Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning refused to answer questions at a grand jury hearing this week, and said she would accept the consequences. (Photo: AP/Dannis Van Tine)
Mar 06, 2019
Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning expressed no regrets Thursday when she revealed that she faces a contempt hearing-- and possible jail time--after declining to answer a grand jury's questions.
Manning appeared before a grand jury Wednesday after being subpoenaed, apparently to discuss her 2010 disclosure of government and military documents about the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to Wikileaks.
The subpoena came about three months after federal prosecutors in Virginia's Eastern District, where the former Army intelligence analyst was called to testify, inadvertently revealed that they had filed sealed charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
She said after the hearing that she had been offered immunity in exchange for testifying, but that she instead had answered each question with the following statement:
I object to the question and refuse to answer on the grounds that the question is in violation of my First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment, and other statutory rights.
"In solidarity with many activists facing the odds, I will stand by my principles," Manning said after the hearing. "I will exhaust every legal remedy available. My legal team continues to challenge the secrecy of these proceedings, and I am prepared to face the consequences of my refusal."
\u201ctomorrow i\u2019m facing a sealed contempt hearing for refusing to testify at a secret grand jury over my 2010 disclosures\n\nstatement:\u201d— Chelsea E. Manning (@Chelsea E. Manning) 1551980826
Manning said the grand jury questioned her about her disclosure to Wikileaks, which was also the focus of her questioning in 2013 when she was court-martialed. Manning was convicted and sentenced to 35 years in prison for her disclosure--which helped expose war crimes by the U.S.--but her sentence was commuted in 2017 by President Barack Obama.
The whistleblower now faces a contempt trial on Friday. She acknowledged as much in her statement, saying that, "The court may find me in contempt, and order me to jail."
Supporters of Manning applauded her steadfast refusal to help prosecutors to incriminate her and convict Assange and denounced the secretive grand jury hearing and the U.S. government's continued efforts to punish her.
\u201cChelsea Manning has suffered enough. Grand Juries are frequently used as a tool for silencing dissent. This must stop. #LeaveChelseaAlone\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1551984897
\u201cIt is beyond comprehension to me that Chelsea Manning could end up in a cage, again.\u201d— Melissa Gira Grant (@Melissa Gira Grant) 1551982896
\u201cOne of the bravest & most principled people continues to be @xychelsea. And it remains remarkable that the Trump DOJ is clearly trying to prosecute WL & Assange for publishing pre-2016 documents - what even the anti-press Obama DOJ said would threaten press freedom - & few care:\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1551995294
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning expressed no regrets Thursday when she revealed that she faces a contempt hearing-- and possible jail time--after declining to answer a grand jury's questions.
Manning appeared before a grand jury Wednesday after being subpoenaed, apparently to discuss her 2010 disclosure of government and military documents about the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to Wikileaks.
The subpoena came about three months after federal prosecutors in Virginia's Eastern District, where the former Army intelligence analyst was called to testify, inadvertently revealed that they had filed sealed charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
She said after the hearing that she had been offered immunity in exchange for testifying, but that she instead had answered each question with the following statement:
I object to the question and refuse to answer on the grounds that the question is in violation of my First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment, and other statutory rights.
"In solidarity with many activists facing the odds, I will stand by my principles," Manning said after the hearing. "I will exhaust every legal remedy available. My legal team continues to challenge the secrecy of these proceedings, and I am prepared to face the consequences of my refusal."
\u201ctomorrow i\u2019m facing a sealed contempt hearing for refusing to testify at a secret grand jury over my 2010 disclosures\n\nstatement:\u201d— Chelsea E. Manning (@Chelsea E. Manning) 1551980826
Manning said the grand jury questioned her about her disclosure to Wikileaks, which was also the focus of her questioning in 2013 when she was court-martialed. Manning was convicted and sentenced to 35 years in prison for her disclosure--which helped expose war crimes by the U.S.--but her sentence was commuted in 2017 by President Barack Obama.
The whistleblower now faces a contempt trial on Friday. She acknowledged as much in her statement, saying that, "The court may find me in contempt, and order me to jail."
Supporters of Manning applauded her steadfast refusal to help prosecutors to incriminate her and convict Assange and denounced the secretive grand jury hearing and the U.S. government's continued efforts to punish her.
\u201cChelsea Manning has suffered enough. Grand Juries are frequently used as a tool for silencing dissent. This must stop. #LeaveChelseaAlone\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1551984897
\u201cIt is beyond comprehension to me that Chelsea Manning could end up in a cage, again.\u201d— Melissa Gira Grant (@Melissa Gira Grant) 1551982896
\u201cOne of the bravest & most principled people continues to be @xychelsea. And it remains remarkable that the Trump DOJ is clearly trying to prosecute WL & Assange for publishing pre-2016 documents - what even the anti-press Obama DOJ said would threaten press freedom - & few care:\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1551995294
Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning expressed no regrets Thursday when she revealed that she faces a contempt hearing-- and possible jail time--after declining to answer a grand jury's questions.
Manning appeared before a grand jury Wednesday after being subpoenaed, apparently to discuss her 2010 disclosure of government and military documents about the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to Wikileaks.
The subpoena came about three months after federal prosecutors in Virginia's Eastern District, where the former Army intelligence analyst was called to testify, inadvertently revealed that they had filed sealed charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
She said after the hearing that she had been offered immunity in exchange for testifying, but that she instead had answered each question with the following statement:
I object to the question and refuse to answer on the grounds that the question is in violation of my First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendment, and other statutory rights.
"In solidarity with many activists facing the odds, I will stand by my principles," Manning said after the hearing. "I will exhaust every legal remedy available. My legal team continues to challenge the secrecy of these proceedings, and I am prepared to face the consequences of my refusal."
\u201ctomorrow i\u2019m facing a sealed contempt hearing for refusing to testify at a secret grand jury over my 2010 disclosures\n\nstatement:\u201d— Chelsea E. Manning (@Chelsea E. Manning) 1551980826
Manning said the grand jury questioned her about her disclosure to Wikileaks, which was also the focus of her questioning in 2013 when she was court-martialed. Manning was convicted and sentenced to 35 years in prison for her disclosure--which helped expose war crimes by the U.S.--but her sentence was commuted in 2017 by President Barack Obama.
The whistleblower now faces a contempt trial on Friday. She acknowledged as much in her statement, saying that, "The court may find me in contempt, and order me to jail."
Supporters of Manning applauded her steadfast refusal to help prosecutors to incriminate her and convict Assange and denounced the secretive grand jury hearing and the U.S. government's continued efforts to punish her.
\u201cChelsea Manning has suffered enough. Grand Juries are frequently used as a tool for silencing dissent. This must stop. #LeaveChelseaAlone\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1551984897
\u201cIt is beyond comprehension to me that Chelsea Manning could end up in a cage, again.\u201d— Melissa Gira Grant (@Melissa Gira Grant) 1551982896
\u201cOne of the bravest & most principled people continues to be @xychelsea. And it remains remarkable that the Trump DOJ is clearly trying to prosecute WL & Assange for publishing pre-2016 documents - what even the anti-press Obama DOJ said would threaten press freedom - & few care:\u201d— Glenn Greenwald (@Glenn Greenwald) 1551995294
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.