeks pregnant.
The Kingsland Police Department did not specifically cite Georgia's six-week abortion ban—which the state Supreme Court has allowed to remain in effect despite a Superior Court ruling that permanently enjoined the ban and found it unconstitutional—but The New York Times reported that documents supporting the department's arrest warrant "echoed aspects of the ban, including saying that 'the baby was well beyond six weeks of conception.'"
The police said Moore was charged with murder because “the victim became a person at the moment of live birth.”
Higgins acknowledged in court that the malice murder charge may not meet "factual and merit" standards, and both Blackerby and Kelly Turner, Moore's defense attorney, noted that Georgia law prohibits the criminalization of someone who has induced an abortion on themself.
The Current, a Georgia-based outlet, also reported that "privacy issues" are likely to be scrutinized in court if the district attorney continues to pursue the case.
"A security guard at Southeast Georgia Health Center in St. Marys called police after medical staff said that Moore had ingested abortion medication and the infant was older than six weeks, according to police records, which also cited Moore’s previous abortion history," reported The Current.
Turner argued in court that Moore legally procured the misoprostol and noted that her blood tests and hospital records did not show Oxycodone in her system.
"Today’s decision is a reminder that justice is not served by accusation alone," said Don Plummer, press officer for the Georgia Public Defender Council, which is representing Moore.
Author and advocate Jessica Valenti of Abortion, Every Day emphasized after Moore's arrest that the murder charge shows how states that have criminalized abortion care are "getting much more explicit" about the anti-choice movement's desire to punish women for obtaining abortions—even though in the past, laws have typically avoided prosecuting them.
A 31-year-old in Georgia has been arrested and charged with murder for allegedly ending her pregnancy with abortion medication.
Here’s what we know: pic.twitter.com/EXAcMqEdak
— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) March 16, 2026
The district attorneys of Georgia's four largest counties pledged in 2019, after the passage of the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act, that they would not prosecute people who obtain abortions.
Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, women in states including Kentucky, Ohio, and South Carolina have faced charges for obtaining abortion care and for suffering pregnancy loss. An Ohio woman sued medical providers last year for conspiring with police to fabricate a criminal case against her; she had been charged with felony abuse of a corpse after having a miscarriage, but a grand jury declined to indict her.
"I really hope that people are paying attention to this," said Valenti of the attempt to bring charges against Moore. "They really are counting on us being too overwhelmed to act, so it's incredibly, incredibly important that we let them know we're paying attention."