June, 07 2012, 08:53am EDT
Russia: Protect Human Rights Defenders in Chechnya
Chechen Leader Threatened ‘Mobile Group’ in TV Broadcast
MOSCOW
Russia should ensure the safety of human rights defenders after public threats by Chechnya's Kremlin-appointed leader, Human Rights Watch said today. The Russian authorities should end harassment of the Joint Mobile Group of Human Rights Defenders in Chechnya (Mobile Group), whose three representatives were the subject of sharp criticism and threats by the Chechen leadership on June 1, 2012.
The Mobile Group was established under the Public Commission on Chechnya, a coalition created by 12 Russian human rights organizations in 2009 following a wave of killing of activists in the region. The group investigates allegations of serious human rights violations by law enforcement and security officials under de facto control of the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. On June 1, Kadyrov and other top Chechen officials criticized the group's work at a staged meeting, which was then broadcast on television.
"The Mobile Group is carrying the mantle of Natalia Estemirova, the foremost Chechen human rights defender, who was abducted and killed in July 2009," said Tanya Lokshina, senior Russia researcher at Human Rights Watch. "The group courageously investigates the most sensitive human rights cases in Chechnya, seeking justice for torture, enforced disappearances, and extra-judicial executions."
Under the leadership or the Nizhny Novgorod Committee against Torture, the Mobile Group established a permanent presence in Chechnya in early November 2009, with lawyers and other human rights activists from various Russian regions working there on rotation despite great personal risk. The group's security situation has grown increasingly precarious, Human Rights Watch said. The Mobile Group received the 2011 Front Line Award for Human Rights Defenders at Risk and the 2011 Human Rights Prize of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
On June 1, the Mobile Group's representatives in Chechnya joined a rally in the center of Grozny, the Chechen capital, against enforced disappearances organized by local activists and the relatives of the disappeared. Magomed Daudov, the new head of administration for Kadyrov and the Chechen government, and the mayor of Grozny, Muslim Khuchiev, unexpectedly showed up at the rally. They approached the Mobile Group's activists and demanded to know the purpose of their stay in the republic. The activists responded, and Daudov and Khuchiev pressed them to go to the city hall for a "detailed conversation."
The "conversation," however, proved to be a meeting with Kadyrov, Ruslan Alkhanov, Chechnya's internal affairs minister, and other local officials. The head of the Investigation Committee for Chechnya, Viktor Ledenev, and the republic's prosecutor, Vladimir Savchin, also participated. Several mothers of the disappeared, who had attended the rally, were brought there as well. The entire event was filmed by a television crew.
Kadyrov opened the meeting with a long, threatening speech about the Mobile Group. He said that the activists, "hated the people of Chechnya," "came [to Chechnya] for financial gain," "helped devils [insurgents] and their collaborators," and strove to provoke conflicts and destabilize the situation in the republic. Kadyrov also said that in his view human rights organizations are not interested in the well-being of the Chechen people and asserted that he is their only source of help and justice.
Kadyrov's head of administration, Daudov, then accused the Mobile Group of paying local residents to give fake reports of torture and described how he had detained three other members of the group in February 2010, when he was police chief in the Shali district of Chechnya, and held them overnight. He noted that the Mobile Group had filed a complaint over the incident with the European Court on Human Rights, contending that the detention was unlawful and, he said, portraying him "as a criminal." He said, however, that his actions had been justified because the activists were "bribing people" to give false testimony.
The activists were not given an opportunity to refute the accusations. Instead, the floor was given to the head of the Investigation Committee and prosecutor, who contended that the Mobile Group interferes with the work of police and investigators and called the group's work counterproductive and unnecessary. Later that day, Chechen television aired a lengthy broadcast from the meeting during prime time news.
"Victims and witnesses of human rights violations in Chechnya are silenced by strong fear of retribution, but the few local residents who still dare seek justice come to the Mobile Group for legal aid and support," Lokshina said. "Broadcasting Ramzan Kadyrov criticizing the Mobile Group sent a clear warning to local residents to stay away and that the Mobile Group's activists have been essentially declared persona non grata in the republic."
Human Rights Watch expressed serious concerns over the threatening events on June 1 and called on the Russian authorities to guarantee that the Mobile Group can continue its work in Chechnya unhindered, in line with top Russian officials' repeated commitments to foster a normal working climate for human rights defenders in the region.
Russia has binding legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to protect people such as those who participate in or cooperate with the Mobile Group from risks and threats to their persons from third parties, most particularly agents of the state.
The known risk to activists in Chechnya, reinforced by blatant public threats by Kadyrov, who is alleged to be personally behind a number of cases of torture and killings, heightens the obligation of the Russian authorities to act urgently, Human Rights Watch said. The Russian authorities need to ensure the Mobile Group's safety and to guarantee that they and those who work with them can exercise their fundamental rights in a secure environment.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Million-Dollar Ad Blitz Targets Senate Dems Who Voted for 'Trump Loyalist Judges'
"This isn’t normal," said the president of the group behind the ad campaign. "If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will."
Dec 03, 2025
The progressive advocacy group Demand Justice on Wednesday launched a seven-figure advertising campaign targeting three members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm President Donald Trump's lifetime judicial nominees, enabling the ongoing right-wing takeover of the nation's courts.
The first series of ads will target Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Angus King (D-Maine), three of the 16 members of the Senate Democratic caucus who have voted to confirm at least one Trump judge this year. Other Senate Democrats who have voted with Republicans in support of at least one Trump judicial pick include Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Adam Schiff of California, and Chris Coons of Delaware.
"It is outrageous that Senate Democrats are voting to confirm Trump’s judicial nominees who refuse to tell the truth about January 6th and the 2020 election,” Josh Orton, the president of Demand Justice, said in a statement. “This isn’t normal. If Senate Democrats don’t take a stand and strongly oppose these judicial nominees who have disqualified themselves—we will. And we won’t let up.”
The group's campaign will also include a national cable TV ad buy and "coordinated digital rollout across key battleground states" naming and shaming Democrats who support "Trump loyalist judges" even as the lawmakers condemn the president's authoritarian assault on democracy.
Watch the Demand Justice ad targeting Maggie Hassan, who on Tuesday voted to confirm Lindsey Ann Freeman, Trump's nominee to the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina:
Freeman, like other Trump judicial picks, refused during her confirmation process to say directly that the president lost the 2020 election.
"President Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 presidential election and served as the 46th President of the United States," Freeman wrote in response to questions from Durbin, who ultimately voted in favor of her confirmation.
In a report released last month, Demand Justice analyzed Trump judicial picks' written responses to senators' questions. The analysis shows that "nominees' responses appear nearly identical, with many nominees using verbatim phrasing, repeating key words, and, overall, using unusual and evasive language that’s almost entirely outside the normal, historical, and common lexicon used to describe such events."
"Every nominee provided near-identical phrasing to avoid a direct answer about the 2020 election, instead referencing the results of the congressional 'certification' process, or answering by noting that President Biden 'served' as president," the report notes. "And 21 of 27 nominees provided extremely similar responses in regard to January 6, often describing what transpired as a 'political issue' and refusing to comment further."
Orton of Demand Justice said that "it is unprecedented for lifetime nominees to the federal bench to provide dishonest and misleading answers about historical facts—and it is deeply concerning that Trump’s nominees are parroting such strikingly similar language, the president’s own language, to avoid telling the truth."
That more than a dozen Senate Democrats still voted to confirm at least one of those nominees is "simply unacceptable," said Orton.
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Yikes’: New Jobs Data Further Undermines Trump Fiction of Thriving Economy
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," said economist Dean Baker.
Dec 03, 2025
Economists on Wednesday expressed significant concerns after new data from global payroll processing firm ADP estimated that the US economy lost 32,000 jobs last month.
As reported by CNBC, small businesses bore the brunt of the job losses, as firms with fewer than 50 employees shed a total of 120,000 jobs, more than offsetting the 90,000 in job gains reported by firms with 50 or more employees.
The loss of 32,000 jobs in November marked a major miss for economists' consensus estimate of 40,000 jobs added on the month, and CNBC noted that the total number of jobs lost according to ADP data "was the biggest drop since March 2023."
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted in a post on X that the job losses recorded by ADP were widespread across the US economy.
"Yikes," she wrote in reaction to the report. "Most industries were doing layoffs. The only ones still are hiring are hospitality and healthcare."
Long also said the disparity between small and large businesses in terms of job growth was more evidence that the US is experiencing a "K-shaped" economy in which those at the top of the economic ladder thrive, even as everyone else struggles.
"Larger companies are still hiring," she explained. "Smaller firms (under 50 workers) are doing the layoffs. It's been a very tough year for small biz due to tariffs and more selective spending from lower and middle-class consumers."
Kevin Gordon, head of macro research and strategy at the Schwab Center for Financial Research, observed that ADP hasn't reported such a big drop in small-business employment since October 2020, when the US economy was suffering through the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, cautioned against reading too much into ADP data, although he added that "in the absence of up to date government payrolls, all other signs point to a further deteriorating labor market."
Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at financial planner Creative Planning, argued that the ADP jobs numbers were part of a negative three-month trend in which the US economy lost an estimated 4,000 jobs per month, which he said was "the first three-month decline since the 2020 recession."
Bilello added that "a year ago, we were adding over 200,000 jobs per month."
Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG, argued that the ADP report showed job losses in the US economy were "broad based" and "were accompanied by a cooling of wage gains" for workers who still have jobs or are switching from one job to another.
"Those with a job are clinging on, while those without are left wanting," she explained.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, argued that the ADP report blows up President Donald Trump's spin about the health of the US economy.
"The booming job market exists only in Donald Trump's demented head," he wrote.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Pope Leo Presses Trump to End Military Escalation Against Venezuela
"So often, who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities," the first American pope said as another regime change war looms.
Dec 03, 2025
Amid escalating threats from the White House in recent days, Pope Leo XIV pleaded for President Donald Trump to pursue diplomacy with Venezuela rather than another regime change war.
"It is better to search for ways of dialogue, or perhaps pressure, including economic pressure," said the first American pope as he returned to Rome from Lebanon.
Since September, the Trump administration has launched airstrikes against at least 22 boats mostly in the Southern Caribbean that have extrajudicially killed at least 83 people. While the administration has claimed these people are "narcoterrorists" from Venezuela, it has provided no evidence to support this.
Trump said he had ordered the closing of Venezuela’s airspace on Saturday, which has left many observers holding their breath in expectation of military action against the South American nation.
As Reuters reported Monday, Trump also offered safe passage to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro last month if he left the country, suggesting that regime change is the administration’s ultimate goal.
"On one hand, it seems there was a call between the two presidents," said the pope, referring to that ultimatum from Trump last month. "On the other hand, there is the danger, there is the possibility there will be some activity, some [military] operation."
"The voices that come from the United States, they change with a certain frequency," Leo added.
The pope has been a frequent critic of the Trump administration’s policies since he was elected earlier this year, with harsh rebukes issued towards the White House's attacks on immigrants.
While the pope did not denounce the idea of US-imposed regime change in Venezuela entirely, he said it should search for other means "if that is what they want to do in the United States.”
The US has notably already applied a great deal of "economic pressure" to Venezuela, via a regime of crippling sanctions that are considered one of the major causes of the nation's economic instability in recent years.
On Tuesday, Abigail Hall, a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, warned that "a US invasion, however framed, would impose steep costs on both nations."
"For the United States, an attempt at regime change in Venezuela would likely be another foray into failed foreign policy, with all the costs that go with it," she said. "A destabilized Venezuela could also trigger another wave of migration across the region, straining neighboring countries and potentially reaching US shores."
"For Venezuelans, the costs would be even greater," she added. "Beyond the immediate human toll of conflict, the long-term costs are incalculable. Even if Maduro were removed, a chaotic transition could destroy prospects for rebuilding Venezuela’s institutions, economy, and civil society."
Amid Trump's latest series of threats, Pope Leo echoed this warning aboard the papal plane. He said Venezuela's bishops are "looking for ways to calm the situation" and pursue "the good of the people, because so often who suffers in these situations is the people, not the authorities."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular