

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Without independent media we are doomed. Just read the corporate press under Trump to find out why.
The Trump administration has proceeded, and is proceeding, at a furious pace to employ executive power attack and undermine central pillars of American democracy, rendering a system already threadbare and fragile even more weakened.
This past week’s deployment of National Guard troops, and then U.S. Marines, on the streets of Los Angeles, in defiance of California Governor Gavin Newsome and LA Mayor Karen Bass, is but the latest example.
Tomorrow—Saturday, June 14—the administration is planning an enormous military parade on the streets of Washington, D.C., to celebrate “Flag Day,” the U.S. Army, and especially to celebrate Trump and his birthday.
As I argued this week in The Bulwark, the entire spectacle rests on historical fiction, and is designed to celebrate neither the army nor the republic, but Trump himself. It symbolizes an arrogation of authoritarian power that borders on monarchism—which is why activists across the country have billed the day as “No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance.”
The Washington Post ran a new article Wednesday on Trump’s planned celebration entitled “Trump’s White House opens door to historic military deployment on U.S. soil.” The headline itself immediately gives one pause, because Trump already opened this door earlier this week, not with a parade but with the actual deployment of armed soldiers to quell protests and detain protesters.
But even more concerning is this passage: “’This kind of thing doesn’t happen in democracies, and it’s becoming a routine part of our politics,” said Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard University, who has long warned that Trump poses a threat to American democracy. (Federal campaign finance records show that a person named Steven Levitsky who works at Harvard has made small campaign donations to Democratic candidates.)”
Two things are remarkable about this passage.
The first is that what Levitsky says is straightforward and incontrovertibly true—and he should know, since he is a renowned expert who has published best-selling books on the topic with co-authors Daniel Ziblatt and Lucan Way, which is presumably why the WaPo reported sought his quote.
The second is the parenthetical insert at the end, which can have only one purpose, and which almost certainly was inserted by editors—to weaken the credibility of the quoted expert, by implying that he is biased, and to bolster the favorability of the newspaper with the White House, by demonstrating that it investigates the tax records of the liberals it quotes and properly reports results if it quotes them.
This is not an isolated instance.
Last week the Post published another article, entitled “The 9-11 presidency: Trump flexes emergency powers in his second term.” Here the reporter quotes Ilya Somin, a prominent libertarian legal scholar: “’What’s notable about Trump is the enormous scale and extent, which is greater than under any modern president,’ said Ilya Somin, who is representing five U.S. businesses who sued the administration . . . “
Read that again.
While in Levitsky’s case the irrelevant and diminishing information is placed in parentheses, in Somin’s case it is included directly in the text, as if it is actually part of the news report.
This sort of thing is a very recent development, and it actually makes Levitsky’s point about the Trumpist assault on liberal democracy. For we have reached a point where the most important legacy newspapers, with WaPo in the lead, are practicing anticipatory compliance, in subtle ways cow-towing to the MAGA agenda by diminishing the credibility of Trump’s critics.
Similar things can be seen in the New York Times, and heard even on NPR. And of course, on cable news channels, especially CNN, such things have been completely normalized.
What we are seeing is FEAR. Fear of an increasingly and unquestionably dictatorial regime. And a kind of cowardice that only serves to further empower the authoritarians.
Without independent media we are doomed. Yes, legacy corporate media are corporate, and they are not really fully independent. But until recently, they were at least independent of the government in power. This is now quickly changing. And it poses enormous challenges for everyone who cares about democracy and seeks to defend it in the face of the MAGA movement’s genuinely authoritarian assault.
It has been said that “democracy dies in darkness.”
The Post these days is surely doing its part to further darken our public life.
"No Kings. No Raids. No War," wrote one of the leaders behind the protests.
Organizers expect millions of people to turn out for nationwide "No Kings" protests on Saturday in order to register their disapproval of the intensifying authoritarianism of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has planned a military parade in Washington, D.C. on the same day, also his 79th birthday.
Organizers behind the "No Kings" movement say that actions are planned in some 2,000 cities and towns throughout the country.
The actions are a counter to Trump's military parade, as well as his administration's "escalating use of military force in American cities" and GOP efforts to target health insurance coverage for millions, food assistance, and other anti-poverty programs for millions. Weather forecasters are warning of showers and thunderstorms for Saturday in Washington, D.C., which could disrupt the parade.
A broad coalition of groups are behind the "No Kings" day of mobilization. They include Indivisible, American Federation of Teachers, the American Civil Liberties Union, Public Citizen, MoveOn, 50501, Stand Up America, Common Defense, Human Rights Campaign, League of Conservation Voters, and over 100 others.
"No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance. From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we’re taking action to reject authoritarianism—and show the world what democracy really looks like," according to the "No Kings" website. "The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us. We're not watching history happen. We're making it."
"No Kings. No Raids. No War," wrote Leah Greenberg, a co-founder and co-executive director of the grassroots progressive organization Indivisible on Friday.
The events are guided by a commitment to nonviolent protest, according to organizing materials. The group also said that organizers with "No Kings" are trained in de-escalation tactics and plan to work closely with local partners to ensure actions are peaceful.
In a Common Dreams op-ed Thursday, veteran organizer Paul Rogat Loeb, urged participants in "No Kings" to carry American flags.
"The 14th is also Flag Day and the 250th anniversary of the Army. The flag can't replace protest signs. But it complements and amplifies them," wrote Loeb.
"The flag represents the imperfect but essential mechanisms of democracy that Trump's regime so profoundly threatens, ones that allow us to keep working for justice," he added.
Multiple observers have drawn a link between "No Kings" rallies and early American history.
"Two hundred fifty years ago, on June 14, 1775, Americans created an army to defend ourselves from an alien force intent on suppressing our right to home rule and threatening personal security in our homes and workplaces," wrote economist and former labor secretary Robert Reich in a Friday post. "Tomorrow, on June 14, 2025, we will be demonstrating across this country against our wannabe king and his decision to destroy the constitutional rights that Americans fought long and hard to secure."
"As we protest, we build solidarity. From that solidarity, we feel less alone and build courage for the work ahead," Reich also wrote on X.
The protests will "allow people everywhere, from many different backgrounds, to join in what till now has always been the basic American message: No Kings. Not George, Not Elon, not Don," wrote author and climate organizer Bill McKibben on Friday in column that appeared in Common Dreams.
McKibben was referencing Elon Musk, the billionaire and Republican megadonor who played a leading and active role in decimating key government programs and agencies in the early months of the Trump administration.
In his piece, McKibben noted the manhandling of Democratic California Sen. Alex Padilla by federal agents on Thursday when he was handcuffed on the ground after being forcibly removed from a news conference held by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles.
"Sen. Padilla has reminded us of how to play it: Firm, dignified, and peaceful," he added.
The far-right Republican president, warned the human rights group, "is continuing to send a clear and chilling message: dissent will be punished."
The human rights advocacy group Amnesty International USA has issued a strong rebuke and warning in response to President Donald Trump's public threat to aim "very heavy force" at law-abiding protesters voicing their constitutionally-protected free speech during organized 'No Kings' protests scheduled for Saturday nationwide.
In Tuesday remarks to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump said he didn't know of any planned protests timed to coincide with his $134-million parade, taking place on his birthday, but said if there are, "these are people that hate our country."
"For those people who want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump said, making no distinction between peaceful demonstrators and those who might be more confrontational or even violent.
"Now is a good moment to remind President Trump that protesting is a human right and that his administration is obligated to respect, protect, and fulfill the human rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly–not suppress them," said Paul O'Brien, executive director of Amnesty International USA, in a statement on Wednesday.
Trump's threat arrived after he overrode California Gov. Gavin Newsom to call up 4,000 National Guard troops in that state last weekend—and subsequently U.S. Marine forces—to confront large protests in Los Angeles that erupted in response to raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and the violent arrest of union leader David Huerta, president of SEIU California.
"The militarized response to protests, including the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines in Los Angeles, further escalates tensions and is a chilling preview of even more human rights violations that could be coming," warned O'Brien. "The U.S. military is not trained or equipped to police civilians. It increases the risk of excessive force, arbitrary arrests, and other violations of free expression and peaceful assembly. The Trump administration has already shown us that it will use any tool of the state, including ICE, police, and military forces to target immigrants, asylum seekers, protesters, and anyone who dares to defend their rights."
Over 1,800 coordinated 'No Kings' protests are being organized for July 14 to counter Trump's growing authoritarianism and to coincide with the military parade Trump is throwing for himself in Washington, D.C., at an estimated cost of $134 million.
A new poll released Thursday shows a majority of Americans believe the parade is a waste of taxpayer money.
Approximately 6 in 10 Americans also say Trump's parade is "not a good use" of taxpayer funds, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. That number of disapproving voters includes a number of people surveyed who have no particular criticism of the parade itself.

Beyond the wasted cost, critics of the president warn that the more dangerous aspect of the parade is how the spectacle dovetails with Trump's broader authoritarianism, including his militarized response to dissent and weaponizing state power against his perceived political enemies.
"Make no mistake," said Amnesty's O'Brien. "President Trump’s response to protests has nothing to do with public safety. This is his administration’s way of stoking fear and suppressing opposition. By sending police, ICE, or the military into neighborhoods to silence voices calling for justice and human rights, President Trump is continuing to send a clear and chilling message: dissent will be punished."
Amnesty called for an immediate halt to Trump's "militarized response" to public protest.
"The task of any law enforcement is to facilitate—not to restrict—a peaceful public assembly," said O'Brien. "This must be clearly understood by all law enforcement officials taking part in the management of the assembly. Law enforcement must also not use violent acts of a few as a pretext to restrict or impede the human rights of others to peacefully protest."