SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rallygoers deliver the "Count Every Vote" message in the wake of the presidential election results on November 07, 2020 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Photo by Daniel Boczarski/Getty Images for MoveOn)
'Unreasonable in the Extreme': Wisconsin Supreme Court Rejects Yet Another Trump Attempt to Undo Biden Victory
The state's high court dismissed the Trump campaign's challenge as "meritless on its face."
Dec 13, 2020
President Donald Trump's flailing effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory suffered yet another body blow on Monday as the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected his campaign's legal challenge in the key battleground state.
Finding Trump's claim of over 220,000 unlawfully cast ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties--which Biden carried by margins of 52.6 and 39.9 points respectively--"meritless on its face," Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote (pdf) for the 4-3 majority that "striking these votes now--after the election, and in only two of Wisconsin's 72 counties when the disputed practices were followed by hundreds of thousands of absentee voters statewide--would be an extraordinary step for this court to take."
"The [Trump] campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable in the extreme, and the resulting prejudice to the election officials, other candidates, voters of the affected counties, and to voters statewide, is obvious and immense," Hagedorn wrote. The justice continued:
Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration. The challenges raised by the [Trump] campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.
Election claims of this type must be brought expeditiously. The campaign waited until after the election to raise selective challenges that could have been raised long before the election. We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.
In her dissent, Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack sided with Trump and asserted that "it is critical that the public perceive that the election was fairly conducted."
However, Roggensack did not address the reasons why millions of Americans believe the election was "rigged" or "stolen," which include incessant lies and disinformation from not only right-wing media and pundits but from prominent Republicans including the president himself.
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports Monday's loss was the fourth time in the past two weeks that the state justices ruled against the president's campaign, which spent $3 millon on a recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties that ended with Biden enjoying an even larger lead than before.
Trump has now lost all but one of his 60 legal challenges in his increasingly desperate bid to reverse the will of the American people--over seven million more of whom voted for Biden than for him. Biden also won the Electoral College by 74 votes, 306-232. Trump, who defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by the exact same Electoral College score in 2016, called his own margin of victory a "landslide" at the time.
The president's latest defeat came as members of the Electoral College were meeting or preparing to meet Monday in state capitals nationwide to cast their ballots to officially elect Joe Biden as the 46th president of the United States.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's flailing effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory suffered yet another body blow on Monday as the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected his campaign's legal challenge in the key battleground state.
Finding Trump's claim of over 220,000 unlawfully cast ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties--which Biden carried by margins of 52.6 and 39.9 points respectively--"meritless on its face," Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote (pdf) for the 4-3 majority that "striking these votes now--after the election, and in only two of Wisconsin's 72 counties when the disputed practices were followed by hundreds of thousands of absentee voters statewide--would be an extraordinary step for this court to take."
"The [Trump] campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable in the extreme, and the resulting prejudice to the election officials, other candidates, voters of the affected counties, and to voters statewide, is obvious and immense," Hagedorn wrote. The justice continued:
Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration. The challenges raised by the [Trump] campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.
Election claims of this type must be brought expeditiously. The campaign waited until after the election to raise selective challenges that could have been raised long before the election. We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.
In her dissent, Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack sided with Trump and asserted that "it is critical that the public perceive that the election was fairly conducted."
However, Roggensack did not address the reasons why millions of Americans believe the election was "rigged" or "stolen," which include incessant lies and disinformation from not only right-wing media and pundits but from prominent Republicans including the president himself.
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports Monday's loss was the fourth time in the past two weeks that the state justices ruled against the president's campaign, which spent $3 millon on a recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties that ended with Biden enjoying an even larger lead than before.
Trump has now lost all but one of his 60 legal challenges in his increasingly desperate bid to reverse the will of the American people--over seven million more of whom voted for Biden than for him. Biden also won the Electoral College by 74 votes, 306-232. Trump, who defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by the exact same Electoral College score in 2016, called his own margin of victory a "landslide" at the time.
The president's latest defeat came as members of the Electoral College were meeting or preparing to meet Monday in state capitals nationwide to cast their ballots to officially elect Joe Biden as the 46th president of the United States.
President Donald Trump's flailing effort to undo President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory suffered yet another body blow on Monday as the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected his campaign's legal challenge in the key battleground state.
Finding Trump's claim of over 220,000 unlawfully cast ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties--which Biden carried by margins of 52.6 and 39.9 points respectively--"meritless on its face," Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote (pdf) for the 4-3 majority that "striking these votes now--after the election, and in only two of Wisconsin's 72 counties when the disputed practices were followed by hundreds of thousands of absentee voters statewide--would be an extraordinary step for this court to take."
"The [Trump] campaign's delay in raising these issues was unreasonable in the extreme, and the resulting prejudice to the election officials, other candidates, voters of the affected counties, and to voters statewide, is obvious and immense," Hagedorn wrote. The justice continued:
Our laws allow the challenge flag to be thrown regarding various aspects of election administration. The challenges raised by the [Trump] campaign in this case, however, come long after the last play or even the last game; the campaign is challenging the rulebook adopted before the season began.
Election claims of this type must be brought expeditiously. The campaign waited until after the election to raise selective challenges that could have been raised long before the election. We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.
In her dissent, Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack sided with Trump and asserted that "it is critical that the public perceive that the election was fairly conducted."
However, Roggensack did not address the reasons why millions of Americans believe the election was "rigged" or "stolen," which include incessant lies and disinformation from not only right-wing media and pundits but from prominent Republicans including the president himself.
The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports Monday's loss was the fourth time in the past two weeks that the state justices ruled against the president's campaign, which spent $3 millon on a recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties that ended with Biden enjoying an even larger lead than before.
Trump has now lost all but one of his 60 legal challenges in his increasingly desperate bid to reverse the will of the American people--over seven million more of whom voted for Biden than for him. Biden also won the Electoral College by 74 votes, 306-232. Trump, who defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by the exact same Electoral College score in 2016, called his own margin of victory a "landslide" at the time.
The president's latest defeat came as members of the Electoral College were meeting or preparing to meet Monday in state capitals nationwide to cast their ballots to officially elect Joe Biden as the 46th president of the United States.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.