SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
December, 03 2010, 07:33am EDT
Contact:
Dick Campbell, 617-301-4370, dcampbell@uusc.org
Human Rights and Humanitarian Relief Groups Urge Rebuilding Plan for Gaza
WASHINGTON
With the blockade and resulting crisis in Gaza continuing with no end in sight, a group of international human rights and humanitarian relief organizations is urging a major home-repair initiative that will enable victims to reclaim their right to live in dignity.
In a report entitled "Gaza Repair Strategies," the nongovernmental organizations propose a concerted effort of small-scale home repairs that offers viable, safe, and dignified repair options. The strategy is designed to enable Gaza residents to move toward regaining their lives and livelihoods until a permanent political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be reached.
The report was published by the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, American Friends Service Committee, and Architecture for Humanity.
"Much of Gaza remains in ruins," Gretchen Alther, UUSC's senior associate and a leader in the campaign to protect the human rights of the victims of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. "A severe, Israeli-imposed blockade continues to keep out most of the materials needed to repair and rebuild homes, schools, hospitals, and universities. UUSC, along with many other organizations around the world, has called this situation a crisis of human dignity."
The political crisis in Gaza has dire humanitarian consequences. The Gaza economy is stagnant, unemployment is near 50 percent, and poverty is widespread. About 80 percent of the people in Gaza depend on humanitarian aid for their survival. Much of the infrastructure, schools, hospitals, and factories in Gaza are unable to function.
Given the severity of the Gaza crisis and the sluggish rate of housing rehabilitation, the report details the most common and critical damage to private residences, and suggests viable, safe and dignified repair options, projects that use locally available resources that can be implemented by communities themselves.
"Many of these suggestions are immediately feasible, while others are ambitious and possibly uncommon, and will require new materials and funding-and the political will to make both available" the report says.
To download and read the full report, visit Gaza Repair Strategies at https://www.uusc.org/gazarepairstrategies
###
UUSC is an international human rights organization founded in 1940 that advances human rights and social justice around the world, responding to humanitarian crises, both natural and man-made, especially reaching out to neglected and marginalized populations in dire need of relief aid. For more information, visit www.uusc.org.
AFSC is a Quaker organization committed to social justice, peace, and humanitarian service whose presence in the Gaza Strip began in 1949. For more information, visit www.afsc.org.
Architecture for Humanity is a nonprofit organization that seeks architectural solutions to humanitarian crises and brings design services to communities in need through a global network of design, development and construction professionals. For more information, visit https://architectureforhumanity.org/.
LATEST NEWS
US Consumers Paying the Most for Tariffs: Wall Street Giant’s Report Exposes Trump Lies
The report from investment bank Goldman Sachs comes as President Donald Trump is piling up even more tariffs on imported goods.
Oct 14, 2025
New research from investment bank Goldman Sachs affirms, as progressive advocates and economists warned, that US consumers are bearing the brunt of President Donald Trump's trade wars.
As reported by Bloomberg on Monday, economists at Goldman released an analysis this week estimating that US consumers are shouldering up to 55% of the costs stemming from Trump's tariffs, even though the president has repeatedly made false claims that the tariffs on imports exclusively tax foreigners.
Goldman's research also found that US businesses will pay 22% of the cost of the tariffs, while foreign exporters will pay just 18% of the cost. Additionally, Goldman economists estimate that Trump's tariffs "have raised core personal consumption expenditure prices by 0.44% so far this year, and will push up the closely watched inflation reading to 3% by December," according to Bloomberg.
Despite all evidence that US consumers are shouldering the costs of the tariffs, the Trump administration has continued to insist that they are exclusively being paid by foreign countries.
During a segment on NBC's "Meet the Press" last month, host Kristen Welker cited an earlier Goldman estimate that 86% of the president's tariffs were being paid by US businesses and consumers, and then asked US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent if he accepted that the tariffs were taxes on Americans.
"No, I don't," Bessent replied.
“Goldman Sachs says 86% of the tariffs have been paid by American businesses & consumers. Do you acknowledge that these tariffs are a tax on Americans?” - NBC
“No I don't.” - Scott Bessent
pic.twitter.com/6wtAznhpCc
— Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) September 7, 2025
As Common Dreams reported in August, executives such as Walmart CEO Doug McMillon have explicitly told shareholders that while they are able to absorb the cost of tariffs, Trump's policy would still "result in higher prices" for customers.
Goldman's report comes as Trump is piling up even more tariffs on imported goods that will ultimately be paid by US consumers as companies raise prices.
According to The New York Times, tariffs on a wide range of products including lumber, furniture, and kitchen cabinets went into effect on Tuesday, and the Trump administration has also "started imposing fees on Chinese-owned ships docking in American ports."
The administration has claimed that the tariffs on lumber are necessary for national security purposes, although some experts are scoffing at this rationale.
Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at libertarian think tank the Cato Institute, told the Times that the administration's justification for the lumber tariffs are "absurd."
"If war broke out tomorrow, there would be zero concern about American ‘dependence’ on foreign lumber or furniture, and domestic sources would be quickly and easily acquired," he said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
As Deadline Nears, News Outlets Have No Plans to Sign 'Flatly Unconstitutional' Pentagon Press Policy
The policy unveiled last month would bar reporters from seeking or reporting information that isn't explicitly authorized by the Trump administration.
Oct 14, 2025
News outlets that cover the US Department of Defense have until 5:00 pm Tuesday to sign an agreement put forward by the Pentagon last month that bars journalists from reporting any information that hasn't been explicitly authorized by the Trump administration—but several major organizations were resolute in stating they would not be agreeing to the terms.
Outlets including the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Atlantic, NPR, and the trade publication Breaking Defense were among those that released statements on Monday saying they would not be signing the agreement released last month, which says journalists could be deemed a "safety or security risk" if they ask Pentagon personnel for sensitive information for reporting purposes.
Since the Department of Defense does not hold regular news briefings, many journalists who report on national security issues use their publications or social media accounts to call for tips from DOD personnel—a practice that would be treated as suspicious under the new policy and could limit outlets' access.
The Pentagon has said outlets and reporters who don't sign the document released last month will have 24 hours to turn in their press credentials—but many organizations suggested Monday they will continue reporting on the US military without credentials rather than signing.
Richard Stevenson, Washington Bureau chief for the Times, said in a statement posted on X that the new policy "threatens to punish [reporters] for ordinary news gathering protected by the First Amendment," and noted that the Pentagon's budget amounts to nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer money annually.
"The public has a right to know how the government and military are operating," said Stevenson.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has claimed the DOD is now called the Department of War, responded to the Times' statement and those of a number of other outlets with only a "hand waving" emoji.
It was the response Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray got when he said the newspaper "will continue to vigorously and fairly report on the policies and positions of the Pentagon and officials across the government."
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic—who was inadvertently added to a Pentagon Signal chat earlier this year and was sent messages regarding US plans to bomb Yemen—also said the new policy violates journalists' "First Amendment rights, and the rights of Americans who seek to know how taxpayer-funded resources and personnel are being deployed," while HuffPost editor-in-chief Whitney Snyder said the new restrictions are "flatly unconstitutional" and are "clearly aimed at snuffing out actual news-gathering at the nation’s largest and best-funded federal department.”
Right-wing outlets including The Washington Times and Newsmax, which called the new requirements "unnecessary and onerous," have also said they won't sign the new policy.
“Newsmax has no plans to sign the letter,” the network told the Times Monday. “We are working in conjunction with other media outlets to resolve the situation."
The new policy was unveiled months after Hegseth's office removed four news outlets from their long-held workspaces in the Pentagon, replacing them with right-wing One America News Network—which has agreed to the restrictions—and Breitbart News.
The DOD has also limited journalists' access to the building, barring them from most hallways without an official escort—a departure from decades of established rules that allowed reporters to travel through most of the Pentagon, except secure areas, without restrictions.
In addition to stifling the free speech of journalists, said the Pentagon Press Association (PPA) last week, the new policy also "conveys an unprecedented message of intimidation to everyone within the DOD," even those who share "entirely unclassified" information with reporters.
The restrictions warn "against any unapproved interactions with the press and even [suggest] it's criminal to speak without express permission—which plainly, it is not."
The PPA emphasized Monday that after pledging to oversee "the most transparent Department of Defense in history," the Trump administration has spent "an inordinate amount of time... systematically limiting access to information about the US military."
"Our members did nothing to create this disturbing situation," said the PPA. "Reporting by the Pentagon press corps involves issues that matter not just to the public, but also to the well-being of the soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and guardians who protect America on a daily basis. Their potential expulsion from the Pentagon should be a concern to all."
Keep ReadingShow Less
North Carolina GOP Plans to Rig US House Map for Trump
"These shameless politicians are abusing their power to take away yours," Democratic Gov. Josh Stein told voters.
Oct 13, 2025
"The General Assembly works for North Carolina, not Donald Trump."
That's how the state's Democratic governor, Josh Stein, responded on Monday after Republican legislative leaders announced plans to vote on redrawing congressional districts for the 2026 midterms to appease the president.
"The Republican leadership in the General Assembly has failed to pass a budget, failed to pay our teachers and law enforcement what they deserve, and failed to fully fund Medicaid," Stein continued. "Now they are failing you, the voters."
"These shameless politicians are abusing their power to take away yours," he added. "I will always fight for you because the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around."
Since Texas Republican lawmakers passed and Gov. Greg Abbott signed a new congressional map gerrymandered for the GOP in August after pressure from Trump, legislators in other states have pursued similar efforts.
Some Democrats in blue states have responded with proposals to draw GOP-held districts out of existence—including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whose redistricting plans are on his state's November ballot.
Newsom was also among the critics calling out North Carolina Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R-26) on Monday:
As The Associated Press reported Monday:
North Carolina Republicans already created a map in 2023 that resulted in GOP candidates winning 10 of the state's 14 US House seats in 2024. That division compared to the 7-7 seat split between Democrats and the GOP under the map used in 2022.
Now, only one of the House districts—the 1st District, currently represented by Democratic Rep. Don Davis—is considered a true swing district and could be targeted by the GOP for an 11th seat.
Former Democratic Congressman Wiley Nickel, who did not seek another term in the House of Representatives after the North Carolina GOP redrew the map two years ago, slammed state lawmakers for trying to oust Davis: "I've seen this movie before—and I didn't like the ending. NC Republicans gerrymandered me out of my seat and cost Democrats control of Congress. Now they’re coming for Don Davis. They couldn't beat him at the ballot box, so they're going to cheat. That's not democracy—it's rigging the system."
Rep. Deborah Ross, one of the other three Democrats representing the state in the US House, said Monday that "for multiple election cycles, Republicans in North Carolina have used partisan gerrymandering to silence voters and manipulate their way into office. With this announcement, we have now reached a decisive turning point for our democracy—a moment when the courts and our elected representatives will need to decide whether it's acceptable for Republicans to blatantly rig elections to cement their hold on power."
"The context is critical. North Carolinians from both parties should be alarmed by credible reports that Phil Berger is pursuing redistricting as part of a corrupt bargain to secure a political endorsement from Donald Trump," she continued. "Republicans are waging a war on American voting rights because they know the truth—their policies are unpopular, their candidates are unlikable, and they can't win a majority in Congress without stacking the deck in their favor."
"Now is the time for people of good faith from both parties who care about the future of our democracy to make their voices heard. Will we allow a corrupt deal to go unchallenged? Will we allow power-hungry politicians to select their voters? Or will we stand up for the bedrock American principle that voters should be empowered to select their leaders?" she asked. "I'm committed to fighting for every North Carolinian who is tired of being silenced by Republicans in Raleigh and Washington."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular