SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
May, 19 2020, 12:00am EDT
Contact:
Kari Hudnell, kari@abpartners.co, 609-668-0560
Majority Action Responds to Votes At JPMorgan Chase Annual Shareholder Meeting
Eli Kasargod-Staub, executive director of Majority Action, a nonprofit shareholder advocacy organization, released the following statement in response to JPMorgan Chase's (NYSE: JPM) annual general meeting in which a number of critical governance and climate-related shareholder proposals were considered.
WASHINGTON
Eli Kasargod-Staub, executive director of Majority Action, a nonprofit shareholder advocacy organization, released the following statement in response to JPMorgan Chase's (NYSE: JPM) annual general meeting in which a number of critical governance and climate-related shareholder proposals were considered. A proposal to align financing to the Paris agreement goals received a reported 49.6% support, and the proposal to elect an independent board chair received 41.96%, its highest support since the 2008 financial crisis. In counting abstentions as votes against proposals, JPMorgan Chase reported results that underrepresent shareholder support for these critical reforms.
"Today's votes at JPMorgan Chase, the world's largest fossil fuel financier, represent a stunning rebuke to the bank's inadequate climate risk strategy. To restore investor confidence, JPMorgan's board must demonstrate that it can exercise independent, climate-competent leadership to grapple with the escalating and systemic risks that climate change poses to investors. Instead of vague professions of support of the Paris Agreement, JPMorgan must commit to the goal of achieving net-zero CO2 financed emissions by 2050 and disclose their plans for how they will realign their lending and underwriting strategies to achieve this goal.
Critical to achieving this goal will be transformative leadership and rigorous board oversight. Nine state treasurers and the largest public pension funds in the country publicly voiced their opposition to Lee Raymond's re-election to the board for a 34th year, as did proxy advisor Glass Lewis. The architect of ExxonMobil's notorious climate denial strategy has no place on the board of JPMorgan Chase. Instead of defending Lee Raymond's record on climate change, as Jamie Dimon did today, JPMorgan Chase must instead announce Raymond's retirement.
We will soon see whether BlackRock and Vanguard's votes, representing nearly 15% of outstanding shares--supported or undermined these critical investor efforts."
JPMorgan Chase has been increasingly under fire for its role as the world's largest financier of fossil fuels. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer and the state treasurers of Pennsylvania Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin called on JPMorgan Chase to align its financing activity with the goals of the Paris agreement and opposed former ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond's re-election to the board. New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, CalPERS and proxy advisor Glass Lewis all opposed Raymond's re-election as well.
Earlier this month, JPMorgan Chase, under pressure from leading shareholders, announced they would remove lead independent director Lee Raymond from his leadership position later this summer--but still has announced no plans for Raymond to retire after 33 years on the board. Instead, Dimon responded to shareholder concerns with praise of Raymond's climate leadership and stated that the "current intent" is to retain Raymond in key committee roles.
BlackRock and Vanguard hold a combined 14.6% of shares in JPM, giving them outsized power to shape the bank's behavior on climate change. Last year, BlackRock and Vanguard backed 99% of oil and gas and electric power company directors across the S&P 500, and BlackRock and Vanguard voted against all of the U.S. shareholder proposals backed by the Climate Action 100+ investor coalition. As major asset managers have made commitments to center climate change concerns in their voting behavior, their votes at JPM stands as a key test of these promises.
JPM lags its global peers in the banking sector in its commitment to addressing climate risks. Barclays Bank PLC, the largest fossil fuel financier in Europe, recently committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions across its financing activity by 2050, following pressure from a coalition of shareholders to do so. Shareholders voted for further action in significant numbers this month to demand that the bank align its lending with its commitment.
LATEST NEWS
'A Clear Choice': Bernie Sanders Endorses Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor
"We need new leadership that is prepared to stand up to powerful corporate interests and fight for the working class."
Jun 17, 2025
With the United States—and the Democratic Party—facing a "fundamental choice" between politics dominated by corporations and billionaires or by the needs of ordinary Americans, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday said that for 8 million people in New York City, there is "a clear choice as to the path forward."
With one week left until voting ends in the city's Democratic mayoral primary, the senator announced his endorsement for progressive Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani.
"How does New York effectively address the crises in affordable housing, education, crime, drugs, transportation, childcare, and many more?" said Sanders (I-Vt.) in a statement. "The answers will not be easy, but one thing I do know: They will not be solved by a Democratic establishment dependent on super PACs funded by billionaires who could care less about the needs of working families. We need a new politics and new leadership which is prepared to stand up to powerful corporate interests and fight for the working class."
The senator applauded Mamdani's push for free public buses, cutting fees for small businesses, and investments in citywide mental health services, which he plans to pay for "by asking corporations and the richest 1% of New Yorkers to pay their fair share in taxes."
Sanders' endorsement came two days after Mamdani joined Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) at a rally where the mayoral candidate said the election "isn't just about the future of our city, it's about the future of our democracy, whether billionaires and massive corporations can simply buy our elections."
"We know that this movement is more powerful than their money," he said.
Disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who resigned in 2021 over numerous sexual harassment allegations, has been leading in polls ahead of the primary, but a survey from Public Policy Polling showed Mamdani, who has focused his campaign on making the nation's largest city affordable for working people, in the lead last week.
Cuomo's lead has also narrowed considerably in other polls as Mamdani has called for a rent freeze for the city's 2 million residents who live in rent-stabilized apartments, a network of city-owned grocery stores to keep grocery prices low, no-cost childcare, and other policies aimed at making life in one of the nation's most expensive cities more affordable.
Corporate and real estate interests have ramped up spending against Mamdani as he's gained momentum and harshly rebuked Cuomo in public statements and debates, attacking the former governor's numerous past scandals, cuts he made to Medicaid, and his March 2020 policy of requiring nursing homes to admit patients who had tested positive for Covid-19.
Sanders noted that Mamdani "is funding his campaign largely through small-dollar donations, including more than 27,000 individual contributions."
Mamdani has also signaled strong opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda, directly confronting border czar Tom Homan about immigration agents' abduction of Columbia University organizer Mahmoud Khalil, while Cuomo recently urged New Yorkers not to "overreact" with protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, even as he said the agency is "going to do things that are illegal and unconstitutional."
While the mayoral election will directly impact a relatively small number of Americans, progressive organizer Corbin Trent wrote in a column at Common Dreams on Saturday that "all change starts somewhere."
"This is where we find out if Democrats will transform or keep managing democracy's decline while the world burns," he wrote. "The clock's ticking."
"Every crisis we face—from troops in our streets to endless wars to families who can't afford basics—comes from the same source: a political system that serves power instead of people," Trent added. "Zohran represents a chance to try something different. That's why his potential success terrifies them more than Trump's authoritarianism. Fascists don't threaten their consulting contracts. Politicians who might actually deliver for working people do."
Warning that the U.S. faces a "pivotal and dangerous moment" in its history, Sanders said Tuesday that "status quo politics is not good enough."
"We need the kind of visionary leadership that Zohran is providing in this campaign," said the senator. "In my view, Zohran Mamdani is the best choice for mayor of New York City."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Bill Would Bar Trump From Using Federal Funds for 'Illegal War With Iran'
"Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu's war of choice," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Jun 17, 2025
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders late Monday led the introduction of a bill that would prevent the Trump administration from using federal funds for a military attack on Iran without explicit authorization from Congress, as Israel's unlawful assault on the country continued for the fifth consecutive day.
"Netanyahu's reckless and illegal attacks violate international law and risk igniting a regional war," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu's war of choice."
"Our Founding Fathers entrusted the power of war and peace exclusively to the people's elected representatives in Congress," the senator added, "and it is imperative that we make clear that the president has no authority to embark on another costly war without explicit authorization by Congress."
Seven Democratic senators—Peter Welch (Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), and Tina Smith (Minn.)—joined Sanders in introducing the legislation, which is titled the No War Against Iran Act.
The legislation states that "no federal funds may be obligated or expended for any use of military force in or against Iran" unless Congress declares war or enacts "specific statutory authorization for such use of military force."
"Another war in the Middle East could cost countless lives, waste trillions more dollars, and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, and more displacement," Sanders said Monday. "I will do everything that I can as a senator to defend the Constitution and prevent the U.S. from being drawn into another war."
Tonight, I introduced legislation to stop Trump from from leading us into an illegal war with Iran.
Another war in the Middle East could cost countless lives, waste trillions more dollars, and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, and more displacement. pic.twitter.com/CchHlSnLZy
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) June 17, 2025
The bill came hours after Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced a war powers resolution similarly aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching an unauthorized attack on Iran. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) announced plans to introduce a companion resolution in the House, a sign of burgeoning congressional opposition to a U.S. war with Iran.
"This is not our war," Massie wrote on social media. "But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution. I'm introducing a bipartisan war powers resolution tomorrow to prohibit our involvement."
The legislative efforts kicked off as Israel expanded its aerial attacks on Iran and as Trump—who has suggested U.S. forces could get more deeply involved in the conflict—urged residents of the Iranian capital to "immediately evacuate," heightening chaos and panic in the densely populated city and fueling concerns of American intervention.
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) condemned Trump's evacuation call as "both reckless and disturbing," noting that "Tehran is one of the most populous cities in the world, home to ten million people and many millions more in the surrounding suburbs."
"While many have tried to flee Israel's campaign of terror, the fact is that many cannot flee—the elderly, or those who can't get gas amid war shortages, and those who have nowhere to go," said NIAC. "We hope that this does not mean an unauthorized U.S. entry into the war, or that he has knowledge of further depraved attacks from Israel."
"There is a choice before Trump: take the pathway of peace by telling Bibi to stop the war, or join with a war criminal and wreak further havoc and endanger U.S. troops in a fight that isn't ours," the group added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Senate GOP Dumps Gasoline on 'Five-Alarm Fire' by Proposing Even Deeper Medicaid Cuts
"We're watching in real time as Senate Republicans line up to gut healthcare for millions of Americans in order to pay for tax cuts for themselves, their wealthy donors, and big businesses."
Jun 17, 2025
Senate Republicans on Monday proposed cutting Medicaid even more aggressively than their House colleagues to help offset the cost of trillions of dollars in tax breaks that would disproportionately benefit the wealthiest Americans.
The legislative text unveiled by the GOP-controlled Senate Finance Committee is a central component of the sprawling reconciliation package that Republicans are hoping to send to President Donald Trump's desk by next month.
The bill contains broader Medicaid work requirements than the House-passed legislation, expanding the ineffective and punitive mandates to low-income adults with children over the age of 14.
The Senate version would also sharply limit provider taxes that states use to fund their Medicaid programs. Edwin Park, a research professor at Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families, warned the provision would "devastate" state finances, particularly where lawmakers have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
"This will create huge budget holes over time, some in as little as two years, forcing states to make severe, highly damaging cuts," Park wrote in an analysis of the new legislation.
"Senate Republicans have made this cruel, heartless bill even worse as they continue on their endless pursuit to destroy our healthcare system."
Senate Republicans released the bill text less than two weeks after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the House-passed reconciliation package would strip healthcare from nearly 11 million Americans over the next decade—a number that rises to 16 million when accounting for the GOP's refusal to renew ACA tax credits set to expire at the end of the year.
Even more people would lose healthcare if Republicans adopt the Senate plan, analysts and advocates warned. One recent study estimated that around 51,000 additional people across the U.S. would die unnecessarily each year due to large-scale health insurance losses caused by the GOP's proposals.
"It shocks the conscience that Senate Republican leaders saw the impacts of the House bill—16 million more people uninsured and millions losing help buying groceries, including families with children—and chose to double down," said Sharon Parrott, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Leslie Dach, chair of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said in a statement that "this bill was already a five-alarm fire for American healthcare, and Senate Republicans have just poured gasoline on it."
"Contrary to what they've repeatedly promised, Republicans are torching Medicaid, ripping apart the Affordable Care Act, and leaving 16 million people without the critical care they need, all so Trump and the GOP can funnel more money to their billionaire and corporate friends," said Dach. "Seniors will be thrown out of nursing homes, people fighting cancer will be cut off from treatment, and rural hospitals will shutter. Senate Republicans have made this cruel, heartless bill even worse as they continue on their endless pursuit to destroy our healthcare system."
If Senate Republicans adopt the proposed changes, the House would have to pass the reconciliation bill again before it can reach Trump's desk. One House Republican, granted anonymity by Politico, said "hell no" in response to the Senate language pertaining to Medicaid provider taxes, a signal that the proposal is likely to face intraparty opposition.
But experts stressed that both the House and Senate versions of the reconciliation bill would be disastrous for low-income Americans and a boon for the rich.
"Now that we've seen Senate text, we can say for certain: Either the House or the Senate version would be the largest transfer from the poor to the rich in a single law in history," wrote Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress.
"Each would kick millions of people off their health insurance and each would rip food assistance away from millions of households," Kogan noted. "Each would increase deficits by trillions of dollars while making the poorest Americans poorer and making the richest Americans richer."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular