The 200,000-member American Postal Workers Union reacted with outrage Tuesday to news that USPS management is moving ahead with a plan to consolidate 18 mail processing facilities as part of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy\u0026#039;s sweeping overhaul of delivery operations.Mark Dimondstein, the president of APWU, said in a statement that the union has \u0022made crystal clear to postal management that any further plant consolidations are a misguided strategy that not only disrupts the lives of postal workers but will further delay mail.\u0022\u0022APWU stands ready to defend the jobs and livelihoods of postal workers and the prompt, reliable, and efficient mail service the law requires and the people of the country deserve.\u0022 —American Postal Workers Union\u0022After a year of courageous and essential frontline work in this pandemic,\u0022 Dimondstein added, \u0022management\u0026#039;s actions are a slap in the face of postal workers.\u0022Months after his operational changes caused significant mail slowdowns and sparked nationwide backlash, DeJoy unveiled a 10-year strategy that Democratic lawmakers decried as a plan to further degrade USPS performance and ensure that the beloved government agency remains in a \u0022death spiral.\u0022Part of DeJoy\u0026#039;s plan includes restarting mail processing plant consolidations and closures that were halted in 2015 amid pushback from lawmakers, APWU, and others. As Eric Katz of Government Executive reported Tuesday, \u0022USPS is moving forward with its facility consolidations despite a 2018 inspector general report that found USPS realized just 5% of the $1.6 billion in savings it had projected from the consolidations.\u0022\u0022The agency successfully shuttered 141 plants in the first phase of its plan, but pulled the plug on its second phase to close an additional 82 plants when it was halfway through,\u0022 Katz noted. \u0022Lawmakers at the time pleaded with postal management to suspend the plan—which would have cost thousands of jobs and further reduced delivery standards—and USPS ultimately agreed.\u0022Calling the previous round of plant closures \u0022a complete failure,\u0022 Dimondstein vowed that \u0022we will fight back facility-by-facility and community-by-community to save these processing plants.\u0022In a statement announcing the new consolidations and other operational changes—including the continued removal of letter- and flat-sorting equipment—the Postal Service vowed that the moves \u0022will not result in employee layoffs.\u0022 But APWU was not remotely satisfied with that pledge.\u0022Management as of yet has not provided the union any impact statements on how these changes will affect the workforce, whether there is any planned excessing of employees, or whether some of these facilities will be \u0026#039;repurposed\u0026#039; to address the changing mail mix,\u0022 the organization said. \u0022APWU stands ready to defend the jobs and livelihoods of postal workers and the prompt, reliable, and efficient mail service the law requires and the people of the country deserve.\u0022\u0022After a year of courageous and essential frontline work in this pandemic, management’s actions are a slap in the face of postal workers.” #SaveThePostOffice https://t.co/1qQB7t7UIL— APWU National (@APWUnational) April 27, 2021DeJoy is pressing forward with his agenda as Democratic lawmakers continue to urge President Joe Biden to replace the entire Postal Service Board of Governors, a move that could pave the way for the postmaster general\u0026#039;s removal. The board, which has maintained its public support for DeJoy throughout his scandal-plagued 10 months in charge, is currently filled with officials nominated by former President Donald Trump.\u0022The entire board and then Mr. DeJoy should be handed their walking papers,\u0022 Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-N.J.) told the\u0026nbsp;Washington Post last week. \u0022Their unquestioning support for this postmaster general is unacceptable.\u0022But Biden, who does not have the authority to fire DeJoy on his own, has thus far resisted taking such a sweeping step, opting instead to advance nominees to fill the board\u0026#039;s three existing vacancies. Those nominees—two Democrats and one Independent—sat for their first confirmation hearing on April 22.