Aug 10, 2021
As the U.S. Senate voted Tuesday to approve a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups denounced the measure for funding "false" solutions to the climate emergency, while underscoring what they say is the critical need for a filibuster-proof reconciliation package that centers human needs, including bold climate action.
"Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
--Natalie Mebane, 350.org
The Senate voted 69-30--with 19 Republicans joining their Democratic colleagues--in favor of the 2,700-page Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (pdf), a move that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called an "overdue step to revitalize America's infrastructure and give our workers, our businesses, our economy the tools to succeed in the 21st century."
However, noting Monday's publication of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report whose findings United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called "a code red for humanity," Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that the infrastructure bill does not adequately fund measures to address the climate emergency.
"Not even close," he said. "Though it includes important investments in hard infrastructure like our roads and bridges, it vastly underfunds public transit, [electrical vehicle], and grid infrastructure."
"This is personal to my district--where public transit underserves Black and brown neighborhoods and where fossil fuel infrastructure like the Cross Bronx Expressway cuts through communities and lowers quality of life, including leading to higher asthma rates among children," Bowman added.
\u201cToday\u2019s IPCC report makes clear what we already know: the bipartisan infrastructure deal fails to address the urgency of the climate crisis. \n\nThe investments we make through reconciliation must be bold and ambitious \u2014 and move us closer to a Green New Deal.\u201d— Congresswoman Cori Bush (@Congresswoman Cori Bush) 1628539407
Echoing many of Bowman's concerns, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) tweeted that "Congress must invest in infrastructure that takes on the climate crisis and meets the needs of working families," and that "CPC members won't support a bipartisan bill without a bold reconciliation bill to advance our priorities."
To that end, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined Schumer Monday in introducing a $3.5 trillion budget resolution that would fund a Civilian Climate Corps; expand Medicare and the Child Tax Credit; invest in affordable housing; and provide a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants, as well as paid family and medical leave, tuition-free community college, and universal pre-K for three- and four-year-olds.
CPC members on Tuesday sent Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a letter asking them to ensure that lawmakers first adopt "a robust reconciliation package" that "reflects our shared and long-standing investment priorities."
\u201cThe UN\u2019s climate change report confirms we've already warmed the globe and must act immediately to prevent it from worsening. Global warming is causing heat waves, stronger storms, flooding, and droughts. \n \nThe stakes are clear for the infrastructure bill. No climate no deal.\u201d— Rep. Ro Khanna (@Rep. Ro Khanna) 1628543930
Mitch Jones, policy director of Food & Water Watch, toldBloomberg that "this infrastructure proposal is not a down payment on real climate action. It is doubling down on support for climate polluters."
As Bloomberg senior climate reporter Leslie Kaufman wrote:
Many of the bill's provisions are on the oil industry's wish list. The proposed legislation has more than $10 billion for carbon capture, transport, and storage, along with $8 billion for hydrogen--with no stipulation that the energy used to produce it comes from clean sources. A new liquid natural gas plant in Alaska won billions in loan guarantees, while other waivers in the bill will weaken environmental reviews of new construction projects, climate groups say.
In a statement, 350.org policy director Natalie Mebane said that "today, our Senate missed a major opportunity to invest in vital climate resilient infrastructure. Instead of facing the climate crisis, the Senate has chosen to invest billions into propping up the fossil fuel industry."
"While they could have led the way to a clean energy future, they chose to pour billions into the false promise of carbon capture and storage," Mebane said of the senators, "further locking us into decades of new fossil fuel infrastructure which will ensure planetary and community devastation."
\u201cToday, the Senate approved the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act \u2014 a deal that falls short of providing the climate, jobs, care, and justice investments our communities need and deserve.\n\n#ChangePoweredByPeople #TimeToThrive\u201d— Sierra Club (@Sierra Club) 1628619303
"The Senate should invest billions more to improve our mass transit, increase spending to electrify school and public buses, and invest more in electric vehicle infrastructure," Mebane added. "We need to build and improve infrastructure that will ensure a livable future and climate-resilient communities."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.