Boris Johnson was forced to ask for another Brexit extension. (Photo: Michael Kappeler/Picture Alliance/Getty Images)
Oct 26, 2019
A popular anecdote is currently doing the rounds on Twitter:
"The year is 2192. The British Prime Minister visits Brussels to ask for an extension of the Brexit deadline. No one remembers where this tradition originated, but every year it attracts many tourists from all over the world."
It may be a joke, but it expresses something of the helplessness of the current Brexit gridlock, which has no end in sight. With Parliament passing a motion to delay the vote on Boris Johnson's recently negotiated Brexit deal to allow proper scrutiny and debate, and the E.U. considering whether or not to grant an extension to the negotiation period, we seem no closer to a Brexit date than we were three years ago.
The EU looks set to grant a further extension to the negotiation period, as Boris Johnson was forced by parliament to write a letter asking for a further delay last week. It's not clear however how long for, although at the moment the likelihood is it will be till the end of January, according to European Council President Donald Tusk. Tusk is reported to have phoned the leaders of the 27 member states this week to ask their thoughts on giving a further extension and also to establish whether they would be happy ratifying such an extension without coming to Brussels (as is normally required). So far, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar has endorsed Tusk's proposal, with doubts only being expressed about view of France's President Macron, who in the past has indicated he would not support a further extension. In any case it seems that critical to the E.U.'s decision will be whether or not the U.K. government can explain a reason for delaying Brexit further, and given the fact that Johnson himself does not want an extension, it's not clear whether such information will be provided to the E.U.
We're somehow getting used now to the dual narrative coming out Number 10; for months the Prime Minister has said he wanted a Brexit deal with the E.U., but all other indications suggested he was holding out for a No Deal Brexit on 31st October. Even as recently as Wednesday, despite having negotiated a deal with the E.U., and likely to be gifted an extension, he stated that he still wanted the UK to leave the E.U. on 31st October. However Johnson has now been forced to abandon this idea once and for all; writing to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn on Thursday night to say he would give parliament one last opportunity to examine his withdrawal agreement bill and 'get Brexit done' by 6th November. In exchange for this he is tabling a motion under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act for Monday which will ask for a general election. Such a motion requires the backing of two-thirds of MPs--434 altogether.
In his letter to Corbyn, the PM wrote: 'An election on 12th December will allow a new parliament and government to be in place by Christmas. If I win a majority in this election, we will then ratify the great new deal that I have negotiated, get Brexit done in January and the country will move on'. However, although he may get the support of the Scottish Nationalists for this, both the Labour opposition and Liberal Democrats have indicated they will not support such an election until the E.U. has given its verdict on an extension. But Labour have said they won't make any final decision till the EU have said whether they will grant an extension and it's been reported Labour MPs have been instructed either to abstain from Monday's general election vote or vote against it.
As yet, the E.U. have not announced their verdict on granting an extension, and there is no evidence that they will be speedy in delivering their response. According to The Guardian, sources said the French government wants to see the outcome of Monday's vote before deciding whether to allow a further delay, reportedly because they don't want to be seen to influence U.K. politics. On Friday it was reported that Michel Barnier said they would grant an extension, but so far the E.U. has not confirmed how long for. It has to be said the organisation has been extremely long-suffering in what has been 3 years of stalemate and fruitless talks. Nevertheless, it's clear that patience is running thin with the U.K.'s indecisiveness. Last week, President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker said Brexit was a 'waste of time and energy' as he expressed regret for how much time he had spent on it. Such Brexit fatigue will only play into Boris Johnson's hands as we head towards a general election...
There are also a number of falsehoods being spun at present which muddy the waters even further. Boris Johnson has repeatedly said his withdrawal deal has been 'passed by parliament' when in fact it hasn't--it's only just passed its second reading. This is not the first time Johnson has been creative with the truth since he came to office, and while his motivation may be to boost the government's position, it has the effect of sowing further mistrust in the Prime Minister and his cabinet. However, Labour MPs are also not blameless, as they continue to repeat that they will not vote for a general election till 'No Deal' is taken off the table. Indeed they must know that in order for No Deal to be ruled out, a general election would have to be called.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A popular anecdote is currently doing the rounds on Twitter:
"The year is 2192. The British Prime Minister visits Brussels to ask for an extension of the Brexit deadline. No one remembers where this tradition originated, but every year it attracts many tourists from all over the world."
It may be a joke, but it expresses something of the helplessness of the current Brexit gridlock, which has no end in sight. With Parliament passing a motion to delay the vote on Boris Johnson's recently negotiated Brexit deal to allow proper scrutiny and debate, and the E.U. considering whether or not to grant an extension to the negotiation period, we seem no closer to a Brexit date than we were three years ago.
The EU looks set to grant a further extension to the negotiation period, as Boris Johnson was forced by parliament to write a letter asking for a further delay last week. It's not clear however how long for, although at the moment the likelihood is it will be till the end of January, according to European Council President Donald Tusk. Tusk is reported to have phoned the leaders of the 27 member states this week to ask their thoughts on giving a further extension and also to establish whether they would be happy ratifying such an extension without coming to Brussels (as is normally required). So far, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar has endorsed Tusk's proposal, with doubts only being expressed about view of France's President Macron, who in the past has indicated he would not support a further extension. In any case it seems that critical to the E.U.'s decision will be whether or not the U.K. government can explain a reason for delaying Brexit further, and given the fact that Johnson himself does not want an extension, it's not clear whether such information will be provided to the E.U.
We're somehow getting used now to the dual narrative coming out Number 10; for months the Prime Minister has said he wanted a Brexit deal with the E.U., but all other indications suggested he was holding out for a No Deal Brexit on 31st October. Even as recently as Wednesday, despite having negotiated a deal with the E.U., and likely to be gifted an extension, he stated that he still wanted the UK to leave the E.U. on 31st October. However Johnson has now been forced to abandon this idea once and for all; writing to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn on Thursday night to say he would give parliament one last opportunity to examine his withdrawal agreement bill and 'get Brexit done' by 6th November. In exchange for this he is tabling a motion under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act for Monday which will ask for a general election. Such a motion requires the backing of two-thirds of MPs--434 altogether.
In his letter to Corbyn, the PM wrote: 'An election on 12th December will allow a new parliament and government to be in place by Christmas. If I win a majority in this election, we will then ratify the great new deal that I have negotiated, get Brexit done in January and the country will move on'. However, although he may get the support of the Scottish Nationalists for this, both the Labour opposition and Liberal Democrats have indicated they will not support such an election until the E.U. has given its verdict on an extension. But Labour have said they won't make any final decision till the EU have said whether they will grant an extension and it's been reported Labour MPs have been instructed either to abstain from Monday's general election vote or vote against it.
As yet, the E.U. have not announced their verdict on granting an extension, and there is no evidence that they will be speedy in delivering their response. According to The Guardian, sources said the French government wants to see the outcome of Monday's vote before deciding whether to allow a further delay, reportedly because they don't want to be seen to influence U.K. politics. On Friday it was reported that Michel Barnier said they would grant an extension, but so far the E.U. has not confirmed how long for. It has to be said the organisation has been extremely long-suffering in what has been 3 years of stalemate and fruitless talks. Nevertheless, it's clear that patience is running thin with the U.K.'s indecisiveness. Last week, President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker said Brexit was a 'waste of time and energy' as he expressed regret for how much time he had spent on it. Such Brexit fatigue will only play into Boris Johnson's hands as we head towards a general election...
There are also a number of falsehoods being spun at present which muddy the waters even further. Boris Johnson has repeatedly said his withdrawal deal has been 'passed by parliament' when in fact it hasn't--it's only just passed its second reading. This is not the first time Johnson has been creative with the truth since he came to office, and while his motivation may be to boost the government's position, it has the effect of sowing further mistrust in the Prime Minister and his cabinet. However, Labour MPs are also not blameless, as they continue to repeat that they will not vote for a general election till 'No Deal' is taken off the table. Indeed they must know that in order for No Deal to be ruled out, a general election would have to be called.
A popular anecdote is currently doing the rounds on Twitter:
"The year is 2192. The British Prime Minister visits Brussels to ask for an extension of the Brexit deadline. No one remembers where this tradition originated, but every year it attracts many tourists from all over the world."
It may be a joke, but it expresses something of the helplessness of the current Brexit gridlock, which has no end in sight. With Parliament passing a motion to delay the vote on Boris Johnson's recently negotiated Brexit deal to allow proper scrutiny and debate, and the E.U. considering whether or not to grant an extension to the negotiation period, we seem no closer to a Brexit date than we were three years ago.
The EU looks set to grant a further extension to the negotiation period, as Boris Johnson was forced by parliament to write a letter asking for a further delay last week. It's not clear however how long for, although at the moment the likelihood is it will be till the end of January, according to European Council President Donald Tusk. Tusk is reported to have phoned the leaders of the 27 member states this week to ask their thoughts on giving a further extension and also to establish whether they would be happy ratifying such an extension without coming to Brussels (as is normally required). So far, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar has endorsed Tusk's proposal, with doubts only being expressed about view of France's President Macron, who in the past has indicated he would not support a further extension. In any case it seems that critical to the E.U.'s decision will be whether or not the U.K. government can explain a reason for delaying Brexit further, and given the fact that Johnson himself does not want an extension, it's not clear whether such information will be provided to the E.U.
We're somehow getting used now to the dual narrative coming out Number 10; for months the Prime Minister has said he wanted a Brexit deal with the E.U., but all other indications suggested he was holding out for a No Deal Brexit on 31st October. Even as recently as Wednesday, despite having negotiated a deal with the E.U., and likely to be gifted an extension, he stated that he still wanted the UK to leave the E.U. on 31st October. However Johnson has now been forced to abandon this idea once and for all; writing to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn on Thursday night to say he would give parliament one last opportunity to examine his withdrawal agreement bill and 'get Brexit done' by 6th November. In exchange for this he is tabling a motion under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act for Monday which will ask for a general election. Such a motion requires the backing of two-thirds of MPs--434 altogether.
In his letter to Corbyn, the PM wrote: 'An election on 12th December will allow a new parliament and government to be in place by Christmas. If I win a majority in this election, we will then ratify the great new deal that I have negotiated, get Brexit done in January and the country will move on'. However, although he may get the support of the Scottish Nationalists for this, both the Labour opposition and Liberal Democrats have indicated they will not support such an election until the E.U. has given its verdict on an extension. But Labour have said they won't make any final decision till the EU have said whether they will grant an extension and it's been reported Labour MPs have been instructed either to abstain from Monday's general election vote or vote against it.
As yet, the E.U. have not announced their verdict on granting an extension, and there is no evidence that they will be speedy in delivering their response. According to The Guardian, sources said the French government wants to see the outcome of Monday's vote before deciding whether to allow a further delay, reportedly because they don't want to be seen to influence U.K. politics. On Friday it was reported that Michel Barnier said they would grant an extension, but so far the E.U. has not confirmed how long for. It has to be said the organisation has been extremely long-suffering in what has been 3 years of stalemate and fruitless talks. Nevertheless, it's clear that patience is running thin with the U.K.'s indecisiveness. Last week, President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker said Brexit was a 'waste of time and energy' as he expressed regret for how much time he had spent on it. Such Brexit fatigue will only play into Boris Johnson's hands as we head towards a general election...
There are also a number of falsehoods being spun at present which muddy the waters even further. Boris Johnson has repeatedly said his withdrawal deal has been 'passed by parliament' when in fact it hasn't--it's only just passed its second reading. This is not the first time Johnson has been creative with the truth since he came to office, and while his motivation may be to boost the government's position, it has the effect of sowing further mistrust in the Prime Minister and his cabinet. However, Labour MPs are also not blameless, as they continue to repeat that they will not vote for a general election till 'No Deal' is taken off the table. Indeed they must know that in order for No Deal to be ruled out, a general election would have to be called.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.