

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Partisan rulings have weakened our democracy and set our rights back by decades," said one expansion advocate.
As the Supreme Court's new term begins amid multiple ethics scandals and widespread public alarm over what many Americans consider extreme decisions by the tribunal's right-wing supermajority, a Marquette University Law School survey published this week revealed that a majority of U.S. adults support expanding the number of justices on the high court.
The poll found that 54% of Americans support increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court, while only 46% oppose it. That's the highest level of support—and the lowest level of opposition—Marquette has recorded since it started asking about the issue in 2019.
The poll also noted that "recent news concerning the justices' financial disclosures and related matters have raised attention to the ethical standards of the court," although only 29% of respondents said they perceived the high court's honesty and ethical standards to be "low" or "very low," while 30% said they were "high" or "very high."
The survey's publication came as Justice Clarence Thomas—who, along with Justice Samuel Alito, took gifts from wealthy Republican donors— refused to recuse himself from a case that could benefit one of his billionaire benefactors, even as he took the rare move of stepping aside as the court rejected an appeal from an architect of the plot to subvert the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
"Partisan rulings have weakened our democracy and set our rights back by decades. In the face of these extreme decisions and flagrant ethical abuses, Americans' faith in the court has plunged to record lows," Just Majority—a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups supporting expansion that includes Demand Justice, Planned Parenthood, Stand Up America, and Color Of Change—told Common Dreams.
The Marquette poll follows a Morning Consult/Politico survey of registered voters released late last month in which 44% of respondents said they either "strongly" or "somewhat" support Supreme Court expansion, compared with 35% who "strongly" or "somewhat" oppose the proposal.
A Gallup poll published on September 29 also found that 58% of Americans disapprove of the Supreme Court's performance, compared with just 41% who approve.
Last year, progressive advocacy groups launched the "Four More" campaign, which seeks to expand the Supreme Court from nine to 13 justices. Earlier this year, Democratic U.S. lawmakers reintroduced the Judiciary Act, which would add four justices to the high court.
Given the Supreme Court’s recent track record and its virtually unchecked power, inaction is no longer acceptable.
he Supreme Court concluded its October 2022 term with three reactionary rulings. In rapid succession, it ended affirmative action in college admissions; overturned President Biden’s student debt forgiveness program; and held that an evangelical Christian graphic designer has a First Amendment right to refuse to create websites for same-sex weddings.
Biden reacted quickly, issuing separate statements on each of the decisions. He condemned them as wrongly decided, painful and disappointing, and promised to develop strategies to counter their impacts. But he stopped short of backing the only reform that can reverse the Supreme Court’s extreme rightward turn: expanding the court and filling the new seats with liberal jurists if he is reelected and the Democrats galvanize their base to retake both houses of Congress in 2024.
To his credit, Biden was forceful in rebuking the court’s 6-3 majority opinion on affirmative action written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
“For 45 years,” he said in a televised address delivered on June 29 from the Roosevelt Room at the White House, “the United States Supreme Court has recognized a college’s freedom to decide…how to build diverse student bodies to meet their responsibility of opening doors of opportunity for every single American. In case after case…the court has affirmed…that colleges could use race not as a determinative factor for admission, but as one of the factors among many in deciding who [sic] to admit from a… qualified pool of applicants.”
He added, “Today, the court once again walked away from decades of precedent” …and issued a decision that as the dissent [written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor] states, ‘rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.’”
Biden also rebutted the insidious myth that affirmative action leads to the admission of unqualified students, and pledged his support for new measures to bolster diversity in higher education.
As he was leaving the room, a reporter shouted out, “President Biden, the Congressional Black Caucus said the Supreme Court has ‘thrown into question its own legitimacy.’ Is this a rogue court?”
Biden paused for a moment, smiled slightly and turned toward the reporter. “This is not a normal court,” he answered. Without further comment, he exited through a side door.
Later that afternoon, in an interview with MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, Biden was asked what he meant by his answer. He replied that the court has “done more to unravel basic rights and basic decisions than any court in recent history, and that’s what I meant by not normal.” He cited last year’s reversal of Roe v. Wade, and observed that the court has “ruled on a number of issues that … had been precedent for 50, 60 years sometimes.”
But he also flatly shot down growing calls by progressives for court expansion, saying, “I think if we start the process of trying to expand the court, we’re going to politicize it maybe forever in a way that is not healthy.”
Given the Supreme Court’s recent track record and its virtually unchecked power, such inaction can no longer be justified.
Biden is a steadfast opponent of court expansion. Throughout the 2020 campaign, when repeatedly pressed on the issue, he promised to convene a blue-ribbon commission to study the need for court reform. He made good on that promise in April 2021 when he issued an executive order that created a bipartisan member panel of former federal judges, high-powered attorneys and law professors to examine the pros and cons, not only of expansion, but also such measures as term limits for Supreme Court justices and ethics reforms aimed at establishing a binding code of judicial conduct for the court, which remains the only federal judicial body that operates without a code.
In the end, however, the commission issued a 288-page final report the following December that can charitably be described as a dud. Apart from tepid and vague language endorsing increased transparency in the court’s internal procedures and the adoption of an “advisory” [but not mandatory] code of conduct, the commission failed to advance any concrete proposals. In the words of The Nation columnist Elie Mystal, the entire endeavor “was designed to fail” from the start, and was “set up to give the president and Senate Democrats cover for total inaction.”
Given the Supreme Court’s recent track record and its virtually unchecked power, such inaction can no longer be justified. With its six-member Republican supermajority, including three justices appointed by Donald Trump, the court is driving the country and American law backward.
The court’s extremism is inflaming voter anger and will likely be a key driver of turnout in the 2024 election. Biden should be shrewd enough to harness that anger. It is not sufficient for him to acknowledge that the Supreme Court isn’t “normal.” It’s time for him to recognize that the court is broken, and the only way to fix it is to expand it.
With a majority of the public now alienated by the reactionary, corrupt Supreme Court, it’s time for Democrats to turn the tables. Leadership must come from the White House.
On the very day last week that The Supreme Court overturned affirmative action and the day before it outlawed Biden’s signature student loan program and gave businesses the right to discriminate against gay people, Biden told Nicolle Wallace that while SCOTUS is not “normal” he opposes court reform because it would “politicize the court in a way that’s not healthy.”
Sorry Joe, but that ship sailed decades ago. The current Court is not just “not normal” but a corrupt, unelected, thoroughly politicized right-wing Republican institution with lifetime appointments that will continue to impose its reactionary vision on the nation for decades to come.
Unchecked, the Court will continue to ignore precedent, take away longstanding Constitutional rights from women, Blacks and other minorities, allow businesses to discriminate against disfavored groups, block the President from doing anything significant about climate change, student debt and just about anything else significant, and overturn common sense gun safety laws.
It’s time for President Biden to put away his butter knife and take out his AR-15 to run against the reactionary, corrupt Supreme Court.
For decades, Democrats have brought a butter knife while Republicans have brought AR-15s to the fight over the courts. Republicans have packed the court with right-wing extremists; refused to give Merrick Garland a hearing; confirmed Amy Coney Barrett while citizens had already begun voting in the 2020 election; confirmed Brett Kavanaugh (and Clarence Thomas) despite credible accusations of sexual harassment; and let Justices take personal financial benefits from right-wing billionaire donors. In his comments opposing court reform, President Biden pulled out the same old butter knife again.

Activists for expanding the U.S. Supreme Court rally outside the nation's highest court in Washington, D.C. on June 22, 2022.
(Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for Demand Justice)
There are credible proposals for court reform on the table that Biden is refusing to acknowledge. For example over 60 Senate and House members just reintroduced the Judiciary Act of 2023 that would unpack the court by adding four seats to the U.S. Supreme Court, bringing the bench from nine to 13 justices. Sponsors include Senators Ed Markey, Tina Smith and Elizabeth Warren and Representatives Jerry Nadler, Hank Johnson, Cori Bush and Adam Schiff.
A coalition of over 40 grassroots organizations called Just Majority support the bill including: Alliance for Justice; American Constitution Society; Black Voters Matter; Center for Popular Democracy Action; Color of Change; Demand Justice; Demos; Greenpeace USA; Guns Down America; Indivisible; Justice Democrats; Latino Victory Project; League of Conservation Voters; MoveOn; NARAL National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum; People for the American Way; Planned Parenthood; Public Citizen; Sunrise Movement; Teachers Unify to End Gun Violence; and Women's March.
According to an Indivisible spokesperson:
“Court expansion is the best chance we have to bring our Supreme Court back from the brink. We’re not calling for expansion because we have passing disagreements with the conservative supermajority. We’re calling for it because our democracy and our fundamental freedoms are at stake. This is a majority that has gutted the Voting Rights Act repeatedly, allowed radical gerrymandering of our congressional maps that undermine the political power of Black and brown folks, and possibly most horrifyingly, has overturned Roe v. Wade and thrown our ability to receive abortion care into utter chaos nationwide. This cannot continue. The only way to save the Supreme Court is to expand it. The American people deserve a Court that’s beholden to the law and the constitution, not billionaire MAGA donors who offer free trips on private jets.”
Another strong court reform proposal comes from The Brennan Center—Term limits for Supreme Court justices to replace lifetime tenure in which Justices serve for decades. As with the proposal to add Justices, Term Limits could be enacted by a majority vote of Congress signed by the President.
Under the Brennan Center’s Term Limits proposal justices would sit in staggered 18-year terms of active service on the Supreme Court, with a new vacancy opening every two years. Each president would have two, and only two, appointments during a four-year term. When a Justice’s term is up, the Justice would move to senior status under which s/he would by designation hear cases in the lower federal courts, and occasionally step in to hear cases on the Supreme Court’s docket upon a recusal by an active justice or an unexpected vacancy. As The Brennan Center writes, “Limiting the justices to specific terms would ensure that every president has an equal imprint on the Court and create more opportunities to appoint new justices that reflect changing demographics and the sentiments of many different communities.”
All but one state supreme court in America has either fixed terms or mandatory retirement, and so do constitutional courts in every other major democratic country in the world. America’s lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices stands out as the sole outlier among worldwide democracies. A new study estimates that without reform, the Court won’t have a majority of Democratic appointees again until 2065.
While court expansion and term limits are compatible, term limits may have a better chance of of being enacted.
Student loan borrowers and advocates gather for a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on February 28, 2023.(Photo: Jemal Countess/Getty Images for People's Rally to Cancel Student Debt )Polls show that only 30% of voters approve of the Court. Over 2/3 of respondents (67%) support term limits including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans.
Even Nancy Pelosi endorsed court reform this week, supporting term limits and leaving the door open to court expansion.
It’s time for President Biden to put away his butter knife and take out his AR-15 to run against the reactionary, corrupt Supreme Court. Republicans have successfully run against the court for decades, mobilizing particularly Christian fundamentalists with promises to overturn abortion rights and limit rights for minorities and the LGBTQ + community.
With a majority of the public now alienated by the reactionary, corrupt Supreme Court, it’s time for Democrats to turn the tables. In addition to defending democracy and supporting economics from the middle out instead of the top down, in 2024 Democrats should aggressively run against the Supreme Court and call for reforms. In light of Dobbs and now the affirmative action, student loan and bad gay rights decisions, this could particularly mobilize minority voters and young voters who Democrats need to inspire to turn out in large numbers.
President Biden must change his naïve institutionalist view opposing court reform and join the majority of the public, grassroots organizations, congressional leaders in making the corrupt reactionary Supreme Court and court reform a major issue in 2024.
"We are the majority!" said one abortion rights leader. "It's time to take our court back. It's time to take our government back."
As rights advocates took stock on Saturday of the catastrophic effects of the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade exactly a year after the court's right-wing majority gutted abortion rights for millions, campaigners rallied to demand bold action from the Democratic Party and the White House to protect reproductive freedom.
" Republicans are across the way right now lobbying for a national abortion ban with their hero Mike Pence," said NARAL Pro-Choice America President Mini Timmaraju, despite the fact that "poll after poll after poll has shown Americans are with us. They don't want a national abortion ban, they want Congress to codify abortion access."
NARAL is among the rights groups that have demanded the passage of the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA), which was obstructed last year when right-wing Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia joined the Republican Party in blocking it. The law would affirm the right to abortion care at the federal level.
The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling last year, handed down just weeks after the WHPA was blocked, paved the way for at least 14 states to ban most abortions. Republicans including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and former Vice President Mike Pence, who is running for president in 2024, have called for a nationwide 15-week abortion ban.
After leading the crowd in a chant of, "We are the majority!" Timmaraju said, "It's time to take our court back. It's time to take our government back."
Along with Planned Parenthood and other national rights organizations, NARAL in recent months has joined the push for an expansion of the Supreme Court, which has been done by Congress seven times in the past.
In Charlotte, North Carolina, Vice President Kamala Harris on Saturday addressed a packed house at the Grady Cole Center, where she noted that "more than 350 new laws to restrict these freedoms and the right to have access to reproductive healthcare" have been proposed or passed in states, leaving 23 million women of reproductive age living in states with extreme abortion bans.
"Extremist Republicans in Congress have proposed to ban abortion nationwide. But I have news for them. We're not having that. We're not standing for that. We won't let that happen. And by the way, the majority of Americans are with us," said Harris. "The United States Congress must put back in place what the Supreme Court took away."
The effects of abortion bans have been well-documented in the past 12 months, as pregnant patients have been denied care by doctors fearing prosecution, even as their pregnancies threatened their health. A survey of OB/GYNs this week found that 68% of doctors said Dobbs has made managing pregnancy-related medical emergencies more difficult and 64% said the ruling has worsened pregnancy-related mortality.
As the anniversary drew near this week, President Joe Biden signed an executive order expanding access to birth control and Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) took action to block county prosecutions of people who have abortions. A 15-week abortion ban is in effect in Hobbs's state.
Amnesty International USA national programs director Tarah Demant said that even in states where bans are not in effect, "a climate of fear is being purposefully sewn to restrict women, girls, and people who can get pregnant from finding legal abortion care."
"Yet despite these coordinated and vitriolic attacks on our rights, Americans continue to overwhelmingly support access to safe and legal abortion, multiple states have added new protections, and activists across states continue to advocate for their rights," said Demant. "Abortion is a human right and basic healthcare, and activists across the country and around the world are more determined than ever to ensure that people across the USA will be able to access this right."
"A few short years ago, we were told court expansion was a pipe dream," said one advocate. "With support from groups boldly advocating at the state level to leading national organizations, our movement is growing stronger every day."
Justice advocates marked what they called a "huge" development in the fight for court reform on Monday as Planned Parenthood joined a national coalition that's pushing for the expansion of the U.S. Supreme Court, with the president of the reproductive rights organization saying the court's "capture" by the far right calls for "structural" change.
Alexis McGill Johnson, who leads the Planned Parenthood Action Fund and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said Monday that the group is joining Just Majority, a coalition including more than 35 groups that are currently on a nationwide tour highlighting ethics violations at the Supreme Court and how reforms including expansion could help protect democracy and secure justice on the highest judicial panel in the country.
"We should be able to make our own decisions about our lives, bodies, and futures," said Johnson in a statement Monday. "The unrelenting attacks on our basic freedoms—including through the courts—demand that we reform our federal court system. Abortion rights, voting rights, LGBTQ+ rights, our democratic institutions, and so much more are at stake."
Johnson spoke to MSNBC's "Inside With Jen Psaki" on Sunday about Planned Parenthood's decision to join the court expansion movement, as other rights groups including NARAL Pro-Choice America, Latino Victory, and Newtown Action Alliance have in recent weeks.
The group was pushed toward its decision, she said, as U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled last month that mifepristone, a pill used in medication abortions, should be taken off the market.
"The reality is, the court now has been fully captured in so many areas," Johnson said. "The fact that you have, again, this lone Texas judge, that can now bring cases, you can form shop there, bring cases to the Fifth Circuit, which is also conservative and up to the Supreme Court now, which has a conservative supermajority... And that is a way to circumvent the way in which popularly elected decisions are made."
"We need to see expanded courts, from the lower courts all the way up to the Supreme Court," she added. "We need to see term limits. We need to see ethical reforms."
Planned Parenthood's decision to join the court expansion movement, which has been led by groups including Demand Justice and Take Back the Court, comes as right-wing Supreme Court justices, particularly Justice Clarence Thomas, have faced intense criticism over alleged ethics violations. Recent reports have pointed to evidence that Thomas has for years received financial gifts from Texas Republican megadonor Harlan Crow without disclosing those financial ties as required by federal law, and Justices Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts have also faced scrutiny about their failure to disclose financial transactions and payments.
"It's really important to call for structural reforms that sustain progress," said Johnson. "It would be one thing to call for a justice to step down for whatever reason, but the reality is that the way in which the system has been captured requires us to engage in structural reform in a different way."
On social media, Johnson said Planned Parenthood's "expanded position" on the courts reflects an expansion of its "commitment" to protecting reproductive rights.
Demand Justice called Planned Parenthood's decision "an inflection point for the Supreme Court reform movement."
"The endorsement of key groups in the progressive ecosystem like Planned Parenthood shows just how far this campaign has come," said Brian Fallon, executive director of the group. "The public has awoken to the dangers of a captured, corrupt judiciary and is demanding solutions. The composition of the court will obviously not be changed overnight, but the consensus about the need for bold, sweeping reforms is growing by the day, and the salience of the court as a political issue has never been higher."
Sarah Lipton-Lubet, president of Take Back the Court, said Planned Parenthood's joining of the movement shows how court expansion has become "a mainstream progressive policy goal with the support of more than 60 members of Congress and some of the most respected and powerful abortion rights champions in our movement."
"A few short years ago, we were told court expansion was a pipe dream," said Lipton-Lubet. "With support from groups boldly advocating at the state level to leading national organizations, our movement is growing stronger every day. The right-wing extremists on the Court can try to rip our rights away, but we're fighting back even stronger—and we're going to win."
The Supreme Court has been expanded seven times in the past. Reform advocates also called for an addition of seats of lower federal courts to reflect growth in population, diversity, and the number of cases that judges hear.
"It won't be easy and it won't happen overnight but we WILL expand the Supreme Court," said Doug Lindner, senior director of judiciary and democracy for the League of Conservation Voters. "We WILL protect our abortion rights and our climate from these extremists. And we WILL pass on a vibrant, multiracial democracy to the next generation."
"It's never a bad day to remind SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts of the rampant corruption and scandals that plague his Court," said Accountable.US.
As the latest polling showed a majority of Americans believe U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas should step down from his lifetime appointment, government watchdog Accountable.US deployed several trucks to Capitol Hill Saturday to display mobile billboards plastered with Thomas' and other right-wing justices' images and recent headlines regarding allegations of ethics violations.
An image of Thomas was shown alongside a headline reading, "America's Supreme Court Faces a Legitimacy Crisis," while Chief Justice John Roberts was displayed with the message: "Justice Roberts: Clean Up Your Court."
"It's never a bad day to remind SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts of the rampant corruption and scandals that plague his Court," said the group, which also sent a mobile billboard to Roberts' country club.
The campaign took place a day after progressive think tank Data for Progress published survey results showing that 53% of respondents believed Thomas should resign following revelations that he's financially benefited for years from trips and other gifts given to him by Republican megadonor Harlan Crow, as well as from a property sale to Crow.
Seventy percent of people told Data for Progress the previously undisclosed property sale was unethical and 64% said the same about his vacations and gifts.
Thomas was the first right-wing judge in recent weeks to come under scrutiny for his failure to disclose his financial ties—a violation of federal law, according to legal experts.
Earlier this week Politico reported that Justice Neil Gorsuch sold a property to a law firm CEO days after being confirmed to the court—but didn't disclose the name of the buyer on federal forms. The CEO's firm has been involved in nearly two dozen cases that have gone before the court since Gorsuch was appointed.
On Friday, whistleblower documents sparked renewed interest in the earnings of Roberts' wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, who made $10.3 million in commissions from a legal recruiting firm she worked at between 2007 and 2014, placing lawyers at firms—including at least one that argued a case before the high court. Roberts did not specify that his wife had earned that money in commissions from law firms on his federal disclosure forms.
"In addition to Clarence Thomas and his issues, we have Justice Gorsuch and his issues, and we've got the chief justice's wife and her issues," said U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) on Saturday at a stop for the Just Majority campaign, a nationwide tour organized by 30 progressive groups to demand accountability on the high court. "It tells you that unaccountability leads to corruption. The American people need and deserve a fair and ethical Supreme Court."
Watson Coleman also called for an expansion of the court, which has been endorsed by numerous progressives in Congress and legal advocacy groups.
The Supreme Court is not bound by a code of ethics, as other federal courts are. Forty-eight percent of respondents told Data for Progress that they supported binding rules, including 67% of Democrats.
"These revelations have renewed pressure on the court to follow an explicit code of conduct," said the think tank. "While all nine justices have so far been resistant to the idea, voters clearly support ensuring that the Supreme Court justices are held to an ethical standard, and also support consequences for justices who fail to do so."