Demonstrators from the Sierra Club, Workers For Progress, Our Revolution, and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network picket in front of the office of U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) as part of the Thrive National Day of Action on June 3, 2021 in Morgantown, West Virginia. (Photo: Jeff Swensen/Getty Images for Green New Deal Network)
Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill Rebuked for Funding False Climate Solutions
"This infrastructure proposal is not a down payment on real climate action. It is doubling down on support for climate polluters."
As the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to approve a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups denounced the measure for funding "false" solutions to the climate emergency, while underscoring what they say is the critical need for a filibuster-proof reconciliation package that centers human needs, including bold climate action.
"Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
--Natalie Mebane, 350.org
The Senate voted 69-30--with 19 Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues--in favor of the 2,700-page Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (pdf), a move that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called an "overdue step to revitalize America's infrastructure and give our workers, our businesses, our economy the tools to succeed in the 21st century."
However, noting Monday's publication of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report whose findings United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called "a code red for humanity," Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that the infrastructure bill does not adequately fund measures to address the climate emergency.
"Not even close," he said. "Though it includes important investments in hard infrastructure like our roads and bridges, it vastly underfunds public transit, [electrical vehicle], and grid infrastructure."
"This is personal to my district--where public transit underserves Black and brown neighborhoods and where fossil fuel infrastructure like the Cross Bronx Expressway cuts through communities and lowers quality of life, including leading to higher asthma rates among children," Bowman added.
Echoing many of Bowman's concerns, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) tweeted that "Congress must invest in infrastructure that takes on the climate crisis and meets the needs of working families," and that "CPC members won't support a bipartisan bill without a bold reconciliation bill to advance our priorities."
To that end, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined Schumer Monday in introducing a $3.5 trillion budget resolution that would fund a Civilian Climate Corps; expand Medicare and the Child Tax Credit; invest in affordable housing; and provide a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants, as well as paid family and medical leave, tuition-free community college, and universal pre-K for three- and four-year-olds.
CPC members on Tuesday sent Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a letter asking them to ensure that lawmakers first adopt "a robust reconciliation package" that "reflects our shared and long-standing investment priorities."
Mitch Jones, policy director of Food & Water Watch, told Bloomberg that "this infrastructure proposal is not a down payment on real climate action. It is doubling down on support for climate polluters."
As Bloomberg senior climate reporter Leslie Kaufman wrote:
Many of the bill's provisions are on the oil industry's wish list. The proposed legislation has more than $10 billion for carbon capture, transport, and storage, along with $8 billion for hydrogen--with no stipulation that the energy used to produce it comes from clean sources. A new liquid natural gas plant in Alaska won billions in loan guarantees, while other waivers in the bill will weaken environmental reviews of new construction projects, climate groups say.
In a statement, 350.org policy director Natalie Mebane said that "today, our Senate missed a major opportunity to invest in vital climate resilient infrastructure. Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
"While they could have led the way to a clean energy future, they chose to pour billions into the false promise of carbon capture and storage," Mebane said of the senators, "further locking us into decades of new fossil fuel infrastructure which will ensure planetary and community devastation."
"The Senate should invest billions more to improve our mass transit, increase spending to electrify school and public buses, and invest more in electric vehicle infrastructure," Mebane added. "We need to build and improve infrastructure that will ensure a livable future and climate-resilient communities."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to approve a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups denounced the measure for funding "false" solutions to the climate emergency, while underscoring what they say is the critical need for a filibuster-proof reconciliation package that centers human needs, including bold climate action.
"Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
--Natalie Mebane, 350.org
The Senate voted 69-30--with 19 Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues--in favor of the 2,700-page Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (pdf), a move that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called an "overdue step to revitalize America's infrastructure and give our workers, our businesses, our economy the tools to succeed in the 21st century."
However, noting Monday's publication of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report whose findings United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called "a code red for humanity," Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that the infrastructure bill does not adequately fund measures to address the climate emergency.
"Not even close," he said. "Though it includes important investments in hard infrastructure like our roads and bridges, it vastly underfunds public transit, [electrical vehicle], and grid infrastructure."
"This is personal to my district--where public transit underserves Black and brown neighborhoods and where fossil fuel infrastructure like the Cross Bronx Expressway cuts through communities and lowers quality of life, including leading to higher asthma rates among children," Bowman added.
Echoing many of Bowman's concerns, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) tweeted that "Congress must invest in infrastructure that takes on the climate crisis and meets the needs of working families," and that "CPC members won't support a bipartisan bill without a bold reconciliation bill to advance our priorities."
To that end, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined Schumer Monday in introducing a $3.5 trillion budget resolution that would fund a Civilian Climate Corps; expand Medicare and the Child Tax Credit; invest in affordable housing; and provide a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants, as well as paid family and medical leave, tuition-free community college, and universal pre-K for three- and four-year-olds.
CPC members on Tuesday sent Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a letter asking them to ensure that lawmakers first adopt "a robust reconciliation package" that "reflects our shared and long-standing investment priorities."
Mitch Jones, policy director of Food & Water Watch, told Bloomberg that "this infrastructure proposal is not a down payment on real climate action. It is doubling down on support for climate polluters."
As Bloomberg senior climate reporter Leslie Kaufman wrote:
Many of the bill's provisions are on the oil industry's wish list. The proposed legislation has more than $10 billion for carbon capture, transport, and storage, along with $8 billion for hydrogen--with no stipulation that the energy used to produce it comes from clean sources. A new liquid natural gas plant in Alaska won billions in loan guarantees, while other waivers in the bill will weaken environmental reviews of new construction projects, climate groups say.
In a statement, 350.org policy director Natalie Mebane said that "today, our Senate missed a major opportunity to invest in vital climate resilient infrastructure. Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
"While they could have led the way to a clean energy future, they chose to pour billions into the false promise of carbon capture and storage," Mebane said of the senators, "further locking us into decades of new fossil fuel infrastructure which will ensure planetary and community devastation."
"The Senate should invest billions more to improve our mass transit, increase spending to electrify school and public buses, and invest more in electric vehicle infrastructure," Mebane added. "We need to build and improve infrastructure that will ensure a livable future and climate-resilient communities."
As the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to approve a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups denounced the measure for funding "false" solutions to the climate emergency, while underscoring what they say is the critical need for a filibuster-proof reconciliation package that centers human needs, including bold climate action.
"Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
--Natalie Mebane, 350.org
The Senate voted 69-30--with 19 Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues--in favor of the 2,700-page Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (pdf), a move that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called an "overdue step to revitalize America's infrastructure and give our workers, our businesses, our economy the tools to succeed in the 21st century."
However, noting Monday's publication of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report whose findings United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called "a code red for humanity," Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that the infrastructure bill does not adequately fund measures to address the climate emergency.
"Not even close," he said. "Though it includes important investments in hard infrastructure like our roads and bridges, it vastly underfunds public transit, [electrical vehicle], and grid infrastructure."
"This is personal to my district--where public transit underserves Black and brown neighborhoods and where fossil fuel infrastructure like the Cross Bronx Expressway cuts through communities and lowers quality of life, including leading to higher asthma rates among children," Bowman added.
Echoing many of Bowman's concerns, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) tweeted that "Congress must invest in infrastructure that takes on the climate crisis and meets the needs of working families," and that "CPC members won't support a bipartisan bill without a bold reconciliation bill to advance our priorities."
To that end, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined Schumer Monday in introducing a $3.5 trillion budget resolution that would fund a Civilian Climate Corps; expand Medicare and the Child Tax Credit; invest in affordable housing; and provide a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants, as well as paid family and medical leave, tuition-free community college, and universal pre-K for three- and four-year-olds.
CPC members on Tuesday sent Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a letter asking them to ensure that lawmakers first adopt "a robust reconciliation package" that "reflects our shared and long-standing investment priorities."
Mitch Jones, policy director of Food & Water Watch, told Bloomberg that "this infrastructure proposal is not a down payment on real climate action. It is doubling down on support for climate polluters."
As Bloomberg senior climate reporter Leslie Kaufman wrote:
Many of the bill's provisions are on the oil industry's wish list. The proposed legislation has more than $10 billion for carbon capture, transport, and storage, along with $8 billion for hydrogen--with no stipulation that the energy used to produce it comes from clean sources. A new liquid natural gas plant in Alaska won billions in loan guarantees, while other waivers in the bill will weaken environmental reviews of new construction projects, climate groups say.
In a statement, 350.org policy director Natalie Mebane said that "today, our Senate missed a major opportunity to invest in vital climate resilient infrastructure. Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
"While they could have led the way to a clean energy future, they chose to pour billions into the false promise of carbon capture and storage," Mebane said of the senators, "further locking us into decades of new fossil fuel infrastructure which will ensure planetary and community devastation."
"The Senate should invest billions more to improve our mass transit, increase spending to electrify school and public buses, and invest more in electric vehicle infrastructure," Mebane added. "We need to build and improve infrastructure that will ensure a livable future and climate-resilient communities."