President Donald Trump and Attorney General William Barr step off Air Force One upon arrival at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on September 1, 2020. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)
Sep 25, 2020
The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday published, abruptly removed, then re-posted a revised version of what was described as a highly unusual press release announcing an inquiry into nine "discarded" military ballots in Pennsylvania, seven of which were purportedly cast for President Donald Trump.
Observers were immediately suspicious of the Justice Department's statement given President Donald Trump's ongoing assault on the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, which he has described as a "scam" and falsely claimed are uniquely susceptible to fraud. Attorney General William Barr has also baselessly attacked voting by mail in recent weeks.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas. It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
--Walter Shaub
On Thursday afternoon, the DOJ issued a press release attributed to David Freed, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, claiming that "FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police" recovered nine military ballots and said all of the "discarded" ballots were cast for Trump.
Shortly after the initial statement went viral on Twitter and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany touted the announcement, the Justice Department deleted the original release and posted an edited version that claims seven of the nine discarded ballots were cast for Trump and "two of the discarded ballots had been resealed inside their appropriate envelopes," leaving their contents unknown.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas," tweeted Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics. "It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
In addition to the statement on the probe, the Justice Department also publicized a letter Freed sent to the director of elections in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania offering further specific details of the investigation, which Freed said was launched at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, a Republican. Trump won the Pennsylvania county by nearly 20 points in 2016.
David Levine, elections integrity fellow at the watchdog group Alliance for Security Democracy, said the DOJ's decision to make public statements--one of which contained false information--about an incomplete investigation so close to the election "is risky at best and dangerous at worst."
As NBC Newsreported late Thursday, "Both statements were highly unusual as U.S. Attorneys typically do not publicly announce they've opened an inquiry. The U.S. Attorney's office declined to give further comment about the probe, except to say the general election ballots were improperly opened by county staff."
\u201cDOJ political gamery..DOJ doesn\u2019t announce this kind of investigation. It certainly doesn\u2019t announce whom ballots were cast for, since that should be immaterial in a voting rts investigation. And then the revision that this is over 7 (not 9) ballots that didn\u2019t alter outcome? \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Vanita Gupta (@Vanita Gupta) 1600994742
Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Justice Department's decision to release the statement "sure looks like an effort to feed a bogus narrative about ballot fraud." The press release came on the same day FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to the Senate that he has seen no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
"This seems like a hugely important story," said Sanchez. "Not because nine ballots got thrown out, almost certainly by accident, but because it suggests DOJ is now an active participant in Trump's effort to undermine the integrity of the presidential election."
Speaking to reporters Thursday before departing to Charlotte, North Carolina, Trump said that "they found, I understand, eight ballots in a waste paper basket in some location"--an apparent reference to the Pennsylvania story.
"And they found--it was reported in one of the newspapers that they found a lot of ballots in a river," Trump said, without offering any specifics on the story. "They throw them out if they have the name 'Trump' on it, I guess."
When a reporter responded that the ballots supposedly found in a river "had no names on them," Trump said, "Okay, well, they still found them in a river, whether they had a name on it or not."
\u201cTRUMP: The ballots -- that's a whole big scam. They found 8 ballots in a waste basket, others in a river. They throw 'em out if they have the name Trump on them.\n\nREPORTER: There were no names on them\n\nTRUMP: Well, they still found them in a river.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1600976014
The president went on to suggest once again that he may not accept the results of the November election, claiming he is "not sure" the contest can be "honest"--remarks that came just 24 hours after Trump refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Take him literally and seriously," New York Times contributor Wajahat Ali tweeted in response to the president's comments. "He has literally told you how he will cheat and contest the election if he loses."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday published, abruptly removed, then re-posted a revised version of what was described as a highly unusual press release announcing an inquiry into nine "discarded" military ballots in Pennsylvania, seven of which were purportedly cast for President Donald Trump.
Observers were immediately suspicious of the Justice Department's statement given President Donald Trump's ongoing assault on the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, which he has described as a "scam" and falsely claimed are uniquely susceptible to fraud. Attorney General William Barr has also baselessly attacked voting by mail in recent weeks.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas. It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
--Walter Shaub
On Thursday afternoon, the DOJ issued a press release attributed to David Freed, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, claiming that "FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police" recovered nine military ballots and said all of the "discarded" ballots were cast for Trump.
Shortly after the initial statement went viral on Twitter and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany touted the announcement, the Justice Department deleted the original release and posted an edited version that claims seven of the nine discarded ballots were cast for Trump and "two of the discarded ballots had been resealed inside their appropriate envelopes," leaving their contents unknown.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas," tweeted Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics. "It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
In addition to the statement on the probe, the Justice Department also publicized a letter Freed sent to the director of elections in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania offering further specific details of the investigation, which Freed said was launched at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, a Republican. Trump won the Pennsylvania county by nearly 20 points in 2016.
David Levine, elections integrity fellow at the watchdog group Alliance for Security Democracy, said the DOJ's decision to make public statements--one of which contained false information--about an incomplete investigation so close to the election "is risky at best and dangerous at worst."
As NBC Newsreported late Thursday, "Both statements were highly unusual as U.S. Attorneys typically do not publicly announce they've opened an inquiry. The U.S. Attorney's office declined to give further comment about the probe, except to say the general election ballots were improperly opened by county staff."
\u201cDOJ political gamery..DOJ doesn\u2019t announce this kind of investigation. It certainly doesn\u2019t announce whom ballots were cast for, since that should be immaterial in a voting rts investigation. And then the revision that this is over 7 (not 9) ballots that didn\u2019t alter outcome? \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Vanita Gupta (@Vanita Gupta) 1600994742
Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Justice Department's decision to release the statement "sure looks like an effort to feed a bogus narrative about ballot fraud." The press release came on the same day FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to the Senate that he has seen no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
"This seems like a hugely important story," said Sanchez. "Not because nine ballots got thrown out, almost certainly by accident, but because it suggests DOJ is now an active participant in Trump's effort to undermine the integrity of the presidential election."
Speaking to reporters Thursday before departing to Charlotte, North Carolina, Trump said that "they found, I understand, eight ballots in a waste paper basket in some location"--an apparent reference to the Pennsylvania story.
"And they found--it was reported in one of the newspapers that they found a lot of ballots in a river," Trump said, without offering any specifics on the story. "They throw them out if they have the name 'Trump' on it, I guess."
When a reporter responded that the ballots supposedly found in a river "had no names on them," Trump said, "Okay, well, they still found them in a river, whether they had a name on it or not."
\u201cTRUMP: The ballots -- that's a whole big scam. They found 8 ballots in a waste basket, others in a river. They throw 'em out if they have the name Trump on them.\n\nREPORTER: There were no names on them\n\nTRUMP: Well, they still found them in a river.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1600976014
The president went on to suggest once again that he may not accept the results of the November election, claiming he is "not sure" the contest can be "honest"--remarks that came just 24 hours after Trump refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Take him literally and seriously," New York Times contributor Wajahat Ali tweeted in response to the president's comments. "He has literally told you how he will cheat and contest the election if he loses."
The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday published, abruptly removed, then re-posted a revised version of what was described as a highly unusual press release announcing an inquiry into nine "discarded" military ballots in Pennsylvania, seven of which were purportedly cast for President Donald Trump.
Observers were immediately suspicious of the Justice Department's statement given President Donald Trump's ongoing assault on the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, which he has described as a "scam" and falsely claimed are uniquely susceptible to fraud. Attorney General William Barr has also baselessly attacked voting by mail in recent weeks.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas. It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
--Walter Shaub
On Thursday afternoon, the DOJ issued a press release attributed to David Freed, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, claiming that "FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police" recovered nine military ballots and said all of the "discarded" ballots were cast for Trump.
Shortly after the initial statement went viral on Twitter and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany touted the announcement, the Justice Department deleted the original release and posted an edited version that claims seven of the nine discarded ballots were cast for Trump and "two of the discarded ballots had been resealed inside their appropriate envelopes," leaving their contents unknown.
"This statement by a U.S. Attorney is bananas," tweeted Walter Shaub, former head of the Office of Government Ethics. "It talks about an ongoing investigation, and it reveals the candidates named on ballots. I'm still processing all of the levels on which this is wildly inappropriate."
In addition to the statement on the probe, the Justice Department also publicized a letter Freed sent to the director of elections in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania offering further specific details of the investigation, which Freed said was launched at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, a Republican. Trump won the Pennsylvania county by nearly 20 points in 2016.
David Levine, elections integrity fellow at the watchdog group Alliance for Security Democracy, said the DOJ's decision to make public statements--one of which contained false information--about an incomplete investigation so close to the election "is risky at best and dangerous at worst."
As NBC Newsreported late Thursday, "Both statements were highly unusual as U.S. Attorneys typically do not publicly announce they've opened an inquiry. The U.S. Attorney's office declined to give further comment about the probe, except to say the general election ballots were improperly opened by county staff."
\u201cDOJ political gamery..DOJ doesn\u2019t announce this kind of investigation. It certainly doesn\u2019t announce whom ballots were cast for, since that should be immaterial in a voting rts investigation. And then the revision that this is over 7 (not 9) ballots that didn\u2019t alter outcome? \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Vanita Gupta (@Vanita Gupta) 1600994742
Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Justice Department's decision to release the statement "sure looks like an effort to feed a bogus narrative about ballot fraud." The press release came on the same day FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to the Senate that he has seen no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
"This seems like a hugely important story," said Sanchez. "Not because nine ballots got thrown out, almost certainly by accident, but because it suggests DOJ is now an active participant in Trump's effort to undermine the integrity of the presidential election."
Speaking to reporters Thursday before departing to Charlotte, North Carolina, Trump said that "they found, I understand, eight ballots in a waste paper basket in some location"--an apparent reference to the Pennsylvania story.
"And they found--it was reported in one of the newspapers that they found a lot of ballots in a river," Trump said, without offering any specifics on the story. "They throw them out if they have the name 'Trump' on it, I guess."
When a reporter responded that the ballots supposedly found in a river "had no names on them," Trump said, "Okay, well, they still found them in a river, whether they had a name on it or not."
\u201cTRUMP: The ballots -- that's a whole big scam. They found 8 ballots in a waste basket, others in a river. They throw 'em out if they have the name Trump on them.\n\nREPORTER: There were no names on them\n\nTRUMP: Well, they still found them in a river.\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1600976014
The president went on to suggest once again that he may not accept the results of the November election, claiming he is "not sure" the contest can be "honest"--remarks that came just 24 hours after Trump refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Take him literally and seriously," New York Times contributor Wajahat Ali tweeted in response to the president's comments. "He has literally told you how he will cheat and contest the election if he loses."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.