

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Rep. Keith Ellison today won unanimous consent from his colleagues to assume leadership of former Rep. John Conyers' historic single-payer health care bill, "The Expanded And Improved Medicare For All Act" (H.R. 676) as its lead sponsor. The bill, first introduced in 2003 with 25 cosponsors, would expand Medicare to become a publicly-financed national health care system that guarantees coverage to every single American through a modest new payroll tax, a financial transaction tax, and tax increases on the wealthiest households. H.R.
Rep. Keith Ellison today won unanimous consent from his colleagues to assume leadership of former Rep. John Conyers' historic single-payer health care bill, "The Expanded And Improved Medicare For All Act" (H.R. 676) as its lead sponsor. The bill, first introduced in 2003 with 25 cosponsors, would expand Medicare to become a publicly-financed national health care system that guarantees coverage to every single American through a modest new payroll tax, a financial transaction tax, and tax increases on the wealthiest households. H.R. 676 today has the support of 121 cosponsors and a similar bill in the Senate, led by Sen. Bernie Sanders, is backed by 17 senators.
"I'm honored to be charged by my colleagues with carrying on the legacy of John Conyers' historic bill to establish health care as a right," said Rep. Keith Ellison. "Every year, more and more Americans rightly question why the United States spends so much more on health care than any other industrialized nation in the world, yet still forces people to choose between paying their health care bills and putting food on the table. This is an idea whose time has come, and it is a crucial lynchpin in our fight for fairness and economic justice."
"I am excited to have Keith take the lead in the House on the fight to pass a Medicare-for-all health care system," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "With his leadership, I know that we will be able to take on the greed of the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries and finally join every other major country in guaranteeing health care as a right, not a privilege."
"I congratulate my friend and colleague Keith Ellison for taking over leadership of H.R. 676 and the fight for Medicare for All," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky. "John Conyers championed this effort throughout his career, not just in the halls of Congress but across the country. As co-chair of the Seniors Task Force, I know how vital Medicare is for seniors and people with disabilities, and I believe the time has come for all Americans to have access to the health care security Medicare provides. Keith Ellison will help us turn that vision into reality. I know that he will not stop organizing until every person in our country is able to get the quality health care they need at a price that they can afford. I will be with him every step of the way."
"It is time for America to transition away from a health system that is centered around private insurance companies reaping profit off of sickness," said Rep. Raul M. Grijalva. "All Americans deserve access to preventative care and should never have to worry about an illness bankrupting their family. Medicare for All can provide the security and quality health care that they need once and for all. Under Congressman Ellison's leadership, the movement for a single payer health care system will be stronger than ever, and I am proud to stand by my friend in the fight to recognize the right of all Americans to live healthy lives."
"Congressman Ellison has long fought to expand access to affordable, lifesaving care and he strongly believes that health care must be a human right, grounded in justice, access, and dignity - not profit," said Rep. Mark Pocan. "Congressman Ellison is the right choice to lead the fight on Medicare for All and build support in Congress to make this bill a law. Along with the millions of Americans calling on Congress to fix our nation's broken health care system, we can make Medicare for All a reality and ensure that health care is a right for all Americans, not just the privileged few."
"We spend more on health care than any other country in the world - and yet, some Americans are just one health care crisis away from complete bankruptcy. This is unacceptable. We need universal health care that ensures every American has access to the care they need, " said Rep. Pramila Jayapal. "I'm so proud to join my good friend Keith Ellison, as he leads the fight for Medicare for All in the House. This is not merely a "progressive" dream. Countries around the world have shown that government funded health care works in delivering quality, affordable and accessible health care to all - and saves us money as we improve health care for all. I urge my colleagues to join us. Let's get this done."
"Health care is a fundamental human right," said Rep. Barbara Lee. "In the richest nation on Earth, no parent should have to choose between paying the bills and taking their sick child to the doctor. That's why I'm proud to cosponsor Medicare For All legislation. At the end of the day, it is patients - not corporate profits - that should come first."
"The simple fact is, it's long past time that we instituted a single-payer, 'Medicare for All' system that provides everyone with affordable, top-quality health care," said Rep. Rick Nolan. "Advanced nations with universal health care systems pay far less than we do and achieve better health outcomes, as measured by life expectancy and infant mortality. As one of the first champions of single payer legislation more than 30 years ago, I am proud to support this bill, and I will keep fighting to ensure that every American has access to the high-quality care they deserve."
"National Nurses United commends Representative Keith Ellison for taking over the lead sponsorship of HR 676, the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act," said Jean Ross, co-president of National Nurses United. "Representative Ellison has long been a leader in the fight for a single payer, Medicare for All health care system, and we are looking forward to working with him to finally win guaranteed healthcare for all people living in the United States. As registered nurses, we see the horrific impacts of our for-profit health insurance system everyday at the hospital bedside. Too many patients can't afford the care they need - millions of Americans go without preventative care or lifesaving medications because they don't have insurance or can't afford the copays. We see the devastation this system causes for so many families when patients lose their lives from preventable illness and injury. As nurses, we have a duty to advocate for our patients - and we know that Medicare for All is the best solution for our patients."
"The crushing cost of health care is the top financial problem facing American families, who often postpone or avoid needed care because of cost," said Dr. Carol Paris, a Nashville-based psychiatrist and president of Physicians for a National Health Program, a nonprofit research and education organization of more than 22,000 doctors and health professionals. "We applaud Rep. Ellison's leadership on H.R. 676, which would provide medically necessary care to everyone in America for a fraction of the cost of our current system."
"We know that the richest country in history can afford to provide guaranteed health care to all of its people because every other wealthy country already does so," said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. "It's long past time for the United States to adopt a single-payer, Medicare-for-All system that will cover every American as a matter of right. Rep. Ellison is ready to fight for Medicare-for-All so that we can finally join the rest of the industrialized world in guaranteeing health care to everyone."
"We congratulate Rep. Ellison for taking the lead on the Medicare for All bill, and encourage all Members, regardless of party affiliation or political ideology, to take another look at the model followed in some way, shape, or form by the rest of the industrialized world," said Richard Master, Board Member of Business Initiative for Health Policy and CEO of MCS Industries. "Without partisan blinders, they will see that the elimination of wasteful middlemen and administrative complexity in our healthcare system will be a boon to our businesses, workers, and economy."
H.R. 676 has been introduced in Congress since 2003, and has a broad base of support among health care activists, organized labor, physicians, nurses, and social justice organizations across the nation. The bill has been endorsed by 26 international unions, Physicians For A National Health Program, two former editors of the New England Journal of Medicine, National Nurses United, the American Medical Students Association, Progressive Democrats of America, and the NAACP.
For text of The Expanded and Improved Medicare For All Act, click here.
Rep. Keith Ellison has represented the Fifth Congressional District of Minnesota in the U.S. House of Representatives since taking office on January 4, 2007. The Fifth Congressional District is the most vibrant and diverse district in Minnesota with a rich history and traditions. The Fifth District includes the City of Minneapolis and the surrounding suburbs.
"It's unfortunate that it took this long for the Pentagon's ridiculous policy to be thrown in the trash," said one press freedom advocate.
A federal judge in Washington, DC blocked the US Department of Defense's widely decried press policy on Friday, which The New York Times and reporter Julian Barnes had argued violates their rights under the First and Fifth amendments to the Constitution.
The Times filed its lawsuit in December, shortly after the first briefing for the "Pentagon Propaganda Corps," which critics called those who signed the DOD's pledge not to report on any information unless it is explicitly authorized by the Trump administration. Journalists who refused the agreement turned over their press credentials and carried out boxes of their belongings.
"A primary purpose of the First Amendment is to enable the press to publish what it will and the public to read what it chooses, free of any official proscription," Judge Paul Friedman, who was appointed to the US District Court for DC by former President Bill Clinton, wrote in a 40-page opinion.
"Those who drafted the First Amendment believed that the nation's security requires a free press and an informed people and that such security is endangered by governmental suppression of political speech," he continued. "That principle has preserved the nation’s security for almost 250 years. It must not be abandoned now."
Friedman recognized that "national security must be protected, the security of our troops must be protected, and war plans must be protected," but also stressed that "especially in light of the country's recent incursion into Venezuela and its ongoing war with Iran, it is more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing—so that the public can support government policies, if it wants to support them; protest, if it wants to protest; and decide based on full, complete, and open information who they are going to vote for in the next election."
The newspaper said that Friday's ruling "enforces the constitutionally protected rights for the free press in this country. Americans deserve visibility into how their government is being run, and the actions the military is taking in their name and with their tax dollars. Today's ruling reaffirms the right of the Times and other independent media to continue to ask questions on the public's behalf."
The Times had hired a prominent First Amendment lawyer, Theodore Boutrous Jr. of Gibson Dunn, who celebrated the decision as "a powerful rejection of the Pentagon's effort to impede freedom of the press and the reporting of vital information to the American people during a time of war."
"As the court recognized, those provisions violate not only the First Amendment and the due process clause, but also the founding principle that the nation's security depends upon a free press," Boutrous said. "The district court's opinion is not just a win for the Times, Mr. Barnes, and other journalists, but most importantly, for the American people who benefit from their coverage of the Pentagon."
Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, also welcomed the ruling, saying that "the judge was right to see the Pentagon's outrageous censorship for what it is, but this wasn't exactly a close call. If the same issue was presented as a hypothetical question on a first-year law school exam, the professor would be criticized for making the test too easy."
"It's shocking that this sweeping prior restraint was the official policy of our federal government and that Department of Justice lawyers had the nerve to argue that journalists asking questions of the government is criminal," Stern declared. "Fifty years ago, the Supreme Court called prior restraints on the press 'the most serious and the least tolerable' of First Amendment violations. At the time, the court was talking about relatively targeted orders restraining specific reporting because of a specific alleged threat—like in the Pentagon Papers case, where the government falsely claimed that the documents about the Vietnam War leaked by Daniel Ellsberg threatened national security."
"Courts back then could never have anticipated the government broadly restraining all reporting that it doesn't authorize without any justification beyond hypothetical speculation," he added. "It's unfortunate that it took this long for the Pentagon's ridiculous policy to be thrown in the trash. Especially now that we are spending money and blood on yet another war based on constantly shifting pretexts, journalists should double down on their commitment to finding out what the Pentagon does not want the public to know rather than parroting 'authorized' narratives."
The Trump administration has not yet said whether it will appeal the decision in the case, which was brought against the DOD—which President Donald Trump calls the Department of War—as well as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, Sean Parnell.
"When the international community didn't stop Israel as it deliberately killed nearly 75,000 Palestinians in Gaza, including 20,000 children, Israel knew they could kill civilians with impunity," said one critic.
Eighty percent of Lebanese people killed in Israel's renewed airstrikes on its northern neighbor were slain in attacks targeting only or mainly civilians, a leading international conflict monitor said Friday.
Reuters, using data provided by the Madison, Wisconsin-based Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), reported that 666 people were killed by Israeli strikes on Lebanon between March 1-16. As of Thursday, Lebanese officials said the death toll from Israeli attacks had topped 1,000.
While Lebanese authorities do not break down the combatant status of those killed and wounded during the war, Israel's targeting of civilian infrastructure, including entire apartment buildings, and reports of whole families being wiped out, have belied Israeli officials' claims that they do everything possible to avoid harming civilians.
Classified Israel Defense Forces (IDF) data leaked last year revealed that—despite Israeli government claims of a historically low civilian-to-combatant kill ratio—83% of Palestinians killed during the first 19 weeks of the genocidal war on Gaza were civilians.
According to Gaza officials, 2,700 families were erased from the civil registry in the Palestinian exclave during Israel's genocidal assault.
"When the international community didn't stop Israel as it deliberately killed nearly 75,000 Palestinians in Gaza, including 20,000 children, Israel knew they could kill civilians with impunity," Lebanese diplomat Mohamad Safa said on social media earlier this week. "The result is exactly what we're seeing in Lebanon and Iran right now."
US-Israeli bombing of Iran has killed at least 1,444 people, according to officials in Tehran. The independent, Washington, DC-based monitor Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI) says the death toll is over twice as high as the official count and includes nearly 1,400 civilians.
The February 28 US massacre of around 175 children and staff at an elementary school for girls in the southern city of Minab—which US President Donald Trump initially tried to blame on Iran—remains the deadliest known incident of the three-week war.
As Israeli airstrikes intensify and the IDF prepares for a possible ground invasion of southern Lebanon—which Israel occupied from 1982-2000—experts are warning that noncombatants will once again pay the heaviest price.
United Nations officials and others assert that Israel's intentional attacks on civilians are war crimes. Israel is the subject of an ongoing genocide case filed by South Africa at the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who are accused of crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza.
"Deliberately attacking civilians or civilian objects amounts to a war crime," UN High Commissioner for Human Rights spokesperson Thameen al-Kheetan said earlier this week. "In addition, international law provides for specific protections for healthcare workers, as well as people at heightened risk, such as the elderly, women, and displaced people."
As was the case during Israel's bombing of Gaza and Lebanon following the October 7, 2023 attack, journalists are apparently being deliberately targeted again. Reporters Without Borders said in December that, for the third straight year, Israel was the world's leading killer of journalists in 2025.
"This was a deliberate, targeted attack on journalists," said RT correspondent Steve Sweeney after narrowly surviving an IDF airstrike on Thursday. "There's no mistake about it. This was an Israeli precision strike from a fighter jet."
"But if they think they’re going to silence us, if they think we're going to stay out of the field, they’re very, very much mistaken," he added.
“With global humanitarian needs already at record levels, further escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and wider region will have grave ramifications for crises across the world,” said one advocate.
The US-Israeli war against Iran has unleashed a "triple emergency" that is draining the global humanitarian aid system of resources and putting millions of the world's most vulnerable people at even greater risk, according to a dire warning issued Friday by the International Rescue Committee.
The war has already resulted in the deaths of thousands and the displacement of millions of people in Iran and Lebanon. But the IRC says that the ripple effects of the war are beginning to spread to conflict zones across the world.
The conflict has caused many nations in the region to partially or fully close their airspace, leaving critical cargo stranded.
Meanwhile, Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and Israeli attacks has disrupted the flow of more than 20% of the world’s oil exports, sharply raising transport costs and straining budgets that could go toward lifesaving aid.
“Medical aid is highly dependent on international transport,” said Willem Zuidema, Save the Children’s global supply chain director. “The blockage in the Strait of Hormuz, combined with spiking cost for insurance and fuel, is directly impacting patients in our health facilities, at the worst time possible.”
IRC said $130,000 worth of pharmaceutical aid intended for its humanitarian response to the conflict in Sudan has been left stranded in Dubai due to the strait's closure.
According to Save the Children, this delay has put 90 primary healthcare facilities across Sudan at risk of running low on supplies.
More than 400,000 children, the group estimated, could be affected by the inability to receive antibiotics, antimalarial drugs, pain and fever medications, and other treatments.
The group said it has been forced to deliver the aid using the much more costly method of transporting it across Jeddah, where it will be carried by sea freight to Sudan, which the group said could add as much as $1,000-2,000 per container.
The same is true of humanitarian zones in Afghanistan and Yemen, where treatments for thousands of children must now be delivered by air or by land, dramatically raising the costs.
The closure of the strait has also forced many vessels carrying aid to find alternative routes. IRC said its shipping partners have been forced to reroute their operations to instead travel around Africa's Cape of Good Hope, adding up to a month for ocean freight deliveries to war zones on the continent.
"What we are seeing is the war in Iran unleashing a triple emergency," said David Milliband, the president and CEO of IRC.
"First, a surge in humanitarian need, with Lebanon now the most visible humanitarian scar and one of the fastest-growing displacement crises in the world, with over one million people forced from their homes in weeks," he said.
"Second, a global economic shock, as disruptions to food, fuel, and fertilizer markets, putting up to 30% of fertilizer trade at risk, threatens more than 300 million people already facing acute food insecurity," said Milliband, and "third, a system under strain, with more than 60 conflicts stretching diplomatic attention and funding to a breaking point, pushing crises like Sudan and Gaza further down the list of priorities."
Milliband marveled at the priorities of the powers prosecuting the war. He pointed to a recent estimate from the Pentagon that the first six days of the war alone cost $11.3 billion, noting that "just $4 billion is enough to pay for treatment for every acutely malnourished child in the world."
Zuidema said that the "grave ripple effects" caused by the war are exacerbated by the fact that "governments are cutting vital foreign aid budgets."
He called on all parties to the war to cease hostilities and to adhere to their obligations under international law, including allowing the free flow of humanitarian aid.
“There should be no barriers to lifesaving supplies: Exemptions should be put in place to allow humanitarian supplies, fertilizer, and food to be able to move through the Strait of Hormuz,” Zuidema said. “With global humanitarian needs already at record levels, further escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and wider region will have grave ramifications for crises across the world.”