Khanna, Massie Push to Block Trump's Ability to Strike Iran Without Congressional Consent

As US President Donald Trump appears poised to launch a massive war with Iran, Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie say they will attempt to force the House to vote on a war powers resolution next week, after Congress returns from recess.

"Trump officials say there's a 90% chance of strikes on Iran. He can’t without Congress," Khanna (D-Calif.) wrote Wednesday night on social media following reports of a massive US military mobilization toward the Middle East.

He said that he and Massie (R-Ky.) "have a War Powers Resolution to debate and vote on... before putting US troops in harm’s way," adding, "I will make a motion to discharge to force a vote on it next week."

It’s not the first time that the progressive and the libertarian have teamed up in an attempt to place a check on the White House, including Trump’s ability to attack Iran.

In June, days after Trump launched strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites amid the nation's 12-day war with Israel, the pair cosponsored a resolution along with 75 other representatives to require congressional approval for any further military actions. However, the bill stalled out after a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was reached.

This time, however, a full-scale war appears much more likely.

"Trump is positioning two aircraft carriers, a dozen warships, and hundreds of fighter jets to prepare for a possible war with Iran," Khanna said.

"A war with Iran would be catastrophic," he went on. "Iran is a complex society of 90 million people with significant air defenses and military capabilities. We also have 30,000 to 40,000 US troops in the region who could be at risk of retaliation. Congress must do its job and stop this march to war."

Massie emphasized that Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the explicit authority "to declare war."

Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, the president is allowed to deploy military force without authorization from Congress, but only in narrow circumstances—when there is a "national emergency created by an attack upon the United States."

In this case, however, Massie said, "There’s no imminent threat from Iran to invoke [this exception in] the 1973 War Powers Act."

A discharge petition, which would force a war powers resolution onto the floor for a vote even without approval from the Republican majority, would require 218 members of the House.

It would not be the first war powers resolution to reach a floor vote. Multiple resolutions to rein in Trump's ability to strike boats in the Caribbean and to wage war on Venezuela have come up just short in recent months.

In January, weeks after Trump’s operation to overthrow Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and commandeer the nation’s oil, a resolution requiring him to seek congressional approval for US military presence there failed by a vote of 215-215, just one yes vote short of passing in the House, where a deadlock means legislation cannot be approved. Massie was joined by one other Republican, Don Bacon (R-Neb.), in crossing party lines to vote with Democrats.

Another prominent Republican critic of Trump's warmongering, former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), had also joined in voting for previous war powers resolutions. However, she resigned from her seat in early January amid a falling out with Trump.

If all 213 Democrats vote in favor of a discharge petition, it's unclear which three Republicans might join Massie and Bacon to pass it. To take effect, the bill would also have to pass the GOP-controlled Senate.

Congress is currently on recess and will not return until Monday, by which time a war may already have begun. However, Khanna said the vote is still important.

"If Trump is preparing to bomb Iran soon and others call for troops on the ground, Congress must get on the record, so Americans know where their representatives stand," he said.

Polls suggest that a war with Iran is overwhelmingly unpopular with the American people. A YouGov survey from early February found that 48% said they strongly or somewhat opposed military action in Iran, compared with just 28% who supported it and 24% who weren’t sure.

"Like the votes before the Iraq War, this could be one of the most consequential votes in the history of Congress," Khanna said. "Are we going to stop another endless dumb foreign war? Or will the neoconservatives mislead us once again?"

The Trump administration has provided little in the way of a public justification for a new war with Iran, while Democratic leadership has been criticized for failing to forcefully stand against it.

"The American public hasn't even gotten a semblance of a rationale from Trump as to why we have to attack Iran now," said Nathan Thompson, a senior policy adviser at Just Foreign Policy. "Congress needs to call up a war powers vote and do its job immediately to stop this disaster from unfolding."